Interventions for prevention of giant retinal tear in the fellow eye

Macular Edema Following Silicone Oil Tamponade for Retinal Detachment: A Literature Review

Macular edema (ME) is a major cause of reduced vision following intraocular surgery. Although the pathophysiology of ME is not completely understood, inflammatory mediators play a key role. The incidence of ME following pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade varies between 13% and 27%. ME usually resolves spontaneously following silicone oil removal, but treatment may be required for resistant cases. In this review, the mechanisms of ME formation after pars plana vitrectomy, its incidence, and its possible therapeutic approaches are discussed.

Retinal Detachment and Epiretinal Membrane Development in Fellow-Eye Laser Prophylaxis

Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of fellow-eye laser prophylaxis (FELP) in reducing the rate of retinal detachment (RD) in patients undergoing repair of a primary RD. Methods: Retrospective data were collected on the fellow eyes of consecutive patients undergoing primary RD repair. Patients lacking peripheral retinal pathology in the fellow eye or with less than 3 years of follow-up were excluded. Ninety-eight consecutive patients were identified who underwent FELP as compared with 28 who did not. No patient had symptoms in their fellow eye upon presentation. Rates of RD and epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation in the treatment group were compared with the control group. Results: Three of 98 (3.1%) patients developed RD despite having FELP compared with 5 of 28 (17.9%) in the control group (P = .005). In the FELP group, 16 (16.3%) patients developed ERM vs 7 of 28 (25.0%) in the group that did not receive prophylactic laser (P = .29). No patients in either the FELP or control group required surgery for ERM. Conclusions: Prophylactic laser to the fellow eye of patients undergoing primary RD repair reduced the risk of RD without significant risk of ERM formation.

A Novel Transcriptome Approach to the Investigation of the Molecular Pathology of Vitreous and Retinal Detachment

Retinal detachment (RD) is one of the most common, sight-threatening ocular conditions requiring emergency intervention. Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) occurs in the majority of an aging population whereby the vitreous body separates from the retina. It is well established that PVD is the common precursor to the most common forms of RD; however, it remains unknown why in most individuals PVD will cause no/few complications (physiological PVD) but in a small percentage will cause retinal tears and detachment (pathological PVD). Despite over 100 years of scientific research, the anatomical definitions of PVD and its pathogenesis remain controversial. Recent research has identified a novel cell population (laminocyte), present at significantly higher numbers in pathological PVD when compared to physiological PVD. We review and summarise the seven distinct clinical sub-groups of retinal breaks and focus on the role of the laminocyte in those secondary to PVD and the transcriptomic profile of this unique cell. Provisional whole transcriptome analysis using bulk RNA-Seq shows marked differentially expressed genes when comparing physiological PVD with PVD associated with RD. The limitations of bulk RNA-Seq are considered and the potential to address these using spatial transcriptomics are discussed. Understanding the pathogenesis of PVD-related retinal tears will provide a baseline for the development of novel therapeutic targets and prophylactic treatments.

Giant retinal tear retinal detachment etiologies, surgical outcome, and incidence of recurrent retinal detachment after silicone oil removal

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate etiologies, management, and outcomes of patients with giant retinal tears (GRTs) undergoing primary surgery at a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, consecutive case series of 94 patients with at least 3 months follow-up after silicone oil removal (SOR). Fifty-seven eyes (60.6%) underwent vitrectomy, 36 eyes (38.3%) underwent combined vitrectomy with buckling, and 1 eye (1.1%) underwent scleral buckling. Perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) heavy liquid to flatten GRT flap intraoperative has been used then PFCL air exchange then air-silicon exchange in all eyes undergoing vitrectomy. Fellow eye was observed for retinal detachment (RD).

RESULTS

Idiopathic cause constitutes 47 eyes (50%), in which 25 eyes (26.6%) are myopic and 22 eyes (23.4%) have a history of trauma. Eighty-five eyes (90.4%) achieved anatomic success. Visual acuity at the last follow-up was at least 20/400 in 71 eyes (75.5%) of patients. Recurrent RD after SOR was found in 21 eyes (22.3%), of which 50% had proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade C (PVR-C) or more (P = 0.03) and 20% had GRT size more than 180° (P = 0.04). Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone (P = 0.89) or combined PPV with buckling (P = 0.98) has no significant correlation with recurrent RD. Twenty-one percent of the fellow eye had RD.

