Phase I/II study of carboplatin and oral etoposide with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

Intra-arterial cisplatin plus oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: a phase II study

Twenty-five adults with recurrent malignant glioma were enrolled into a phase II clinical study. All patients had undergone surgical resection and had failed radiotherapy and first-line treatment with nitrosourea-based chemotherapy; five had failed second-line chemotherapy. Our objective was to test the efficacy of combining intra-arterially (i.a.) infused cisplatin and oral etoposide. Using conventional angiographic technique to access anterior/posterior cerebral circulation, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 was administered by i.a. infusion on day 1 of treatment. Oral etoposide 50 mg/m2/day was given days 1-21, with a 7 day rest interval between courses. Response to treatment was evaluated in 20 patients. Two patients with anaplastic astrocytoma had partial responses (PR) and six patients experienced stable disease (SD) for an overall response rate (PR +/- SD) of 40%. The median time to disease progression (MTP) following treatment for the responder subgroup was 18 weeks. The median survival time from treatment (MST) for the responders (n = 8) and non-responders (n = 12) was 56.5 weeks and 11 weeks, respectively. Combined i.a. cisplatin and oral etoposide was well-tolerated, but produced an objective response in only a minority of patients. Those considered responders (PR + SD) experienced significant survival advantage when compared to the non-responders. Nonetheless, i.a. delivery of chemotherapy is an expensive and technologically burdensome treatment for most patients to access, requiring proximity to a major center with neuro-oncological and neuroradiological clinical services. This is of special concern for patients suffering recurrent disease with progressive neurological symptoms at a time in their course when quality of life must be safeguarded and palliation of symptoms should be the therapeutic goal. Despite the efforts of previous investigators to use this combination of agents to treat recurrent malignant glioma, we cannot recommend the use of i.a. chemotherapy for salvage treatment of this disease.

Carboplatin and Etoposide (CE) Regimen

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column reviews various issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy, both commercially available and investigational.

Prolonged oral versus high-dose intravenous etoposide in combination with carboplatin for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a randomized trial

In order to investigate whether dose-intensive intravenous (i.v.) etoposide offers an advantage over prolonged oral administration of etoposide when combined with carboplatin (CBDCA), between January, 1991 and December, 1994, 171 patients with metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive CBDCA, 400 mg/m2, day 1 with either oral etoposide, 50 mg/m2, days 1-21 (group I) or i.v. etoposide, 200 mg/m2, days 1-3 (group II), every 4 weeks for up to six cycles or until tumour progression. Of the patients 168 were fully assessable for response, survival and toxicity. There were three (4%) CR and 16 (19%) PR in group 1, and the overall response rate was 23%. There were four (5%) CR and 12 (14%) PR in group II, and the overall response rate was 19% (P = 0.82). The median survival time (MST) in group I was 8 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 35 and 9.5%, respectively, while the corresponding figures for group II were 7 months, and 31 and 7.1%, respectively (P = 0.40). Both haematological and non-haematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in group II with six (7%) patients in that group dying of treatment-related infection. Intensive i.v. etoposide combined with CBDCA was similar in efficacy to but more toxic than prolonged oral etoposide plus carboplatin and we do not recommend it for further investigation.

Carboplatin-oral etoposide personalized dosing in elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients. Gruppo Oncologico Cooperativo Sud-Italia

The toxicity and therapeutic activity, including the effect on quality of life, of the carboplatin-oral etoposide combination, given with an intrapatient dose escalation, was tested in 38 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged over 70 years, and in 8 younger patients with a performance status of 2. In the absence of grade 3-4 toxicity, doses were escalated as follows: first course (carboplatin AUC 4; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-14); second course (carboplatin AUC 5; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-14); third course (carboplatin AUC 5; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-21). A total of 141 chemotherapy cycles were delivered. The treatment was, in general, well tolerated and no toxic deaths occurred. More than 60% of patients received 100% of the planned dose intensity. Transient grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 and 2 patients, respectively, but only 2 patients had to be hospitalised because of fever. All patients were evaluated for activity on an 'intention to treat basis'. Ten partial responses and 20 stable disease were recorded, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 11-36). 9/38 (24%; 95% CI = 12-41) elderly patients obtained a partial response. The median response duration was 4 months. A quality of life improvement was observed in 19 of the 46 enrolled patients (41%; 95% CI = 27-57), and 15/46 (33%; 95% CI = 19-48) showed a performance status improvement. The quality of life score improved in 17/38 (45%) elderly patients. 8/10 responders and 11/20 patients with stable disease showed a concomitant improvement in quality of life. At a median potential follow-up of 16 months (range 2-21), 31 patients had had progression of disease and 23 had died, for a median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of 5 and 10 months, respectively. The median survival time was 11 months in the elderly patients. The median time to subjective impairment (TSI) was 6 months (7 months in the elderly group). One-year estimated TTP, TSI and OS rates were 22, 29 and 41%, respectively. At multivariate Cox analysis, a > 25% improvement in the quality of life score was more predictive of a better survival outcome than the response achievement.