1
|
Al-wageeh S, Alyhari QA, Ahmed F, Altam A, Alshehari G, Badheeb M. Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Alvarado Score and Abdominal Ultrasound for Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Open Access Emerg Med 2024; 16:159-166. [PMID: 38994039 PMCID: PMC11236940 DOI: 10.2147/oaem.s462013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Acute appendicitis is a complex diagnosis that often requires both clinical and radiological evaluation. Significant variations in diagnostic approaches are evident among clinicians and healthcare institutions. While certain guidelines advocate for risk stratification based on clinical characteristics, others emphasize the importance of pre-operative imaging. This study seeks to explore the accuracy of the Alvarado Score and abdominal ultrasound (AUS) in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods Suspected cases of appendicitis admitted to Al-Thora Hospital in Ibb, Yemen, from Jan 2021 to July 2022 were evaluated. The demographics, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. This study assessed Alvarado scores (calculated based on clinical evaluation and laboratory data) and pre-operative AUS findings, correlating them with post-operative and histopathology findings. The Alvarado scores and AUS sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed using the ROC curve. Results Out of 1021 cases of acute abdomen, 171 patients were suspected of appendicitis. Using AUS along with the Alvarado score, appendicitis was presumed in 137 patients who underwent appendectomy. 130 (94.9%) patients had positive intraoperative and histopathology findings while 7 (5.1%) had negative findings. The Alvarado Score had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.62% and 87.80% at cutoffs of 6, respectively [Area under the curve (AUC): 0.985; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.954 to 0.998; p < 0.0001]. Abdominal US showed a sensitivity of 98.46% and specificity of 82.93% (AUC:0.907; 95% CI, 0.853 to 0.946; p < 0.0001). Conclusion Alvarado's score and AUS exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing acute appendicitis. The substantial accuracy and efficacy of both the Alvarado score and AUS support their utilization as primary investigative tools in resource-limited settings. This approach can help avoid unnecessary appendectomies and minimize the financial burden on patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleh Al-wageeh
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen
| | | | - Faisal Ahmed
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen
| | - Abdulfattah Altam
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, 21 September University, Sana’a, Yemen
| | - Gubran Alshehari
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen
| | - Mohamed Badheeb
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale New-Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stiegler C, Kapitza C, Weber F, Patalakh W, Schäfer C. Case report: A rare cause of intestinal perforation in a third-trimester pregnant woman. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1387043. [PMID: 39021822 PMCID: PMC11251912 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1387043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background An acute abdomen is a medical emergency that requires early diagnosis and treatment. In pregnancy, this process is significantly more challenging, and radiological findings are sometimes unclear due to the enlarged uterus displacing other structures. Moreover, endometriosis-related complications are rare, and the disease is often undiagnosed. Case presentation We report a case of acute perforation of the cecum and appendix during pregnancy (35 weeks of gestation) caused by a previously unknown, deep infiltrating endometriosis with focal ulceration of the affected bowel wall, which sonographically seemed to be acute appendicitis. Conclusion Despite the relatively low risk, clinicians should be aware of possible endometriosis-associated complications in pregnancy with potentially life-threatening events, even in previously unknown endometriosis. Further studies should evaluate intestinal complications during pregnancy in relation to previous treatment of intestinal endometriosis (conservative vs. surgical).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Stiegler
- Medical Department II, Klinikum Neumarkt, Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz, Germany
| | - Christopher Kapitza
- Medical Department II, Klinikum Neumarkt, Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz, Germany
| | - Florian Weber
- Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wladimir Patalakh
- Department for Surgery, Klinikum Neumarkt, Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz, Germany
| | - Claus Schäfer
- Medical Department II, Klinikum Neumarkt, Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Donald N, Halliday L, Smith G, Dighe S. Risk Factors Associated With Negative Appendicectomy Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cureus 2024; 16:e64509. [PMID: 39139307 PMCID: PMC11320375 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common emergency general surgical condition worldwide. Diagnosis is challenging and incorporates clinical, biochemical and radiological investigations. Our aim was to provide data from routine practice investigating widely utilised diagnostic methods from a single centre within the United Kingdom. METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent a laparoscopic appendicectomy for AA between April 2022 and March 2023. AA was defined as the presence of transmural polymorphonuclear leukocytes in histology. Subgroup analysis was performed on paediatric patients. Factors associated with AA were investigated, and the diagnostic utility of biochemical and radiological investigations was examined. RESULTS A total of 330 appendicectomies were analysed. We found an overall negative appendicectomy rate (NAR) of 38% and 48% in paediatric patients. Independent factors associated with AA on the multivariate analysis included elevated neutrophil counts (>7 × 109/L) (OR 4.04), elevated CRP (>5 mg/L) (OR 3.04) and a radiological diagnosis (OR 8.0). Computerised tomography (CT) and ultrasound had sensitivity/specificity of 98%/47% and 35%/86%, respectively. The positive-predictive values were 85% for CT and 50% for ultrasound, and the negative-predictive values were 86% for CT and 77% for ultrasound. CONCLUSION Our study has highlighted the importance of utilising a combination of factors to improve the diagnostic certainty of AA. However, our routine practice data have shown different sensitivities and specificities of imaging in comparison to existing literature, resulting in a high NAR. Further real-world data are needed to understand whether these differences from the existing data are seen in other clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Donald
