Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease

Association between systemic inflammatory indicators with the survival of chronic kidney disease: a prospective study based on NHANES

Background

systemic inflammation disorders were observed in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Whether the systemic inflammatory indicators could be optimal predictors for the survival of CKD remains less studied.

Methods

In this study, participants were selected from the datasets of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 to 2018 years. Four systemic inflammatory indicators were evaluated by the peripheral blood tests including systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet*neutrophil/lymphocyte), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Kaplan-Meier curves, restricted cubic spline (RCS), and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the association between the inflammatory index with the all-cause mortality of CKD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and concordance index (C-index) were used to determine the predictive accuracy of varied systemic inflammatory indicators. Sensitive analyses were conducted to validate the robustness of the main findings.

Results

A total of 6,880 participants were included in this study. The mean age was 67.03 years old. Among the study population, the mean levels of systemic inflammatory indicators were 588.35 in SII, 2.45 in NLR, 133.85 in PLR, and 3.76 in LMR, respectively. The systemic inflammatory indicators of SII, NLR, and PLR were all significantly positively associated with the all-cause mortality of CKD patients, whereas the high value of LMR played a protectable role in CKD patients. NLR and LMR were the leading predictors in the survival of CKD patients [Hazard ratio (HR) =1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.36, p = 0.003 (3rd quartile), HR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.35-1.72, p<0.001 (4th quartile) in NLR, and HR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.75-0.92, p<0.001 (2nd quartile), HR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.65-0.82, p<0.001 (3rd quartile), and = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.65-0.83, p<0.001 (4th quartile) in LMR], with a C-index of 0.612 and 0.624, respectively. The RCS curves showed non-linearity between systemic inflammatory indicators and all-cause mortality risk of the CKD population.

Conclusion

Our study highlights that systemic inflammatory indicators are important for predicting the survival of the U.S. population with CKD. The systemic inflammatory indicators would add additional clinical value to the health care of the CKD population.

Medical Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of mortality among this population. In addition, chronic kidney disease is a major risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease and is widely regarded as a coronary artery disease risk equivalent. Medical therapy is the cornerstone of coronary artery disease management in the general population. However, there are few trials to guide medical therapy of coronary artery disease in chronic kidney disease, with most data extrapolated from clinical trials of mainly non-chronic kidney disease patients, which were not adequately powered to evaluate this subgroup. There is some evidence to suggest that the efficacy of certain therapies such as aspirin and statins is attenuated with declining estimated glomerular filtration rate, with questionable benefit among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Furthermore, chronic kidney disease and ESRD patients are at higher risk of potential side effects with therapy, which may limit their use. In this review, we summarize the available evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of medical therapy of coronary artery disease in chronic kidney disease and ESRD patients. We also discuss the data on new emerging therapies, including PCSK9i, SGLT2i, GLP1 receptor agonists, and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, which show promise at reducing risk of cardiovascular events in the chronic kidney disease population and may offer additional treatment options. Overall, dedicated studies directly evaluating chronic kidney disease patients, particularly those with advanced chronic kidney disease and ESRD, are greatly needed to establish the optimal medical therapy for coronary artery disease and improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine the evidence base for lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease, with an emphasis on reporting available data in distinct subtypes.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search (origin to February 2023) was conducted and references for selected studies were reviewed to identify additional articles. Search terms included chronic kidney disease, major adverse cardiovascular events, and heart failure hospitalization.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS

English language studies reporting cardiovascular outcomes data in patients with chronic kidney disease were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Much of the data on interventions to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease are derived from observational studies or subgroup analyses of trials of broader populations. Some common recommendations, such as weight loss, may be harmful in certain patients. Others may only offer benefits in subgroups, such as those with albuminuria. Newer agents, such as SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone, have clearer evidence of cardiovascular benefit, but these may also apply only to specific subgroups.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Given the prevalence of chronic kidney disease and its attendant cardiovascular risk, it is important to understand which interventions offer the greatest benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease have markedly increased risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death. However, until recently, there were few cardiovascular outcome studies that targeted enrollment specifically to those patients. Certain drugs now have shown benefits to cardiovascular end points in this population.

