Autologous blood and platelet-rich plasma injection therapy for lateral elbow pain

Manual therapy and exercise for lateral elbow pain

BACKGROUND

Manual therapy and prescribed exercises are often provided together or separately in contemporary clinical practice to treat people with lateral elbow pain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both for adults with lateral elbow pain.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase, and trial registries until 31 January 2024, unrestricted by language or date of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised trials. Participants were adults with lateral elbow pain. Interventions were manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both. Primary comparators were placebo or minimal or no intervention. We also included comparisons of manual therapy and prescribed exercises with either intervention alone, with or without glucocorticoid injection. Exclusions were trials testing a single application of an intervention or comparison of different types of manual therapy or prescribed exercises.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted trial characteristics and numerical data, and assessed study risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. The main comparisons were manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both compared with placebo treatment, and with minimal or no intervention. Major outcomes were pain, disability, heath-related quality of life, participant-reported treatment success, participant withdrawals, adverse events and serious adverse events. The primary endpoint was end of intervention for pain, disability, health-related quality of life and participant-reported treatment success and final time point for adverse events and withdrawals.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three trials (1612 participants) met our inclusion criteria (mean age ranged from 38 to 52 years, 47% female, 70% dominant arm affected). One trial (23 participants) compared manual therapy to placebo manual therapy, 12 trials (1124 participants) compared manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both to minimal or no intervention, six trials (228 participants) compared manual therapy and exercise to exercise alone, one trial (60 participants) compared the addition of manual therapy to prescribed exercises and glucocorticoid injection, and four trials (177 participants) assessed the addition of manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both to glucocorticoid injection. Twenty-one trials without placebo control were susceptible to performance and detection bias as participants were not blinded to the intervention. Other biases included selection (nine trials, 39%, including two quasi-randomised), attrition (eight trials, 35%) and selective reporting (15 trials, 65%) biases. We report the results of the main comparisons. Manual therapy versus placebo manual therapy Low-certainty evidence, based upon a single trial (23 participants) and downgraded due to indirectness and imprecision, indicates manual therapy may reduce pain and elbow disability at the end of two to three weeks of treatment. Mean pain at the end of treatment was 4.1 points with placebo (0 to 10 scale) and 2.0 points with manual therapy, MD -2.1 points (95% CI -4.2 to -0.1). Mean disability was 40 points with placebo (0 to 100 scale) and 15 points with manual therapy, MD -25 points (95% CI -43 to -7). There was no follow-up beyond the end of treatment to show if these effects were sustained, and no other major outcomes were reported. Manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both versus minimal intervention Low-certainty evidence indicates manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both may slightly reduce pain and disability at the end of treatment, but the effects were not sustained, and there may be little to no improvement in health-related quality of life or number of participants reporting treatment success. We downgraded the evidence due to increased risk of performance bias and detection bias across all the trials, and indirectness due to the multimodal nature of the interventions included in the trials. At four weeks to three months, mean pain was 5.10 points with minimal treatment and manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both reduced pain by a MD of -0.53 points (95% CI -0.92 to -0.14, I2 = 43%; 12 trials, 1023 participants). At four weeks to three months, mean disability was 63.8 points with minimal or no treatment and manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both reduced disability by a MD of -5.00 points (95% CI -9.22 to -0.77, I2 = 63%; 10 trials, 732 participants). At four weeks to three months, mean quality of life was 73.04 points with minimal treatment on a 0 to 100 scale and prescribed exercises reduced quality of life by a MD of -5.58 points (95% CI -10.29 to -0.99; 2 trials, 113 participants). Treatment success was reported by 42% of participants with minimal or no treatment and 57.1% of participants with manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both, RR 1.36 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.93, I2 = 73%; 6 trials, 770 participants). We are uncertain if manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both results in more withdrawals or adverse events. There were 83/566 participant withdrawals (147 per 1000) from the minimal or no intervention group, and 77/581 (126 per 1000) from the manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both groups, RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.12, I2 = 0%; 12 trials). Adverse events were mild and transient and included pain, bruising and gastrointestinal events, and no serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events were reported by 19/224 (85 per 1000) in the minimal treatment group and 70/233 (313 per 1000) in the manual therapy, prescribed exercises or both groups, RR 3.69 (95% CI 0.98 to 13.97, I2 = 72%; 6 trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-certainty evidence from a single trial in people with lateral elbow pain indicates that, compared with placebo, manual therapy may provide a clinically worthwhile benefit in terms of pain and disability at the end of treatment, although the 95% confidence interval also includes both an important improvement and no improvement, and the longer-term outcomes are unknown. Low-certainty evidence from 12 trials indicates that manual therapy and exercise may slightly reduce pain and disability at the end of treatment, but this may not be clinically worthwhile and these benefits are not sustained. While pain after treatment was an adverse event from manual therapy, the number of events was too small to be certain.

