Vinorelbine combined with paclitaxel infused over 96 hours (VI-TA-96) for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma

Design and Development of New Combinations of the CMF Agents with Taxanes (Paclitaxel or Docetaxel) in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study

Aims and background

We previously designed and tested combinations made up of the CMF agents, two at a time by rotation, and of doxorubicin or epirubicin. The present study was aimed to similarly test new combinations made up of the CMF agents, two at a time by rotation, and paclitaxel or docetaxel.

Methods

The doses of each taxane were escalated with the objective of reaching at least a single dose level of 90 mg/m2 of paclitaxel and 45 mg/m2 of docetaxel on days 1 and 8 of each four-week cycle. Thirty-two patients with advanced breast carcinoma were randomized to receive increasing doses of paclitaxel (45, 65, 80, 90 and 100 mg/m2) or docetaxel (30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 mg/m2) together with the CMF agents at the same dose as that used in the conventional regimen. Each dose level was administered to a triplet of patients. No direct comparison of the two taxanes was made.

Results

The fourth dose level was reached for paclitaxel and docetaxel. The most important toxicities were grade 4 neutropenia and grade 1-2 nausea/vomiting and stomatitis. The objective response rate, assessed only after the third cycle at any dose level, was 31% (95% CI, 15-47%).

Conclusions

The combinations of the CMF agents (two at a time in rotation) with paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) or docetaxel (45 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of each four-week cycle are feasible and lead to definite signs of therapeutic activity, and the side effects are generally mild. Further studies are therefore warranted.

Chemotherapy for Late-Stage Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Complete Response Rates

Complete response (CR) rates reported for cytotoxic chemotherapy for late-stage cancer patients are generally low, with few exceptions, regardless of the solid cancer type or drug regimen. We investigated CR rates reported in the literature for clinical trials using chemotherapy alone, across a wide range of tumour types and chemotherapeutic regimens, to determine an overall CR rate for late-stage cancers. A total of 141 reports were located using the PubMed database. A meta-analysis was performed of reported CR from 68 chemotherapy trials (total 2732 patients) using standard agents across late-stage solid cancers—a binomial model with random effects was adopted. Mean CR rates were compared for different cancer types, and for chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action, using a logistic regression. Our results showed that the CR rates for chemotherapy treatment of late-stage cancer were generally low at 7.4%, regardless of the cancer type or drug regimen used. We found no evidence that CR rates differed between different chemotherapy drug types, but amongst different cancer types small CR differences were evident, although none exceeded a mean CR rate of 11%. This remarkable concordance of CR rates regardless of cancer or therapy type remains currently unexplained, and motivates further investigation.

A phase II clinical trial of ixabepilone (Ixempra; BMS-247550; NSC 710428), an epothilone B analog, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Ixabepilone (Ixempra; BMS-247550) is an epothilone B analog and nontaxane microtubule-stabilizing compound with clinical activity in a range of solid tumors. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had measurable disease and had not received previous cytotoxic or targeted therapy were treated with 6 mg/m(2) ixabepilone i.v. daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Levels of Glu-terminated and acetylated tubulin, markers of microtubule stabilization, were assessed by Western blot. VHL gene mutation status was determined by sequencing.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients received a total of 590 cycles, with a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-29). The overall response rate was 13% (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor). One patient had a complete response, 10 patients had partial responses, and 59 patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 5.5 months. The median overall survival of renal cell carcinoma Motzer grade 0 and 1 patients with clear cell histology was 19.25 months. Treatment-related adverse events were primarily alopecia, gastrointestinal toxicity, neuropathy, and fatigue. Biopsies were done at baseline and after five doses of ixabepilone. Microtubule target engagement was achieved in 84.6% to 92.3% of patients evaluated. No correlation was identified between the target engagement, VHL gene mutation status, and clinical response.

CONCLUSION

Ixabepilone can cause tumor regression in some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and could be considered in combination regimens with other therapies.