- General Surgery, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, GBR
| | - Laura Halliday
- General Surgery, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, GBR
- Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, GBR
| | - Gillian Smith
- General Surgery, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, GBR
| | - Shwetal Dighe
- General Surgery, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krishnan N, Pakkasjärvi N, Kainth D, Arredondo Montero J, Danielson J, Verma P, Verma A, Yadav DK, Anand S. Utility of thiol/disulphide homeostasis as a biomarker for acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2024; 40:152. [PMID: 38847871 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05728-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the role of thiol/disulfide homeostasis (TDH) parameters as an indicator of oxidative stress in acute appendicitis (AA). PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies reporting on TDH in AA (both complicated and uncomplicated cases) were included. The comparator group were healthy controls. The TDH domain was compared between the groups using anti-oxidant parameters, namely native thiol and total thiol levels, and native thiol/total thiol ratio; and oxidant parameters, namely disulfide level, disulfide/native thiol ratio, and disulfide/total thiol ratio. The statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Eleven studies with a total of 926 subjects, comprising 457 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 147 with complicated appendicitis, and 322 healthy controls were included. Our study demonstrated significantly increased oxidative stress in AA as compared to healthy controls in all TDH parameters and significantly lower total thiol levels in complicated AA as compared to uncomplicated AA. Due to a poor methodological quality in five out of eleven studies, future prospective studies with adequate power are essential to validate these observations and refine the diagnostic approaches to AA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nellai Krishnan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, 110029, Delhi, India
| | - Niklas Pakkasjärvi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, New Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Section of Urology, University Children's Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Deepika Kainth
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Johan Danielson
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Section of Urology, University Children's Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pulkit Verma
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Verma
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, 110029, Delhi, India
| | - Devendra Kumar Yadav
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, 110029, Delhi, India
| | - Sachit Anand
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, 110029, Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Badawy I, Mbaya K, Metwally H. Acute Appendicitis Presenting As Left Flank Pain: A Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e62181. [PMID: 38993448 PMCID: PMC11239144 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common surgical emergency. The diagnosis is mainly clinical and is largely based on the typical presentation of periumbilical pain radiating to the right iliac fossa. However, atypical presentations have been reported in the literature. Left-sided appendicitis is a rare presentation. Imaging with ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) is of paramount importance in such cases to aid diagnosis and exclude other causes. We report a case of a 21-year-old man who presented with acute left flank pain. He was diagnosed with AA by CT, which showed an appendix diameter of 13 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Badawy
- Urgent Care Department, Mediclinic Hospital, Al Ain, ARE
| | - Khaled Mbaya
- Urgent Care Department, Mediclinic Hospital, Al Ain, ARE
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Morin CE, Karakas P, Vorona G, Sreedher G, Brian JM, Chavhan GB, Chung T, Griffin LM, Kaplan SL, Moore M, Schenker K, Subramanian S, Aquino M. The Society for Pediatric Radiology Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Emergency and Trauma Imaging Committees' consensus protocol recommendation for rapid MRI for evaluating suspected appendicitis in children. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:12-19. [PMID: 38049531 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05819-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
The imaging evaluation of acute abdominal pain in children with suspected appendicitis has evolved to include rapid abdominopelvic MRI (rMRI) over recent years. Through a collaborative effort between the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Emergency and Trauma Imaging Committees of the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR), we conducted a survey on the utilization of rMRI to assess practice specifics and protocols. Subsequently, we present a proposed consensus rMRI protocol derived from the survey results, literature review, and discussion and consensus between committee members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara E Morin
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
| | | | - Gregory Vorona
- Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | | | - James M Brian
- Department of Radiology, Penn State Children's Hospital, Penn State Health, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA
| | - Govind B Chavhan
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Taylor Chung
- UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, USA
| | | | - Summer L Kaplan
- Department of Radiology Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Michael Moore
- Department of Radiology, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Kathleen Schenker
- Department of Radiology, Nemours Children's Hospital, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | | | - Michael Aquino
- Section of Pediatric Imaging, Cleveland Clinic Imaging Institute and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western University, Cleveland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dirie J, Suleman H, Karimjee H. The Effect of Preoperative Imaging on the Negative Appendicectomy Rate. Cureus 2023; 15:e41809. [PMID: 37575745 PMCID: PMC10422921 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain and appendicectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures. The proliferation of radiological imaging has reduced the number of patients who have a normal appendix removed, i.e., a negative appendicectomy. We aimed to assess the effect of preoperative imaging on the negative appendicectomy rate (NAR). Methodology All emergency appendicectomies performed at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom over two separate one-year periods were retrospectively analysed using emergency theatre log books. The timeframes were chosen based on the introduction of a diagnostic pathway to reduce the number of appendicectomies performed on patients later found not to have appendicitis or alternative abnormality, i.e., a negative appendicectomy. This pathway involved a greater emphasis placed on preoperative imaging (CT or ultrasound) for patients with suspected appendicitis. The study excluded any patients who were found to have an alternative pathology during surgery. Information technology databases were used to collect data on patient demographics, date of surgery, histology, and any preoperative imaging that was performed. All histological findings showing acutely inflamed appendices and those positive for malignancy were categorised as positive, whereas all other findings were categorised as negative. Results During our initial data collection period (April 2018 to April 2019), we collected data on 207 patients who underwent an appendicectomy. The NAR was 17%. During our subsequent data collection period (August 2020 to August 2021), we collected data on 184 patients. The NAR was 16%. In our adult population, the NAR decreased from 13% to 9%. Discussion At first glance, the NAR does not seem to have improved. On closer look, all patients over the age of 21 years in our re-audit underwent pr-operative CT, and there was a reduction in the NAR in these patients. The issue arises with younger patients, in whom justifying the radiation associated with a CT scan may be difficult. Although ultrasound does not carry the same radiation risk, previous audits at our trust have that shown its sensitivity and specificity for appendicitis is approximately 60%. We may have to explore alternative imaging modalities such as MRI in the paediatric population or accept the higher NAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamal Dirie
- General Surgery, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, GBR
| | - Humza Suleman
- General Surgery, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, GBR
| | - Hussain Karimjee
- General Surgery, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim D, Woodham BL, Chen K, Kuganathan V, Edye MB. Rapid MRI Abdomen for Assessment of Clinically Suspected Acute Appendicitis in the General Adult Population: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1473-1485. [PMID: 37081221 PMCID: PMC10366263 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05626-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a systematic review on the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen to evaluate clinically suspected appendicitis in the general adult population. We examined the diagnostic accuracy, the reported trends of MRI use, and the factors that affect the utility of MRI abdomen, including study duration and cost-benefits. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. We enrolled primary studies investigating the use of MRI in diagnosing appendicitis in the general adult population, excluding studies that predominantly reported on populations not representative of typical adult appendicitis presentations, such as those focusing on paediatric or pregnant populations. RESULTS Twenty-seven eligible primary studies and 6 secondary studies were included, totaling 2,044 patients from eight countries. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for diagnosing appendicitis were 96% (95% CI: 93-97%) and 93% (95% CI: 80-98%), respectively. MRI can identify complicated appendicitis and accurately propose alternative diagnoses. The duration of MRI protocols in each primary study ranged between 2.26 and 30 minutes, and only one study used intravenous contrast agents in addition to the non-contrast sequences. Decision analysis suggests significant benefits for replacing computed tomography (CT) with MRI and a potential for cost reduction. Reported trends in MRI usage showed minimal utilisation in diagnostic settings even when MRI was available. CONCLUSIONS MRI accurately diagnoses appendicitis in the general adult population and improves the identification of complicated appendicitis or alternative diagnoses compared to other modalities using a single, rapid investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongchan Kim
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, N.S.W. Australia
| | - Benjamin Luke Woodham
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, N.S.W. Australia
- Department of General Surgery, Blacktown and Mount Druitt Hospitals, Blacktown Road, Blacktown, N.S.W. Australia
| | - Kathryn Chen
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, N.S.W. Australia
| | - Vinushan Kuganathan
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, N.S.W. Australia
| | - Michael Benjamin Edye
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, N.S.W. Australia
- Department of General Surgery, Blacktown and Mount Druitt Hospitals, Blacktown Road, Blacktown, N.S.W. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