The Crosstalk between Nephropathy and Coagulation Disorder: Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Dilemmas

ABSTRACT

The interaction between the kidney and the coagulation system greatly affects each other because of the abundant vessel distribution and blood perfusion in the kidney. Clinically, the risks of complicated thrombosis and bleeding have become important concerns in the treatment of nephropathies, especially nephrotic syndrome, CKD, ESKD, and patients with nephropathy undergoing RRTs. Adverse effects of anticoagulant or procoagulant therapies in patients with nephropathy, especially anticoagulation-related nephropathy, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and bleeding, seriously worsen the prognosis of patients, which have become challenges for clinicians. Over the decades, the interaction between the kidney and the coagulation system has been widely studied. However, the effects of the kidney on the coagulation system have not been systematically investigated. Although some coagulation-related proteins and signaling pathways have been shown to improve coagulation abnormalities while avoiding additional kidney damage in certain kidney diseases, their potential as anticoagulation targets in nephropathy requires further investigation. Here, we review the progression of research on the crosstalk between the coagulation system and kidney diseases and systematically analyze the significance and shortcomings of previous studies to provide new sight into future research. In addition, we highlight the status of clinical treatment for coagulation disorder and nephropathy caused by each other, indicating guidance for the formulation of therapeutic strategies or drug development.

Antiplatelet Therapy in End-stage Renal Disease Patients on Maintenance Dialysis: a State-of-the-art Review

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on maintenance dialysis have an increased risk of ischaemic events, such as recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Potent antiplatelet therapy may help mitigate this risk. Nonetheless, ERSD patients are also at increased risk of bleeding due to their complex vascular milieu, which limits the routine use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors. Moreover, these patients are often underrepresented or excluded from major clinical trials leaving a significant gap in existing knowledge. Understanding the mechanisms of this paradox may serve as a benchmark for the development of ESRD trials. The present review aims to provide an overview of the pathophysiological nature of increased bleeding and ischaemic risks in ERSD patients as well as summarize available evidence of antiplatelet use and propose new concepts to guide physicians in selecting appropriate drug regimes for this high-risk cohort.

Bleeding during tooth extraction in patients with chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This work measures the intra-operative bleeding in end-stage renal disease patients and assesses whether laboratory coagulation tests and nitrogenous compounds are related to a higher bleeding risk.

METHODS

Laboratory tests were performed on the day of surgery and some patients with thrombocytopenia and values above the normal levels of international normalised ratio (INR), thrombin time (TT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were identified.

RESULTS

Haemostatic time ranged from 2 to 35 min (mean of 8.51 min) after suture. Bleeding volume ranged from 0.02 to 67.06 mL (mean of 4.38 mL) and the bleeding volume per minute ranged from 0.05 to 2.10 mL/min (median of 0.6 mL/min). Only seven patients (16.27%) had abnormal bleeding (more than 0.6 mL/min). Spearman's coefficient showed weak correlations between bleeding volume (mL/min) and serum urea (r = 0.226), TT (r = 0.227), plasma urea (r = 0.148) and creatinine (r = 146), as well as very weak correlations with all other variables (r < 0.140) such as age, haemodialysis time, glycaemia, glycated haemoglobin, platelets, INR, aPTT and fibrinogen.

CONCLUSION

It was not possible to associate any laboratory test or nitrogenous compounds present in the blood and saliva with an increased bleeding.

The developmental journey of therapies targeting purine receptors: from basic science to clinical trials

Since the discovery of ATP as an extracellular signalling molecule in 1972, purinergic signalling, mediated by extracellular purines and pyrimidines has been identified in virtually all mammalian tissues and is implicated in regulating fundamental cellular processes. In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on the pathophysiology and potential therapeutic interventions based on purinergic signalling. A vast range of compounds targeting purine receptors are in clinical development, and many more are in preclinical studies, which highlights the fast growth in this research field. As a tribute to Professor Geoffrey Burnstock's legacy in purinergic signalling, we present here a brief review of compounds targeting purine receptors that are in different stages of clinical trials. The review highlights the 50-year journey from basic research on purinergic receptors to clinical applications of therapies targeting purine receptors.