Adjuvant irradiation after prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate with positive surgical margins

Adjuvant and salvage treatment options for patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

The management of high-risk prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy remains a treatment dilemma. Multimodality approaches incorporating surgery, radiation therapy and systemic agents offer the hope of improved cure rates; however, most randomized studies to date are either immature or negative. The systemic treatment options best studied is androgen deprivation, which has been shown to demonstrate a survival advantage in patients with lymph node-positive disease. Systemic chemotherapy has demonstrated a modest survival advantage in androgen-independent disease. Current studies are exploring its role in the adjuvant and neo-adjuvant setting. Lastly, recent randomized trials have demonstrated a biochemical advantage to adjuvant radiation therapy, but it remains to be seen if this will translate to an improvement is survival end points or if salvage radiation therapy would be just as effective. In this update article, we review the use of external beam radiation therapy and systemic agents in combination with surgery for high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Prostate-Specific Antigen Control with Low-Dose Adjuvant Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after low-dose adjuvant RT at a single institution, because the role and optimal dose of external beam radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer remain controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 65 men who had received low-dose adjuvant RT (median 50 Gy) for microscopically positive margins with an undetectable postoperative PSA from 1990 to 2004. Biochemical failure-free survival was the primary endpoint. Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutive PSA increases to greater than 0.2 ng/mL.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 5 years, 2 men had developed distant metastasis, 2 had local recurrence, and 2 had died (neither attributable to prostate cancer). Biochemical failure had occurred in 7 men (11%). The 5 and 8-year rate of biochemical failure-free survival was 87%. A greater Gleason score (P = 0.04) and seminal vesicle invasion (P = 0.04) predicted significantly for increased biochemical failure on univariate analysis. No single factor was significant on multivariate analysis. Men with a Gleason score of 7 or less had a 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rate of more than 90%. In contrast, those with a Gleason score of 8 or more had a 50% risk of biochemical failure at 5 years. Acute bowel or bladder toxicity (all grade 2 or less) developed in 25%. Two men developed chronic urethral stricture requiring dilation, and 34 (51%) developed surgery-related toxicity that persisted throughout and after RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose RT is well tolerated and can potentially provide PSA control in men with Gleason score 7 or less disease with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Long-Term Benefits of Elective Radiotherapy After Prostatectomy for Patients With Positive Surgical Margins

PURPOSE

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy after prostatectomy for patients with pathological risk factors but with an undetectable postoperative PSA remains controversial. In this retrospective study we define the benefits of elective postoperative radiotherapy in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 44 patients received elective postoperative radiotherapy at a single institution in the PSA era (1989 to 1995) for positive surgical margins and undetectable postoperative PSA. Radiotherapy was delivered to a median dose of 60 Gy. Clinical target volume included the prostate bed. Pelvic nodes were not treated. The four-field box technique with customized blocking of bladder, rectum and small bowels was used and defined the planning target volume. The patients were then compared to a contemporaneous group of 189 patients with positive surgical margins who underwent radical prostatectomy without any adjuvant therapy. Failure was defined as biochemical (PSA) recurrence and was timed from first detectable PSA.

RESULTS

The 5 and 10-year biochemical no evidence of disease was 90.9% and 90.9% for the elective postoperative radiotherapy group, and 66.4% and 54.5% for the observation group, respectively (p = 0.0012). Median time to biochemical failure was also longer in the elective postoperative radiotherapy group (88.6 months) compared to the observation group (43.5 months) (p <0.001). Risk factors for biochemical recurrence on multivariate analysis were Gleason score greater than 7 (p = 0.017), established extracapsular extension (p = 0.002) and lack of elective postoperative radiation (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the longest followup studies showing that elective postoperative radiation therapy is associated with improved bNED and prolonged time to recurrence. Combined radical prostatectomy and elective postoperative radiotherapy should be considered in the management of high risk prostate cancer, especially in the presence of positive surgical margins despite undetectable PSA.

An interdisciplinary approach to treating prostate cancer

Urologists often are faced with challenges in treating men with metastatic prostate cancer. Although historically chemotherapy has had limited utility in treating this disease, therapeutic nihilism surrounding its use is no longer warranted, as demonstrated by results of 2 recent randomized clinical trials showing that docetaxel-based chemotherapy improves survival in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Although the survival benefit was a modest 2 months, the results hold the promise that docetaxel-based treatment in earlier-stage disease may provide a longer survival advantage. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90203 and TAX 3501 studies are phase 3 neoadjuvant and adjuvant radical prostatectomy trials designed to assess the role of docetaxel in patients with high-risk localized disease. These 2 trials, along with the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 9921 trial, which will assess the potential for adjuvant mitoxantrone, are paving the way for earlier systemic treatment. The need for better therapies for patients routinely seen in the urology clinic and the potential for improvements with chemotherapy necessitate an increasing collaboration between urologists and oncologists. Referral to a medical oncologist for a full discussion of treatment options is in the best interest of patients with HRPC, and patients at high-risk for treatment failure should be encouraged to consider clinical trial enrollment.

Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features

PURPOSE

The indications for adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) are poorly defined. We performed a retrospective comparison of our institution's experience treating prostate cancer with RP vs. RP followed by adjuvant EBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1987 and 1998, 617 patients with clinical Stage T1-T2N0M0 prostate cancer underwent RP. Patients who underwent preoperative androgen deprivation and those with positive lymph nodes were excluded. Of the 617 patients, 34 (5.5%) with an undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level underwent adjuvant prostatic fossa RT at a median of 0.25 year (range, 0.1-0.6) postoperatively because of poor pathologic features. The median total dose was 59.4 Gy (range, 50.4-66.6 Gy) in 1.8-2.0-Gy fractions. These 34 RP+RT patients were compared with the remaining 583 RP patients. Biochemical failure was defined as any postoperative PSA level > or =0.1 ng/mL and any postoperative PSA level > or =0.3 ng/mL (at least 30 days after surgery). Administration of androgen deprivation was also scored as biochemical failure when applying either definition. The median clinical follow-up was 8.2 years (range, 0.1-11.2 years) for RP and 8.4 years (range, 0.3-13.8 years) for RP+RT.

RESULTS

Radical prostatectomy + radiation therapy patients had a greater pathologic Gleason score (mean, 7.3 vs. 6.5; p < 0.01) and pathologic T stage (median, T3a vs. T2c; p < 0.01). Age (median, 65.7 years) and pretreatment PSA level (median, 7.9 ng/mL) were similar between the treatment groups. Extracapsular extension was present in 72% of RP+RT patients vs. 27% of RP patients (p < 0.01). The RP+RT patients were more likely to have seminal vesicle invasion (29% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) and positive margins (73% vs. 36%, p < 0.01). Despite these poor pathologic features, the 5-year biochemical control (BC) rate (PSA <0.1 ng/mL) was 57% for RP+RT and 47% for RP (p = 0.28). For patients with extracapsular extension, the 5-year BC rate was 52% for RP+RT vs. 30% for RP (p < 0.01). The 5-year BC rate for patients with seminal vesicle invasion was 60% for RP+RT vs. 18% for RP (p < 0.01). For those with positive margins, the 5-year BC rate was 64% for RP+RT vs. 27% for RP (p < 0.01). The use of adjuvant RT remained statistically significant on multivariate analysis when applying either biochemical failure definition. Adjuvant RT also remained statistically significant when including the postoperative PSA level (>30 days after surgery) in the multivariate analyses. In addition, 99 (17%) of the 583 RP patients required salvage prostatic fossa RT (median dose, 59.4 Gy) at a median interval of 1.3 years after surgery (range, 0.1-8.4) for a palpable recurrence (n = 10) or a detectable/rising postoperative PSA level (n = 89). The median PSA level before salvage RT was 0.8 ng/mL (mean, 3.2 ng/mL). The 5-year and 8-year BC rate, using the PSA <0.1 ng/mL definition, from the date of salvage RT was 41% and 35%, respectively. The 5-year and 8-year BC rate, using the PSA <0.3 ng/mL definition, was 46% and 36%, respectively. The 8-year local recurrence rate after salvage RT was 4%.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant RT demonstrated improved efficacy against prostate cancer. For patients with poor pathologic features (extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, positive margins), adjuvant RT improved the biochemical outcome independent of other prognostic factors.

Use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy to prevent or delay recurrence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer

There have been improvements in the outcome of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. However, some patients treated with radical prostatectomy will have clinical or biochemical progression. These men are at increased risk of dying of their disease. Identification of patients with adverse features at the time of radical prostatectomy may permit the use of additional multimodality therapies to improve outcomes. Whether this additional multimodality therapy should be administered in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting remains controversial. Further, whether a patient at increased risk for progression after radical prostatectomy requires additional therapy before the development of documented progression remains controversial. This article reviews the potential multimodality approaches to prevent or delay recurrence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer.

