1
|
Chakraborty S, Singh M, Pandita RK, Singh V, Lo CS, Leonard F, Horikoshi N, Moros EG, Guha D, Hunt CR, Chau E, Ahmed KM, Sethi P, Charaka V, Godin B, Makhijani K, Scherthan H, Deck J, Hausmann M, Mushtaq A, Altaf M, Ramos KS, Bhat KM, Taneja N, Das C, Pandita TK. Heat-induced SIRT1-mediated H4K16ac deacetylation impairs resection and SMARCAD1 recruitment to double strand breaks. iScience 2022; 25:104142. [PMID: 35434547 PMCID: PMC9010620 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Hyperthermia inhibits DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair that utilizes homologous recombination (HR) pathway by a poorly defined mechanism(s); however, the mechanisms for this inhibition remain unclear. Here we report that hyperthermia decreases H4K16 acetylation (H4K16ac), an epigenetic modification essential for genome stability and transcription. Heat-induced reduction in H4K16ac was detected in humans, Drosophila, and yeast, indicating that this is a highly conserved response. The examination of histone deacetylase recruitment to chromatin after heat-shock identified SIRT1 as the major deacetylase subsequently enriched at gene-rich regions. Heat-induced SIRT1 recruitment was antagonized by chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1 depletion and, like hyperthermia, the depletion of the SMARCAD1 or combination of the two impaired DNA end resection and increased replication stress. Altered repair protein recruitment was associated with heat-shock-induced γ-H2AX chromatin changes and DSB repair processing. These results support a novel mechanism whereby hyperthermia impacts chromatin organization owing to H4K16ac deacetylation, negatively affecting the HR-dependent DSB repair. H4K16ac deacetylation during hyperthermia is conserved in human, Drosophila, and yeast Dynamic regulation of the chromatin functions during hyperthermia is SIRT1-dependent SIRT1 function is negatively impacted by SMARCAD1 Hyperthermia increases replication stress and impacts DNA resection, impairing DSB repair
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharmistha Chakraborty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Mayank Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Raj K. Pandita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Vipin Singh
- Biophysics & Structural Genomics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata, West Bengal 700064, India
- Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Calvin S.C. Lo
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 Rotterdam, CA, the Netherlands
| | - Fransisca Leonard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nobuo Horikoshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eduardo G. Moros
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Deblina Guha
- Biophysics & Structural Genomics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata, West Bengal 700064, India
| | - Clayton R. Hunt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric Chau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kazi M. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Prayas Sethi
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Vijaya Charaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Biana Godin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kalpana Makhijani
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Harry Scherthan
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology Affiliated to the University of Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 Munich, Germany
| | - Jeanette Deck
- Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hausmann
- Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arjamand Mushtaq
- Department of Biotechnology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190006, India
| | - Mohammad Altaf
- Department of Biotechnology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190006, India
| | - Kenneth S. Ramos
- Center for Genomics and Precision Medicine, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Krishna M. Bhat
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Nitika Taneja
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 Rotterdam, CA, the Netherlands
| | - Chandrima Das
- Biophysics & Structural Genomics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata, West Bengal 700064, India
- Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Corresponding author
| | - Tej K. Pandita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
- Center for Genomics and Precision Medicine, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seay B, Adetona AM, Sarofim M, Kolian M. Estimating Arctic Temperature Impacts from Select European Residential Heating Appliances and Mitigation Strategies. EARTH'S FUTURE 2020; 8:10.1029/2020ef001493. [PMID: 32802911 PMCID: PMC7425647 DOI: 10.1029/2020ef001493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The use of residential heating devices is a key source of black carbon and other short-lived climate forcer emissions in Arctic and other high latitude regions, with important impacts to the Arctic climate and human health. The types of combustion technologies and fuels used varies by region, which impacts the emission profiles of these pollutants and thus the magnitude of Arctic climate responses. Using emission inventory data from 14 European countries, we derive wood-fueled residential heating emissions of black carbon, organic carbon, and sulfate from six appliance types in 2016. Using previously derived equilibrium Arctic temperature responses, we estimate Arctic temperature influences from each appliance type. Using the 2016 appliance emission data as a baseline, we compute the emission mass and Arctic temperature mitigation potential from hypothetical stove conversion scenarios. A total of 43.2 gigagrams (Gg) of black carbon, 175.7 Gg of organic carbon, and 10.3 Gg of sulfate were emitted in 2016 from the six appliance types in the 14 countries. The combined emissions increased Arctic surface temperatures by +2.8 millikelvin. If each country converted its appliance fleet to the technologically advanced pellet stoves and boilers, the combined black carbon, organic carbon, and sulfate emissions from heating appliances could be reduced by 94% and the Arctic temperature response reduced by 85%. The specific source and originating region of emissions are important factors in resolving the magnitude of their impacts. Improved country-level accounting of specific appliances and their emission characteristics can lead to a better understanding of potential mitigation options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brannon Seay
- Battelle Memorial Institute. 505 King Ave, Columbus, OH 43201
| | - Anna M. Adetona
- Battelle Memorial Institute. 505 King Ave, Columbus, OH 43201
| | - Marcus Sarofim
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation. 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20004
| | - Michael Kolian
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation. 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20004
| |
Collapse
|