Tailored or adapted interventions for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and at least one other long-term condition: a mixed methods review

Supporting self-management for patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases: Utility and acceptability of digital devices

INTRODUCTION

Patients diagnosed with Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) use devices to self-monitor their health and well-being. Little is known about the range of devices, selection, frequency and terms of use and overall utility. We sought to quantify patients' usage and experiences with home digital devices, and further evaluate their perceived utility and barriers to adaptation.

METHODS

A team of expert clinicians and patient partners interested in self-management approaches designed a 48-question cross-sectional electronic survey; specifically targeted at individuals diagnosed with ILD. The survey was critically appraised by the interdisciplinary self-management group at Royal Devon University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust during a 6-month validation process. The survey was open for participation between September 2021 and December 2022, and responses were collected anonymously. Data were analysed descriptively for quantitative aspects and through thematic analysis for qualitative input.

RESULTS

104 patients accessed the survey and 89/104 (86%) reported a diagnosis of lung fibrosis, including 46/89 (52%) idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with 57/89 (64%) of participants diagnosed >3 years and 59/89 (66%) female. 52/65(80%) were in the UK; 33/65 (51%) reported severe breathlessness medical research council MRC grade 3-4 and 32/65 (49%) disclosed co-morbid arthritis or joint problems. Of these, 18/83 (22%) used a hand- held spirometer, with only 6/17 (35%) advised on how to interpret the readings. Pulse oximetry devices were the most frequently used device by 35/71 (49%) and 20/64 (31%) measured their saturations more than once daily. 29/63 (46%) of respondents reported home-monitoring brought reassurance; of these, for 25/63 (40%) a feeling of control. 10/57 (18%) felt it had a negative effect, citing fluctuating readings as causing stress and 'paranoia'. The most likely help-seeking triggers were worsening breathlessness 53/65 (82%) and low oxygen saturation 43/65 (66%). Nurse specialists were the most frequent source of help 24/63 (38%). Conclusion: Patients can learn appropriate technical skills, yet perceptions of home-monitoring are variable; targeted assessment and tailored support is likely to be beneficial.

The Valuable Prognostic Impact of Regional Lymph Node Removed on Outcomes for IIIA N0 NSCLC Patients

Background: Regional lymph nodes (RLNs) removed combined with surgery is a standard option for patients at stage I to IIIA NSCLC. The objective of the study is to clarify the effect of removing different number of RLNs on survival outcomes for patients at stage IIIA N0 NSCLC. Methods: Patients at stage IIIA N0 NSCLC from 2004 to 2015 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Prior propensity score method (PSM), survival time was compared among different number (0, 1-3 and ≥4) of RLNs removed groups. After PSM, lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analyses were used to clarify the impact of the factors on the prognosis with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 11,583 patients at stage IIIA N0 NSCLC were included. Prior PSM, survival indicators including 1-year mortality rate, 5-year mortality rate, median survival time (MDST) and mean survival time (MST) from good to bad were all: ≥4, 1-3 and none RLNs removed group. After PSM, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate Cox regression analyses on OS and LCSS revealed a statistically significance on survival curve (P<0.001) between each two of the three groups (none, 1-3 and ≥4 RLNs removed group). Multivariable Cox regression analyses on OS and LCSS showed an independent association of RLNs removed with higher OS (HR, 0.275; 95% CI, 0.259-0.291; P<0.001) and LCSS (HR, 0.239; 95% CI, 0.224-0.256; P<0.001) compared with none RLN removed and no statistical difference with OS (HR, 1.118; 95% CI, 0.983-1.271; P=0.088) and LCSS (HR, 1.107; 95% CI, 0.954-1.284; P=0.179) between 1-3 RLNs removed and ≥4 RLNs removed. Conclusions: Removing RLNs was beneficial to survival outcomes of patients at stage IIIA N0 NSCLC. Compared with 1-3 RLNs removed, ≥4 RLNs removed could bring a better survival time but not an independent prognostic factor (P>0.05).

Quantitative evaluation of diaphragmatic motion during forced breathing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients using dynamic chest radiography

Objective

To quantitatively evaluate the bilateral diaphragmatic motion difference during forced breathing between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and healthy individuals using dynamic chest radiography technique.