Postoperative radiotherapy after prostatectomy--a review

PURPOSE

The management of prostate adenocarcinomas using postoperative irradiation is a controversial question. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the subject.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 417 articles dealing with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in English literature (1990-2002) were reviewed in aspects of effect on survival, time of irradiation, risk factors, dose and technique and side effects.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

No randomised studies have been performed and therefore no definitive conclusive data can be made concerning the efficiency of the concept. However, postoperative radiotherapy appears to increase local control preferably in pT3/4 prostatic carcinomas with seminal vesicles involvement and/or positive margins and/or high Gleason score and high postoperative PSA level. It has not been shown to improve survival. Severe side effects are reported in a low frequency. However, postoperative irradiation can cause severe side effects and postoperative adjuvant/salvage treatments should be delivered earliest 3-6 months after surgery and the total dose delivered to the prostate bed should be 65-70 Gy. Postoperative radiotherapy induces improved local control in patients with positive surgical margins and in patients with a local relapse, preferably if the tumour is small (i.e. PSA <1-2 ng/mL).

Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

PURPOSE

When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason <or=6, and clinical stage <or=T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA >or=10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason >or=7, or clinical T stage >or=T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV.

Therapeutic Postprostatectomy Irradiation

The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients receiving external beam radiation for an elevated postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Between December 1991 and September 1998, 108 patients received definitive radiation therapy for elevated postprostatectomy PSA levels. The median dose of irradiation was 68 Gy (range, 48-74 Gy). During treatment, the PSA levels were checked an average of 5 times (range, 3-7 times). Prostate-specific antigen values were judged to decline or increase during treatment if they changed by more than 0.2 ng/mL. After treatment, biochemical failure was defined as a measurable or rising PSA > 0.2 ng/mL. Median follow-up was 51 months (range, 3-112 months). Fifty-eight patients (54%) had evidence of biochemical failure. The 3- and 5-year actuarial biochemical relapse-free (bNED) survivals for all patients were 55% and 39%, respectively. Upon univariate analysis, intratreatment PSA and preradiation PSA were significant predictors of bNED survival. Patients with a PSA level that decreased during treatment had a 5-year bNED survival of 43% compared to 10% in patients with an increasing PSA level (P = 0.0002). Using the preradiation therapy PSA value as a continuous variable, higher preradiation therapy PSA levels were associated with an increased risk of failure (P = 0.004). Cut points of pretreatment PSA were derived at 0.9 ng/mL and 4.2 ng/mL using the Michael Leblanc recursive partitioning algorithm. The 5-year bNED rate for patients with a preradiation therapy PSA < 0.9 ng/mL was 45% versus 42% for patients with preradiation therapy PSA between 0.9 and 4.2 ng/mL and 21% for patients > or = 4.2 ng/mL (P = 0.0003). Patients with a Gleason score of < or = 7 had a 5-year bNED rate of 38% compared to 37% for patients with a Gleason score > 7 (P = 0.27). Other factors examined individually that did not reach statistical significance included time from surgery to radiation therapy, race, seminal vesicle involvement, pathological stage, surgical margin, and perineural invasion. Upon multivariate analysis, only preradiation therapy PSA (P < 0.001) and the PSA trend during radiation therapy (P < 0.001) were significant factors. The results of therapeutic radiation for patients with elevated postprostatectomy PSA levels are sufficiently poor; other strategies should be explored as alternatives, including early adjuvant postprostatectomy irradiation or the use of combined hormonal and radiation therapy in the salvage situation.

Postprostatectomy radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the biochemical and clinical results of postprostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) for high-risk, mostly non-rgan-confined prostate cancer.

METHODS

After radical prostatectomy, 66 consecutive patients received either adjuvant (n = 29) or therapeutic (n = 37) postoperative RT. Therapeutic RT was given for persistently elevated postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (n = 14), gradually rising PSA levels (n = 6), or clinical local recurrence (n = 17). The selection of time and referral for RT was at the discretion of the treating urologists.

RESULTS

The mean and median follow-up after surgery was 56.8 and 54.2 months, and after radiotherapy, it was 43.2 and 35.0 months, respectively. At 5 years, the actuarial biochemical control for the whole collective was 59.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43.3% to 72.8%). Patients treated with adjuvant RT had statistically improved biochemical control (85.2% versus 34.0%, P = 0.001), but not disease-free survival (91% versus 73%, P = 0.09). Advanced tumor stage (pT3b-4) (relative risk 16.6; 95% CI 0.9 to 313.3; P = 0.01), poorly differentiated histologic features (relative risk 4.63; 95% CI 1.8 to 12.2; P = 0.001), and pre-RT PSA (relative risk 1.15, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.25; P = 0.003) were associated with a statistically significant increased risk of biochemical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although adjuvant postoperative RT resulted in improved biochemical control, no significant difference in disease-free survival has been obtained to date. It therefore remains to be determined whether the better biochemical control observed will ultimately translate into a survival benefit after longer follow-up and prospective trials.

