Cellular analysis of a molluscan retinal biological clock

Changes of the clock gene expression in central and peripheral organs of common carp exposed to constant lighting conditions

In both mammals and fish, the circadian system is composed of oscillators that function at the cellular, tissue, and system levels and show the cyclic expression of clock genes. The organization and functioning of the biological clock in fish has not yet been characterized in detail, therefore, in the present study, an extensive analysis of the rhythmic expression of the main components of the biological clock in the central and peripheral organs of common carp was performed. The diurnal changes in clock gene expression were determined with respect to the subjective light cycle in fish exposed to constant light or darkness. It was found that the pattern of expression of clock, bmal, per and cry genes in carp was highest in the brain, pituitary gland, and retina. The peak clock and bmal expression was phase aligned with the lights off, whereas both per genes show similar phasing with acrophase close to light onset. The expression of cry genes varied depending on the type of tissue and the subtype of gene. The diurnal changes in the expression of clock genes demonstrates that, in particular, the expression of the clock in the retina shows endogenous oscillations independent of the influence of light. The data suggest that in carp, the time-varying expression of individual genes allows for a diverse and tissue-specific response to secure oscillations with variable phase and period.

Electrical activity can impose time of day on the circadian transcriptome of pacemaker neurons

BACKGROUND

Circadian (∼24 hr) rhythms offer one of the best examples of how gene expression is tied to behavior. Circadian pacemaker neurons contain molecular clocks that control 24 hr rhythms in gene expression that in turn regulate electrical activity rhythms to control behavior.

RESULTS

Here we demonstrate the inverse relationship: there are broad transcriptional changes in Drosophila clock neurons (LN(v)s) in response to altered electrical activity, including a large set of circadian genes. Hyperexciting LN(v)s creates a morning-like expression profile for many circadian genes while hyperpolarization leads to an evening-like transcriptional state. The electrical effects robustly persist in per(0) mutant LN(v)s but not in cyc(0) mutant LN(v)s, suggesting that neuronal activity interacts with the transcriptional activators of the core circadian clock. Bioinformatic and immunocytochemical analyses suggest that CREB family transcription factors link LN(v) electrical state to circadian gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The electrical state of a clock neuron can impose time of day to its transcriptional program. We propose that this acts as an internal zeitgeber to add robustness and precision to circadian behavioral rhythms.

Pigment-dispersing factor and GABA synchronize cells of the isolated circadian clock of the cockroach Leucophaea maderae

Pigment-dispersing factor-immunoreactive circadian pacemaker cells, which arborize in the accessory medulla, control circadian locomotor activity rhythms in Drosophila as well as in the cockroach Leucophaea maderae via unknown mechanisms. Here, we show that circadian pacemaker candidates of the accessory medulla of the cockroach produce regular interspike intervals. Therefore, the membrane potential of the cells oscillates with ultradian periods. Most or all oscillating cells within the accessory medulla are coupled via synaptic and nonsynaptic mechanisms, forming different assemblies. The cells within an assembly share the same ultradian period (interspike interval) and the same phase (timing of spikes), whereas cells between assemblies differ in phase. Apparently, the majority of these assemblies are formed by inhibitory GABAergic synaptic interactions. Application of pigment-dispersing factor phase locked and thereby synchronized different assemblies. The data suggest that pigment-dispersing factor inhibits GABAergic interneurons, resulting in disinhibition and phase locking of their postsynaptic cells, which previously belonged to different assemblies. Our data suggest that phase control of action potential oscillations in the ultradian range is a main task of the circadian pacemaker network. We hypothesize that neuropeptide-dependent phase control is used to gate circadian outputs to locomotor control centers.

Time and development

The role that biological timers play in gametogenesis and development is reviewed through use of selected examples. Some general features of biological timers are also reviewed, and two types of timing mechanism are discussed in more detail: circadian rhythms and cell-cycle-based timers. In particular, the recent evidence that oscillatory ion channel activity may play an important role in timing mechanisms is summarized. The activity and properties of an oscillatory K(+) channel present during preimplantation mouse development are described, and preliminary results from its neutralization are discussed.