Methods

This prospective study included the COPD patients (n: 96, f/m: 17/79, age: 66 ± 8 years old) and healthy individuals (n: 50, f/m: 42/8, age: 53 ± 5 years old) that underwent dynamic chest radiography with a flat panel X-ray detector system during forced breathing in a standing position. After analyzing the excursions, duration and velocity of diaphragmatic motion were automatically calculated using the postprocessing software. The parameters of diaphragmatic motion including excursion, duration, velocity, inhalation/exhalation times were assessed in all subjects for both diaphragms. The correlation between lung function parameters and diaphragmatic motion excursions were further evaluated.

Results

The excursions of diaphragmatic motion in COPD patients were significantly decreased in COPD patients compared with healthy individuals during forced breathing (P < 0.05). The excursion in COPD patients was 35.93 ± 13.07 mm vs. 41.49 ± 12.07 mm in healthy individuals in the left diaphragm, and 32.05 ± 12.29 mm in COPD patients vs. 36.88 ± 10.96 mm in healthy individuals in the right diaphragm. The duration of diaphragmatic motion significantly decreased in COPD patients, compared with the healthy individuals (P < 0.05). The inhalation time in COPD patients was 2.03 ± 1.19 s vs. 2.53 ± 0.83 s in healthy individuals in the left diaphragm and 1.94 ± 1.32 s in COPD patients vs. 2.23 ± 1.21 s in healthy individuals in the right diaphragm. The exhalation time was 4.77 ± 1.32 s in COPD patients vs. 6.40 ± 2.73 s in healthy individuals in the left diaphragm and 4.94 ± 3.30 s in COPD patients vs. 6.72 ± 2.58 s in healthy individuals in the right diaphragm. The peak velocity of diaphragmatic motion showed no significant difference between COPD and healthy groups. The excursions of bilateral diaphragmatic motion showed moderate correlation with FEV1/FVC (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). Multi-linear regression analysis showed that the excursions of bilateral diaphragm are significantly associated with COPD occurrence (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The excursions and duration of diaphragmatic motion during forced breathing are significantly decreased in COPD patients, compared with healthy individuals. Our study showed that precise bilateral diaphragmatic motion activity can be evaluated by dynamic chest radiography.

Closing the Gap between Inpatient and Outpatient Settings: Integrating Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Technological Advances in the Comprehensive Management of Frail Patients

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a well-established intervention supported by strong evidence that is used to treat patients affected by chronic respiratory diseases. However, several barriers still affect its spreading in rehabilitation clinical practices. Although chronic respiratory diseases are common age-related disorders, there is still a gap of knowledge regarding the implementation of sustainable strategies integrating PR in the rehabilitation management of frail patients at high risk of respiratory complications. Therefore, in the present study, we characterized the effects of PR in frail patients, highlighting the evidence supporting its role in improving the complex rehabilitative management of these patients. Moreover, we propose a novel organizational model promoting PR programs for frail patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Our model emphasizes the role of interdisciplinary care, specifically tailored to patients and environmental characteristics. In this scenario, cutting-edge technology and telemedicine solutions might be implemented as safe and sustainable strategies filling the gap between inpatient and outpatient settings. Future research should focus on large-scale sustainable interventions to improve the quality of life and global health of frail patients. Moreover, evidence-based therapeutic paths should be promoted and taught in training courses promoting multiprofessional PR knowledge to increase awareness and better address its delivery in frail patients.

Tailored or adapted interventions for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and at least one other long-term condition: a mixed methods review