Oral vinorelbine/paclitaxel combination treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase I study

PURPOSE

Intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine (VRL) generally given on days 1 and 8 of an every three-week cycle in combination with paclitaxel (PTX) is an effective option for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In an effort to improve both patient and chemotherapy unit convenience, oral VRL was used at equivalent doses of i.v. VRL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was determined during the first cycle of oral VRL given on days 1 and 8 or 15 and PTX infused over 3 h on day 1 every 3 weeks, maximum of 6 cycles. The dose of oral VRL was escalated from 60 to 80 mg/m2 in 10 mg/m2 increments. Paclitaxel was administered at 110 and then 135 mg/m2. The combination regimen was given as first-line chemotherapy of MBC. Three to six patients per cohort were treated.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were treated in the first four cohorts (oral VRL/PTX): 60/110, 70/110, 80/110 and 80/135. In cohort 4, seven patients were treated, one patient being non-evaluable for MTD, three of them presented a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisting of febrile neutropenia and neutropenic infection. Therefore 80/135 was the MTD. Because 36% of oral VRL administrations on day 8 were delayed to day 15 at 80/110, two additional cohorts were tested: in cohort 5, oral VRL 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and PTX 135 mg/m2 on day 1 and in cohort 6, oral VRL 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and PTX 110 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks. In cohort 5, six out of eight patients had DLTs: omission of oral VRL on day 15 for five patients, grade 4 neutropenia>7 days for another one. Therefore the recommended dose (RD) for further clinical testing was oral VRL 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and PTX 110 mg/m2 on day 1 of an every 3-week cycle. Two of the three evaluable patients treated at the RD had a partial response. The pharmacokinetics of VRL and PTX is being analysed and will be further presented in a separate publication.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase I study has determined the doses of oral VRL and PTX to be used in combination for the benefit of the patient and of the chemotherapy unit in term of nurse's workload. The recommended regimen of oral VRL 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and PTX 110 mg/m2 on day 1 given every 3 weeks will be further tested in phase II.

Vinorelbine in the management of breast cancer: New perspectives, revived role in the era of targeted therapy

Vinorelbine is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid that has been shown active in many tumour types and is currently registered for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This agent has a generally favourable safety profile, and may be suitable for use in special populations such as the elderly and/or frail patient. However, with the taxanes firmly established as standard second line treatment for ABC after failure of an anthracycline, vinorelbine has been generally relegated for use as third line therapy, in competition with the oral compound capecitabine. More recently, the exciting results observed with the combination of vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients with Her-2 overexpressing/amplified tumours, as well as the development of a reliable formulation and revised schedule of oral vinorelbine with proven activity in ABC appear to have revived the interest in this compound in the management of this disease. There are still a number of unanswered questions that will have to be addressed by properly designed, adequately powered randomised clinical trials.

Phase II Study of Paclitaxel Combined With Vinorelbine in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine are two drugs active against breast cancer. A phase II study was initiated with the aim of assessing the efficacy and feasibility of the combination. Twenty-six patients presenting with advanced breast cancer with a taxane- and vinorelbine-free line of chemotherapy were included and treated with vinorelbine (20 mg/m2 on D1, D15), followed by paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 on D1), every 3 weeks. A 48% (95% CI: 35-61) response rate was obtained in the 23 patients evaluable for response. Vinorelbine was administered on D15, as scheduled, in 72% of cycles. The main toxicity observed was grade III to IV neutropenia in 73% of patients. Febrile neutropenia was reported in three patients. Disease-free survival was 118 days, and overall median survival was 361 days. This combination of paclitaxel and vinorelbine is feasible and effective in patients with early relapse or previously treated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease.

Vinorelbine as a 96-hour continuous infusion in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer: a cooperative study by the GEICAM group

The efficacy of vinorelbine given as a continuous infusion was evaluated in 47 patients with breast cancer who had received previous treatment with first-line, second-line, and third-line chemotherapy including taxanes and/or anthracyclines. For inclusion into the study, patients were required to have histology-proven bi-dimensionally measurable disease. The treatment schedule was a bolus injection of vinorelbine 8 mg/m(2) administered over 5-10 minutes on day 1 followed by vinorelbine 8 mg/m(2) continuous infusion on days 1-4, every 21 days for 6 cycles. On an intent-to-treat basis, a 2% complete response rate and a 17% partial response rate were observed. The median time to progression was 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.83-2.97). Median survival was 7.73 months (95% CI, 4.48-10.98; range, 0.33-55.0 months). Major toxicities included febrile neutropenia in 40 cycles (24%) affecting 24 patients (51%) and 1 toxic death. Other nonhematologic toxicities included stomatitis (13%) and asthenia (13%). We conclude that this treatment shows considerable therapeutic activity, albeit at considerable toxicity costs, even in patients who have had multiple lines of prior chemotherapy. However, the results do not indicate clear advantages compared to the conventional weekly scheme of administration.

