1
|
Oldacres L, Hegarty J, O'Regan P, Murphy-Coakley NM, Saab MM. Interventions promoting cognitive function in patients experiencing cancer related cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2023; 32:214-228. [PMID: 36443527 PMCID: PMC10107470 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of interventions used to enhance cognitive function in patients experiencing cancer-related cognitive impairment. METHODS Studies including adults with a non-metastatic cancer who have received chemotherapy as part of their treatment and who have undergone interventions targeting cancer-related cognitive impairment were included. Studies involving patients with metastatic cancer and pre-existing cognitive deficits were excluded. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with full text, MEDLINE, Education Full Text, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, and ERIC were searched for studies published between January 2011 and September 2022. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two authors and cross-checked by the review team. Quality appraisal was conducted using 12 items from the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were presented narratively without meta-analysis. RESULTS Thirty-one studies were included. Interventions were categorised as integrative/complementary, cognitive behavioural therapy and compensatory strategies, exercise, psychoeducational/psychosocial, brain-training, and pharmacological. Over 100 instruments were identified, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive, Trail Making Tests-A and B, and instruments measuring secondary outcomes, including depression. Instruments often measured attention and concentration, language, memory, executive function, and/or patient-reported outcomes. Improvements were reported, with most studies measuring some or various aspects of cognitive functioning and very few studies measuring all domains of cognitive functioning, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Various interventions are available to treat cancer-related cognitive impairment. Outcome measurement was inconsistent and future research should prioritise using standardised measures. Current evidence, whilst not being definitive, suggests that certain interventions show greater promise than others, including cognitive behavioural therapy and brain training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Oldacres
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Bon Secours Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Josephine Hegarty
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Patricia O'Regan
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Mohamad M Saab
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gates NJ, Rutjes AWS, Di Nisio M, Karim S, Chong L, March E, Martínez G, Vernooij RWM. Computerised cognitive training for 12 or more weeks for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 2:CD012277. [PMID: 32104914 PMCID: PMC7045394 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012277.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing age is associated with a natural decline in cognitive function and is the greatest risk factor for dementia. Cognitive decline and dementia are significant threats to independence and quality of life in older adults. Therefore, identifying interventions that help to maintain cognitive function in older adults or that reduce the risk of dementia is a research priority. Cognitive training uses repeated practice on standardised exercises targeting one or more cognitive domains and may be intended to improve or maintain optimal cognitive function. This review examines the effects of computerised cognitive training interventions lasting at least 12 weeks on the cognitive function of healthy adults aged 65 or older and has formed part of a wider project about modifying lifestyle to maintain cognitive function. We chose a minimum 12 weeks duration as a trade-off between adequate exposure to a sustainable intervention and feasibility in a trial setting. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of computerised cognitive training interventions lasting at least 12 weeks on cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life. SEARCH METHODS We searched to 31 March 2018 in ALOIS (www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois), and we performed additional searches of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO Portal/ICTRP (www.apps.who.int/trialsearch), to ensure that the search was as comprehensive and as up-to-date as possible to identify published, unpublished, and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, published or unpublished, reported in any language. Participants were cognitively healthy people, and at least 80% of the study population had to be aged 65 or older. Experimental interventions adhered to the following criteria: intervention was any form of interactive computerised cognitive intervention - including computer exercises, computer games, mobile devices, gaming console, and virtual reality - that involved repeated practice on standardised exercises of specified cognitive domain(s) for the purpose of enhancing cognitive function; the duration of the intervention was at least 12 weeks; cognitive outcomes were measured; and cognitive training interventions were compared with active or inactive control interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We performed preliminary screening of search results using a 'crowdsourcing' method to identify RCTs. At least two review authors working independently screened the remaining