Symphysiotomy for feto-pelvic disproportion. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1996. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005299]

The Irish experience of Symphysiotomy: 40 years onwards

The art of symphysiotomy for delivery in the instance of cephalopelvic disproportion has been a dying art since the advent of caesarean section but in Ireland this surgical procedure was not abolished until 1992. This practice is still present in the developing world and in some circumstances used in developed countries. This study offers some insights on the 40-year follow-up of patients who had undergone symphysiotomy.

The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies

Objective

To investigate whether initiating external cephalic version (ECV) earlier in pregnancy might increase the rate of successful ECV procedures, and be more effective in decreasing the rate of non-cephalic presentation at birth and of caesarean section.

Design

An unblinded multicentred randomised controlled trial.

Setting

A total of 1543 women were randomised from 68 centres in 21 countries.

Population

Women with a singleton breech fetus at a gestational age of 33^0/7 weeks (231 days) to 35^6/7 weeks (251 days) of gestation were included.

Methods

Participants were randomly assigned to having a first ECV procedure between the gestational ages of 34^0/7 (238 days) and 35^6/7 weeks of gestation (early ECV group) or at or after 37^0/7 (259 days) weeks of gestation (delayed ECV group).

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the rate of caesarean section; the secondary outcome was the rate of preterm birth.

Results

Fewer fetuses were in a non-cephalic presentation at birth in the early ECV group (314/765 [41.1%] versus 377/768 [49.1%] in the delayed ECV group; relative risk [RR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.75, 0.94, P = 0.002). There were no differences in rates of caesarean section (398/765 [52.0%] versus 430/768 [56.0%]; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85, 1.02, P = 0.12) or in risk of preterm birth (50/765 [6.5%] versus 34/768 [4.4%]; RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.97, 2.26, P = 0.07) between groups.

Conclusion

External cephalic version at 34–35 weeks versus 37 or more weeks of gestation increases the likelihood of cephalic presentation at birth but does not reduce the rate of caesarean section and may increase the rate of preterm birth.

Intrauterine Resuscitation During Labor: Review of Current Methods and Supportive Evidence

When the fetal heart rate pattern is suggestive of fetal compromise during labor, various methods to promote fetal well-being are traditionally initiated. They include maternal repositioning, reduction of uterine activity, an intravenous fluid bolus, oxygen administration, correction of maternal hypotension, amnioinfusion, and alteration of second-stage labor pushing efforts. Although these intrauterine resuscitation techniques are commonly used, and in some cases considered standard care, supportive data could be more robust. Nevertheless, there is enough evidence to suggest they are beneficial to the fetus and there is minimal risk of harm when used with clinical common sense. Until more data are available, it seems reasonable to err on the side of fetal safety by using these techniques when appropriate, based on the specific fetal heart rate pattern.

Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery

BACKGROUND

Instrumental or assisted vaginal birth is commonly used to expedite birth for the benefit of either mother or baby or both. It is sometimes associated with significant complications for both mother and baby. The choice of instrument may be influenced by clinical circumstances, operator choice and availability of specific instruments.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate different instruments in terms of achieving a vaginal birth and avoiding significant morbidity for mother and baby.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of assisted vaginal delivery using different instruments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality, extracted the data, and checked them for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 studies (6597 women) in this review. Forceps were less likely than the ventouse to fail to achieve a vaginal birth with the allocated instrument (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 0.94). However, with forceps there was a trend to more caesarean sections, and significantly more third- or fourth-degree tears (with or without episiotomy), vaginal trauma, use of general anaesthesia, and flatus incontinence or altered continence. Facial injury was more likely with forceps (RR 5.10, 95% CI 1.12 to 23.25). Using a random-effects model because of heterogeneity between studies, there was a trend towards fewer cases of cephalhaematoma with forceps (average RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.11).Among different types of ventouse, the metal cup was more likely to result in a successful vaginal birth than the soft cup, with more cases of scalp injury and cephalhaematoma. The hand-held ventouse was associated with more failures than the metal ventouse, and a trend to fewer than the soft ventouse.Overall forceps or the metal cup appear to be most effective at achieving a vaginal birth, but with increased risk of maternal trauma with forceps and neonatal trauma with the metal cup.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a recognised place for forceps and all types of ventouse in clinical practice. The role of operator training with any choice of instrument must be emphasised. The increasing risks of failed delivery with the chosen instrument from forceps to metal cup to hand-held to soft cup vacuum, and trade-offs between risks of maternal and neonatal trauma identified in this review need to be considered when choosing an instrument.