Positive resection margin and/or pathologic T3 adenocarcinoma of prostate with undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: to irradiate or not?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for positive resection margin and/or pathologic T3 (pT3) adenocarcinoma of the prostate with undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 125 patients with a positive resection margin and/or pT3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had undetectable postoperative serum PSA levels after radical prostatectomy. Seventy-three patients received postoperative adjuvant RT and 52 did not. Follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 12.0 years (median 4.2 for the irradiated group and 4.9 for the nonirradiated group). PSA outcome was available for all patients. Freedom from failure was defined as the maintenance of a serum PSA level of < or =0.2 ng/mL, as well as the absence of clinical local recurrence and distant metastasis.

RESULTS

No difference was found in the 5-year actuarial overall survival between the irradiated and nonirradiated group (94% vs. 95%). However, patients receiving adjuvant RT had a statistically superior 5-year actuarial relapse-free rate, including freedom from PSA failure, compared with those treated with surgery alone (88% vs. 65%, p = 0.0013). In the irradiated group, 8 patients had relapse with PSA failure alone. None had local or distant recurrence. In the nonirradiated group, 15, 1, and 2 had PSA failure, local recurrence, and distant metastasis, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, pre-radical prostatectomy PSA level and adjuvant RT were statistically significant predictive factors for relapse, and Gleason score, extracapsular invasion, and resection margin status were not. There was a suggestion that seminal vesicle invasion was associated with an increased risk of relapse. The morbidity of postoperative adjuvant RT was acceptable, with only 2 patients developing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 genitourinary complications. Adjuvant RT had a minimal adverse effect on urinary continence and did not cause serious gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant RT was associated with a lower risk of relapse, including freedom from PSA failure, compared with observation alone for pT3 and/or margin-positive disease with undetectable postoperative PSA levels. This was accomplished with a minimal risk of serious RT morbidity.

[Stage pT3 prostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy. Results in progression and survival]

PURPOSE

To analyse progression and survival after radical prostatectomy in patients with stage pT3 carcinoma of the prostate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1986 and November 1998, we performed 372 radical prostatectomies, 74 of which were pT3N0 (19.8%), 43 pT3a and 31 pT3b (TNM 97).

RESULTS

In patients with pathological stage pT3, we found any progression in 24 patients (32%), 8 in pT3a, and 16 in pT3b. In 10 of 24 pT3, there was local relapse or distant metastases. About the freedom from biochemical relapse survival rate, we found statistically differences between pT3a and pT3b (p < 0.0001). In pT3a patients, we found no differences between PSA levels > 20 ng/ml, versus < 20 (p = 0.415), and statistically differences between pathological Gleason 6 or greater, versus < 6 (p = 0.048). However, we found no differences when we used both criteria (PSA and Gleason) (p = 0.195).

CONCLUSIONS

We support for early adjuvant hormonal therapy in pT3b patients. In pT3a, the hormonotherapy may be used if appears biochemical failure, specially with adverse prognostic factors (PSA and Gleason).

Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The correlation of surgical margins and extraprostatic extension (EPE) with progression is uncertain with regard to prostate carcinoma patients treated by radical prostatectomy. The objective of this study was to define factors predictive of cancer progression; emphasis was placed on surgical margins and their relation to extraprostatic extension.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 377 patients who were treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic between 1986 and 1993. All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Patients ranged in age from 41 to 79 years (mean, 65 years). Those with seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastasis and those treated preoperatively with radiation or androgen deprivation were excluded. Final pathologic T classifications were pT2a (41 patients), pT2b (237), and pT3a (99). Progression was defined as biochemical failure (prostate specific antigen [PSA] >0.2 ng/mL), clinical or biopsy-proven local recurrence, or distant metastasis. The mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.2-11.4 years). Seventy-nine patients who received adjuvant treatment within 3 months after surgery were excluded from survival analysis.

RESULTS

The overall margin positivity rate was 29%. Seventy-two patients (19%) had only positive surgical margins without evidence of EPE ("surgical incision"), 53 (14%) had only EPE, 37 (10%) had both, and 215 (57%) had neither. Positive margins were correlated with the finding of EPE (P = 0.003). Progression free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 88% and 67%, respectively. In univariate analysis, preoperative PSA concentration, positive surgical margins, Gleason grade, cancer volume, and DNA ploidy were significant in predicting progression (P values, <0.001, <0.001, 0.01, 0.007, and <0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, margin status and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of progression (relative risk for margin status, 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.4; P = 0.03; relative risk for DNA ploidy, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.4-10.9; P<0.001). Among patients with positive margins, 5-year progression free survival was 78% for those with negative EPE and 55% for those with positive EPE.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical margin status and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of progression after radical prostatectomy. To improve cancer control, adjuvant therapy may be considered for patients with positive surgical margins or nondiploid cancer.