citations against inclusion criteria. At least two review authors also independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included RCTs. Where appropriate, we synthesised data in random-effects meta-analyses, comparing computerised cognitive training (CCT) separately with active and inactive controls. We expressed treatment effects as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used GRADE methods to describe the overall quality of the evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We identified eight RCTs with a total of 1183 participants. The duration of the interventions ranged from 12 to 26 weeks; in five trials, the duration of intervention was 12 or 13 weeks. The included studies had moderate risk of bias, and the overall quality of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. We compared CCT first against active control interventions, such as watching educational videos. Negative SMDs favour CCT over control. Trial results suggest slight improvement in global cognitive function at the end of the intervention period (12 weeks) (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.57 to -0.05; 232 participants; 2 studies; low-quality evidence). One of these trials also assessed global cognitive function 12 months after the end of the intervention; this trial provided no clear evidence of a persistent effect (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.66 to 0.24; 77 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence). CCT may result in little or no difference at the end of the intervention period in episodic memory (12 to 17 weeks) (SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.26; 439 participants; 4 studies; low-quality evidence) or working memory (12 to 16 weeks) (SMD -0.17, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.02; 392 participants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence). Because of the very low quality of the evidence, we are very uncertain about the effects of CCT on speed of processing and executive function. We also compared CCT to inactive control (no interventions). We found no data on our primary outcome of global cognitive function. At the end of the intervention, CCT may lead to slight improvement in episodic memory (6 months) (mean difference (MD) in Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT) -0.90 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.73 to -0.07; 150 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence) but can have little or no effect on executive function (12 weeks to 6 months) (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.15; 292 participants; 2 studies; low-quality evidence), working memory (16 weeks) (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.27; 60 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence), or verbal fluency (6 months) (MD -0.11, 95% CI -1.58 to 1.36; 150 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence). We could not determine any effects on speed of processing because the evidence was of very low quality. We found no evidence on quality of life, activities of daily living, or adverse effects in either comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found low-quality evidence suggesting that immediately after completion of the intervention, small benefits of CCT may be seen for global cognitive function when compared with active controls, and for episodic memory when compared with an inactive control. These benefits are of uncertain clinical importance. We found no evidence that the effect on global cognitive function persisted 12 months later. Our confidence in the results was low, reflecting the overall quality of the evidence. In five of the eight trials, the duration of the intervention was just three months. The possibility that more extensive training could yield larger benefit remains to be more fully explored. We found substantial literature on cognitive training, and collating all available scientific information posed problems. Duration of treatment may not be the best way to categorise interventions for inclusion. As the primary interest of older people and of guideline writers and policymakers involves sustained cognitive benefit, an alternative would be to categorise by length of follow-up after selecting studies that assess longer-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Gates
- University of New South WalesCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA)Suite 407 185 Elizabeth StreetSydneyNSWAustralia2000
| | - Anne WS Rutjes
- University of BernInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)Mittelstrasse 43BernBernSwitzerland3012
- University of BernInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM)Mittelstrasse 43BernBernSwitzerland3012
| | - Marcello Di Nisio
- University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti‐PescaraDepartment of Medicine and Ageing SciencesVia dei Vestini 31Chieti ScaloItaly66013
| | - Salman Karim
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation TrustPsychiatrySceptre Point, Sceptre WayPrestonUKPR5 6AW
| | | | - Evrim March
- St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)St Vincent's Adult Mental Health46 Nicholson StreetFitzroyVICAustralia3065
| | - Gabriel Martínez
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAvenida Argentina 2000AntofagastaChile127001
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- University Medical Center UtrechtDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary CareHeidelberglaan 100UtrechtNetherlands3584 CX
