Certolizumab pegol for maintenance of medically induced remission in Crohn's disease

Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children: Current Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, has emerged as a significant global health challenge with rising incidence rates. Unlike adult inflammatory bowel disease, PIBD presents complexities, including growth impairment, nutritional deficiencies, and psychosocial challenges that necessitate tailored management strategies. This article reviews current diagnostic and emerging treatment strategies to highlight the evolution from traditional therapies such as aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators to advanced biologic agents like infliximab and adalimumab. Emerging biological therapies, including vedolizumab and ustekinumab, show promise, while novel small molecule therapies such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are under investigation for potential use in the pediatric population. Supportive treatments, including exclusive enteral nutrition, modified diets, and probiotics, play a critical role in comprehensive disease management. Stem cell therapy and fecal microbiota transplant represent innovative approaches still under clinical evaluation. The review underscores the significance of holistic care, incorporating mind-body interventions and psychosocial support to improve patient quality of life. Key challenges persist, such as infection risks associated with long-term biological therapy use, gaps in pediatric-specific guidelines, and the limited inclusion of children in clinical trials. Future recommendations emphasize the importance of structured transition programs bridging pediatric and adult care, regular updates to clinical guidelines, and the integration of precision medicine to personalize treatment plans. Continued research and collaboration are essential for advancing the understanding and management of PIBD, ensuring that pediatric patients benefit from the most effective, evidence-based care available.

Worldwide research trends in Crohn's disease treatment over the past 2 decades: a bibliometric analysis

Background

The treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) has received widespread attention in clinical practice, but there is currently a lack of quantitative evaluation of the literature published in this field. This study aimed to describe the development trends and research hotspots of CD treatment through bibliometric analysis.

Methods

Publications related to CD treatment published from 2004 to 2023 were searched in the WoSCC. Microsoft Office Excel 2021 was used for the analysis and visualization of the annual number of publications. CiteSpace was used to visualize the collaboration networks of authors, institutions, and countries, as well as to construct a reference timeline visualization map and identify keywords with the strongest citation bursts.

Results

The bibliometric analysis included 25,608 publications between 2004 and 2023. The most productive year was 2021. The United States of America (n = 7,891) and the University of California System (n = 939) are the country and institution with the most published papers, respectively. Among the 97,564 authors, Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent (n = 424) published the most articles. The core journals were Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Journal of Crohns and Colitis, Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, etc. The timeline view showed that "#5 JAK Inhibitor" was the most recent topic. The keywords that burst and persist from 2020 to 2023 include "ustekinumab" and "vedolizumab".

Conclusion

An increasing number of researchers are dedicating their efforts to exploring the treatment of CD, with the United States making the largest contribution to this field. Currently, the research hotspots predominantly involve drug therapy including ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and JAK inhibitors. Our study provides valuable information for scholars studying CD treatment.

Infliximab for medical induction of remission in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralises tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which is present in high levels in the blood serum, mucosa and stool of people with Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of infliximab alone or in combination with another agent for induction of remission in Crohn's disease compared to placebo or active medical therapies.

SEARCH METHODS

On 31 August 2021 and 4 March 2023, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization ICTRP.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing infliximab alone or in combination with another agent to placebo or another active comparator in adults with active Crohn's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Pairs of review authors independently selected studies and conducted data extraction and risk of bias assessment. We expressed outcomes as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. Our primary outcomes were clinical remission, clinical response and withdrawals due to adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were endoscopic remission, histological remission, endoscopic response, and serious and total adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

The search identified 10 RCTs with 1101 participants. They were conducted between 1999 and 2019, and 7/10 RCTs included biologically naive participants. All but one RCT, which did not provide information, were multicentre and funded by pharmaceutical companies, and their authors declared conflicts. The age of the participants ranged from 26 to 65 years. Results were based on one study unless otherwise stated. Infliximab 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg may be more effective than placebo at week four for clinical remission (30/55 versus 3/25; RR 4.55, 95% CI 1.53 to 13.50; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3) and response (36/55 versus 4/25; RR 4.09, 95% CI 1.63 to 10.25, NNTB 3). The evidence was low certainty. The study did not report withdrawals due to adverse events. We could not draw conclusions on the effects of infliximab 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg compared to placebo for fistulating participants for clinical remission (29/63 versus 4/31; RR 3.57, 95% CI 1.38 to 9.25; NNTB 4), response (48/106 versus 15/75; RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.41; NNTB 6; 2 studies) or withdrawals due to adverse events (2/63 versus 0/31; RR 2.50, 95% CI 0.12 to 50.54). The evidence was very low certainty. Infliximab used in combination with purine analogues is probably more effective than purine analogues alone for clinical remission at weeks 24 to 26 (182/301 versus 95/302; RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.32, NNTB 4; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and clinical response at week 26 (107/177 versus 66/178; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.05; NNTB 5; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events at week 26 (62/302 versus 53/301; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.21; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). Infliximab alone may be more effective than purine analogues alone at week 26 for clinical remission (85/177 versus 57/178; RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.95; NNTB 7; 2 studies) and response (94/177 versus 66/178; RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.82; NNTB 7; 2 studies). There may be little or no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events (30/177 versus 43/178; RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.06; 4 studies). The evidence was low certainty. We could not draw any conclusions on the effects of infliximab 5 mg/kg compared to 10 mg/kg for clinical remission (19/27 versus 11/28; RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.02) and response (22/27 versus 24/28; RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.46). The evidence was very low certainty. Withdrawals due to adverse events were not reported. We could not draw any conclusions on the effects of infliximab 5 mg/kg compared to 10 mg/kg in an exclusively fistulating population for clinical remission (17/31 versus 12/32; RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.53), response (21/31 versus 18/32; RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.78), or withdrawals due to adverse events (1/31 versus 1/32; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.07 to 15.79). The evidence was very low certainty. We could not draw any conclusions on the effects of infliximab 5 mg/kg compared to 20 mg/kg for clinical remission (19/27 versus 11/28; RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.02) or response (22/27 versus 18/28; RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.76). The evidence was very low certainty. Withdrawals due to adverse events were not reported. We could not draw any conclusions on the effects of infliximab 10 mg/kg compared to 20 mg/kg for clinical remission (11/28 versus 11/28; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.92) or response (14/28 versus 18/28; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.23). The evidence was very low certainty. Withdrawals due to adverse events were not reported. There may be little or no difference between infliximab and a CT-P13 biosimilar at week six for clinical remission (47/109 versus 49/111; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.32), response (67/109 versus 70/111; RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.20) and withdrawals due to adverse events (21/109 versus 17/111; RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.25). The evidence was low certainty.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab in combination with purine analogues is probably more effective than purine analogues alone in inducing clinical remission and clinical response. Infliximab alone may be more effective in inducing clinical remission and response than purine analogues alone or placebo. Infliximab may be similar in efficacy to a CT-P13 biosimilar and there may be little or no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events. We were unable to draw meaningful conclusions as to whether infliximab alone is effective when used for exclusively fistulating populations. There was evidence that there may be little or no difference in withdrawal due to adverse events between infliximab plus purines compared with purines alone, as well as infliximab alone compared with purines alone. Meaningful conclusions cannot be drawn on all other outcomes related to adverse events due to very low certainty evidence.