The impact of different setup methods on the dose distribution in proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Evaluation of Diaphragm Position Variations During Proton Therapy for Pediatric Patients With Neuroblastoma

Background To evaluate the respiratory-induced intrafractional diaphragm motion and interfractional diaphragm displacement in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma (NBL). Materials and methods Ten pediatric patients with a mean age of 4.5 years (range: 1.8-8.7 years) with abdominal NBL treated with proton therapy (PT) have been evaluated. Intrafractional motion and interfractional displacement have been analyzed by using cine radiography and orthogonal X-ray images, respectively. In each case, the cranio-caudal positions of the diaphragm have been measured as an index. This study has investigated the possible correlations between intrafractional diaphragm motion and height. Additionally, interfractional displacement and its time trend during the treatment course have been analyzed. Results The average right and left diaphragm intrafractional motions of 8.3 mm (range: 4.4-11.5 mm) and 6.4 mm (range: 2.2-11.8 mm) were observed, respectively; however, no significant correlation has been observed with height. An interfractional displacement of 5 mm or more has been observed in 20 out of 152 fractions (13%). The average absolute value of the interfractional displacement was 2.5 mm (range: 0-8.6 mm). Interfractional displacement did not show a peculiar tendency throughout the treatment period. Conclusions It was suggested that respiratory-induced diaphragm position variation in children varies greatly among individuals, and accurately estimating it based on height is difficult. Thus, these individual evaluations are considered indispensable.

Analysis of respiratory-induced motion trajectories of individual liver segments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To analyze the respiratory-induced motion trajectories of each liver segment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to derive a more accurate internal margin and optimize treatment protocol selection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten-phase-gated four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans of 14 patients with HCC were analyzed. For each patient, eight representative regions of interest (ROI) were delineated on each liver segment in all 10 phases. The coordinates of the center of gravity of each ROI were obtained for each phase, and then the respiratory motion in the left-right (LR), anteroposterior (AP), and craniocaudal (CC) directions was analyzed. Two sets of motion in each direction were also compared in terms of only two extreme phases and all 10 phases.

RESULTS

Motion of less than 5 mm was detected in 12 (86%) and 10 patients (71%) in the LR and AP directions, respectively, while none in the CC direction. Motion was largest in the CC direction with a maximal value of 19.5 mm, with significant differences between liver segment 7 (S7) and other segments: S1 (p < 0.036), S2 (p < 0.041), S3 (p < 0.016), S4 (p < 0.041), and S5 (p < 0.027). Of the 112 segments, hysteresis >1 mm was observed in 4 (4%), 2 (2%), and 15 (13%) in the LR, AP, and CC directions, respectively, with a maximal value of 5.0 mm in the CC direction.

CONCLUSION

A significant amount of respiratory motion was detected in the CC direction, especially in S7, and S8. Despite the small effect of hysteresis, it can be observed specifically in the right lobe. Therefore, caution is required when using 4DCT to determine IM using only end-inspiration and end-expiration. Understanding the respiratory motion in individual liver segments can be helpful when selecting an appropriate treatment protocol.

Effectiveness of proton beam therapy for liver oligometastatic recurrence in patients with postoperative esophagus cancer

There are several reports of hepatic resection for postoperative hepatic metastatic recurrence of esophageal cancer. However, it is unclear whether surgery is the best local treatment for liver metastases. Thus, this study aimed to retrospectively analyze proton beam therapy (PBT) for postoperative liver metastatic recurrence of esophageal cancer without extrahepatic lesions and examine outcomes and adverse events. This single-center historical cohort study selected patients who underwent PBT at our proton therapy center between 2012 and 2018. The patients were selected based on the following criteria: primary esophagus carcinoma was resection and metachronous liver oligometastasis recurrence without extrahepatic tumors and no more than three liver metastases. This study included seven males with a median age of 66 (range, 58-78) years, and 15 lesions were included in the study. The median tumor size was 22.6 (7-55.3) mm. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy relative biological effect (RBE)/22 fractions (fr) for four lesions and 64 Gy (RBE)/8 fr for four lesions. The median survival time was 35.5 (13.2-119.4) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 100%, 57.1% and 42.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 8.7 (1.2-44.1) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS rates were 28.6%. The 1-, 2- and 3-year local control (LC) rates were 100%. No grade ≥4 radiation-induced adverse events (AEs) were observed. We conclude that PBT can be considered an alternative to hepatic resection for recurrent liver metastases postoperative esophageal cancer.

Proton therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer represents one of the most common causes of death from cancer worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of all primary liver cancers. Among local therapies, evidence regarding the use of radiation therapy is growing. Proton therapy currently represents the most advanced radiation therapy technique with unique physical properties which fit well with liver irradiation. Here, in this review, we aim to 1) illustrate the rationale for the use of proton therapy (PT) in the treatment of HCC, 2) discuss the technical challenges of advanced PT in this disease, 3) review the major clinical studies regarding the use of PT for HCC, and 4) analyze the potential developments and future directions of PT in this setting.