Treatment outcome with adjuvant and salvage irradiation after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the factors associated with outcome by reviewing our institution's experience treating patients with external beam radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients received RT to the prostatic fossa after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (median dose 59.4 Gy). Thirty-eight patients received adjuvant RT within 6 months of surgery for adverse pathologic findings only. Therapeutic RT was administered to 23 patients either for a persistently elevated postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (n = 2), a rising PSA level more than 6 months after surgery (n = 9), or a biopsy-proven local recurrence (n = 12). Preoperative and preradiation PSA values, Gleason score, pathologic findings, patient age, total RT dose, and indication for RT were analyzed for their impact on biochemical control. The median follow-up was 48 months.

RESULTS

Patients treated with adjuvant RT achieved 3 and 5-year biochemical control rates of 84% and 67%, respectively. Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for an association with biochemical control. No variable was associated with 5-year outcome. The 5-year actuarial rate of biochemical control for patients treated with therapeutic RT was 16%. Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for an association with biochemical control. Only a pre-RT PSA level of 2 ng/mL or less was associated with an improved rate of biochemical control at 3 years (80% versus 27%, P = 0.001). However, at 5 years, this difference was not statistically significant. A separate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors associated with outcome for the entire group of patients. Only the indication for RT (adjuvant versus therapeutic) was associated with 5-year outcome. Patients treated with adjuvant RT had a statistically significant improvement in 5-year actuarial rates of biochemical control (67% versus 16%, P <0.001) and disease-free survival (66% versus 46%, P = 0.037) but not in overall survival. There were no statistically significant differences between patient groups with respect to age, preoperative PSA, Gleason score, pathologic T stage, median follow-up, and total RT dose.

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, patients treated with adjuvant RT after prostatectomy for adverse pathologic findings achieved excellent rates of biochemical control that were significantly better than that of similar patients treated therapeutically for persistent or rising PSA or clinical local recurrence.

Pathologic seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate carcinoma: effect of early adjuvant radiation therapy on biochemical control

BACKGROUND

The authors evaluated the effect of postoperative radiation therapy on freedom from biochemical failure (bNED) in men with prostate carcinoma who had pathologic seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy and negative pelvic lymph node dissection (pT3cN0).

METHODS

Between 1989 and 1995, 375 men underwent radical prostatectomy at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Fifty-three men (13%) had pT3cN0 prostate carcinoma and were the subject of this analysis. Men in whom prostate specific antigen (PSA) could not be detected were deemed free of biochemical failure.

RESULTS

Of the 53 men with pT3cN0 prostate carcinoma, 18 had an elevated PSA immediately after surgery and received salvage radiation therapy (RT). The 3-year bNED rate for this group was only 38%. At 3 months, PSA could not be detected in the other 35 men. Fifteen of those 35 men underwent early adjuvant RT, and the other 20 were observed for biochemical failure. The 3-year bNED rate for the 15 patients treated with immediate adjuvant RT was 86%, compared with 48% for the 20 men who were observed (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that early adjuvant RT for men with pT3cN0 prostate carcinoma and no detectable PSA postoperatively reduces the likelihood of future biochemical failure. Men with pT3cN0 prostate carcinoma and a persistently elevated postoperative PSA level are less likely to benefit from RT and should be considered for systemic therapy.

Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Following radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy may be beneficial in select patients with isolated local recurrence. Pathological stage, Gleason score and the timing of prostate specific antigen (PSA) elevation are useful in distinguishing men with local recurrence from those with distant metastases. We test the ability of these criteria to predict long-term suppression of PSA recurrence following post-prostatectomy radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 1,699 men treated with radical prostatectomy from 1982 to 1995, 82 with an isolated PSA elevation or local recurrence following surgery underwent radiation therapy to the prostatic bed and were followed for at least 2 years. No patient had evidence of metastases at the time of radiation.

