1
|
Forbes G, Akter S, Miller S, Galadanci H, Qureshi Z, Al-Beity FA, Hofmeyr GJ, Moran N, Fawcus S, Singata-Madliki M, Wakili AA, Amole TG, Musa BM, Dankishiya F, Atterwahmie AA, Muhammad AS, Ekweani J, Nzeribe E, Osoti A, Gwako G, Okore J, Kikula A, Metta E, Mwampashi A, Evans C, Mammoliti KM, Devall A, Coomarasamy A, Gallos I, Oladapo OT, Bohren MA, Lorencatto F. Development and Piloting of Implementation Strategies to Support Delivery of a Clinical Intervention for Postpartum Hemorrhage in Four sub-Saharan Africa Countries. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2024; 12:e2300387. [PMID: 39261009 PMCID: PMC11521548 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-23-00387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains the leading cause of maternal mortality. A new clinical intervention (E-MOTIVE) holds the potential to improve early PPH detection and management. We aimed to develop and pilot implementation strategies to support uptake of this intervention in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and Tanzania. METHODS Implementation strategy development: We triangulated findings from qualitative interviews, surveys and a qualitative evidence synthesis to identify current PPH care practices and influences on future intervention implementation. We mapped influences using implementation science frameworks to identify candidate implementation strategies before presenting these at stakeholder consultation and design workshops to discuss feasibility, acceptability, and local adaptations. Piloting: The intervention and implementation strategies were piloted in 12 health facilities (3 per country) over 3 months. Interviews (n=58), case report forms (n=1,269), and direct observations (18 vaginal births, 7 PPHs) were used to assess feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity. RESULTS Implementation strategy development: Key influences included shortages of drugs, supplies, and staff, limited in-service training, and perceived benefits of the intervention (e.g., more accurate PPH detection and reduced PPH mortality). Proposed implementation strategies included a PPH trolley, on-site simulation-based training, champions, and audit and feedback. Country-specific adaptations included merging the E-MOTIVE intervention with national maternal health trainings, adapting local PPH protocols, and PPH trollies depending on staff needs. Piloting: Intervention and implementation strategy fidelity differed within and across countries. Calibrated drapes resulted in earlier and more accurate PPH detection but were not consistently used at the start. Implementation strategies were feasible to deliver; however, some instances of limited use were observed (e.g., PPH trolley and skills practice after training). CONCLUSION Systematic intervention development, piloting, and process evaluation helped identify initial challenges related to intervention fidelity, which were addressed ahead of a larger-scale effectiveness evaluation. This has helped maximize the internal validity of the trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Forbes
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shahinoor Akter
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Suellen Miller
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hadiza Galadanci
- Africa Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Zahida Qureshi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - G Justus Hofmeyr
- Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand and Walter Sisulu University, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - Neil Moran
- KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Sue Fawcus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mandisa Singata-Madliki
- Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand and Walter Sisulu University, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Aminu Ado Wakili
- Africa Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Taiwo Gboluwaga Amole
- Africa Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Baba Maiyaki Musa
- Africa Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Faisal Dankishiya
- Africa Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | | | - Alfred Osoti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - George Gwako
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jenipher Okore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Amani Kikula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Global Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Emmy Metta
- Department of Behavioural Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Ard Mwampashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Cherrie Evans
- Maternal and Newborn Health Unit, Technical Leadership and Innovation, Jhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kristie-Marie Mammoliti
- WHO Collaborating Centre on Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Devall
- WHO Collaborating Centre on Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- WHO Collaborating Centre on Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ioannis Gallos
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olufemi T Oladapo
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fabiana Lorencatto