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gates NJ, Rutjes AWS, Di Nisio M, Karim S, Chong L, March E, Martínez G, Vernooij RWM. Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3:CD012277. [PMID: 30864187 PMCID: PMC6414816 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012277.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing age is associated with a natural decline in cognitive function and is also the greatest risk factor for dementia. Cognitive decline and dementia are significant threats to independence and quality of life in older adults. Therefore, identifying interventions that help to maintain cognitive function in older adults or to reduce the risk of dementia is a research priority. Cognitive training uses repeated practice on standardised exercises targeting one or more cognitive domains and is intended to maintain optimum cognitive function. This review examines the effect of computerised cognitive training interventions lasting at least 12 weeks on the cognitive function of healthy adults aged 65 or older. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of computerised cognitive training interventions lasting at least 12 weeks for the maintenance or improvement of cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life. SEARCH METHODS We searched to 31 March 2018 in ALOIS (www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois) and performed additional searches of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO Portal/ICTRP (www.apps.who.int/trialsearch) to ensure that the search was as comprehensive and as up-to-date as possible, to identify published, unpublished, and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, published or unpublished, reported in any language. Participants were cognitively healthy people, and at least 80% of the study population had to be aged 65 or older. Experimental interventions adhered to the following criteria: intervention was any form of interactive computerised cognitive intervention - including computer exercises, computer games, mobile devices, gaming console, and virtual reality - that involved repeated practice on standardised exercises of specified cognitive domain(s) for the purpose of enhancing cognitive function; duration of the intervention was at least 12 weeks; cognitive outcomes were measured; and cognitive training interventions were compared with active or inactive control interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We performed preliminary screening of search results using a 'crowdsourcing' method to identify RCTs. At least two review authors working independently screened the remaining citations against inclusion criteria. At least two review authors also independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included RCTs. Where appropriate, we synthesised data in random-effect meta-analyses, comparing computerised cognitive training (CCT) separately with active and inactive controls. We expressed treatment effects as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used GRADE methods to describe the overall quality of the evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We identified eight RCTs with a total of 1183 participants. Researchers provided interventions over 12 to 26 weeks; in five trials, the duration of intervention was 12 or 13 weeks. The included studies had a moderate risk of bias. Review authors noted a lot of inconsistency between trial results. The overall quality of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes.We compared CCT first against active control interventions, such as watching educational videos. Because of the very low quality of the evidence, we were unable to determine any effect of CCT on our primary outcome of global cognitive function or on secondary outcomes of episodic memory, speed of processing, executive function, and working memory.We also compared CCT versus inactive control (no interventions). Negative SMDs favour CCT over control. We found no studies on our primary outcome of global cognitive function. In terms of our secondary outcomes, trial results suggest slight improvement in episodic memory (mean difference (MD) -0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.73 to -0.07; 150 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence) and no effect on executive function (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.15; 292 participants; 2 studies; low-quality evidence), working memory (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.27; 60 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence), or verbal fluency (MD -0.11, 95% CI -1.58 to 1.36; 150 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence). We could not determine any effects on speed of processing at trial endpoints because the evidence was of very low quality.We found no evidence on quality of life, activities of daily living, or adverse effects in either comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found little evidence from the included studies to suggest that 12 or more weeks of CCT improves cognition in healthy older adults. However, our limited confidence in the results reflects the overall quality of the evidence. Inconsistency between trials was a major limitation. In five of the eight trials, the duration of intervention was just three months. The possibility that longer periods of training could be beneficial remains to be more fully explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Gates
- University of New South WalesCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA)Suite 407 185 Elizabeth StreetSydneyNSWAustralia2000
| | - Anne WS Rutjes
- University of BernInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)Mittelstrasse 43BernBernSwitzerland3012