RESULTS

Of the men 17 (21%) had an undetectable PSA (less than 0.2 ng./ml.) for 2 or greater years following radiation. The 5-year actuarial PSA recurrence-free rate after radiation was 10%. PSA remained at undetectable levels for 2 or greater years in no patients with Gleason score 8 or greater (12 cases), positive seminal vesicles (12) or positive lymph nodes (3), and in only 1 of 16 men (6%) who had a PSA recurrence within 1 year of prostatectomy. As the interval to PSA recurrence increased, the likelihood of responding to radiotherapy increased to 44% if initial disease detection occurred 5 or more years after prostatectomy. There was no demonstrated advantage to radiating men with an isolated PSA elevation before a documented local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Gleason score 8 or greater, positive seminal vesicles or lymph nodes, or a PSA recurrence within the first year following surgery rarely benefit from radiation therapy. As the interval to PSA recurrence increases, the likelihood of responding to radiation therapy increases substantially. These parameters are useful in the selection of patients with prostate cancer recurrences who are likely to benefit from radiation to the prostatic bed.

Disease recurrence and progression in untreated pathologic stage T3 prostate cancer: selecting the patient for adjuvant therapy

PURPOSE

Optimal management of pathologic T3 prostate cancer is poorly defined. We conducted a prospective study of untreated pT3 patients to improve understanding of the natural history of this disease and to identify clinical parameters useful in patient selection for adjuvant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 583 consecutive patients with clinical stage T1 to 2 disease managed by total prostatectomy, 206 had pT3 disease. Excluding patients requesting immediate adjuvant treatment or neoadjuvant therapy, 156 subjects were eligible for the study, including 34 with pT3a, 80 pT3b, 22 pT3c, and 20 pT3N+ disease. Patients were followed for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence of greater than 0.2 ng./ml. and biopsy proved local or distant tumor progression demonstrated by imaging studies.

RESULTS

After a median of 45 months, PSA recurrence was seen in 29.4% of pT3a (10/34), 30% of pT3b (24/80), 27.3% of pT3c (6/22), and 80% of pT3N+ (16/20 cases). Local or distant progression was seen in 2.9% of pT3a (1), 6.2% of pT3b (5), 9.1% of pT3c (2), and 55% of pT3N+ (11 cases). Recurrence and progression correlated with the number of surgical margins involved by tumor, pathological Gleason score and baseline pre-prostatectomy PSA levels. PSA recurrence was seen in 20.8% (10/48) patients with 1 surgical margin involved, 40.9% (9/22) with 2 margins involved and 50% (5/10) with 3 or more margins involved. PSA recurrence was 20.3% (14/69) with Gleason scores of less than 7, 33.9% (19/56) with a score of 7 and 74.2% (23/31) with scores of greater than 7. Pre-prostatectomy PSA levels less than 10 ng./ml. were associated with a PSA recurrence of 17.3% (14/81) and 45.4% (25/55), with levels greater than 10 ng./ml. Selecting patients for high or low risk based upon the results of these parameters allowed accurate prediction of PSA recurrence; 8.5% (4/47) for low risk patients and 44.8% (30/67) for high risk. Tumor progression was seen in no low risk patient and in 9% (6) with high risk. The difference between the 2 risk groups was highly significant (p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with pT3 prostate cancer will not experience recurrent disease for many years if ever. Immediate use of adjuvant treatment should be reserved for those patients with a high risk of recurrent disease.

Tolerance and early outcome results of postprostatectomy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) has been associated with a reduction in acute and late toxicity among patients treated for localized prostatic cancer. The purpose of this study is to assess the acute and late toxicity of 3D-CRT delivered to patients in the postprostatectomy setting and to analyze which factors predict for durable biochemical control in this group of patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1988 and 1994, 42 patients were treated after prostatectomy with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The median time from prostatectomy to radiotherapy was 11 months. Indications for treatment included a rising serum PSA level in 28 patients (65%) and positive surgical margins without a rising PSA level in 14 (35%). Twenty-five patients (60%) had pathologic stage T3 disease, and 32 (74%) had tumor at or close to the surgical margins. The median dose was 64.8 Gy, and the median follow-up time was 2 years.

RESULTS

3D-CRT in the postprostatectomy setting was well tolerated. Three patients (7%) experienced Grade II acute genitourinary toxicity and nine patients (21%) experienced Grade II acute gastrointestinal toxicity during treatment. No patient experienced Grade III or higher acute morbidity. The 2-year actuarial risk for Grade II late genitourinary and gastrointestinal late complications were 5 and 9%, respectively. In patients with existing incontinence, the incidence of worsening stress incontinence 6 months after treatment was 17%, which resolved within 12 months to its preradiotherapy level in four of six cases (66%). The overall 2-year postirradiation PSA relapse-free survival rate was 53%. The 2-year PSA relapse-free survival was 66% for patients with undetectable PSA levels in the immediate postoperative period compared to 26% for those with detectable levels of PSA after surgery (p < 0.006). Furthermore, for patients with preradiotherapy PSA levels of < or = 1.0 ng/ml, the 2-year PSA relapse-free survival was 74% compared to 17% of those with preradiotherapy PSA levels of > 1.0 ng/ml (p < 0.002). The resection margin status, presence of seminal vesicle involvement, Gleason score, and the preprostatectomy PSA level did not impact on PSA relapse-free survival. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that a preradiotherapy PSA value of > 1 ng/ml (p < 0.002) was the most important covariate predicting for a rising PSA after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

After prostatectomy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is associated with minimal treatment-related morbidity. Patients with postprostatectomy, preradiotherapy PSA levels < or = 1.0 ng/ml, and those patients who had undetectable PSA levels in the immediate postoperative period are more likely to benefit from local adjuvant therapy.

