Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for acute and chronic hepatic encephalopathy

Management of hepatic encephalopathy

OPINION STATEMENT

Hepatic encephalopathy management varies depending on the acuity of liver failure. However, in patients with either acute or chronic liver failure five basic steps in management are critical: stabilization, addressing modifiable precipitating factors, lowering blood ammonia, managing elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) (if present), and managing complications of liver failure that can contribute to encephalopathy, particularly hyponatremia. Because liver failure patients are prone to a variety of other medical problems that can lead to encephalopathy (such as coagulopathy associated intracranial hemorrhage, electrolyte disarray, renal failure, hypotension, hypoglycemia, and infection), a thorough history, physical and neurologic examination is mandated in all encephalopathic liver failure patients. There should be a low threshold for brain imaging in patients with focal neurological deficits given the propensity for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. In patients with acute liver failure and high grade encephalopathy, identification of the etiology of acute liver failure is essential to guide treatment and antidote administration, particularly in the case of acetaminophen poisoning. Equally critical is management of elevated ICP in acute liver failure. Intracranial hypertension can be treated with hypertonic saline and/or adjustment of the dialysis bath. Placement of an intracranial monitor to guide ICP therapy is risky because of concomitant coagulopathy and remains controversial. Continuous renal replacement therapy may help lower serum ammonia, treat coexisting uremia, and improve symptoms. Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for patients with acute liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy. In patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy, lactulose and rifaxamin remain a mainstay of therapy. In these patients, it is essential to identify reversible causes of hepatic encephalopathy such as increased ammonia production and/or decreased clearance (eg, infection, GI bleed, constipation, hypokalemia, dehydration). Chronic hyponatremia should be managed by gradual sodium correction of no more than 8‒12 meq/L per day to avoid central myelinolysis syndrome. Free water restriction and increased dietary sodium are reasonable, cost effective treatment options. Many emerging therapies, both pharmacologic and interventional, are currently being studied to improve management of hepatic encephalopathy.

Hepatic encephalopathy: an updated approach from pathogenesis to treatment

One of the most serious complications of chronic or fulminant liver failure is hepatic encephalopathy (HE), associated most commonly with cirrhosis. In the presence of chronic liver disease, HE is a sign of decompensation, while in fulminant liver failure its development represents a worrying sign and usually indicates that transplantation will be required. Despite the significance of HE in the course of liver disease, the progress in development of new therapeutic options has been unremarkable over the last 20 years. An up-to-date review regarding HE, including both research and review articles. HE is a serious and progressive, but potentially reversible, disorder with a wide spectrum of neuropsychiatric abnormalities and motor disturbances that ranges from mild alteration of cognitive and motor function to coma and death. Although a clear pathogenesis is yet to be determined, elevated ammonia in serum and the central nervous system is the mainstay for pathogenesis and treatment of HE. Management includes early diagnosis and prompt treatment of precipitating factors. Clinical trials and extensive clinical experience have established the efficacy of diverse substances in HE treatment. Novel therapies with clinical promise include: L-ornithine L-aspartate, sodium benzoate, phenylacetate, AST-120, and the molecular adsorbent recirculating system. Eventually, liver transplantation is often the most successful long-term therapy for HE.

Hepatic encephalopathy therapy: An overview

Type-C hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe complication of cirrhosis, which seriously affects quality of life and is strongly related to patient survival. Treatment based on a classical pharmacological approach that is aimed at reducing the production of gut-derived toxins, such as ammonia, is still under debate. Currently, results obtained from clinical trials do not support any specific treatment for HE and our competence in testing old and new treatment modalities by randomized controlled trials with appropriate clinically relevant end-points urgently needs to be improved. On the other hand, patients who are at risk for HE are now identifiable, based on studies on the natural history of the disease. Today, very few studies that are specifically aimed at establishing whether HE may be prevented are available or in progress. Recent studies have looked at non absorbable disaccharides or antibiotics and other treatment modalities, such as the modulation of intestinal flora. In the treatment of severe stage HE, artificial liver supports have been tested with initial positive results but more studies are needed.

Current trends in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common reversible neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with chronic and acute liver dysfunction and significant morbidity and mortality. Although a clear pathogenesis is yet to be determined, elevated ammonia in the serum and central nervous system are the mainstay for pathogenesis and treatment. Management includes early diagnosis and prompt treatment of precipitating factors (infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, electrolyte disturbances, hepatocellular carcinoma, dehydration, hypotension, and use of benzodiazepines, psychoactive drugs, and/or alcohol). Clinical trials have established the efficacy of lactulose and lactitol enemas in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy. Extensive clinical experience has demonstrated the efficacy of oral lactulose and lactitol with the goal of two to three soft bowel movements a day for the treatment of chronic HE. However, lactulose and lactitol have significant gastrointestinal side effects. For patients unable to tolerate lactulose or lactitol or who still have persistent chronic HE with lactulose or lactitol, neomycin, metronidazole and rifaximin are second-line agents. More recent data supports the benefits of rifaximin used solely and as an additional agent with fewer side effects than neomycin or metronidazole. Newer therapies being investigated in humans with clinical promise include nitazoxanide, the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), L-ornithine phenylacetate, sodium benzoate, and/or sodium phenylacetate and Kremezin^® (AST-120).

