Hydrosurgical debridement versus conventional surgical debridement for acute partial-thickness burns

Efficacy of hydrosurgical eschar excision following MEEK microskin grafting in patients with massive burns: A retrospective study of a single center

INTRODUCTION

One of the most common traumatic injuries, burn injuries lead to at least 180,000 deaths each year worldwide. Massive burns result in severe tissue loss and increase the rate of infection. Eschar excision with skin grafting is the gold standard of treatments for massive burns. Retaining dermis tissue is the key to ensuring the survival of skin grafts and rapidly closing exposed tissues. Traditional eschar excision with Humby or Weck knife controls the depth of excision until the dermis, but ensuring the accuracy of excision is challenging. Hydrosurgery minimizes damage to uninjured tissues during the removal of necrotic tissues. A foot pedal is used to adjust debridement depth for precise debridement. To figure out the clinical advantages and risks of using hydrosurgery in treating massive burns, this study has been conducted.

METHOD

Forty-two patients with massive burns and total body surface area (TBSA) of > 30% were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from May 2020 to January 2023. They underwent hydrosurgical eschar excision with MEEK microskin graft (n = 23) or tangential excision with MEEK microskin graft (n = 19).

RESULT

No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in the following demographics were found between the two groups: age, weight, TBSA, deep-partial-thickness burn, gender, inhalation injury, shock, excision area, and MEEK ratio. By contrast, statistically significant differences in per unit area of operation time, per unit area of operation spending, hospitalization cost, hospitalization duration, wound-healing time, skin graft survival, and scar quality were found between hydrosurgical excision group with MEEK microskin graft and conventional excision group with MEEK microskin graft.

CONCLUSION

The hydrosurgical excision system showed better clinical effects for patients with massive burns.

[Burns and Diabetes Mellitus: Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation and Prognosis]

Burns in diabetics are quite frequent and serious in relation to diabetic neuropathy, which is common in this population, delaying healing and predisposing to the risk of infection. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of burns in diabetics hospitalized at the CTB of Tunis over 18 months. During the study period, 891 patients were hospitalized, including 43 diabetics (5%). The average age of our patients was 57 years old with a male predominance (65%). Type 2 diabetes was present in 86% of cases and type 1 diabetes in 14% of cases. Degenerative complications were reported in 10 cases (23%), such as diabetic retinopathy (n=6), diabetic nephropathy (n=4) and diabetic neuropathy (n=6). The circumstances of burns were related to a domestic accident in 2/3 of the cases (76.7%). Thermal burns were involved in 83.7% of cases. 86% of the patients had decompensated their diabetes during their hospitalization. Sepsis marked the evolution of the patients in 55.8% of cases. In our study, poor prognostic factors were: a glycosylated haemoglobin > 13%, an extent of burns greater than 20%, and a delay in consultation greater than 6 hours. The mortality rate was 18.6%.

In situ gelling hydrogel loaded with berberine liposome for the treatment of biofilm-infected wounds

Background: In recent years, the impact of bacterial biofilms on traumatic wounds and the means to combat them have become a major research topic in the field of medicine. The eradication of biofilms formed by bacterial infections in wounds has always been a huge challenge. Herein, we developed a hydrogel with the active ingredient berberine hydrochloride liposomes to disrupt the biofilm and thereby accelerate the healing of infected wounds in mice. Methods: We determined the ability of berberine hydrochloride liposomes to eradicate the biofilm by means of studies such as crystalline violet staining, measuring the inhibition circle, and dilution coating plate method. Encouraged by the in vitro efficacy, we chose to coat the berberine hydrochloride liposomes on the Poloxamer range of in-situ thermosensitive hydrogels to allow fuller contact with the wound surface and sustained efficacy. Eventually, relevant pathological and immunological analyses were carried out on wound tissue from mice treated for 14 days. Results: The final results show that the number of wound tissue biofilms decreases abruptly after treatment and that the various inflammatory factors in them are significantly reduced within a short period. In the meantime, the number of collagen fibers in the treated wound tissue, as well as the proteins involved in healing in the wound tissue, showed significant differences compared to the model group. Conclusion: From the results, we found that berberine liposome gel can accelerate wound healing in Staphylococcus aureus infections by inhibiting the inflammatory response and promoting re-epithelialization as well as vascular regeneration. Our work exemplifies the efficacy of liposomal isolation of toxins. This innovative antimicrobial strategy opens up new perspectives for tackling drug resistance and fighting wound infections.

Enhanced healing of oral chemical burn by inhibiting inflammatory factors with an oral administration of shengFu oil