Adjuvant and salvage irradiation following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We performed a retrospective analysis to assess the durability of benefit derived from irradiation after prostatectomy for pT3N0 disease, and the possibility of cure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We studied 88 patients who were irradiated after prostatectomy and had available prostate specific antigen (PSA) data, no known nodal or metastatic disease, no hormonal treatment, and follow-up of at least 12 months from surgery. Forty patients received adjuvant therapy for a high risk of local failure with undetectable PSA. Forty-eight patients received salvage therapy for elevated PSA levels. Mean follow up was 44 months from date of surgery and 31 months from irradiation. Biochemical failure was strictly defined as a confirmed rise in PSA of >10%, or as the ability to detect a previously undetectable PSA value.

RESULTS

After salvage irradiation, 69% of patients attained an undetectable PSA. Eighty-eight percent of adjuvant patients were biochemically and clinically free of disease (bNED) at 3 years from prostatectomy. Sixty-eight percent of those receiving salvage irradiation were bNED 3 years after surgery. On univariate analysis, treatment group (adjuvant or salvage), pre-operative PSA, and the status of seminal vesicles were significant prognostic factors. The extent of PSA elevation in the salvage group was also significant. We did not demonstrate a significant difference between those salvage patients referred for persistently elevated PSA as compared to those with a late rise in PSA. On multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of outcome was treatment group, with adjuvant irradiation having better outcome than salvage.

CONCLUSION

More than two-thirds of this group of patients remain biochemically disease free at 3 years following irradiation, attesting to a number of potential cures. For patients with stage pT3N0 prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, our data support the use of either routine postoperative adjuvant irradiation or close PSA follow-up with early salvage treatment.

[Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: indications, results and side effects]

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy in locally progressed prostate carcinoma has become increasingly important in the last few years as both adjuvant therapy in patients with pT3-tumors with or without positive margins and treatment for a PSA increase in local recurrence of disease. The background for this is the knowledge gained by using PSA that up to 60% of the patients with histopathologically confirmed pT3/4 tumors or involvement of the lymph nodes are systemically and/or locally progressive after 3 to 5 years if only surgical or radiation therapy was performed.

RESULTS

A number of studies, albeit exclusively retrospective, substantiated a significantly high local tumor control by radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. This holds true for adjuvant therapy with a PSA in the "zero range" as well as with a PSA increase from the "zero range", whereby it must be taken into consideration that a certain percentage of treated patients with a PSA in the "zero-range" with or without positive margins actually do not need further therapy. Two retrospective studies demonstrated a significant better lengthening of "freedom from treatment failure" that is local and systemic progression of disease. Lengthening the survival time has, however, not yet been proven. With an increase in the PSA from the "zero range" after radical prostatectomy, there are indications that systemic metastatic spread already occurs with values higher than 2.5 to 4 ng/ml and the radiotherapy no longer has any curative intention.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT following radical prostatectomy gives better local control rates and probably better rates of "freedom from treatment failure" in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer with positive margins and probably in patients with negative margins. However, in retrospective studies no advantage in overall survival was shown.

Serum prostate-specific antigen elevation in the post-radical prostatectomy patient

The management of postprostatectomy serum prostate-specific antigen elevation is hampered by the inability to determine the location of the recurrence accurately and the lack of data demonstrating a survival advantage from any of the available therapies. Treatment must be individualized for each patient.