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory condition characterised by shortness of breath, cough and recurrent exacerbations. People with COPD often live with one or more co-existing long-term health conditions (comorbidities). People with more severe COPD often have a higher number of comorbidities, putting them at greater risk of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of any single intervention for COPD adapted or tailored to their comorbidity(s) compared to any other intervention for people with COPD and one or more common comorbidities (quantitative data, RCTs) in terms of the following outcomes: Quality of life, exacerbations, functional status, all-cause and respiratory-related hospital admissions, mortality, pain, and depression and anxiety. To assess the effectiveness of an adapted or tailored single COPD intervention (simple or complex) that is aimed at changing the management of people with COPD and one or more common comorbidities (quantitative data, RCTs) compared to usual care in terms of the following outcomes: Quality of life, exacerbations, functional status, all-cause and respiratory-related hospital admissions, mortality, pain, and depression and anxiety. To identify emerging themes that describe the views and experiences of patients, carers and healthcare professionals when receiving or providing care to manage multimorbidities (qualitative data).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched multiple databases including the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, to identify relevant randomised and qualitative studies. We also searched trial registries and conducted citation searches. The latest search was conducted in January 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared a) any single intervention for COPD adapted or tailored to their comorbidity(s) compared to any other intervention, or b) any adapted or tailored single COPD intervention (simple or complex) that is aimed at changing the management of people with COPD and one or more comorbidities, compared to usual care. We included qualitative studies or mixed-methods studies to identify themes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods for analysis of the RCTs. We used Cochrane's risk of bias tool for the RCTs and the CASP checklist for the qualitative studies. We planned to use the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool (MMAT) to assess the risk of bias in mixed-methods studies, but we found none. We used GRADE and CERQual to assess the quality of the quantitative and qualitative evidence respectively. The primary outcome measures for this review were quality of life and exacerbations.

MAIN RESULTS

Quantitative studies We included seven studies (1197 participants) in the quantitative analyses, with interventions including telemonitoring, pulmonary rehabilitation, treatment optimisation, water-based exercise training and case management. Interventions were either compared with usual care or with an active comparator (such as land-based exercise training). Duration of trials ranged from 4 to 52 weeks. Mean age of participants ranged from 64 to 72 years and COPD severity ranged from mild to very severe. Trials included either people with COPD and a specific comorbidity (including cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, lung cancer, head or neck cancer, and musculoskeletal conditions), or with one or more comorbidities of any type. Overall, we judged the evidence presented to be of moderate to very low certainty (GRADE), mainly due to the methodological quality of included trials and imprecision of effect estimates. Intervention versus usual care Quality of life as measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score may improve with tailored pulmonary rehabilitation compared to usual care at 52 weeks (mean difference (MD) -10.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.66 to -9.04; 1 study, 70 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tailored pulmonary rehabilitation is likely to improve COPD assessment test (CAT) scores compared with usual care at 52 weeks (MD -8.02, 95% CI -9.44 to -6.60; 1 study, 70 participants, moderate-certainty evidence) and with a multicomponent telehealth intervention at 52 weeks (MD -6.90, 95% CI -9.56 to -4.24; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence is uncertain about effects of pharmacotherapy optimisation or telemonitoring interventions on CAT improvement compared with usual care. There may be little to no difference in the number of people experiencing exacerbations, or mean exacerbations with case management compared with usual care (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.57; 1 study, 470 participants; very low-certainty evidence). For secondary outcomes, six-minute walk distance (6MWD) may improve with pulmonary rehabilitation, water-based exercise or multicomponent interventions at 38 to 52 weeks (low-certainty evidence). A multicomponent intervention may result in fewer people being admitted to hospital at 17 weeks, although there may be little to no difference in a telemonitoring intervention. There may be little to no difference between intervention and usual care for mortality. Intervention versus active comparator We included one study comparing water-based and land-based exercise (30 participants). We found no evidence for quality of life or exacerbations. There may be little to no difference between water- and land-based exercise for 6MWD (MD 5 metres, 95% CI -22 to 32; 38 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Qualitative studies One nested qualitative study (21 participants) explored perceptions and experiences of people with COPD and long-term conditions, and of researchers and health professionals who were involved in an RCT of telemonitoring equipment. Several themes were identified, including health status, beliefs and concerns, reliability of equipment, self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, factors affecting usefulness and perceived usefulness, attitudes and intention, self-management and changes in healthcare use. We judged the qualitative evidence presented as of very low certainty overall.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Owing to a paucity of eligible trials, as well as diversity in the intervention type, comorbidities and the outcome measures reported, we were unable to provide a robust synthesis of data. Pulmonary rehabilitation or multicomponent interventions may improve quality of life and functional status (6MWD), but the evidence is too limited to draw a robust conclusion. The key take-home message from this review is the lack of data from RCTs on treatments for people living with COPD and comorbidities. Given the variation in number and type of comorbidity(s) an individual may have, and severity of COPD, larger studies reporting individual patient data are required to determine these effects.