In vivo genome-editing screen identifies tumor suppressor genes that cooperate with Trp53 loss during mammary tumorigenesis

Advances in personalized medicine: translating genomic insights into targeted therapies for cancer treatment

Background

Personalized medicine has revolutionized cancer treatment by utilizing genomic insights to tailor therapies based on individual molecular profiles. This approach enhances therapeutic efficacy, minimizes adverse effects, and addresses tumor heterogeneity through precision-targeted interventions.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted through a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, using MeSH terms and keywords related to genomic profiling and targeted cancer therapies. Eligible studies included original research involving cancer patients who underwent genomic profiling and targeted therapies from January 1, 1950, to February 9, 2025.

Results

Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and bioinformatics have accelerated the identification of clinically relevant mutations-such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and BRAF V600E in melanoma-enabling the development of effective targeted therapies. Emerging technologies like clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene editing and artificial intelligence (AI) are further refining treatment selection by enabling more precise and adaptive therapeutic strategies. Despite these innovations, challenges persist regarding data interpretation, equitable access, costs, regulatory frameworks, and integration into routine clinical workflows.

Conclusions

Genomic profiling is central to the advancement of precision oncology. The convergence of genomics, gene editing, and AI is paving the way toward more personalized, efficient, and inclusive cancer care. Realizing the full potential of personalized medicine will require interdisciplinary collaboration, investment in infrastructure, and ethical oversight to ensure broad, equitable, and responsible implementation in clinical practice.

Recent progress on the organoids: Techniques, advantages and applications

Organoids are a cutting-edge technology in the life sciences field, with applications in precision medicine, bionic organs, and toxicological evaluations of chemicals. Their 3D structure closely resembles that of real organs, allowing more accurate functional mimicry. The 3D organoid culture system can simulate the growth state of cells in vivo and establish a suspension culture system for organoid 3D culture by using scaffold-less or scaffold technology to avoid direct contact between cells and plastic culture vessels. Furthermore, organoids can simulate the pathophysiological state of tissues and organs in vitro. This paper primarily discusses the construction methodologies, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of 3D culture systems for both scaffold-free organoids and scaffolded organoids. This review also summarizes the application of organoid models in chemical toxicology evaluation, drug screening and functional evaluation, establishment of in vitro disease models, and research on disease occurrence and potential mechanisms. The aim is to provide a reference for the research and practical applications of organoid-related scientific fields.

Combinatorial In Vivo Genome Editing Identifies Widespread Epistasis and an Accessible Fitness Landscape During Lung Tumorigenesis

Lung adenocarcinoma, the most common subtype of lung cancer, is genomically complex, with tumors containing tens to hundreds of non-synonymous mutations. However, little is understood about how genes interact with each other to enable the evolution of cancer in vivo, largely due to a lack of methods for investigating genetic interactions in a high-throughput and quantitative manner. Here, we employed a novel platform to generate tumors with inactivation of pairs of ten diverse tumor suppressor genes within an autochthonous mouse model of oncogenic KRAS-driven lung cancer. By quantifying the fitness of tumors with every single and double mutant genotype, we show that most tumor suppressor genetic interactions exhibited negative epistasis, with diminishing returns on tumor fitness. In contrast, Apc inactivation showed positive epistasis with the inactivation of several other genes, including synergistic effects on tumor fitness in combination with Lkb1 or Nf1 inactivation. Sign epistasis was extremely rare, suggesting a surprisingly accessible fitness landscape during lung tumorigenesis. These findings expand our understanding of the interactions that drive tumorigenesis in vivo.

Organoid Cultures for the Study of Mammary Biology and Breast Cancer: The Promise and Challenges

During the last decade, biomedical research has experienced a resurgence in the use of three-dimensional culture models for studies of normal and cancer biology. This resurgence has been driven by the development of models in which primary cells are grown in tissue-mimicking media and extracellular matrices to create organoid or organotypic cultures that more faithfully replicate the complex architecture and physiology of normal tissues and tumors. In addition, patient-derived tumor organoids preserve the three-dimensional organization and characteristics of the patient tumors ex vivo, becoming excellent preclinical models to supplement studies of tumor xenografts transplanted into immunocompromised mice. In this perspective, we provide an overview of how organoids are being used to investigate normal mammary biology and as preclinical models of breast cancer and discuss improvements that would enhance their utility and relevance to the field.