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akter S, Forbes G, Vazquez Corona M, Miller S, Althabe F, Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID, Oladapo OT, Vogel JP, Lorencatto F, Bohren MA. Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 11:CD013795. [PMID: 38009552 PMCID: PMC10680124 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013795.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), defined as blood loss of 500 mL or more after childbirth, is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. It is possible to prevent complications of PPH with timely and appropriate detection and management. However, implementing the best methods of PPH prevention, detection and management can be challenging, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVES Our overall objective was to explore the perceptions and experiences of women, community members, lay health workers, and skilled healthcare providers who have experience with PPH or with preventing, detecting, and managing PPH, in community or health facility settings. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and grey literature on 13 November 2022 with no language restrictions. We then performed reference checking and forward citation searching of the included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with an identifiable qualitative component. We included studies that explored perceptions and experiences of PPH prevention, detection, and management among women, community members, traditional birth attendants, healthcare providers, and managers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used three-stage maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in terms of relevance of the study to the review objectives, richness of data, and coverage of critical contextual elements: setting (region, country income level), perspective (type of participant), and topic (prevention, detection, management). We extracted data using a data extraction form designed for this review. We used thematic synthesis to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and we used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in each finding. To identify factors that may influence intervention implementation, we mapped each review finding to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability, Motivation, and Opportunity model of Behaviour change (COM-B). We used the Behaviour Change Wheel to explore implications for practice. MAIN RESULTS We included 67 studies and sampled 43 studies for our analysis. Most were from low- or middle-income countries (33 studies), and most included the perspectives of women and health workers. We downgraded our confidence in several findings from high confidence to moderate, low, or very-low confidence, mainly due to concerns about how the studies were conducted (methodological limitations) or concerns about missing important perspectives from some types of participants or in some settings (relevance). In many communities, bleeding during and after childbirth is considered "normal" and necessary to expel "impurities" and restore and cleanse the woman's body after pregnancy and birth (moderate confidence). In some communities, people have misconceptions about causes of PPH or believe that PPH is caused by supernatural powers or evil spirits that punish women for ignoring or disobeying social rules or for past mistakes (high confidence). For women who give birth at home or in the community, female family members or traditional birth attendants are the first to recognise excess bleeding after birth (high confidence). Family members typically take the decision of whether and when to seek care if PPH is suspected, and these family members are often influenced by trusted traditional birth attendants or community midwives (high confidence). If PPH is identified for women birthing at home or in the community, decision-making about the subsequent referral and care pathway can be multifaceted and complex (high confidence). First responders to PPH are not always skilled or trained healthcare providers (high confidence). In health facilities, midwives may consider it easy to implement visual estimation of blood loss with a kidney dish or under-pad, but difficult to accurately interpret the amount of blood loss (very low confidence). Quantifying (rather than estimating) blood loss may be a complex and contentious change of practice for health workers (low confidence). Women who gave birth in health facilities and experienced PPH described it as painful, embarrassing, and traumatic. Partners or other family members also found the experience stressful. While some women were dissatisfied with their level of involvement in decision-making for PPH management, others felt health workers were best placed to make decisions (moderate confidence). Inconsistent availability of resources (drugs, medical supplies, blood) causes delays in the timely management of PPH (high confidence). There is limited availability of misoprostol in the community owing to stockouts, poor supply systems, and the difficulty of navigating misoprostol procurement for community health workers (moderate confidence). Health workers described working on the maternity ward as stressful and intense due to short staffing, long shifts, and the unpredictability of emergencies. Exhausted and overwhelmed staff may be unable to appropriately monitor all women, particularly when multiple women are giving birth simultaneously or on the floor of the health facility; this could lead to delays in detecting PPH (moderate confidence). Inadequate staffing, high turnover of skilled health workers, and appointment of lower-level cadres of health workers are key challenges to the provision of quality PPH care (high confidence). Through team-based simulation training, health workers of different cadres (doctors, midwives, lay health workers) can develop a shared mental model to help them work quickly, efficiently, and amicably as a team when managing women with PPH (moderate confidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight how improving PPH prevention, detection, and management is underpinned by a complex system of interacting roles and behaviours (community, women, health workers of different types and with different experiences). Multiple individual, sociocultural, and environmental factors influence the decisions and behaviours of women, families, communities, health workers, and managers. It is crucial to consider the broader health and social systems when designing and implementing PPH interventions to change or influence these behaviours. We have developed a set of prompts that may help programme managers, policymakers, researchers, and other key stakeholders to identify and address factors that affect implementation and scale-up of interventions to improve PPH prevention, detection, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahinoor Akter
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gillian Forbes
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martha Vazquez Corona