- University of BernInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM)Mittelstrasse 43BernBernSwitzerland3012
| | - Marcello Di Nisio
- University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti‐PescaraDepartment of Medicine and Ageing SciencesVia dei Vestini 31Chieti ScaloItaly66013
| | - Salman Karim
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation TrustPsychiatrySceptre Point, Sceptre WayPrestonUKPR5 6AW
| | | | - Evrim March
- St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)St Vincent's Adult Mental Health46 Nicholson StreetFitzroyVICAustralia3065
| | - Gabriel Martínez
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAvenida Argentina 2000AntofagastaChile127001
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gates NJ, Rutjes AWS, Di Nisio M, Karim S, Chong L, March E, Martínez G, Vernooij RWM. Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3:CD012278. [PMID: 30864746 PMCID: PMC6415131 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012278.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Normal aging is associated with changes in cognitive function that are non-pathological and are not necessarily indicative of future neurocognitive disease. Low cognitive and brain reserve and limited cognitive stimulation are associated with increased risk of dementia. Emerging evidence now suggests that subtle cognitive changes, detectable years before criteria for mild cognitive impairment are met, may be predictive of future dementia. Important for intervention and reduction in disease risk, research also suggests that engaging in stimulating mental activity throughout adulthood builds cognitive and brain reserve and reduces dementia risk. Therefore, midlife (defined here as 40 to 65 years) may be a suitable time to introduce cognitive interventions for maintaining cognitive function and, in the longer term, possibly preventing or delaying the onset of clinical dementia. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of computerised cognitive training interventions lasting at least 12 weeks for maintaining or improving cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife. SEARCH METHODS We searched up to 31 March 2018 in ALOIS (www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois), the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG). We ran additional searches in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO Portal/ICTRP at www.apps.who.int/trialsearch, to ensure that the search was as comprehensive and as up-to-date as possible, to identify published, unpublished, and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs, published or unpublished, reported in any language. Participants were cognitively healthy people between 40 and 65 years of age (80% of study population within this age range). Experimental interventions adhered to the following criteria: intervention was any form of interactive computerised cognitive intervention - including computer exercises, computer games, mobile devices, gaming console, and virtual reality - that involved repeated practice on standardised exercises of specified cognitive domain(s) for the purpose of enhancing cognitive function; duration of the intervention was at least 12 weeks; cognitive outcomes were measured; and cognitive training interventions were compared with active or inactive control interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For preliminary screening of search results, we used a 'crowd' method to identify RCTs. At least two review authors working independently screened remaining citations against inclusion criteria; independently extracted data; and assessed the quality of the included trial, using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We used GRADE to describe the overall quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We identified one eligible study that examined the effect of computerised cognitive training (CCT) in 6742 participants over 50 years of age, with training and follow-up duration of six months. We considered the study to be at high risk of attrition bias and the overall quality of the evidence to be low.Researchers provided no data on our primary outcome. Results indicate that there may be a small advantage for the CCT group for executive function (mean difference (MD) -1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.85 to -1.29; participants = 3994; low-quality evidence) and a very small advantage for the control group for working memory (MD 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.15; participants = 5831; low-quality evidence). The intervention may have had little or no effect on episodic memory (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.04; participants = 3090; low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found low-quality evidence from only one study. We are unable to determine whether computerised cognitive training is effective in maintaining global cognitive function among healthy adults in midlife. We strongly recommend that high-quality studies be undertaken to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of cognitive training in midlife, using interventions that last long enough that they may have enduring effects on cognitive and brain reserve, and with investigators following up long enough to assess effects on clinically important outcomes in later life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Gates
- University of New South WalesCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA)Suite 407 185 Elizabeth StreetSydneyAustralia2000
| | | | - Marcello Di Nisio
