Analysis of modulation factor to shorten the delivery time in helical tomotherapy

Parotid gland dose reduction in the hippocampus avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy

The present study aimed to reduce the parotid gland dose in the hippocampus avoidance with whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) using the helical tomotherapy (HT). Ten patients who had previously undergone WBRT were randomly selected and enrolled in this study. During the treatment planning, two different techniques to the jaw were applied for each patient, namely, 1.0 cm fixed jaw and 2.5 cm dynamic jaw. To efficiently reduce the dose in the bilateral parotid glands, directional block (DB) mode was set. The DB is a function of a treatment planning system for the dose reduction in organs at risk. The standard HA-WBRT plan which did not reduce the parotid gland dose was also designed to compare the plan quality. Compared with the standard HA-WBRT plan, the parotid gland dose could be reduced by approximately 70% without extending the delivery time by adding the parotid gland on the DB mode to the dose constraint. In addition, the differences in dosimetric parameters observed between the plans employing the 1.0 cm fixed jaw and 2.5 cm dynamic jaw were almost negligible. Moreover, delivery time in the 2.5 cm dynamic jaw could be greatly reduced by 60% compared with that in the 1.0 cm fixed jaw.

Influence of Modulation Factor on Treatment Plan Quality and Irradiation Time in Hippocampus-Sparing Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Using Tomotherapy

Objectives: Hippocampus-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) using tomotherapy is known to provide a better dose distribution than volumetric-modulated arc therapy but requires an extended irradiation time. The present study aimed to investigate whether irradiation time can be shortened by reducing the modulation factor (MF) without losing the target dose distribution. Methods: Using six tilted computed tomography images in the head area, the planning target volume (PTV) and hippocampal doses, and the irradiation time was investigated with a jaw width of 1 cm, a pitch of 0.200, and the MF changed from 3.0 to 2.6, 2.2, 1.8, and 1.4. Results: No significant changes in the PTV or hippocampus were found with MF in the range from 3.0 to 1.8, but marked deterioration was found with that of 1.4. The irradiation time showed a linear relationship with the MF within the range from 3.0 to 1.8, with 1334, 1158, 986, and 817 s at modulation factors of 3.0, 2.6, 2.2, and 1.8, respectively. However, when the MF was 1.4, the irradiation time was 808 s. Conclusions: When HS-WBRT is performed with a tilted body position and a jaw width of 1 cm, with a MF of 1.8, a favorable balance between dose parameters and irradiation time is achieved, whereas with a MF of 1.4, the quality of the radiotherapy plan deteriorates, and the irradiation time is approximately the same as that with a MF of 1.8.

Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy

Purpose:

This study aimed to investigate the parameters with a significant impact on delivery quality assurance (DQA) failure and analyze the planning parameters as possible predictors of DQA failure for helical tomotherapy.

Methods:

In total, 212 patients who passed or failed DQA measurements were retrospectively included in this study. Brain (n = 43), head and neck (n = 37), spinal (n = 12), prostate (n = 36), rectal (n = 36), pelvis (n = 13), cranial spinal irradiation and a treatment field including lymph nodes (n = 24), and other types of cancer (n = 11) were selected. The correlation between DQA results and treatment planning parameters were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, areas under the curves (AUCs), and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm were used to analyze treatment planning parameters as possible predictors for DQA failure.

Results:

The AUC for leaf open time (LOT) was 0.70, and its cut-off point was approximately 30%. The ROC curve for the predicted probability calculated when the multivariate variable model was applied showed an AUC of 0.815. We confirmed that total monitor units, total dose, and LOT were significant predictors for DQA failure using the CART.

Conclusions:

The probability of DQA failure was higher when the percentage of LOT below 100 ms was higher than 30%. The percentage of LOT below 100 ms should be considered in the treatment planning process. The findings from this study may assist in the prediction of DQA failure in the future.

On the complexity of helical tomotherapy treatment plans

PURPOSE

Multiple metrics are proposed to characterize and compare the complexity of helical tomotherapy (HT) plans created for different treatment sites.

METHODS

A cohort composed of 208 HT plans from head and neck (105), prostate (51) and brain (52) tumor sites was considered. For each plan, 14 complexity metrics were calculated. Those metrics evaluate the percentage of leaves with small opening times or approaching the projection duration, the percentage of closed leaves, the amount of tongue-and-groove effect, and the overall modulation of the planned sinogram. To enable data visualization, an approach based on principal component analysis was followed to reduce the dataset dimensionality. This allowed the calculation of a global plan complexity score. The correlation between plan complexity and pretreatment verification results using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients was investigated.