Delayed/salvage radiation therapy in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy. A long term follow-up

BACKGROUND

In this article the authors report an analysis and long term results of delayed/salvage radiation therapy administered to asymptomatic patients who had an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, many months to many years after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

During 1987 to 1990, 40 asymptomatic patients were found to have an elevated PSA level 9 to 96 months after radical prostatectomy. The patients underwent transrectal needle aspiration biopsy of the urethrovesicle junction anastomosis (uvj); 28 patients had a positive biopsy and 12 patients had a negative biopsy. Delayed/salvage radiation therapy was administered to the pelvis (45 Gray [Gy]) and prostate bed (59.5 Gy), including the uvj.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 37 patients (65%) were free of clinical disease. In 10 patients (27%), the radiation therapy resulted in a durable decrease in the elevated PSA level below a detectable level for a minimum 5-year follow-up. Five patients were alive with clinical disease. Eight died of disease. Three patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience shows that delayed/salvage radiation therapy to the pelvis (45 Gy) and prostate bed (59.5 Gy), even many years after radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage pB, pC, and pD1 carcinoma of the prostate, was well tolerated and provided freedom from clinical disease in 24 of 37 patients (65%), and a decrease in elevated PSA level in 10 patients (27%). Delayed/salvage radiation therapy appears to be beneficial for patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy only and then developed rising PSA levels during the follow-up period.

Should asymptomatic progression following definitive local treatment for prostate cancer be treated?

Asymptomatic progression following definitive therapy for prostate cancer can take the form of a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or local recurrence following radical prostatectomy or a rising PSA or palpable recurrence following radiotherapy. Options for treatment include hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, salvage surgery, and experimental therapies. Although such forms of treatment have known effects on intermediate endpoints, such as reduction of PSA, the overall effect on survival and quality of life is uncertain.

Effect of radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy on serum prostate-specific antigen measured by an ultrasensitive assay

OBJECTIVES

To study prospectively the impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on the serum level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), as measured by an ultrasensitive Yang Proscheck assay in patients with detectable serum PSA and a negative metastatic survey after radical prostatectomy for T1 or T2 prostate cancer.

METHODS

Seventeen patients had a detectable serum PSA (2.40 +/- 2.1 ng/mL; range, 0.5 to 10) by the Yang polyclonal assay 2 to 71 months after radical prostatectomy for P2N0 (2 patients) or P3N0 (15 patients) prostate cancer. Metastatic workup (bone and computed tomography scan) was negative; 9 of 17 patients had a local recurrence documented by a positive biopsy of the vesicourethral anastomosis. All patients were treated by external radiotherapy, receiving 65 Gy on the prostate fossa over 5 weeks for an assumed low volume residual disease. Patients were followed up by determination of serum PSA every 3 months, using the Yang ultrasensitive assay for a mean duration of 14.4 months.

RESULTS

In 17.6% of the patients (3 of 17) PSA became undetectable (less than 0.05 ng/mL) after radiotherapy. Radiotherapy had no impact on PSA in 35.3% (6 of 17). PSA decreased after radiation therapy within 6 months in 47.1% (8 of 17) and for up to 12 months in 2 patients, with a nadir of 0.28 ng/mL. All patients in this group experienced a secondary rise in PSA a mean of 10.6 months (range, 6 to 18 months) after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

External radiotherapy has a limited impact on residual disease after radical prostatectomy, as assessed by its impact on PSA.

Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy--results of 56 patients

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate with positive surgical margins and/or seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy (RP) have a high risk of local recurrence or distant spread of disease. Several investigators reported increased local control rates following adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). However, it is unclear whether this procedure, with or without hormonal therapy (HT), improves the outcome. From 1975 to 1987, 56 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent adjuvant RT following RP (pathological stage C1, n = 19; stage C2, n = 17; stage D1, n = 20). In 27 of 56 patients an additional immediate orchiectomy was performed. 48 patients received 4000-5000 cGy to the pelvic lymphatics, including the prostatic fossa, followed by a boost to the prostatic fossa to complete 6400-7000 cGy, whereas 8 patients were treated to the prostatic fossa only. With a median follow-up of 89 months, the overall survival rate of patients with stages C1, C2 and D1 did not differ significantly (10-year overall survival rate 84, 74 and 71, respectively). The local control rate for 5- and 10-years was 96 and 90%, respectively. A significant advantage in overall survival (5- and 10-year rate: 92 versus 93% and 92 versus 63%; P < 0.05, respectively) and clinical disease-free survival (5- and 10-year rate: 92 versus 72% and 92 versus 49%; P < 0.05, respectively) was seen in 27 patients with orchiectomy compared with 29 patients without HT. A total of 15 patients (26%) developed at least one form of late toxicity, in most cases a mild proctitis, cystitis, or penile or leg oedema. However, 6 patients (11%) had severe grade 3 or 4 side-effects that necessitated a cystectomy in 2 cases as well as a colostomy in 2 cases. In all patients with grade 3 or 4 side-effects, 70 Gy as a tumour-encompassing isodose were applied. Adjuvant RT, following RP in stage C and D1 prostate cancer with positive surgical margins and/or seminal vesicle invasion increases local control. Whether immediate HT influences the outcome, as seen in this study, should be proven in prospective clinical trials.