Short-term perioperative all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

Cosmetic treatment in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases: Best practices for patients with lupus erythematosus

The cutaneous manifestations of lupus, especially chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, are a source of significant morbidity and can negatively impact patient quality of life. While the active inflammatory component of the disease may be adequately treated, patients are frequently left with residual skin damage and disfiguring aesthetic deficits. Dermatologists lack guidelines regarding the use and safety of various reconstructive and cosmetic interventions in this patient population. Laser treatments are largely avoided in the lupus population because of the possible photodamaging effects of ultraviolet and visible light. Similarly, given the autoimmune nature of this disease, some physicians avoid injectable treatment and grafts because of the concern for disease reactivation via antigenic stimulation. In the second article in this continuing medical education series we compile available data on this topic with the goal of providing evidence-based guidance on the cosmetic treatment of patients with lupus erythematosus with a focus on chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Risk factors for development of early infectious and noninfectious complications in systemic lupus erythematosus patients undergoing major surgery

Background We aimed to identify risk factors for early complications in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients undergoing major surgery. Methods We conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study including patients with SLE undergoing major surgery, and non-SLE patients matched 1:1. Main outcomes were development of infectious and noninfectious complications, and 30-day postoperative mortality. Results A total of 382 patients (191 SLE and 191 non-SLE) were included. Postoperative complications occurred in 82 (43%) SLE patients and 58 (30%) without SLE, ( p = 0.01). Variables associated with infectious complications in SLE patients: prednisone use (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.13-2.90), anemia (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.45-4.08), hypoalbuminemia (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.55-4.30) and lymphopenia (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.52-3.89), p < 0.05. Variables associated with noninfectious complications: anemia (OR, 1.93, 95% CI 1.03-3.64) and hypoalbuminemia (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.16-3.86), p < 0.05. Variables associated with any complication: SLEDAI-2K (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.20), nephritis (OR 10.08, 95% CI 1.21-83.63), aspirin use (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.19-6.02, p = 0.01), low C3 (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.06-3.80), anemia (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.39-5.18), hypoalbuminemia (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.83-6.66) and lymphopenia (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.30-4.26), p < 0.05. More patients with SLE died (6% vs 1%, p = 0.02). Conclusions SLE patients present higher frequency of postoperative complications and mortality compared with non-SLE patients. Hypoalbuminemia, anemia, lymphopenia and aspirin use are independent risk factors.

Systemic lupus erythematosus and the risk of perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The relationship between SLE and perioperative cardiovascular risks following non-cardiac surgery is uncertain. We investigated associations between a diagnosis of SLE and outcomes following major non-cardiac surgery in a large national database from the United States. Patients age ≥ 18 years requiring major non-cardiac surgery were identified from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample data from 2004 to 2014. Systemic lupus erythematosus and perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or death) were defined by ICD-9 diagnosis codes. Perioperative MACE were reported for SLE patients stratified by age and sex. From 2004 to 2014, a total of 17,853,194 hospitalizations for major non-cardiac surgery met study inclusion criteria. SLE was identified in 70,578 (0.4%) hospitalizations. Overall, the frequency of perioperative MACE was higher in patients with vs. without SLE [2.4 vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001; adjusted OR (aOR) 1.25; 95% CI 1.18-1.31]. Perioperative MACE associated with SLE was largely driven by increased death (aOR 1.58 95% CI 1.40-1.77) and myocardial infarction (aOR 1.32; 95% CI 1.05-1.66) in younger patients with SLE. The increased risk of perioperative MACE associated with SLE in younger patients was attenuated with increasing age. A diagnosis of SLE is associated with increased risk of perioperative MACE, particularly among younger patients. Efforts to improve the perioperative management and outcomes of patients with SLE are needed.

Perioperative Management of Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Major Orthopaedic Surgery: A Practical Overview

Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases often need orthopaedic surgery due to joint involvement. Total hip replacement and total knee replacement are frequent surgical procedures in these patients. Due to the complexity of the inflammatory rheumatic diseases, the perioperative management of these patients must envisage a multidisciplinary approach. The frequent association with extraarticular comorbidities must be considered when evaluating perioperative risk of the patient and should guide the clinician in the decision-making process. However, guidelines of different medical societies may vary and are sometimes contradictory. Orthopaedics should collaborate with rheumatologists, anaesthesiologists and, when needed, cardiologists and haematologists with the common aim of minimising perioperative risk in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The aim of this review is to provide the reader with simple practical recommendations regarding perioperative management of drugs such as disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and tools for a risk stratification for cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk based on current evidence for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Perioperative medical management for patients with RA, SPA, and SLE undergoing total hip and total knee replacement: a narrative review