8/m mit rechtsseitigen Unterbauchschmerzen. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00112-022-01533-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
10
|
Ghani R, O’Connor A, Sajid I, Johnson G, Ullah S. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the paediatric population with acute right iliac fossa pain, our District General Hospital experience. THE ULSTER MEDICAL JOURNAL 2022; 91:26-29. [PMID: 35169335 PMCID: PMC8835414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
AIM This project aimed to evaluate the role of ultrasound scan (USS) in children presenting with acute onset right iliac fossa (RIF) pain and suspected appendicitis. METHODS We retrospectively studied 100 consecutive children undergoing USS for RIF pain. Children with low to moderate clinical probability of appendicitis were seen by the surgical team and subsequently underwent USS by a radiologist or a sonographer with a special interest in paediatric USS. The clinical findings, blood tests, and radiological diagnosis led to a decision to operate, observe or discharge. USS findings were subsequently verified with the final histology. The six-month follow-up data of these patients were also analysed. RESULTS 35 males, median age of 11 years (range 4-17), and 65 females, median age of 14 years (range 6-18) were included. A total of 23 appendicectomies were performed. On histology appendicitis was confirmed in 20, including 16 pre-operatively diagnosed on USS. 6 of these appendicectomies were performed on clinical suspicion with normal USS. 1 patient was diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumour of the appendix. Only 2 negative appendicectomies were performed. 62 patients were discharged without intervention. USS sensitivity was 74%, and specificity was 92% for appendicitis. An additional 16 patients were identified with alternate pathology including 5 ovarian cysts. CONCLUSION Appendicitis was more common in male patients; however, there was no difference in overall disease prevalence in male or female paediatric patients. Thus, USS is a valuable tool to exclude appendicitis in children with low to moderate probability.
Collapse
|
11
|
D'Souza N, Hicks G, Beable R, Higginson A, Rud B. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 12:CD012028. [PMID: 34905621 PMCID: PMC8670723 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012028.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendicitis remains a difficult disease to diagnose, and imaging adjuncts are commonly employed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging test that can be used to diagnose appendicitis. It is not commonly regarded as a first-line imaging test for appendicitis, but the reported diagnostic accuracy in some studies is equivalent to computed tomography (CT) scans. As it does not expose patients to radiation, it is an attractive imaging modality, particularly in women and children. OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting appendicitis in all patients. Secondary objectives: To investigate the accuracy of MRI in subgroups of pregnant women, children, and adults. To investigate the potential influence of MRI scanning variables such as sequences, slice thickness, or field of view. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase until February 2021. We searched the references of included studies and other systematic reviews to identify further studies. We did not exclude studies that were unpublished, published in another language, or retrospective. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that compared the outcome of an MRI scan for suspected appendicitis with a reference standard of histology, intraoperative findings, or clinical follow-up. Three study team members independently filtered search results for eligible studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently extracted study data and assessed study quality using the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy - Revised (QUADAS-2) tool. We used the bivariate model to calculate pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. MAIN RESULTS We identified 58 studies with sufficient data for meta-analysis including a total of 7462 participants (1980 with and 5482 without acute appendicitis). Estimates of sensitivity ranged from 0.18 to 1.0; estimates of specificity ranged from 0.4 to 1.0. Summary sensitivity was 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 0.97); summary specificity was 0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97). Sensitivity and specificity remained high on subgroup analysis for pregnant women (sensitivity 0.96 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.99); specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98); 21 studies, 2282 women); children (sensitivity 0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97); specificity 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.98); 17 studies, 2794 children); and adults (sensitivity 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.97); specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.98); 9 studies, 1088 participants), as well as different scanning techniques. In a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients, there would be 12 false-positive results and 30 false-negative results. Methodological quality of the included studies was poor, and the risk of bias was high or unclear in 53% to 83% of the QUADAS-2 domains. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS MRI appears to be highly accurate in confirming and excluding acute appendicitis in adults, children, and pregnant women regardless of protocol. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low due to incomplete and low standards of follow-up, so summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity may be biased. We could not assess the impact and direction of potential bias given the very low number of high-quality studies. Studies comparing MRI protocols were few, and although we found no influence of MRI protocol variables on the summary estimates of accuracy, our results do not rule out that some MRI protocols are more accurate than others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Bo Rud
- Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre , Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|