Evaluation of the efficiency of an ultrasound-supported infiltration technique in patients with tennis elbow applying the ITEC medical device: a multicenter study

Background

The treatment of lateral epicondylitis remains unsatisfactory in certain cases. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficiency of an ultrasound-guided infiltration combined with fenestration of the extensor tendon postulating a 50% reduction in pain on exertion within 6 months.

Methods

In a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study design, 68 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis and symptoms lasted for at least 6 weeks were included. Each hospital has been assigned for Traumeel (A), autologous whole blood (B), or dextrose (C) in advance. Preinterventional, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after infiltration, patient-related outcome parameter, and dorsal wrist extension strength were documented. Preinterventional (obligate) and after 6 months (optional) radiological evaluation (magnetic resonance imaging) was performed.

Results

The Visual Analog Scale showed a significant reduction after 6 months in all groups (A. 4.8-2.5, B. 6.2-2.3, C. 5.8-2.4). Similar results could be observed with Subjective elbow value, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation. The loss of strength could be completely compensated after about 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging did not fully reflect clinical convalescence. Re-infiltrations were sometimes necessary for final reduction of symptoms (A = 11, B = 8, C = 4). Switching to surgical intervention was most frequently observed in group C (A = 2, B = 1, C = 5). In 14.5% of the cases, no improvement of the symptoms could be achieved with this method.

Conclusion

The primary hypothesis of a significant long-term pain reduction of at least 50% could be achieved regardless of the medication chosen.

[Infiltration therapies for lateral epicondylopathy]

The therapy of the lateral epicondylopathy (tennis elbow) includes drug injection into the extensor tendon insertion in chronic cases. The choice of medication and the type of injection is decisive for the success of therapy. Furthermore, accurate application is indispensable for therapy success (e.g. peppering injection technique, ultrasound-supported injection technique). Corticosteroid injection is often associated with short-term success, so that other options have found their way into everyday practice. Objectification of treatment success is usually defined by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROM). With the introduction of Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID), statistically significant results are put into perspective in terms of clinical significance. Therapy for lateral epicondylopathy was considered effective if the mean difference in score results between baseline and follow-up exceeded 1.5 points for the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 16 points for Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH), 11 points for Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), and 15 points for Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). However, the effectiveness must still be critically questioned according to meta-analytical evaluations, in which healing within 12 months was found in 90% of the cases of untreated chronic tennis elbow in the placebo groups. The use of substances, such as Traumeel (Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH, Baden-Baden, Germany), hyaluronic acid, botulinum toxin, platelet rich plasma (PRP), autologous blood or polidocanol, are based on various mechanisms. In particular, the use of PRP or autologous blood for the treatment of musculotendinous and degenerative articular pathologies has become popular, although the studies regarding effectiveness are inconsistent. PRP can be divided into leukocyte-rich (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor plasma (LP-PRP) according to its preparation. In contrast to LP-PRP, LR-PRP incorporates the middle and intermediate layers, but there is no standardized preparation described in the literature. Conclusive data regarding effective efficacy are still pending.

Update on Efficacy of Conservative Treatments for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper extremity compression neuropathy. Non-operative interventions are usually the first-line treatments, and surgery is reserved for those that do not achieve a satisfactory symptom state by non-operative means. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence regarding the efficacy of orthoses, corticosteroid injections, platelet-rich plasma injections, Kinesio taping, neurodynamic techniques, gabapentin, therapeutic ultrasound, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy in people with CTS. While many trials suggest small short-term benefits, rigorous evidence of long-term patient-important benefits is limited. To improve the utility of healthcare resources, research in this area should focus on establishing efficacy of each treatment instead of comparing various treatments with uncertain benefits.