RESULTS

According to the global score, the most complex plans were the head and neck tumor cases, followed by the prostate and brain lesions irradiated with stereotactic technique. For almost all individual metrics, head and neck plans confirmed to be the plans with the highest complexity. Nevertheless, prostate cases had the highest percentage of leaves with an opening time approaching the projection duration, whereas the stereotactic brain plans had the highest percentage of closed leaves per projection. Significant correlations between some of the metrics and the pretreatment verification results were identified for the stereotactic brain group.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed metrics and the global score demonstrated to be useful to characterize and quantify the complexity of HT plans of different treatment sites. The reported differences inter- and intra-group may be valuable to guide the planning process aiming at reducing uncertainties and harmonize planning strategies.

The impact of the offset distance between the planning target volume and isocenter on irradiation time in TomoTherapy: A phantom study

PURPOSE

The influence of the offset distance from treatment target to gantry isocenter (GIC) on the dosimetric parameter and irradiation time was investigated using TomoTherapy METHODS: The reference position was defined as the centers of both the I'mRT phantom and planning target volume (PTV) with a spherical of 4 cm diameter aligned with the GIC. The dose calculations were performed in two offset methods with 2 and 12 Gy/fr, Method 1. The PTV was moved from 0.0 to 12.5 cm along the RL direction and -5.0 to 5.0 cm along the AP direction (PTV offset), Method 2. The phantom was moved from 0.0 to -7.5 cm along the RL direction and -5.0 to 5.0 cm along the AP direction (Phantom offset). The maximum, minimum and mean doses, homogeneity index, conformity index, irradiation time, and monitor unit were compared.

RESULTS

The irradiation times increased with increasing PTV offset. The increases in the irradiation time were 54.4% and 40.8% at PTV offsets of 12.5 cm along the RL direction for 2 and 12 Gy/fr, while the increases were 20.1% and 15.0% at a PTV offset of 5.0 cm along the AP direction. An increased irradiation time was not observed for the phantom offset. The offset didn't affect the other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The PTV location offset of ≥5 cm from the GIC along the RL and AP axes increased the irradiation time; therefore, the PTV should be aligned with the GIC as much as possible to reduce the irradiation time on TomoTherapy.

Determining efficient helical IMRT modulation factor from the MLC leaf-open time distribution on precision treatment planning system

Purpose

Since the modulation factor (MF) impacts both plan quality and delivery efficiency in tomotherapy Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) treatment planning, the purpose of this study was to demonstrate a technique in determining an efficient MF from the Multileaf Collimator (MLC) leaf‐open time (LOT) distribution of a tomotherapy treatment delivery plan.

Methods

Eight clinical plans of varying complexity were optimized with the highest allowed MF on the Accuracy Precision treatment planning system. Using a central limit theorem argument a range of reduced MFs were then determined from the first two moments of the LOT distribution. A step down approach was used to calculate the reduced‐MF plans and plan comparison tools available on the Precision treatment planning system were used to evaluate dose differences with the reference plan.

Results

A reduced‐MF plan that balanced delivery time and dosimetric quality was found from the set of five MFs determined from the LOT distribution of the reference plan. The reduced‐MF plan showed good agreement with the reference plan (target and critical organ dose‐volume region of interest dose differences were within 1% and 2% of prescription dose, respectively).

Discussion

Plan evaluation and acceptance criteria can vary depending on individual clinical expectations and dosimetric quality trade‐offs. With the scheme presented in this paper a planner should be able to efficiently generate a high‐quality plan with efficient delivery time without knowing a good MF beforehand.

Conclusion

A methodology for deriving a reduced MF from the LOT distribution of a high MF treatment plan using the central limit theorem has been presented. A scheme for finding a reduced MF from a set of MFs that results in a plan balanced in both dosimetric quality and treatment delivery efficiency has also been presented.

Interfacility variation in treatment planning parameters in tomotherapy: field width, pitch, and modulation factor

Several studies have reported changes in dose distribution and delivery time based on the value of specific planning parameters [field width (FW), pitch, and modulation factor (MF)] in tomotherapy. However, the variation in the parameters between different facilities is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine standard values of the above parameters for cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) and prostate cancer (PC) in Japan. In this survey, a web-based questionnaire was sent to 48 facilities performing radiation therapy with tomotherapy in March 2016. The deadline for data submission was April 2016. In the questionnaire, the values of the planning parameters usually used were requested and 23 responses were received, representing a response rate of 48% (23/48). The FW selected was 2.5 cm in most facilities, and facilities with a tomoEDGE license used dynamic FW rather than fixed FW. Facilities changed the pitch based on FW, dose per fraction, or target offset more frequently in HNC than in PC. In contrast, >50% of the facilities used the magic number proposed by Kissick et al. Median preset MFs (range, min to max) in HNC and PC were 2.4 (1.8-2.8) and 2.0 (1.8-3.0), respectively, and MF values showed large variations between the facilities. Our results are likely to be useful to several facilities designing treatment plans in tomotherapy.