Metabolism of Xenobiotics by Aldehyde Oxidase

Mechanisms of promiscuity among drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters

Detoxication, or 'drug-metabolizing', enzymes and drug transporters exhibit remarkable substrate promiscuity and catalytic promiscuity. In contrast to substrate-specific enzymes that participate in defined metabolic pathways, individual detoxication enzymes must cope with substrates of vast structural diversity, including previously unencountered environmental toxins. Presumably, evolution selects for a balance of 'adequate' kcat /KM values for a wide range of substrates, rather than optimizing kcat /KM for any individual substrate. However, the structural, energetic, and metabolic properties that achieve this balance, and hence optimize detoxication, are not well understood. Two features of detoxication enzymes that are frequently cited as contributions to promiscuity include the exploitation of highly reactive versatile cofactors, or cosubstrates, and a high degree of flexibility within the protein structure. This review examines these intuitive mechanisms in detail and clarifies the contributions of the classic ligand binding models 'induced fit' (IF) and 'conformational selection' (CS) to substrate promiscuity. The available literature data for drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters suggest that IF is exploited by these promiscuous detoxication enzymes, as it is with substrate-specific enzymes, but the detoxication enzymes uniquely exploit 'IFs' to retain a wide range of substrates at their active sites. In contrast, whereas CS provides no catalytic advantage to substrate-specific enzymes, promiscuous enzymes may uniquely exploit it to recruit a wide range of substrates. The combination of CS and IF, for recruitment and retention of substrates, can potentially optimize the promiscuity of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters.

Metabolism by Aldehyde Oxidase: Drug Design and Complementary Approaches to Challenges in Drug Discovery

Aldehyde oxidase (AO) catalyzes oxidations of azaheterocycles and aldehydes, amide hydrolysis, and diverse reductions. AO substrates are rare among marketed drugs, and many candidates failed due to poor pharmacokinetics, interspecies differences, and adverse effects. As most issues arise from complex and poorly understood AO biology, an effective solution is to stop or decrease AO metabolism. This perspective focuses on rational drug design approaches to modulate AO-mediated metabolism in drug discovery. AO biological aspects are also covered, as they are complementary to chemical design and important when selecting the experimental system for risk assessment. The authors' recommendation is an early consideration of AO-mediated metabolism supported by computational and in vitro experimental methods but not an automatic avoidance of AO structural flags, many of which are versatile and valuable building blocks. Preferably, consideration of AO-mediated metabolism should be part of the multiparametric drug optimization process, with the goal to improve overall drug-like properties.

Pyrido[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one metabolism mediated by aldehyde oxidase is blocked by C2-substitution

1. We have previously described C8-substituted pyrido[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one derivatives as cell permeable inhibitors of the KDM4 and KDM5 subfamilies of JmjC histone lysine demethylases. 2. Although exemplar compound 1 exhibited moderate clearance in mouse liver microsomes, it was highly cleared in vivo due to metabolism by aldehyde oxidase (AO). Similar human and mouse AO-mediated metabolism was observed with the pyrido[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one scaffold and other C8-substituted derivatives. 3. We identified the C2-position as the oxidation site by LC-MS and 1H-NMR and showed that C2-substituted derivatives are no longer AO substrates. 4. In addition to the experimental data, these observations are supported by molecular modelling studies in the human AO protein crystal structure.

Prevalence of Non-Cytochrome P450-Mediated Metabolism in Food and Drug Administration-Approved Oral and Intravenous Drugs: 2006-2015

In recent years, claims of increased involvement of non-cytochrome P450 (non-P450) enzymes in the metabolism of drugs have appeared in the literature. However, no temporal summaries of the contribution of non-P450 enzymes to the metabolism of drugs have been published. Using data from human radiolabeled absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion studies available for a set of 125 orally or intravenously administered small-molecule drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration from 2006 to 2015, the contributions of P450 and non-P450 enzymes to the formation of major metabolites (≥10% of dose) were assessed and tabulated. Over this time frame, the involvement of P450 versus non-P450 enzymes in the formation of major metabolites is compared, and the individual non-P450 enzymes responsible are described. This analysis indicates that non-P450 enzymes contribute significantly to the metabolism of the 125 drugs analyzed. Approximately 30% of the metabolism of these drugs is carried out by non-P450 enzymes, with the predominant non-P450 enzymes identified being glucuronosyltransferases (11.7%), hydrolases (10.8%), carbonyl reductases (2.4%), and aldehyde oxidase (1.1%). Although significant, the relative contribution of non-P450 enzymes to drug metabolism does not appear to have increased dramatically over the last 10 years. As the current evaluation involves drugs which emerged from the discovery phase >10 years ago, this evaluation may not reflect the current or evolving situation in some research organizations; therefore, additional monitoring and assessment of the involvement of non-P450 enzymes in the metabolism of drugs will be conducted in the future.