CONCLUSION

Idiopathic cause constitutes the majority (50%). Patients with GRT who underwent surgery achieved a high anatomic success rate. PVR-C or more and GRT size more than 180° remain the most significant risk factor for recurrent RD after SOR, whereas PPV alone or combined PPV with buckling has no significant correlation with recurrent RD.

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear

BACKGROUND

A giant retinal tear (GRT) is a full-thickness neurosensory retinal break extending for 90° or more in the presence of a posterior vitreous detachment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy alone for eyes with giant retinal tear.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 8), which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in our electronic search. We last searched the electronic databases on 16 August 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy alone for giant retinal tear regardless of age, gender, lens status (e.g. phakic or pseudophakic eyes) of the affected eye(s), or etiology of GRT among participants enrolled in these trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed titles and abstracts, then full-text articles, using Covidence. Any differences in classification between the two review authors were resolved through discussion. Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias of included trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We found two RCTs in abstract format (105 participants randomized). Neither RCT was published in full. Based on the data presented in the abstracts, scleral buckling might be beneficial (relative risk of re-attachement ranged from 3.0 to 4.4), but the findings are inconclusive due to a lack of peer reviewed publication and insufficient information for assessing risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no conclusive evidence from RCTs on which to base clinical recommendations for scleral buckle combined with pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear. RCTs are clearly needed to address this evidence gap. Such trials should be randomized, and patients should be classified by giant retinal tear characteristics (extension (90º, 90º to 180º, > 180º), location (oral, anterior, posterior to equator)), proliferative vitreoretinopathy stage, and endotamponade. Analysis should include both short-term (three months and six months) and long-term (one year to two years) outcomes for primary retinal reattachment, mean change in best corrected visual acuity, study eyes that required second surgery for retinal reattachment, and adverse events such as elevation of intraocular pressure above 21 mmHg, choroidal detachment, cystoid macular edema, macular pucker, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and progression of cataract in initially phakic eyes.

Silicone oil versus gas tamponade for giant retinal tear-associated fovea-sparing retinal detachment: a comparison of outcome

PurposeSilicone oil is the most common choice of tamponade agent used when managing a giant retinal tear (GRT). Concern exists regarding its potential detrimental effect on vision. We herein report on visual and surgical outcomes of all patients treated at Moorfields Eye Hospital for a GRT over a five year period. We further analysed a subgroup of fovea-sparing retinal detachments (RD) treated by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with either silicone oil or gas tamponade.MethodsRetrospective comparative, non-randomised, cross-sectional review of patients with a new diagnosis of GRT from 1 September 2005 to 31 August 2010ResultsOne hundred twenty four eyes of 118 patients were identified with mean age of 45.5 years and median follow-up of 24 months. Subgroup analysis of fovea-sparing RDs (Silicone Oil n=49, Gas n=15) revealed visual loss (≥2 Snellen Lines of vision) in 49.0% (n=24) of patients managed with oil compared to 13.3% (n=2) of gas patients (P=0.019). In all, 73.3% (n=11) in the gas group achieved a final vision of 6/12 or better, compared to 36.7% (n=18) in the oil group (P=0.031). No difference was observed in eventual or primary anatomical success rate (100 vs 93.9%, and 66.7 vs 79.6%, gas vs oil, respectively, (P>0.1)). Postoperative complications were absent in 66.7% (n=10) of gas patients compared with 14.3% (n=7) of oil patients (P=0.002). Multiple variable linear regression determined tamponade choice as the only variable predictive of final visual acuity (P=0.046).ConclusionEyes with fovea-sparing GRT-related RDs managed with gas achieved a better visual outcome with fewer postoperative complications and no significant difference in anatomical success. A multicentre approach to investigate this further is advised.