ShengFu oil is a compounded Chinese medicinal prescription, and provides antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic effects, favoring burn wound repair. In this study, we aimed at investigating the effects of topical applications of ShengFu oil and its active ingredients in oral chemical burns and elucidating its regulatory effects on β-catenin, COX-2, and MMP-9 expression caused by exposure to acid or alkaline agents. ShengFu oil contains 16 components, such as Frankincense, Radix Scutellariae and Radix Rehmanniae, and the main active ingredients from Frankincense are α-pinene, linalool, and n-octanol. Mouse models of oral chemical burns were induced by using glacial acetic acid or sodium hydroxide. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical staining were used to detect the protein expressions of β-catenin, COX-2, and MMP-9 in wound tissues. They were further quantified by multispectral imaging analysis to clarify the effective mechanism of ShengFu oil for intervening inflammatory factors and active components. Our results indicated that the application of ShengFu oil on oral chemical burns effectively stopped the oral burn bleeding and reduced the inflammatory reaction in the damaged tissues, demonstrating that ShengFu oil can promote wound tissue repair in burns caused by heat, acids, and alkalis. The immunohistochemical staining results illustrated that ShengFu oil and its active ingredients significantly reversed the abnormal changes in inflammation-related proteins in mouse tongue tissues that were caused by chemical burns. Regarding long-term toxic effects of ShengFu oil on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and kidney system, the results of hematoxylin and eosin staining experiments depicted that ShengFu oil was safe and effective for liver, kidney, intestine, esophagus, and tongue. All of these demonstrated that ShengFu oil and its active ingredients are effective and safe in preventing and treating oral chemical burns by interfering with the inflammatory microenvironment.

From the Cochrane Library: Hydrosurgical Debridement Versus Conventional Surgical Debridement for Acute Partial-Thickness Burns

Collapse

Hydrosurgical and conventional debridement of burns: randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Tangential excision of burned tissue followed by skin grafting is the cornerstone of burn surgery. Hydrosurgery has become popular for tangential excision, with the hypothesis that enhanced preservation of vital dermal tissue reduces scarring. The aim of this trial was to compare scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional debridement before split-skin grafting.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized within-patient multicentre controlled trial was conducted in patients with burns that required split-skin grafting. One wound area was randomized to hydrosurgical debridement and the other to Weck knife debridement. The primary outcome was scar quality at 12 months, assessed with the observer part of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Secondary outcomes included complications, scar quality, colour, pliability, and histological dermal preservation.

RESULTS

Some 137 patients were randomized. At 12 months, scars of the hydrosurgical debrided wounds had a lower POSAS observer total item score (mean 2.42 (95 per cent c.i. 2.26 to 2.59) versus 2.54 (95 per cent c.i. 2.36 to 2.72; P = 0.023)) and overall opinion score (mean 3.08 (95 per cent c.i. 2.88 to 3.28) versus 3.30 (95 per cent c.i. 3.09-3.51); P = 0.006). Patient-reported scar quality and pliability measurements were significantly better for the hydrosurgically debrided wounds. Complication rates did not differ between both treatments. Histologically, significantly more dermis was preserved with hydrosurgery (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

One year after surgery scar quality and pliability was better for hydrosurgically debrided burns, probably owing to enhanced histological preservation of dermis.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

Trial NL6085 (NTR6232 (http://www.trialregister.nl)).

A simple, safe and easily accessible polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel for wound cleaning

Acute wounds are often contaminated by some kind of filth, and fluids are usually used to wash away the dirt, but the force of the fluid may cause secondary injury at the wound site or even increase the risk of infection. Hydrogels have several advantages over liquid scouring since they are less intense, more portable, and easier to control. In this study, poly(vinyl alcohol) was used to prepared a series of hydrogels, which were tested in terms of their properties and abilities to clean simulated dirty wounds. Simulated dirt and bacterial (Serratia marcescens) adhesion experiments demonstrated that they could effectively adhere to a certain amount of dirt or bacteria to achieve the purpose of wound cleaning. In addition to the bacterial adhesion, the antibacterial experiments also proved that the hydrogels have a certain inhibitory effect on the proliferation of E.coli and S.aureus. The hydrogels could change shape freely and exhibited excellent biocompatibility, ductility, and self-healing capabilities, which increase their service life and make them more suitable for treating wounds or acting as protection buffers. Based on all these characteristics, the developed hydrogel may be a potentially valuable material for wound cleaning.

Early non-excisional debridement of paediatric burns under general anaesthesia reduces time to re-epithelialisation and risk of skin graft

Reported advantages of early excision for larger burn injuries include reduced morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay for adult burn patients. However, a paucity of evidence supports the best option for paediatric burns and the advantages of non-excisional (mechanical) debridement. Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department is a popular alternative to debridement in operating theatres under general anaesthesia. This study aims to evaluate the association between early (< 24 h post-injury) non-excisional debridement under general anaesthesia with burn wound re-epithelialisation time and skin graft requirements. Cohort study of children younger than 17 years who presented with burns of five percent total body surface area or greater. Data from January 2013 to December 2019 were extracted from a prospectively collected state-wide paediatric burns' registry. Time to re-epithelialisation was tested using survival analysis, and binary logistic regression for odds of skin graft requirementto analyse effects of early non-excisional debridement in the operating theatre. Overall, 292 children met eligibility (males 55.5%). Early non-excisional debridement under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre, significantly reduced the time to re-epithelialisation (14 days versus 21 days, p = 0.029)) and the odds of requiring a skin graft in comparison to paediatric patients debrided in the emergency department under Ketamine sedation (OR: 6.97 (2.14-22.67), p < 0.001. This study is the first to demonstrate that early non-excisional debridement under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre significantly reduces wound re-epithelialisation time and subsequent need for a skin graft in paediatric burn patients. Analysis suggests that ketamine procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department used for burn wound debridement is not an effective substitute for debridement in the operating theatre.