- University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti‐PescaraDepartment of Medicine and Ageing SciencesVia dei Vestini 31Chieti ScaloItaly66013
| | - Salman Karim
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation TrustPsychiatrySceptre Point, Sceptre WayPrestonUKPR5 6AW
| | | | - Evrim March
- St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)St Vincent's Adult Mental Health46 Nicholson StreetFitzroyAustralia3065
| | - Gabriel Martínez
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAvenida Argentina 2000AntofagastaChile127001
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167BarcelonaSpain08025
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gates NJ, Vernooij RWM, Di Nisio M, Karim S, March E, Martínez G, Rutjes AWS. Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3:CD012279. [PMID: 30864747 PMCID: PMC6415132 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012279.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of people living with dementia is increasing rapidly. Clinical dementia does not develop suddenly, but rather is preceded by a period of cognitive decline beyond normal age-related change. People at this intermediate stage between normal cognitive function and clinical dementia are often described as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Considerable research and clinical efforts have been directed toward finding disease-modifying interventions that may prevent or delay progression from MCI to clinical dementia. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of at least 12 weeks of computerised cognitive training (CCT) on maintaining or improving cognitive function and preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment. SEARCH METHODS We searched to 31 May 2018 in ALOIS (www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois) and ran additional searches in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO portal/ICTRP (www.apps.who.int/trialsearch) to identify published, unpublished, and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which cognitive training via interactive computerised technology was compared with an active or inactive control intervention. Experimental computerised cognitive training (CCT) interventions had to adhere to the following criteria: minimum intervention duration of 12 weeks; any form of interactive computerised cognitive training, including computer exercises, computer games, mobile devices, gaming console, and virtual reality. Participants were adults with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild neurocognitive disorder (MND), or otherwise at high risk of cognitive decline. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of the included RCTs. We expressed treatment effects as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and as risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes. We used the GRADE approach to describe the overall quality of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS Eight RCTs with a total of 660 participants met review inclusion criteria. Duration of the included trials varied from 12 weeks to 18 months. Only one trial used an inactive control. Most studies were at unclear or high risk of bias in several domains. Overall, our ability to draw conclusions was hampered by very low-quality evidence. Almost all results were very imprecise; there were also problems related to risk of bias, inconsistency between trials, and indirectness of the evidence.No trial provided data on incident dementia. For comparisons of CCT with both active and inactive controls, the quality of evidence on our other primary outcome of global cognitive function immediately after the intervention period was very low. Therefore, we were unable to draw any conclusions about this outcome.Due to very low quality of evidence, we were also unable to determine whether there was any effect of CCT compared to active control on our secondary outcomes of episodic memory, working memory, executive function, depression, functional performance, and mortality. We found low-quality evidence suggesting that there is probably no effect on speed of processing (SMD 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.16 to 0.56; 2 studies; 119 participants), verbal fluency (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.76 to 0.44; 3 studies; 150 participants), or quality of life (mean difference (MD) 0.40, 95% CI -1.85 to 2.65; 1 study; 19 participants).When CCT was compared with inactive control, we obtained data on five secondary outcomes, including episodic memory, executive function, verbal fluency, depression, and functional performance. We found very low-quality evidence; therefore, we were unable to draw any conclusions about these outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Currently available evidence does not allow us to determine whether or not computerised cognitive training will prevent clinical dementia or improve or maintain cognitive function in those who already have evidence of cognitive impairment. Small numbers of trials, small samples, risk of bias, inconsistency between trials, and highly imprecise results mean that it is not possible to derive any implications for clinical practice, despite some observed large effect sizes from individual studies. Direct adverse events are unlikely to occur, although the time and sometimes the money involved in computerised cognitive training programmes may represent significant burdens. Further research is necessary and should concentrate on improving methodological rigour, selecting suitable outcomes measures, and assessing generalisability and persistence of any effects. Trials with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the potential of this intervention to reduce the risk of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Gates
