Intrinsic detector sensitivity analysis as a tool to characterize ArcCHECK and EPID sensitivity to variations in delivery for lung SBRT VMAT plans

RTOG 0915-compliant patient specific QA for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using the new PTW 1600SRS detector array

PURPOSE

An area of focus in radiotherapy is the treatment of oligometastatic lung cancer using highly conformal techniques such as SBRT, performed using VMAT that involves flattening filter free (FFF) beams. This study proposes a new calibration procedure for PTW Octavius 1600SRS detector array and was designed to also evaluate clinical and dosimetric aspects of a patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for lung SBRT patients.

METHODS

The cohort consists of 20 patients, treated for lung metastases using SBRT with 50 Gy dose in 5 fractions (10 Gy/fr). The proposed calibration method uses only one calibration factor determined at maximum dose rate of 6MV FFF photon beam. The dosimetric accuracy of achieving a high dose gradient was analyzed using the RTOG 0915 protocol and was confirmed by PSQA procedures using the PTW Octavius 1600SRS detector.

RESULTS

Conformity index, gradient index, maximum dose at 2 cm and V20 parameters were evaluated with clinical favorable results, with only two plans with lesions situated in the inferior lobe exceeding the deviation allowed for the gradient index. Gamma passing rates using the new calibration method were 98.93% and 99.38% for different gamma criteria of 2 mm/2% and 1 mm/3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method for calibration using one calibration factor at maximum dose rate for the involved photon beam shows clinically acceptable gamma passing rates. Employing the RTOG 0915 protocol for lung SBRT treatment plan evaluation brings important dosimetric information about treatment plan quality and dose gradient fall-off which can be correlated with the results achieved during the pretreatment verification procedures.

Assessment of stereotactic high-resolution detectors for stereotactic body radiotherapy: comparative analysis between myQA® SRS and Gafchromic EBT-XD films

The study aimed to evaluate dosimetry systems used for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), specifically 2D array dosimetry and film dosimetry systems, for exploring their characteristics and clinical suitability. For this, high-resolution myQA SRS detectors and Gafchromic EBT-XD films were employed. Film analysis included net optical density (OD) values depending on energy, dose rate, scanner orientation, scanning side, and post-exposure growth. For myQA SRS, signal values were evaluated in terms of dose rate (400-1400 MU/min) and angular dependence (0-180° at 30° intervals) along with couch angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°. Pre-treatment verification included 32 SBRT patients for whom myQA SRS results were compared with those obtained with Gafchromic EBT-XD films. Analysis revealed less than 1% deviation in net OD for energy and dose rate dependence. Scanner orientation caused 2.5% net OD variation, with minimal differences between film front and back scan orientations (variance < 1.0%). A rapid OD rise occurred within six hours post-exposure, followed by gradual increase. The myQA SRS detector showed - 3.7% dose rate dependence (400 MU/min), while the angular dependence at 90° was - 26.7%. A correction factor effectively reduced these differences to < 1%. For myQA SRS, gamma passing rates were-93.6% (2%/1 mm), while those for EBT-XD films were-92.8%. Improved rates were observed with 3%/1 mm: for myQA SRS-97.9%, and for EBT-XD film-98.16%. In contrast, for 2%/2 mm with 10% threshold, for myQA SRS-97.7% and for EBT-XD film-98.97% were obtained. It is concluded that both myQA SRS detectors and EBT-XD films are suitable for SBRT pre-treatment verification, ensuring accuracy and reliability. However, myQA SRS detectors are preferred over EBT-XD film due to the fact that they offer real-time measurements and user-friendly features.

Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: a systematic review of measurement-based methods

This topical review focuses on Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) approaches to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT requires stricter accuracy than standard radiation therapy due to the high dose per fraction and the limited number of fractions. The review considered various PSQA methods reported in 36 articles between 01/2010 and 07/2022 for SBRT treatment. In particular comparison among devices and devices designed for SBRT, sensitivity and resolution, verification methodology, gamma analysis were specifically considered. The review identified a list of essential data needed to reproduce the results in other clinics, highlighted the partial miss of data reported in scientific papers, and formulated recommendations for successful implementation of a PSQA protocol.

Application of error classification model using indices based on dose distribution for characteristics evaluation of multileaf collimator position errors

This study aims to evaluate the specific characteristics of various multileaf collimator (MLC) position errors that are correlated with the indices using dose distribution. The dose distribution was investigated using the gamma, structural similarity, and dosiomics indices. Cases from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 119 were planned, and systematic and random MLC position errors were simulated. The indices were obtained from distribution maps and statistically significant indices were selected. The final model was determined when all values of the area under the curve, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity were higher than 0.8 (p < 0.05). The dose-volume histogram (DVH) relative percentage difference between the error-free and error datasets was examined to investigate clinical relations. Seven multivariate predictive models were finalized. The common significant dosiomics indices (GLCM Energy and GLRLM_LRHGE) can characterize the MLC position error. In addition, the finalized logistic regression model for MLC position error prediction showed excellent performance with AUC > 0.9. Furthermore, the results of the DVH were related to dosiomics analysis in that it reflects the characteristics of the MLC position error. It was also shown that dosiomics analysis could provide important information on localized dose-distribution differences in addition to DVH information.