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Suellen Miller
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, and Safe Motherhood Program, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Fernando Althabe
- Department of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ioannis D Gallos
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olufemi T Oladapo
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joshua P Vogel
- Maternal and Child Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bohren MA, Lorencatto F, Coomarasamy A, Althabe F, Devall AJ, Evans C, Oladapo OT, Lissauer D, Akter S, Forbes G, Thomas E, Galadanci H, Qureshi Z, Fawcus S, Hofmeyr GJ, Al-Beity FA, Kasturiratne A, Kumarendran B, Mammoliti KM, Vogel JP, Gallos I, Miller S. Formative research to design an implementation strategy for a postpartum hemorrhage initial response treatment bundle (E-MOTIVE): study protocol. Reprod Health 2021; 18:149. [PMID: 34261508 PMCID: PMC8278177 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01162-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal death worldwide. When PPH occurs, early identification of bleeding and prompt management using evidence-based guidelines, can avert most PPH-related severe morbidities and deaths. However, adherence to the World Health Organization recommended practices remains a critical challenge. A potential solution to inefficient and inconsistent implementation of evidence-based practices is the application of a 'clinical care bundle' for PPH management. A clinical care bundle is a set of discrete, evidence-based interventions, administered concurrently, or in rapid succession, to every eligible person, along with teamwork, communication, and cooperation. Once triggered, all bundle components must be delivered. The E-MOTIVE project aims to improve the detection and first response management of PPH through the implementation of the "E-MOTIVE" bundle, which consists of (1) Early PPH detection using a calibrated drape, (2) uterine Massage, (3) Oxytocic drugs, (4) Tranexamic acid, (5) Intra Venous fluids, and (6) genital tract Examination and escalation when necessary. The objective of this paper is to describe the protocol for the formative phase of the E-MOTIVE project, which aims to design an implementation strategy to support the uptake of this bundle into practice. METHODS We will use behavior change and implementation science frameworks [e.g. capability, opportunity, motivation and behavior (COM-B) and theoretical domains framework (TDF)] to guide data collection and analysis, in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania. There are four methodological components: qualitative interviews; surveys; systematic reviews; and design workshops. We will triangulate findings across data sources, participant groups, and countries to explore factors influencing current PPH detection and management, and potentially influencing E-MOTIVE bundle implementation. We will use these findings to develop potential strategies to improve implementation, which will be discussed and agreed with key stakeholders from each country in intervention design workshops. DISCUSSION This formative protocol outlines our strategy for the systematic development of the E-MOTIVE implementation strategy. This focus on implementation considers what it would take to support roll-out and implementation of the E-MOTIVE bundle. Our approach therefore aims to maximize internal validity in the trial alongside future scalability, and implementation of the E-MOTIVE bundle in routine practice, if proven to be effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04341662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
| | | | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK
| | - Fernando Althabe
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Adam J Devall
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK
| | - Cherrie Evans
- Maternal & Newborn Health Unit, Technical Leadership Office, Jhpiego, Johns Hopkins University, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| | - Olufemi T Oladapo
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David Lissauer
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Research Institute, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, William Henry Duncan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Shahinoor Akter
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Gillian Forbes
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Thomas
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK
| | - Hadiza Galadanci
- Africa Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, Bayero University, Kano, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Zahida Qureshi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Kenyatta National Hospital Campus, Old Mbagathi Road, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sue Fawcus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Grooteschuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Floor H Old Main Building, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - G Justus Hofmeyr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Botswana, Notwane Rd, Gaborone, Botswana
- University of the Witwatersrand, Amalinda Drive, East London, South Africa
- Walter Sisulu University, Amalinda Drive, East London, South Africa
| | - Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, United Nation Road, Upanga, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Anuradhani Kasturiratne
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, 6, Thalagolla Road, Ragama, 11010, Sri Lanka
| | - Balachandran Kumarendran
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, Adiyapatham Road, Kokkuvil, Sri Lanka
| | - Kristie-Marie Mammoliti
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK
| | - Joshua P Vogel
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Ioannis Gallos
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK
| | - Suellen Miller
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, Bixby Center, Safe Motherhood Program, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|