Paroxysmal motor disorders: expanding phenotypes lead to coalescing genotypes

Novel Genetic Variants Expand the Functional, Molecular, and Pathological Diversity of KCNA1 Channelopathy

The KCNA1 gene encodes Kv1.1 voltage-gated potassium channel α subunits, which are crucial for maintaining healthy neuronal firing and preventing hyperexcitability. Mutations in the KCNA1 gene can cause several neurological diseases and symptoms, such as episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1) and epilepsy, which may occur alone or in combination, making it challenging to establish simple genotype-phenotype correlations. Previous analyses of human KCNA1 variants have shown that epilepsy-linked mutations tend to cluster in regions critical for the channel's pore, whereas EA1-associated mutations are evenly distributed across the length of the protein. In this review, we examine 17 recently discovered pathogenic or likely pathogenic KCNA1 variants to gain new insights into the molecular genetic basis of KCNA1 channelopathy. We provide the first systematic breakdown of disease rates for KCNA1 variants in different protein domains, uncovering potential location biases that influence genotype-phenotype correlations. Our examination of the new mutations strengthens the proposed link between the pore region and epilepsy and reveals new connections between epilepsy-related variants, genetic modifiers, and respiratory dysfunction. Additionally, the new variants include the first two gain-of-function mutations ever discovered for KCNA1, the first frameshift mutation, and the first mutations located in the cytoplasmic N-terminal domain, broadening the functional and molecular scope of KCNA1 channelopathy. Moreover, the recently identified variants highlight emerging links between KCNA1 and musculoskeletal abnormalities and nystagmus, conditions not typically associated with KCNA1. These findings improve our understanding of KCNA1 channelopathy and promise to enhance personalized diagnosis and treatment for individuals with KCNA1-linked disorders.

Episodic Ataxias: Primary and Secondary Etiologies, Treatment, and Classification Approaches

Background

Episodic ataxia (EA), characterized by recurrent attacks of cerebellar dysfunction, is the manifestation of a group of rare autosomal dominant inherited disorders. EA1 and EA2 are most frequently encountered, caused by mutations in KCNA1 and CACNA1A. EA3-8 are reported in rare families. Advances in genetic testing have broadened the KCNA1 and CACNA1A phenotypes, and detected EA as an unusual presentation of several other genetic disorders. Additionally, there are various secondary causes of EA and mimicking disorders. Together, these can pose diagnostic challenges for neurologists.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed in October 2022 for 'episodic ataxia' and 'paroxysmal ataxia', restricted to publications in the last 10 years to focus on recent clinical advances. Clinical, genetic, and treatment characteristics were summarized.

Results

EA1 and EA2 phenotypes have further broadened. In particular, EA2 may be accompanied by other paroxysmal disorders of childhood with chronic neuropsychiatric features. New treatments for EA2 include dalfampridine and fampridine, in addition to 4-aminopyridine and acetazolamide. There are recent proposals for EA9-10. EA may also be caused by gene mutations associated with chronic ataxias (SCA-14, SCA-27, SCA-42, AOA2, CAPOS), epilepsy syndromes (KCNA2, SCN2A, PRRT2), GLUT-1, mitochondrial disorders (PDHA1, PDHX, ACO2), metabolic disorders (Maple syrup urine disease, Hartnup disease, type I citrullinemia, thiamine and biotin metabolism defects), and others. Secondary causes of EA are more commonly encountered than primary EA (vascular, inflammatory, toxic-metabolic). EA can be misdiagnosed as migraine, peripheral vestibular disorders, anxiety, and functional symptoms. Primary and secondary EA are frequently treatable which should prompt a search for the cause.

Discussion

EA may be overlooked or misdiagnosed for a variety of reasons, including phenotype-genotype variability and clinical overlap between primary and secondary causes. EA is highly treatable, so it is important to consider in the differential diagnosis of paroxysmal disorders. Classical EA1 and EA2 phenotypes prompt single gene test and treatment pathways. For atypical phenotypes, next generation genetic testing can aid diagnosis and guide treatment. Updated classification systems for EA are discussed which may assist diagnosis and management.

Dystonias: Clinical Recognition and the Role of Additional Diagnostic Testing

Dystonia is the third most common movement disorder, characterized by abnormal, frequently twisting postures related to co-contraction of agonist and antagonist muscles. Diagnosis is challenging. We provide a comprehensive appraisal of the epidemiology and an approach to the phenomenology and classification of dystonia, based on the clinical characteristics and underlying etiology of dystonia syndromes. We discuss the features of common idiopathic and genetic forms of dystonia, diagnostic challenges, and dystonia mimics. Appropriate workup is based on the age of symptom onset, rate of progression, whether dystonia is isolated or combined with another movement disorder or complex neurological and other organ system eatures. Based on these features, we discuss when imaging and genetic should be considered. We discuss the multidisciplinary treatment of dystonia, including rehabilitation and treatment principles according to the etiology, including when pathogenesis-direct treatment is available, oral pharmacological therapy, chemodenervation with botulinum toxin injections, deep brain stimulation and other surgical therapies, and future directions.