Agreement between reported use of interventions for liver diseases and research evidence in Cochrane systematic reviews

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study evaluates the agreement between reported use of interventions for patients with liver diseases and research evidence in Cochrane systematic reviews.

METHODS

In July 2002, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group had completed 28 systematic reviews on 36 interventions that were available in Denmark. Based on the reviews, three interventions (n-acetylcysteine for paracetamol overdose, terlipressin for bleeding oesophageal varices, and antibiotics for patients with cirrhosis and gastrointestinal bleeding) with significant beneficial effects on clinical outcomes were classified as 'evidence-based', whereas 19 were classified as 'possibly evidence-based', and 14 as 'not evidence-based'. Questionnaires on reported use and perceived intervention effects were mailed to 108 physicians practising in Danish hospitals. Sixty-six returned their questionnaire.

RESULTS

The proportion of physicians who reported that they never used the three evidence-based interventions varied considerably (2, 62, and 57%, respectively). The perceived intervention effect, duration of clinical experience, employment as head of department, and university hospital employment were significant predictors of more frequent use of evidence-based interventions. Physicians also reported that they used the interventions that were not evidence-based more often if they were employed at a university hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable disagreements between reported use and research evidence were identified. Additional research on methods to introduce evidence-based medicine in practice seems warranted.

Expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor subunits α1, β1, γ2 mRNA in rats with hepatic encephalopathy

AIM: To investigate the mRNA expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA_A) receptor subunits α₁, β₁, γ₂ in different parts of the brain of rats with hepatic encephalopathy.

METHODS: Twelve adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups: (1) hepatic encephalopathy model group (n = 6), which was induced by intraperitoneal injection of thioacetamide (TAA, 350 mg/kg) for three consecutive days; (2) control group (n = 6), in which the rats were treated with same dose of normal saline solution. After the freeze slice of cerebrum was made, in situ hybridization was used to detect the mRNA of GABA_A receptor subunits α₁, β₁, and γ₂ in rat cerebral cortex, basal nuclei, substantia nigra and hippocampi. Image data were collected and analyzed quantitatively by QWin550CW model image signal gather and analysis system.

RESULTS: In rats with hepatic encephalopathy, mRNA expression levels of GABA_A receptor subunits α₁, β₁ increased significantly in basal nuclei, substantia nigra pars compacta, substantia nigra pars reticularis and hippocampi (144.7±15.67/184.14±4.41, 60.61±33.66/113.07±32.44, 87.71± 21.25/128.40±18.85, 122.34±5.56/161.60±4.56, 123.29±5.21/140.65±4.15, 123.40±4.42/140.09±4.52, 124.76±4.18/140.09±4.12, 141.62±15.09/182.80 ±5.20, 69.13±30.74/134.21±43.76, 87.87±25.16/151.01±19.49, 122.14±6.30 /162.33±3.92, 122.81±5.09/137.19±7.12, 123.00±4.63/138.11±5.92, 125.75 ±2.43/138.81±6.10, P<0.01), but did not change in the cerebral cortex compared to the control group. Similar changes were found in the mRNA expression levels of GABA_A receptor subunit γ₂, which increased significantly in basal nuclei, substantia nigra pars compacta, substantia nigra pars reticularis (136.81±26.41/167.97±16.23, 51.00±36.14/113.18±36.52, 86.35±20.30/ 126.90±19.74, P<0.01), CA1 of hippocampal (162.15±9.05/178.62±6.45, P<0.05), and no changes were found in the cerebral cortex and CA2, CA3, CA4 of hippocampi.

CONCLUSION: In rats with hepatic encephalopathy, mRNA expression levels of GABA_A receptor subunits α₁, β₁, γ₂ increase significantly in basal nuclei, substantia nigra and hippocampi, suggesting that the changes of mRNA expression levels in GABA_A receptor subunits may contribute to the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy.

Are the patients with post-transplant psychiatric consultation different from other medical-surgical consultation inpatients?

The present study examines the characteristics of post-transplant patients compared with non-transplant patients seen by consultation psychiatrists. Medical records of 541 consecutive psychiatric consultation patients at a university teaching hospital in 2001 were reviewed. Of the 541 patients who were evaluated, 67 were post-transplant patients. Post-transplant psychiatric consultation is different in some aspects from other psychiatric consultation. Post-transplant patients suffer complicated medical, psychiatric, and social burdens.

[Acute liver failure]

Acute liver failure is characterized by a dynamic clinical course associated with high mortality. The main prognostic determinant is the development of extrahepatic complications. Close monitoring is mandatory, and prophylactic measures to avoid complications should be initiated. In case of complications, early and aggressive treatment is indicated. To date, artificial liver support devices are still in the experimental phase. Liver transplantation should be considered in patients with predictors of a poor spontaneous prognosis. Therefore, a transplant center should be contacted in every case of acute liver failure.