Management of Giant Retinal Tear Detachments

Giant retinal tears (GRTs) are full-thickness circumferential tears of more than 90 degrees of the retina that are associated with vitreous detachment. They are related to ocular trauma, high myopia, aphakia, pseudophakia, genetic mutations involving collagen and young age. GRTs comprise 1.5% of all rhegmatogenous retinal detachments and the average age of incidence is 42 years. GRTs are more common in males, as 72% of all cases occur in males. The incidence of GRTs in the general population is estimated to be 0.05 per 100,000 individuals. Common techniques used in the management of GRTs include fluid-air exchange, pneumatic retinopexy, scleral buckling, primary vitrectomy with gas or silicone oil tamponade, and combined scleral buckle-vitrectomies. However, management of GRTs poses a great challenge to physicians due to the high risk of intra- and post-operative complications and the many technical difficulties involved. The advent of perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCL) and the use of micro-incisional surgery for the treatment of GRTs has provided new opportunities for the management of GTRs. Today, retinal reattachment can be achieved in 94-100% of cases.

Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments

BACKGROUND

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a full-thickness break in the sensory retina, caused by vitreous traction on the retina. While pneumatic retinopexy, scleral buckle, and vitrectomy are the accepted surgical interventions for eyes with RRD, their relative effectiveness has remained controversial. 

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to assess the effectiveness and safety of pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle or pneumatic retinopexy versus a combination treatment of scleral buckle and vitrectomy for people with RRD. The secondary objectives were to summarize any data on economic measures and quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2014, Issue 12), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to January 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2015), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to January 2015), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 13 January 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle (with or without vitrectomy) for eyes with RRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

After screening for eligibility, two review authors independently extracted study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. We followed systematic review standards as set forth by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two randomized controlled trials (218 eyes of 216 participants) comparing the effectiveness of pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for eyes with RRD. We identified no studies investigating the comparison of pneumatic retinopexy versus a combination treatment of scleral buckle and vitrectomy. Of the two included studies, one was a small study with 20 participants enrolled in Ireland and followed for an average of 16 months. The second study was larger with 196 participants (198 eyes) enrolled in the United States and followed for at least 6 months. Cautious interpretation of the results is warranted, since we graded the evidence as low to moderate quality due to insufficient reporting of study methods and imprecision and inconsistency among study results.Both studies showed fewer eyes achieving retinal reattachment in the pneumatic retinopexy group compared with the scleral buckle group by six-months follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.02, 218 eyes); however, we are uncertain as to whether the intervention has an important effect on reattachment because the results are imprecise. Eyes in the pneumatic retinopexy group also were more likely to have had a recurrence of retinal detachment by six-months follow-up (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.24, 218 eyes); however, we are uncertain as to whether the intervention has an important effect on recurrence because the lower CI equals no difference. Neither study reported mean change in visual acuity, quality of life data, or economic measures. Differences between the pneumatic retinopexy group and scleral buckle group were uncertain due to small numbers of events with respect to operative ocular adverse events (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.42, 218 eyes), development of cataract (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.06 to 14.54, 198 eyes), glaucoma (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.91, 198 eyes), macular pucker (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.67, 198 eyes), and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.96, 218 eyes). Fewer eyes in the pneumatic retinopexy group compared with the scleral buckle group experienced choroidal detachment (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.57, 198 eyes) or myopic shift equal to or greater than 1 diopter spherical equivalent (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.13, 198 eyes).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that pneumatic retinopexy may result in lower rates of reattachment and higher rates of recurrence than scleral buckle for eyes with RRD, but does not rule out no difference between procedures. The relative safety of the procedures is uncertain and the relative effects of these procedures in terms of other patient-important outcomes, such as visual acuity and quality of life, is unknown. Due to the limited information available between pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckle procedures, future research addressing these evidence gaps are warranted.

Evaluation and management of pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachments are rare, accounting for less than ten percent of all rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. While most retinal detachments in the adult population are related to posterior vitreous detachment, pediatric retinal detachment are often related to trauma or an underlying congenital abnormalities or genetic syndrome. The anatomy of pediatric eyes, the often late presentation of the disease, and the high incidence of bilateral pathology in children all pose significant challenges in the management of these patients. We discuss the epidemiology of pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, review the genetic syndromes associated with a high incidence of retinal detachment, and examine other common causes of retinal detachment in this age group. We then outline an approach to evaluation and management and describe the expected outcomes of repair of retinal detachment in the pediatric population.