Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

Addressing the elephant in the room, therapeutic resistance in non-small cell lung cancer, with epigenetic therapies

Like Chinese boxes nesting inside each other, the classification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is subdivided into smaller and smaller subtypes on the basis of histological and molecular attributes. The latter characterizes NSCLC by its molecular alterations and the identification of inhibitors that target these cancer-specific "driver" mutations. Despite the initial promise of precision-guided therapies to inhibit a finer and finer array of molecular subcategories, despite even the curative potential of immunotherapeutic checkpoint blockade, in particular, casualties still abound and true clinical success stories are few and far between; the ever-present, if sometimes unmentioned, "elephant in the room", is the acquisition of resistance, which, sooner or later, rears its ugly head to undermine treatment success and shorten survival. Emerging data suggests that epigenetic therapies are able to reprogram the aberrant tumor-associated epigenome and 'tame the beast of resistance', thereby prolonging survival. This article reviews the role of epigenetic dysregulation in NSCLC, explores PFS2 as a possible surrogate endpoint, briefly mentions possible biomarkers and highlights combinatorial treatment epigenetic strategies to "prime" tumors and reverse resistance.

Phase I study of gemcitabine, docetaxel and imatinib in refractory and relapsed solid tumors

PURPOSE

In a phase I study, the combination of gemcitabine and imatinib was well tolerated with broad anticancer activity. This phase I trial evaluated the triplet of docetaxel, gemcitabine and imatinib.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Imatinib was administered at 400 mg daily on days 1-5, 8-12 and 15-19. Gemcitabine was started at 600 mg/m(2) at a rate of 10 mg/min on days 3 and 10 and docetaxel at 30 mg/m(2) on day 10, on a 21-day cycle. Diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI was performed in selected patients.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors were enrolled in this IRB-approved study. The mean age was 64, and mean ECOG PS was 1. Two patients were evaluated by diffusion/perfusion MRI. After two grade 3 hematological toxicities at dose level 1, the protocol was amended to reduce the dose of imatinib. MTDs were 600 mg/ m(2) on days 3 and 10 for gemcitabine, 30 mg/ m(2) on day 10 for docetaxel, and 400 mg daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 for imatinib. Dose limiting toxicities after one cycle were neutropenic fever, and pleural and pericardial effusions. The best response achieved was stable disease, for six cycles, in one patient each with mesothelioma and non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the MTD. Two patients with NSCLC had stable disease for four cycles.

DISCUSSION

An unexpectedly low MTD for this triplet was identified. Our results suggest drug-drug interactions that amplify toxicities with little evidence of improved tumor control.

[Pharmacoeconomic assessment of taxanes as first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer]

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of taxane-containing regimens versus non-taxane-containing regimens using a metanalysis and its subsequent pharmacoeconomic assessment to define the role of taxanes as first-line therapy for non micro-cytic lung cancer.

METHOD

A search of the MEDLINE database from 2000 to June 2005 was performed. The search was restricted to phase-III clinical trials, and 29 papers were selected. Effectivity measures considered included: objective response, 1- and 2-year survival. Maentel-Haenszel combined odds ratio (OR) was estimated in the metanalysis. The statistical analysis of effectiveness across categories was performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences were statistically considered for p values = 0.01. All results obtained were weighted according to number of patients.

RESULTS

OR estimates for the various effectiveness variables showed statistically significant differences when 2-year survival was considered both for taxanes in general and docetaxel specifically versus non-taxane regimens. These same results are seen when the effectiveness analysis is performed using ANOVA. For the pharmacoeconomic analysis taxane-free regimens were considered as reference, this being of choice for comparisons versus paclitaxel-containing regimens whereas the selection of docetaxel-containing schemes represents additional costs per extra effectiveness unit that oscillate between 26,559 and 96,527 (2-year survival and objective response, respectively) versus taxane-free regimens. The sensitivity analysis ultimately confirmed our study s results.

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, taxane-containing schemes are valid therapeutic options, but at a very high cost.

Gemcitabine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination (GIP) in treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer: results of a phase II study

OBJECTIVES

We have carried out a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and the toxicity associated with the combination of gemcitabine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (GIP) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Each cycle consisted of treatment with ifosfamide (3000 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1500 mg/m2) on day 1, followed by cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1500 mg/m2) on day 15. Each treatment cycle was repeated every 28 days. A maximum of 6 cycles were administered.

