Patient size matters: Effect of tube current modulation on size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) and image quality in low-dose lung cancer screening CT

Pathology-based radiation dose in computed tomography: investigation of the effect of lung lesions on water-equivalent diameter, CTDIVol and SSDE in COVID-19 patients

Lung lesions can increase the CT number and affect the water-equivalent diameter (Dw), Dw-based conversion factor (CFw), and Dw-based size-specific dose estimate (SSDEw). We evaluated the effect of COVID-19 lesions and total severity score (TSS) on radiation dose considering the effect of automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) and fixed tube current (FTC). A total of 186 chest CT scans were categorised into five TSS groups, including healthy, minimal, mild, moderate and severe. The effective diameter (Deff), Dw, CFw, Deff-based conversion factor (CFeff), volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIVol), pathological dose impact factor (PDIF) 1 and SSDEw were calculated. TSS was correlated with Dw (r = 0.29, p-value = 0.001), CTDIVol (ATCM) (r = 0.23, p = 0.001) and PDIF (r = - 0.51, p-value = 0.001). $\overline{{\mathrm{SSDE}}_{\mathrm{w}}}$ (FTC) was significantly different among all groups. $\overline{{\mathrm{SSDE}}_{\mathrm{w}}}$ (ATCM) was greater for moderate (13%) and mild (14%) groups. Increasing TSS increase the Dw and causes a decrease in CFw and $\overline{{\mathrm{SSDE}}_{\mathrm{w}}}$ (FTC), and can increase $\overline{{\mathrm{SSDE}}_{\mathrm{w}}}$ (ATCM) in some Dw ranges.

Application effect of low-dose spiral CT on pulmonary nodules and its diagnostic value for benign and malignant nodules

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine the application effect of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) on detecting pulmonary nodules (PNs) and its diagnostic value for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

Data of 432 patients with PNs admitted to Julu County Hospital between March 2018 and June 2021 in were collected and analysed retrospectively. All patients underwent LDCT and conventional-dose spiral computed tomography (CT). The detection rate and image characteristics of the two methods were compared, and the image quality and radiation dose of the two diagnostic methods were also compared.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between LDCT and conventional-dose spiral CT in the detection rate of lung cancer (P>0.05). The area under the curve of conventional-dose CT was 0.932, with a specificity and sensitivity of 93.87% and 92.45%, and the area under the curve of LDCT was 0.902, with a specificity and sensitivity of 90.80% and 89.62%. The radiation dose consumed during LDCT was greatly less than that consumed by conventional-dose CT (P<0.05). Additionally, the two methods were not different in CT image quality and superior vena cava artifact (P>0.05). No notable difference was found between LDCT and conventional-dose CT in terms of the diagnosis rate of PNs in vascular aggregation sign, pleural indentation sign, lobulation sign and spiculation sign.

CONCLUSION

LDCT can clearly show the typical images of early lung cancer, with less effective radiation dose, and can thus contribute to a high detection rate, so it is worth popularizing.

Size-specific dose estimates of adult, chest computed tomography examinations: Comparison of Chinese and updated 2017 American College of Radiology diagnostic reference levels based on the water-equivalent diameter

Rationale and objectives

This study aimed to compare the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), with the China and updated 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in chest CT examinations of adults based on the water-equivalent diameter (Dw).

Materials and methods

All chest CT examinations conducted without contrast administration from January 2020 to July 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. The Dw and SSDE of all examinations were calculated automatically by “teamplay”. The CTDIvol and DLP were displayed on the DICOM-structured dose report in the console based on a 32cm phantom.The differences in patient CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE values between groups were examined by the one-way ANOVA. The differences in patient CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE values between the updated 2017 ACR and the China DRLs were examined with one sample t-tests.

Results

In total 14666 chest examinations were conducted in our study. Patients were divided into four groups based on Dw:270 (1.84%) in 15–20 cm group, 10287 (70.14%) in the 21–25 cm group, 4097 (27.94%) in the 26–30 cm group, and 12 (0.08%) patients had sizes larger than 30 cm. CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE increased as a function of Dw (p<0.05). CTDIvol was smaller than SSDE among groups (p<0.05). The mean CTDIvol and DLP values were lower than the 25^th, 50^th, and 75^th percentile of the China DRLs (p <0.05). The CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE were lower than the 50^th and 75^th percentiles of the updated 2017 ACR DRLs (p <0.05) among groups.

Conclusions

SSDE takes into account the influence of the scanning parameters, patient size, and X-ray attenuation on the radiation dose, which can give a more realistic estimate of radiation exposure dose for patients undergoing CT examinations. Establishing hospital’s own DRL according to CTDIvol and SSDE is very important even though the radiation dose is lower than the national DRLs.