Stem cell-based interventions for the prevention of morbidity and mortality following hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in newborn infants

Delayed Double Treatment with Adult-Sourced Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Increases Striatal Medium-Spiny Neuronal Number, Decreases Striatal Microglial Number, and Has No Subventricular Proliferative Effect, after Acute Neonatal Hypoxia-Ischemia in Male Rats

Perinatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) is a major cause of striatal injury. Delayed post-treatment with adult-sourced bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) increased the absolute number of striatal medium-spiny neurons (MSNs) following perinatal HI-induced brain injury. Yet extraction of BMSCs is more invasive and difficult compared to extraction of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), which are easily sourced from subcutaneous tissue. Adult-sourced AD-MSCs are also superior to BMSCs in the treatment of adult ischemic stroke. Therefore, we investigated whether delayed post-treatment with adult-sourced AD-MSCs increased the absolute number of striatal MSNs following perinatal HI-induced brain injury. This included investigation of the location of injected AD-MSCs within the brain, which were widespread in the dorsolateral subventricular zone (dlSVZ) at 1 day after their injection. Cells extracted from adult rat tissue were verified to be stem cells by their adherence to tissue culture plastic and their expression of specific ‘cluster of differentiation’ (CD) markers. They were verified to be AD-MSCs by their ability to differentiate into adipocytes and osteocytes in vitro. Postnatal day (PN) 7/8, male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to either HI right-sided brain injury or no HI injury. The HI rats were either untreated (HI + Diluent), single stem cell-treated (HI + MSCs×1), or double stem cell-treated (HI + MSCs×2). Control rats that were matched-for-weight and litter had no HI injury and were treated with diluent (Uninjured + Diluent). Treatment with AD-MSCs or diluent occurred either 7 days, or 7 and 9 days, after HI. There was a significant increase in the absolute number of striatal dopamine and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein (DARPP-32)-positive MSNs in the double stem cell-treated (HI + MSCs×2) group and the normal control group compared to the HI + Diluent group at PN21. We therefore investigated two potential mechanisms for this effect of double-treatment with AD-MSCs. Specifically, did AD-MSCs: (i) increase the proliferation of cells within the dlSVZ, and (ii) decrease the microglial response in the dlSVZ and striatum? It was found that a primary repair mechanism triggered by double treatment with AD-MSCs involved significantly decreased striatal inflammation. The results may lead to the development of clinically effective and less invasive stem cell therapies for neonatal HI brain injury.

The Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell as Therapy in Neonatal Diseases

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can be derived from various tissue sources, such as the bone marrow (BMSCs), adipose tissue (ADSCs), umbilical cord (UC-MSCs) and umbilical cord blood (UCB-MSCs). Clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the potential of MSCs in ameliorating neonatal diseases, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). In preclinical studies, MSC therapy has been tested for the treatment of various neonatal diseases affecting the heart, eye, gut, and brain as well as sepsis. Up to date, the number of clinical trials using MSCs to treat neonatal diseases is still limited. The data reported thus far positioned MSC therapy as safe with positive outcomes. However, most of these trials are still preliminary and generally smaller in scale. Larger trials with more appropriate controls and a longer follow-up period need to be conducted to prove the safety and efficacy of the therapy more conclusively. This review discusses the current application of MSCs in treating neonatal diseases, its mechanism of action and future direction of this novel therapy, including the potential of using MSC-derived extracellular vesicles instead of the cells to treat various clinical conditions in the newborn.

Stem cell-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of germinal matrix-intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Germinal matrix-intraventricular haemorrhage (GMH-IVH) remains a substantial issue in neonatal intensive care units worldwide. Current therapies to prevent or treat GMH-IVH are limited. Stem cell-based therapies offer a potential therapeutic approach to repair, restore, and/or regenerate injured brain tissue. These preclinical findings have now culminated in ongoing human neonatal studies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of stem cell-based interventions for prevention or treatment of germinal matrix-intraventricular haemorrhage (GM-IVH) in preterm infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 1), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 7 January 2019); Embase (1980 to 7 January 2019); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to 7 January 2019). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We attempted to identify randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials, and cluster trials comparing (1) stem cell-based interventions versus control; (2) mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) of type or source versus MSCs of other type or source; (3) stem cell-based interventions other than MSCs of type or source versus stem cell-based interventions other than MSCs of other type or source; or (4) MSCs versus stem cell-based interventions other than MSCs. For prevention studies, we included extremely preterm infants (less than 28 weeks' gestation), 24 hours of age or less, without ultrasound diagnosis of GM-IVH; for treatment studies, we included preterm infants (less than 37 weeks' gestation), of any postnatal age, with ultrasound diagnosis of GM-IVH.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For each of the included trials, two review authors independently planned to extract data (e.g. number of participants, birth weight, gestational age, type and source of MSCs, other stem cell-based interventions) and assess the risk of bias (e.g. adequacy of randomisation, blinding, completeness of follow-up). Primary outcomes considered in this review are all-cause neonatal mortality, major neurodevelopmental disability, GM-IVH, and extension of pre-existing non-severe GM-IVH. We planned to use the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 769 references. We did not find any completed studies for inclusion. One randomised controlled trial is currently registered and ongoing. Five phase 1 trials are described in the excluded studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently no evidence is available to show the benefits or harms of stem cell-based interventions for treatment or prevention of GM-IVH in preterm infants.