Evaluating Mobius3D Dose Calculation Accuracy for Small-Field Flattening- Filter-Free Photon Beams

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the dose calculation accuracy of Mobius3D for small-field flattening-filter-free x-rays, mainly utilized for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The accuracy of beam modeling and multileaf collimator (MLC) modeling in Mobius3D, significantly affecting the dose calculation is investigated. Methods: The commissioning procedures of Mobius3D were performed for unflattened 6 MV and 10 MV x-ray beams of the linear accelerator, including beam model adjustment and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) optimization. An experimental study with artificial plans was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of small-field modeling. The dose calculation accuracy of Mobius3D was also evaluated for retrospective SBRT plans with multiple targets. Results: Both studies evaluated the dose calculation accuracy through comparisons with the measured data. Relatively large differences were observed for off-axis distances over 5 cm and for small fields less than 1 cm field size. For the study with artificial plans, the maximum absolute error of 9.96% for unflattened 6 MV and 9.07% for unflattened 10 MV was observed when the field size was 1 cm. For the study with patient plans, the mean gamma passing rate with 3%/3 mm gamma criterion was 63.6% for unflattened 6 MV and 82.6% for unflattened 10 MV. The maximum of the average dose difference was -19.9% for unflattened 6MV and -10.1% for unflattened 10MV. Conclusions: The dose calculation accuracy uncertainties of Mobius3D for small-field flattening-filter-free photon beams were observed. The study results indicated that the beam and MLC modeling of Mobius3D must be improved for use in SBRT pretreatment QA in clinical practice.

Evaluating the effect of high-density measurement mode on patient-specific quality assurance for head and neck cancer with ArcCHECK

The high-density measurement (HDm) mode of the ArcCHECK device can achieve a twofold resolution enhancement compared to the standard measurement (Sm) mode. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of HDm on the gamma passing rate (GPR) for the patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) in head and neck cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 30 patients who underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancer. Absolute gamma analysis was performed on Sm and HDm data. We also investigated correlations between the modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv) and differences in the GPR between the two measurement modes. The global GPR of Sm and HDm was 81.0% ± 8.4% and 82.6% ± 7.6% for the 2%/2 mm criterion, 94.0% ± 4.1% and 94.9% ± 3.6% for the 3%/2 mm criterion, and 96.6% ± 2.4% and 97.0% ± 2.4% for the 3%/3 mm criterion, respectively. HDm slightly improved GPR (p < 0.01) for the 2%/2 mm criterion. Differences in GPR between Sm and HDm for the 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 3%/3 mm criteria were 1.6% ± 3.0%, 0.8% ± 2.0%, and 0.4% ± 1.2%, respectively. No correlation was identified between the MCSv and the difference in GPR between Sm and HDm. Despite an improvement in GPR with HDm, the difference in GPR between Sm and HDm was approximately 2% even when the tighter criteria were used. Moreover, the change in the GPR between Sm and HDm did not depend on plan complexity. Thus, the effect of HDm on GPR is limited for the PSQA in VMAT for head and neck cancer.

Comprehensive clinical evaluation of TomoEQA for patient-specific pre-treatment quality assurance in helical tomotherapy

Background

Based on a previous study on the feasibility of TomoEQA, an exit detector-based patient-specific pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) method for helical tomotherapy, an in-depth clinical evaluation was conducted.

Methods

Data of one hundred patients were analyzed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of TomoEQA for patient-specific pre-treatment QA in comparison with the conventional phantom-based method. Additional investigations were also performed under unusual measurement conditions to validate the off-axis region. In addition to the clinical evaluation of TomoEQA, a statistical analysis was conducted to determine the plan parameters that affect the pass/failure results of pre-treatment QA.

Results

The average and standard deviations of the gamma passing rate and point dose error for TomoEQA were comparable to those of the conventional QA method. For TomoEQA, the average values of the gamma passing rate and point dose error were 96.32% (standard deviation (1 sigma) = 3.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 95.55 to 97.09) and − 1.12% (standard deviation (1 sigma) = 1.04; CI, − 1.32 to − 0.92), respectively. For the conventional QA method, the average values of the gamma passing rate and point dose error were 95.95% (standard deviation (1 sigma) = 4.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 95.10 to 96.80) and − 1.20% (standard deviation (1 sigma) = 1.61; CI, − 1.52 to − 0.88), respectively. Further experiments on the off-axis region demonstrated that TomoEQA can provide accurate results for 3D dose analysis, which is inherently difficult in the conventional QA method. Through a statistical analysis based on the results of TomoEQA, it was validated that the total fraction (Total Fx), monitor units, beam-on-time, leaf-of-time below 100 ms, and planning target volume diameter were statistically significant for the pass/failure of the pre-treatment QA results.

Conclusions

TomoEQA is a clinically beneficial alternative to the conventional phantom-based QA method.

Evaluation of the ability of three commercially available dosimeters to detect systematic delivery errors in step-and-shoot IMRT plans

Background

There is limited data on error detectability for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT) plans, despite significant work on dynamic methods. However, sIMRT treatments have an ongoing role in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate variations in the sensitivity of three patient-specific quality assurance (QA) devices to systematic delivery errors in sIMRT plans.

Materials and methods

Four clinical sIMRT plans (prostate and head and neck) were edited to introduce errors in: Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) position (increasing field size, leaf pairs offset (1-3 mm) in opposite directions; and field shift, all leaves offset (1-3 mm) in one direction); collimator rotation (1-3 degrees) and gantry rotation (0.5-2 degrees). The total dose for each plan was measured using an ArcCHECK diode array. Each field, excluding those with gantry offsets, was also measured using an Electronic Portal Imager and a MatriXX Evolution 2D ionisation chamber array. 132 plans (858 fields) were delivered, producing 572 measured dose distributions. Measured doses were compared to calculated doses for the no-error plan using Gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm criteria (1716 analyses).

Results

Generally, pass rates decreased with increasing errors and/or stricter gamma criteria. Pass rate variations with detector and plan type were also observed. For a 3%/3 mm gamma criteria, none of the devices could reliably detect 1 mm MLC position errors or 1 degree collimator rotation errors.

Conclusions

This work has highlighted the need to adapt QA based on treatment plan type and the need for detector specific assessment criteria to detect clinically significant errors.