Oral combination antiemetics in patients with small cell lung cancer receiving cisplatin or cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin

An analysis of the antiemetic protection of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in Chinese patients receiving moderately high emetogenic chemotherapy

This descriptive study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic protection of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in a sample of 33 Chinese breast cancer patients who were receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. The antiemetic protection effect was not satisfactory. The results showed that the worst nausea and vomiting was experienced on the third day, with 87.9% of patients reporting nausea and 63.6% experiencing vomiting on that day. In almost one-third of the sample antiemetic medication failed to protect against either acute vomiting or delayed vomiting (i.e. patients continued to experience more than five emetic episodes). Complete protection from acute vomiting was seen in 36.4% of patients, whereas complete protection from delayed vomiting was seen in only one-third of the patients. There was an association between acute nausea/vomiting and delayed nausea/vomiting. Different types of antiemetics need to be offered to Chinese patients receiving chemotherapy (i.e. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists or a combination of antiemetics), but more research should be directed to this area.

Steroids affect collateral sensitivity to gemcitabine of multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cells

Gemcitabine is phosphorylated by deoxycytidine kinase and thymidine kinase 2 and during S-phase incorporated into DNA. The steroids cortisol and dexamethasone, which regulate cell proliferation and gene expression, are pumped out of the cell by the membrane efflux pumps P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), which are blocked by verapamil. In parental non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells (SW1573), 5 microM cortisol and 100 nM dexamethasone decreased sensitivity to gemcitabine. However, both cortisol and dexamethasone only decreased sensitivity with verapamil in MRP (2R120) and P-glycoprotein (2R160) overexpressing variants. Cortisol decreased deoxycytidine kinase activity in SW1573 cells and cortisol with verapamil in 2R120 and 2R160 cells. Dexamethasone with verapamil decreased deoxycytidine kinase activity in 2R160. Cortisol decreased thymidine kinase 2 activity in 2R120 and 2R160 cells. Dexamethasone decreased thymidine kinase 2 activity in SW1573, 2R120 and 2R160 cells. In conclusion, since dexamethasone is frequently used to treat side effects of oncolytic therapy, a decrease of sensitivity to gemcitabine by steroids might be clinically relevant.

Comparing cost-effectiveness analyses for the clinical oncology setting: the example of the Gynecologic Oncology Group 111 trial

For the practicing oncologist, balancing quality of care with cost containment has become an unavoidable challenge. The development of new technologies, increased patient awareness, growth of managed care, and aging of our population represent conflicting interests in this endeavor. Medical literature has recently been inundated with economic analyses in an effort to approach some of these difficult questions, but often times it is difficult to see how this research applies to any particular oncologist's practice. This article identifies many of the key issues raised in the critical evaluation of cost-effectiveness analyses as they relate to the practicing oncologist. We offer suggestions on the interpretation of these studies to the clinical setting, using the recently published Journal of Clinical Oncology articles on cost-effectiveness analyses of paclitaxel-cisplatin as first-line therapy for ovarian cancer as examples.