Cytoskeleton-interacting activity of geiparvarin, diethylstilbestrol and conjugates

Geiparvarin, a natural compound isolated from the leaves of Geijera parviflora, inhibits the growth of various tumor cell lines with a mode of action which may be attributed to its anti-microtubular activity. Our previous findings indicated that geiparvarin is able to inhibit the in vitro polymerization of tubulin and to derange the microtubular network in fibroblasts more effectively in the presence of paclitaxel. To further explore its biological activity here we have studied the effects exerted on the other components of the cytoskeleton by geiparvarin and two derivatives obtained by conjugating the 3(2H)-furanone ring of geiparvarin with diethylstilbestrol (DES). Firstly, observations by electron microscopy confirmed anti-microtubular properties, a near-total absence of microtubules is detected when tubulin is incubated with drugs in the presence of paclitaxel, whereas microtubule formation is not inhibited by drugs when assembly is induced by guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP). Immunofluorescence assays demonstrated that geiparvarin and DES act in a vinblastine-like fashion, causing a marked depletion of intermediate filaments while the network of microfilaments is not affected. Both the conjugates alter the 'stress fibers' organization of actin and disrupt the vimentin pattern; generally they derange cytoskeleton more markedly than the parent compounds. The cell growth inhibiting effects of geiparvarin and derivatives are dose-dependent; they vary according to the cell line used, when compounds were administered either alone or simultaneously with paclitaxel. Unlike other anti-microtubule agents, they do not exhibit cell-cycle compartment specificity and do not influence thymidine uptake in the cell.

A Phase I-II study of 96-hour infusional topotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent Müllerian tumors

BACKGROUND

Topotecan and paclitaxel are schedule dependent chemotherapeutic agents with activity against ovarian carcinoma. A Phase I-II study in which both drugs were administered concurrently by 96-hour, continuous, intravenous infusion was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the combination.

METHODS

Women with ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and documented recurrent disease were eligible for the study. The dose of topotecan was escalated from 1.6 mg/m(2) while maintaining the paclitaxel dose constant at 100 mg/m(2). Plasma concentrations of both drugs were monitored daily during the first cycle of therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 42-70 years) received 181 cycles of therapy. Five patients were recruited to each of four dose levels (topotecan 1.6 mg/m(2), 2.0 mg/m(2), 2.8 mg/m(2), and 3.6 mg/m(2)), and an additional 25 patients were treated at the MTD (Phase II). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia became dose limiting toxicities (DLT) at the fourth dose level. Emesis, mucositis, peripheral neuropathy, diarrhea, and alopecia were mild. Twenty patients (44%) had line-related occlusion, thrombosis, or infection. The mean values (+/- standard deviation) of the apparent steady-state plasma concentrations at the Phase II doses were 2.3 nM +/- 0.5 nM for topotecan lactone, 5.6 nM +/- 2.1 nM for total topotecan, and 40.1 nM +/- 16.8 nM for paclitaxel. There were seven partial responses (Phase II) contributing to an objective response rate of 28% and a median survival time of 11.7 months (range, 0.6-20.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan at a dose of 2.8 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) administered by concurrent, 96-hour, continuous intravenous infusions shows activity against tumors of Müllerian origin.

The relevance of drug sequence in combination chemotherapy

The concept of combining chemotherapeutic agents to increase the cytotoxic efficacy has evolved greatly over the past several years. In the past, the rationale for combination chemotherapy centered on attacking different biochemical targets, overcoming drug resistance in heterogenous tumors, and increasing the dose-density of combination chemotherapy to take advantage of tumor growth kinetics. The overall goal was to improve clinical efficacy with acceptable clinical toxicity. It is now apparent that the sequence of drug administration can significantly enhance the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy. These sequence-dependent effects can be explained by chemotherapy-induced cell cycle perturbations, or by pharmacodynamic interactions between the agents in combination. In this review, we focus on drug combinations with taxanes and camptothecins, which we believe best illustrate the importance of the cell cycle and pharmacologic interactions in the sequential administration of chemotherapy. As our understanding of the cell cycle grows, our ability to appropriately sequence chemotherapy can have a great impact on the treatment of human cancers. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.