Anterior chemotherapy in esophageal cancer

Influence of sex on the survival of patients with esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The prognostic value of sex for esophageal cancer survival is currently unclear, and growing data suggest that hormonal influences may account for incidence disparities between men and women. Therefore, moving from the hypothesis that hormones could affect the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer, we investigated the primary hypothesis that sex is associated with survival and the secondary hypotheses that the relationship between sex and survival depends, at least in part, on age, histology, and race/ethnicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

By using the SEER databases from 1973 to 2007, we identified 13,603 patients (34%) with metastatic esophageal cancer (MEC) and 26,848 patients (66%) with locoregional esophageal cancer (LEC). Cox proportional hazards model for competing risks were used for analyses.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, women had longer esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) than men in both MEC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.949; 95% CI, 0.905 to 0.995; P = .029) and LEC (HR, 0.920; 95% CI, 0.886 to 0.955; P < .001) cohorts. When age and histology were accounted for, there was no difference for ECSS between men and women with adenocarcinoma. In contrast, women younger than age 55 years (HR, 0.896; 95% CI, 0.792 to 1.014; P = .081) and those age 55 years or older (HR, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.862 to 0.950; P < .001) with squamous cell LEC had longer ECSS than men. In the squamous cell MEC cohort, only women younger than age 55 years had longer ECSS (HR, 0.823; 95% CI, 0.708 to 0.957; P = .011) than men.

CONCLUSION

Sex is an independent prognostic factor for patients with LEC or MEC. As secondary hypotheses, in comparison with men, women age 55 years or older with squamous cell LEC and women younger than age 55 years with squamous cell MEC have a significantly better outcome. These last two findings need further validation.

Preoperative Mitomycin, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Followed by Esophagectomy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: Pathologic Complete Response Induced by Chemotherapy Leads to Long-Term Survival

Purpose: Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus remains an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis, even after curative-intent surgery. This article analyzes the impact of preoperative chemotherapy with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC) on a cohort of 68 patients.

Patients and Methods: From 1988 to 1994, 68 patients with potentially operable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were entered onto two phase II trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin 6 mg/m2, ifosfamide 3 g/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and received between two and four cycles of treatment at 3-weekly intervals. Two patients were removed from the analysis when they were found to have malignancy other than squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Results: Forty (61%) of 66 patients had a radiologic response to chemotherapy (18 complete responses and 22 partial responses), and 52 (79%) of 66 patients went on to have the primary tumor resected. There were nine pathologic complete responders, seven of whom remain fit and well after at least 60 months of follow-up. The overall median survival was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval, 9.6 to 18.8 months). The complete response and node-negative patients survived significantly longer than those in other categories (log-rank χ2 = 18.8; P < .001): on average 13 months longer than the node-positive or nonresected category (22.0 v 9.4 months). The toxicity of the regimen was low.

Conclusion: MIC is an easily administered, well-tolerated, and efficacious regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. These results warrant further investigation.

Chemotherapy and combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer

Treatment of esophageal carcinoma with radiation alone or surgery alone has yielded unsatisfactory cure rates and has not had a major impact on survival. The failure to cure or prolong survival of patients with esophageal cancer is because of our inability to eradicate residual disease at the primary site and to early systemic dissemination of disease. Three neoadjuvant approaches involving chemotherapy have been studied in patients with apparently localized esophageal cancer: preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery, chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy followed by surgery, and chemotherapy and radiation therapy without surgery. All of these approaches have shown potential in pilot trials. Large-scale trials comparing surgery alone with chemotherapy prior to operation are underway. For patients with local-regional epidermoid carcinoma who are not able to undergo or who refuse operation, chemotherapy plus concurrent radiation appears, in random assignment trials, to be superior to radiation alone.

Combined treatment modalities in esophageal cancer. Should chemotherapy be included?

The poor prognosis of esophageal carcinoma patients after treatment with local modalities (surgery/radiotherapy) is well known. The purpose of this review is to assess the question whether addition of chemotherapy to local treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus has had any beneficial effect on treatment results. In the absence of a sufficient number of randomized trials addressing this issue, data mainly from single-arm studies are discussed. Compiled data from studies on preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative chemoradiation and chemoradiation without surgery suggest that addition of chemotherapy to local treatment (surgery/radiotherapy) might increase short-term survival (2 years) compared to local therapy alone. In the case of chemoradiation without surgery this conclusion is strengthened by results from randomized trials. In general lack of long-term follow-up data limits conclusion whether to recommend the inclusion of chemotherapy into treatment of esophageal cancer or not. Treatment results, however, from studies utilizing combination chemotherapy given concomitant with radiotherapy support the contention that well-designed randomized trials with long-term follow-up should be performed. Outside controlled trials, however, surgery or radiotherapy should still be regarded as standard treatment modalities.

The role of intraluminal radiotherapy and concurrent 5-fluorouracil infusion in the management of carcinoma esophagus: a pilot study

Fifty patients with carcinoma of the esophagus were entered in a randomized pilot study to test the efficacy of intraluminal radiotherapy (ILRT) and concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion. The median age was 65 years, with 80% having middle third lesions; in 62%, the lesions were longer than 5 cm. After external beam therapy of 50 Gy in 5 weeks, patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy. Significant improvement in dysphagia was recorded in 76% patients with complete response in 47 cases ranging from 6 to 27 months. The overall survival at 2 years was 15% with ILRT alone versus 22% with ILRT plus 5-FU infusion.

Neoadjuvant Cis-DDP in esophageal cancers: an experience at a regional cancer centre, India

We are analysing the results of 80 patients who underwent surgery during 1983-84 for esophageal cancer. Forty patients who received pre-operative single agent Cis-DDP were grouped under "A" and 40 patients who went for surgery directly were grouped under "B". Twenty-two patients (55%) of Group A showed tumor necrosis. Both groups underwent resection and hand-sewn anastamosis of the esophagus. There were 10 post-operative deaths among 80 resected cases, 9 of them being from anastomatic leak. Cis-DDP has induced negligible side effects. A comparatively high survival rate during early years in patients who responded to Cis-DDP suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be of value.

Intermediate-dose methotrexate and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced epidermoid esophageal carcinoma. Response rate and disease-free survival

Seventeen patients with inoperable locoregional disease (epidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus) were treated only with two courses of intermediate-dose methotrexate (200 mg/m2 on day 1) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d for 5 days). According to the response criteria, 14 (82.4%) achieved a good response (GR) and 3 (17.6%) showed no response (NR). The median recurrence-free survival time was 5 months (range, 2 to 16 months) in seven patients with regular follow-up. Three patients are still alive and disease-free at 37+, 44+, and 51+ months. No patient received radiotherapy or surgery after chemotherapy until recurrence. This combination schedule appears to be effective in advanced esophageal carcinoma.