Total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are widely used, successful procedures for symptomatic end stage arthritis of the hips or knees, but patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and spondyloarthritis (SPA) including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PSA) are at higher risk for adverse events after surgery. Utilization rates of THA and TKA remain high for patients with RA, and rates of arthroplasty have increased for patients with SLE and SPA. However, complications such as infection are increased for patients with SLE, RA, and SPA, most of whom are receiving potent immunosuppressant medications and glucocorticoids at the time of surgery. Patients with SLE and AS are also at increased risk for perioperative cardiac and venous thromboembolism (VTE), while RA patients do not have an increase in perioperative cardiac or VTE risk, despite an overall increase in VTE and cardiac disease. This narrative review will discuss the areas of heightened risk for patients with RA, SLE, and SPA, and the perioperative management strategies currently used to minimize the risks.

A prospective comparison of telemedicine versus in-person delivery of an interprofessional education program for adults with inflammatory arthritis

Introduction We evaluated two modes of delivery of an inflammatory arthritis education program ("Prescription for Education" (RxEd)) in improving arthritis self-efficacy and other secondary outcomes. Methods We used a non-randomized, pre-post design to compare videoconferencing (R, remote using telemedicine) versus local (I, in-person) delivery of the program. Data were collected at baseline (T₁), immediately following RxEd (T₂), and at six months (T₃). Self-report questionnaires served as the data collection tool. Measures included demographics, disorder-related, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (SE), previous knowledge (Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit (ACREU) rheumatoid arthritis knowledge questionnaire), coping efficacy, Illness Intrusiveness, and Effective Consumer Scale. Analysis included: baseline comparisons and longitudinal trends (R vs I groups); direct between-group comparisons; and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analysis. Results A total of 123 persons attended the program (I: n = 36; R: n = 87) and 111 completed the baseline questionnaire (T₁), with follow-up completed by 95% ( n = 117) at T₂ and 62% ( n = 76) at T₃. No significant baseline differences were found across patient characteristics and outcome measures. Both groups (R and I) showed immediate effect (improved arthritis SE, mean change (95% confidence interval (CI)): R 1.07 (0.67, 1.48); I 1.48 (0.74, 2.23)) after the program that diminished over six months (mean change (95% CI): R 0.45 (-0.1, 0.1); I 0.73 (-0.25, 1.7)). For each of the secondary outcomes, both groups showed similar trends for improvement (mean change scores (95% CI)) over time. GEE analysis did not show any meaningful differences between groups (R vs I) over time. Discussion Improvements in arthritis self-efficacy and secondary outcomes displayed similar trends for I and R participant groups.

Cardiovascular risk in the rheumatic disease patient undergoing orthopedic surgery

A hallmark of the rheumatic diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosis, spondyloarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, has been sustained inflammation, which typically targets the joint and may lead to joint destruction. Inflammation also plays a role in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which is highly prevalent in patients with rheumatic diseases. Total joint arthroplasty, considered an intermediate cardiac risk procedure by the American College of Cardiology, maintains an important role in the management of rheumatic disease patients who progress to end-stage joints. The purpose of this article is to discuss the role of inflammation in cardiovascular disease, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases, and the role of cardiovascular risk assessment when these patients undergo total joint arthroplasty.

Orthopedic surgery and its complication in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-systemic immune-complex mediated autoimmune condition which chiefly affects women during their prime year. While the management of the condition falls into the specialty of internal medicine, patients with SLE often present with signs and symptoms pertaining to the territory of orthopedic surgery such as tendon rupture, carpal tunnel syndrome, osteonecrosis, osteoporotic fracture and infection including septic arthritis, osteomyelitis and spondylodiscitis. While these orthopedic-related conditions are often debilitating in patients with SLE which necessitate management by orthopedic specialists, a high index of suspicion is necessary in diagnosing these conditions early because lupus patients with potentially severe orthopedic conditions such as osteomyelitis frequently present with mild symptoms and subtle signs such as low grade fever, mild hip pain and back tenderness. Additionally, even if these orthopedic conditions can be recognized, complications as a result of surgical procedures are indeed not uncommon. SLE per se and its various associated pharmacological treatments may pose lupus patients to certain surgical risks if they are not properly attended to and managed prior to, during and after surgery. Concerted effort of management and effective communication among orthopedic specialists and rheumatologists play an integral part in enhancing favorable outcome and reduction in postoperative complications for patients with SLE through thorough pre-operative evaluation, careful peri-operative monitoring and treatment, as well as judicious postoperative care.