- University of New South WalesCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA)Suite 407 185 Elizabeth StreetSydneyAustralia2000
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167BarcelonaSpain08025
| | - Marcello Di Nisio
- University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti‐PescaraDepartment of Medicine and Ageing SciencesVia dei Vestini 31Chieti ScaloItaly66013
| | - Salman Karim
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation TrustPsychiatrySceptre Point, Sceptre WayPrestonUKPR5 6AW
| | - Evrim March
- St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)St Vincent's Adult Mental Health46 Nicholson StreetFitzroyAustralia3065
| | - Gabriel Martínez
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAvenida Argentina 2000AntofagastaChile127001
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dietary interventions for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in mid life. Hippokratia 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
7
|
Siervo M, Lara J, Munro A, Tang EYH, Rutjes AWS, Stephan B. Dietary interventions for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Siervo
- Newcastle University; Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute for Ageing and Health; Campus of Ageing and Vitality Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE4 5PL
| | - Jose Lara
- Newcastle University; Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute for Ageing and Health; Campus of Ageing and Vitality Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE4 5PL
| | - Alex Munro
- Newcastle University; Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute for Ageing and Health; Campus of Ageing and Vitality Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE4 5PL
| | - Eugene Yee Hing Tang
- Newcastle University; Institute for Ageing and Institute of Health and Society; Baddiley-Clark Building Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE2 4AX
| | - Anne WS Rutjes
- Fondazione "Università G. D'Annunzio"; Centre for Systematic Reviews; Via dei Vestini 31 Chieti Chieti Italy 66100
- University of Bern; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM); Finkenhubelweg 11 Bern Bern Switzerland 3012
| | - Blossom Stephan
- Newcastle University; Institute for Ageing and Institute of Health and Society; Baddiley-Clark Building Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE2 4AX
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tang EYH, Harrison SL, Albanese E, Gorman TJ, Rutjes AWS, Siervo M, Stephan B. Dietary interventions for prevention of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Yee Hing Tang
- Newcastle University; Institute for Ageing and Institute of Health and Society; Baddiley-Clark Building Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE2 4AX
| | - Stephanie L Harrison
- Newcastle University; Institute of Health and Society; Baddiley-Clark Building Richardson Road Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE2 4AX
| | - Emiliano Albanese
- King's College London; Health Service and Population Research; De Crespigny Park London UK SE22 0HP
| | - Thomas J Gorman
- Newcastle University; Institute of Health and Society; Baddiley-Clark Building Richardson Road Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE2 4AX
| | - Anne WS Rutjes
- Fondazione "Università G. D'Annunzio"; Centre for Systematic Reviews; Via dei Vestini 31 Chieti Chieti Italy 66100
- University of Bern; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM); Finkenhubelweg 11 Bern Bern Switzerland 3012
| | - Mario Siervo
- Newcastle University; Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute for Ageing and Health; Campus of Ageing and Vitality Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE4 5PL
| | - Blossom Stephan
- Newcastle University; Institute for Ageing and Institute of Health and Society; Baddiley-Clark Building Newcastle upon Tyne UK NE2 4AX
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Forbes SC, Forbes D, Forbes S, Blake CM, Chong LY, Thiessen EJ, Rutjes AWS, Little JP. Exercise interventions for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Scott C Forbes
- Okanagan College; Biology, Human Kinetics; Penticton Campus 583 Duncan Avenue West Penticton BC Canada V2A 8E1
| | - Dorothy Forbes
- University of Alberta; Faculty of Nursing; level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy Edmonton AB Canada T6G 1C9
| | - Sean Forbes
- University of Florida; Department of Physical Therapy; 100 S. Newell Drive, McKnight Brain Institute, rm L3-183 Gainesville FL USA 32610
| | - Catherine M Blake
- University of Western Ontario; School of Nursing, Health Sciences Addition H022; 1151 Richmond Street London ON Canada N6A 3K7
| | | | - Emily J Thiessen
- University of Alberta; Faculty of Nursing; level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy Edmonton AB Canada T6G 1C9
| | - Anne WS Rutjes
- Fondazione "Università G. D'Annunzio"; Centre for Systematic Reviews; via dei Vestini 31 Chieti Chieti Italy 66100
- University of Bern; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM); Finkenhubelweg 11 Bern Bern Switzerland 3012
- University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences; via dei Vestini 31 Chieti Chieti Italy 66100
| | - Jonathan P Little
- University of British Columbia Okanagan; School of Health and Exercise Sciences; 3333 University Way Kelowna BC Canada V1V 1V7
| |
Collapse
|