Combinatorial in vivo genome editing identifies widespread epistasis during lung tumorigenesis

Lung adenocarcinoma, the most common subtype of lung cancer, is genomically complex, with tumors containing tens to hundreds of non-synonymous mutations. However, little is understood about how genes interact with each other to enable tumorigenesis in vivo , largely due to a lack of methods for investigating genetic interactions in a high-throughput and multiplexed manner. Here, we employed a novel platform to generate tumors with all pairwise inactivation of ten tumor suppressor genes within an autochthonous mouse model of oncogenic KRAS-driven lung cancer. By quantifying the fitness of tumors with every single and double mutant genotype, we show that most tumor suppressor genetic interactions exhibited negative epistasis, with diminishing returns on tumor fitness. In contrast, Apc inactivation showed positive epistasis with the inactivation of several other genes, including dramatically synergistic effects on tumor fitness in combination with Lkb1 or Nf1 inactivation. This approach has the potential to expand the scope of genetic interactions that may be functionally characterized in vivo , which could lead to a better understanding of how complex tumor genotypes impact each step of carcinogenesis.

Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy

The CRISPR system is a revolutionary genome editing tool that has the potential to revolutionize the field of cancer research and therapy. The ability to precisely target and edit specific genetic mutations that drive the growth and spread of tumors has opened up new possibilities for the development of more effective and personalized cancer treatments. In this review, we will discuss the different CRISPR-based strategies that have been proposed for cancer therapy, including inactivating genes that drive tumor growth, enhancing the immune response to cancer cells, repairing genetic mutations that cause cancer, and delivering cancer-killing molecules directly to tumor cells. We will also summarize the current state of preclinical studies and clinical trials of CRISPR-based cancer therapy, highlighting the most promising results and the challenges that still need to be overcome. Safety and delivery are also important challenges for CRISPR-based cancer therapy to become a viable clinical option. We will discuss the challenges and limitations that need to be overcome, such as off-target effects, safety, and delivery to the tumor site. Finally, we will provide an overview of the current challenges and opportunities in the field of CRISPR-based cancer therapy and discuss future directions for research and development. The CRISPR system has the potential to change the landscape of cancer research, and this review aims to provide an overview of the current state of the field and the challenges that need to be overcome to realize this potential.

Systemic and Local Strategies for Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer

One in eight women will develop breast cancer in the US. For women with moderate (15-20%) to average (12.5%) risk of breast cancer, there are few options available for risk reduction. For high-risk (>20%) women, such as BRCA mutation carriers, primary prevention strategies are limited to evidence-based surgical removal of breasts and/or ovaries and anti-estrogen treatment. Despite their effectiveness in risk reduction, not many high-risk individuals opt for surgical or hormonal interventions due to severe side effects and potentially life-changing outcomes as key deterrents. Thus, better communication about the benefits of existing strategies and the development of new strategies with minimal side effects are needed to offer women adequate risk-reducing interventions. We extensively review and discuss innovative investigational strategies for primary prevention. Most of these investigational strategies are at the pre-clinical stage, but some are already being evaluated in clinical trials and others are expected to lead to first-in-human clinical trials within 5 years. Likely, these strategies would be initially tested in high-risk individuals but may be applicable to lower-risk women, if shown to decrease risk at a similar rate to existing strategies, but with minimal side effects.

Clonal dynamics limits detection of selection in tumour xenograft CRISPR/Cas9 screens

Transplantable in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens, in which cells are edited in vitro and inoculated into mice to form tumours, allow evaluation of gene function in a cancer model that incorporates the multicellular interactions of the tumour microenvironment. To improve our understanding of the key parameters for success with this method, we investigated the choice of cell line, mouse host, tumour harvesting timepoint and guide RNA (gRNA) library size. We found that high gRNA (80-95%) representation was maintained in a HCT116 subline transduced with the GeCKOv2 whole-genome gRNA library and transplanted into NSG mice when tumours were harvested at early (14 d) but not late time points (38-43 d). The decreased representation in older tumours was accompanied by large increases in variance in gRNA read counts, with notable expansion of a small number of random clones in each sample. The variable clonal dynamics resulted in a high level of 'noise' that limited the detection of gRNA-based selection. Using simulated datasets derived from our experimental data, we show that considerable reductions in count variance would be achieved with smaller library sizes. Based on our findings, we suggest a pathway to rationally design adequately powered in vivo CRISPR screens for successful evaluation of gene function.

Applications of CRISPR Technology to Breast Cancer and Triple Negative Breast Cancer Research

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) technology has transformed oncology research in many ways. Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy globally and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most aggressive subtypes with numerous challenges still to be faced. In this work, we have explained what CRISPR consists of and listed its applications in breast cancer while focusing on TNBC research. These are disease modelling, the search for novel genes involved in tumour progression, sensitivity to drugs and immunotherapy response, tumour fitness, diagnosis, and treatment. Additionally, we have listed the current delivery methods employed for the delivery of CRISPR systems in vivo. Lastly, we have highlighted the limitations that CRISPR technology is subject to and the future directions that we envisage. Overall, we have provided a round summary of the aspects concerning CRISPR in breast cancer/TNBC research.