Paroxysmal Movement Disorders

Paroxysmal movement disorders (PxMDs) are a clinical and genetically heterogeneous group of movement disorders characterized by episodic involuntary movements (dystonia, dyskinesia, chorea and/or ataxia). Historically, PxMDs were classified clinically (triggers and characteristics of the movements) and this directed single-gene testing. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), how we classify and investigate PxMDs has been transformed. Next-generation sequencing has enabled new gene discovery (RHOBTB2, TBC1D24), expansion of phenotypes in known PxMDs genes and a better understanding of disease mechanisms. However, PxMDs exhibit phenotypic pleiotropy and genetic heterogeneity, making it challenging to predict genotype based on the clinical phenotype. For example, paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia is most commonly associated with variants in PRRT2 but also variants identified in PNKD, SCN8A, and SCL2A1. There are no radiological or biochemical biomarkers to differentiate genetic causes. Even with NGS, diagnosis rates are variable, ranging from 11 to 51% depending on the cohort studied and technology employed. Thus, a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed compared to other neurological disorders such as epilepsy, highlighting the need for further genomic research in PxMDs. Whole-genome sequencing, deep-sequencing, copy number variant analysis, detection of deep-intronic variants, mosaicism and repeat expansions, will improve diagnostic rates. Identifying the underlying genetic cause has a significant impact on patient care, modification of treatment, long-term prognostication and genetic counseling. This paper provides an update on the genetics of PxMDs, description of PxMDs classified according to causative gene rather than clinical phenotype, highlighting key clinical features and providing an algorithm for genetic testing of PxMDs.

Paroxysmal Genetic Movement Disorders and Epilepsy

Paroxysmal movement disorders include paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia, paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia, paroxysmal exercise-induced dyskinesia, and episodic ataxias. In recent years, there has been renewed interest and recognition of these disorders and their intersection with epilepsy, at the molecular and pathophysiological levels. In this review, we discuss how these distinct phenotypes were constructed from a historical perspective and discuss how they are currently coalescing into established genetic etiologies with extensive pleiotropy, emphasizing clinical phenotyping important for diagnosis and for interpreting results from genetic testing. We discuss insights on the pathophysiology of select disorders and describe shared mechanisms that overlap treatment principles in some of these disorders. In the near future, it is likely that a growing number of genes will be described associating movement disorders and epilepsy, in parallel with improved understanding of disease mechanisms leading to more effective treatments.

Clinical Spectrum of KCNA1 Mutations: New Insights into Episodic Ataxia and Epilepsy Comorbidity

Mutations in the KCNA1 gene, which encodes voltage-gated Kv1.1 potassium channel α-subunits, cause a variety of human diseases, complicating simple genotype–phenotype correlations in patients. KCNA1 mutations are primarily associated with a rare neurological movement disorder known as episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1). However, some patients have EA1 in combination with epilepsy, whereas others have epilepsy alone. KCNA1 mutations can also cause hypomagnesemia and paroxysmal dyskinesia in rare cases. Why KCNA1 variants are associated with such phenotypic heterogeneity in patients is not yet understood. In this review, literature databases (PubMed) and public genetic archives (dbSNP and ClinVar) were mined for known pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in KCNA1 to examine whether patterns exist between mutation type and disease manifestation. Analyses of the 47 deleterious KCNA1 mutations that were identified revealed that epilepsy or seizure-related variants tend to cluster in the S1/S2 transmembrane domains and in the pore region of Kv1.1, whereas EA1-associated variants occur along the whole length of the protein. In addition, insights from animal models of KCNA1 channelopathy were considered, as well as the possible influence of genetic modifiers on disease expressivity and severity. Elucidation of the complex relationship between KCNA1 variants and disease will enable better diagnostic risk assessment and more personalized therapeutic strategies for KCNA1 channelopathy.

Paroxysmal movement disorders - practical update on diagnosis and management

Introduction: Paroxysmal dyskinesias and episodic ataxias are often caused by mutations in genes related to cell membrane and synaptic function. Despite the exponential increase in publications of genetically confirmed cases, management remains largely clinical based on non-systematic evidence. Areas covered: The authors provide a historical and clinical review of the main types of paroxysmal dyskinesias and episodic ataxias, with recommendations for diagnosis and management of patients suffering from these conditions. Expert opinion: After secondary paroxysmal dyskinesias, the most common paroxysmal movement disorders are likely to be PRRT2-associated paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesias, which respond well to small doses of carbamazepine, and episodic ataxia type 2, which often responds to acetazolamide. Familial paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesias are largely caused by mutations in PNKD and have poor response to therapy but improve with age. Exercise-induced dyskinesias are genetically heterogeneous, caused by disorders of glucose transport, mitochondrial function, dopaminergic pathways or neurodegenerative conditions amongst others. GNAO1 and ADCY5 mutations can also cause paroxysmal movement disorders, often in the context of ongoing motor symptoms. Although a therapeutic trial is justified for classic cases and in limited resource settings, genetic testing may help direct initial or rescue therapy. Deep brain stimulation may be an option for severe cases.

Therapy of episodic ataxias: case report and review of the literature

Episodic ataxias (EAs) are characterized by recurrent, discrete episodes of vertigo and ataxia. EA1 and EA2 are the two most common forms. In the interictal interval, myokymia is typically present in EA1, whereas EA2 patients present with interictal nystagmus. Specific pharmacological therapies are available for EA1 and especially EA2. We briefly discuss the case of an Italian young man with EA2, with a novel de novo CACNA1A mutation, who in our opinion is particularly illustrative for introducing the therapeutic approach. Acetazolamide could fully suppress EA episodes in our patient. We also provide a perspective review of the topic. 4-Aminopyridine is another valid treatment option. For EA1 (and for rarer EAs), the therapeutic possibilities are more limited. Carbamazepine is probably the treatment of choice for EA1, but the optimal treatment plan is unknown. A better understanding of the molecular processes involved in the mediation of EAs will lead to more specific and efficacious therapies for this still elusive group of disorders.