RESULTS

Sixty NSCLC patients (23 stage III and 37 stage IV) were entered in this study. The median survival for all patients is 9 months (stage III: 12.3 months; stage IV: 7.5 months). The overall survival at 1 and 2 years is 38% and 17%, respectively (52% and 30% for stage III; 30% and 8% for stage IV). The median time to progression is 6.3 months (stage III: 8.8 months; stage IV: 3.6 months). Progression free survival at 1 and 2 years for all patients is 22% and 8%. The response rate is 56% for patients with stage III disease and 27% for patients with stage IV disease. Among the grade 3/4 toxicities, hematological toxicity was the most frequent (59% of patients) followed by gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea/vomiting) in 21% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The GIP combination yields an efficacy, in terms of response and survival, comparable to that reported with other triplet combination treatments for local advanced or metastatic NSCLC, with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Vinorelbine Combination Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Vinorelbine-cisplatin combination chemotherapy is a standard approach for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The addition of paclitaxel as a third therapeutic agent seems promising. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of this new regimen. Forty-six nonselected and chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 were treated every 4 weeks with paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 given iv in 3 hours) and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 given iv in 6 hours) on day 1 and vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 given iv in 30 minutes) on days 1 and 15. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and response according to the intent-to-treat principle. An objective response was observed in 39% of the patients (95% CI: 25% to 55%). World Health Organization grade III to IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 43%, 2%, and 17%, respectively. There was one treatment-related death. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild, mainly grade III nausea and vomiting in 20% of the patients. After a median follow-up period of 54 months, the median progression-free survival was 14.3 weeks and the median overall survival was 31.3 weeks. This three-drug chemotherapy combination is feasible, well tolerated, and shows activity in metastatic NSCLC.

Front-line paclitaxel/cisplatin-based chemotherapy in brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Paclitaxel-cisplatin is considered to be a standard therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of this combination with vinorelbine or gemcitabine as front-line therapy in brain metastases from NSCLC.

METHODS

Twenty-six chemotherapy-naive patients with an ECOG performance status of 0-2 were treated with paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2)) on day 1, cisplatin (120 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and either vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15 or gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8. Whole-brain irradiation was offered early in case of progression and later as consolidation treatment.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluated for toxicity and 25 for response. An intracranial response rate was observed in 38% of the patients (95% CI: 22-59%). WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 31 and 4% of the patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death. Non-hematological toxicities were mild. After a median follow-up of 46 months, the median overall survival for all patients was 21.4 weeks and the median time to progression was 12.8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel and cisplatin combined with vinorelbine or gemcitabine as front-line therapy in brain metastases seem to achieve responses similar to those for extracranial disease, suggesting a meaningful role in this setting.

Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan and vinorelbine in stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined irinotecan and vinorelbine in previously treated patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-three patients with NSCLC (7 stage IIIB and 26 stage IV) were enrolled. All had been previously treated with cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. In addition, 24 patients had received radiotherapy. Irinotecan (300 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1 and vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 14, every 4 weeks. Partial response was achieved in 3 patients (9%; 95% CI: 2-24%), stable disease (SD) in 13 (39%; 95% CI: 23-58%), whereas 17 patients progressed (51%; 95% CI: 33-69%). Median event-free survival was 10 weeks and median overall survival was 25 weeks. Three patients were event free at the end of the study with a follow-up of 40, 73, and 75 weeks. Toxicity was mild, with leukopenia grade III-IV in 8.6% of cycles. No episodes of diarrhea III-IV were observed. Three patients died early after administration of this combination, one of them in the context of severe leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Approximately 50% of patients treated with CPT-11 and vinorelbine in combination show partial response or stable disease with minimal toxicity.

[Non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma in advanced stages: prognostic value of weight loss and clinical implications]

This study of advanced-stage non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma aimed 1) to identify prognostic factors collected at the moment of diagnosis, 2) to determine whether weight loss is a useful parameter to screen for subjects who will receive greater benefit from anticancer therapy.Patients and methods. Eighty-one patients were enrolled after diagnosis of stage III-B and IV non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma and levels of activity < 2 according to Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group classification. The variables studied were age, sex, smoking history, associated disease, clinical data (weight loss, dyspnea, superior vena cava syndrome), laboratory parameters [hemoglobin, serum albumin, total lymphocytes, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), calcium and liver enzymes], tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, histologic type, activity, treatment received and survival in weeks. The results were analyzed in two groups: 1) the general group consisting of results for all patients, and 2) the no-weight-loss group consisting of results for those whose weight had been stable. Student t, chi-squared, Kaplan Meier, log-rank and Cox's regression model were used to analyze data and survival.

RESULTS

Mean survival was 29 weeks (21-37). Survival was significantly related to weight loss, total lymphocytes, serum LDH, TNM and activity level in the general group. Only two factors continued to have prognostic value in the multivariate study: weight loss (OR: 1.48 (1.14-1.92), p = 0.002) and TNM (OR: 0.72 (0.54-0.96), p = 0.02). Among the patients with no weight loss, treatment received and TNM were significantly related to survival in univariable analysis and in Cox's regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience with advanced lung cancer subjected to anticancer therapy, the presence of weight loss is the variable with the greatest prognostic value, such that it may be useful to consider it routinely, along with activity level, to try to identify patients who will receive the most benefit from cytostatic treatment.