Appendicular Lean Mass, Grip Strength, and the Development of Knee Osteoarthritis and Knee Pain Among Older Adults

Association of low muscle mass index and sarcopenic obesity with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia and knee osteoarthritis are common age-related diseases that have become important public health issues worldwide. Few studies have reported the association between muscle mass loss and knee osteoarthritis. This may be due to the high level of heterogeneity between studies stemming from different definitions of muscle mass loss.

METHODS

The systematic searches were carried out in PubMed and Web of Science from the inception of the databases until 13 January 2023, by two independent researchers. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for overall and subgroup analyses were obtained using either a random effects model (I2 >50%) or fixed effects model (I2 ≤50%) in Stata.

RESULTS

Of the 1,606 studies identified, we ultimately included 12 articles on the association between muscle mass and knee osteoarthritis (prospective: n = 5; cross-sectional: n = 7). Low-quality evidence indicated that low muscle mass index and sarcopenic obesity increase the odds of knee osteoarthritis (low muscle mass index OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.64; sarcopenic obesity OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.35-2.34). However, no association was observed between general sarcopenia or low muscle mass with knee osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that low muscle mass index and sarcopenic obesity were associated with an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis.

Causal relationship between sarcopenia with osteoarthritis and the mediating role of obesity: a univariate, multivariate, two-step Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Recent genetic evidence supports a causal role for sarcopenia in osteoarthritis, which may be mediated by the occurrence of obesity or changes in circulating inflammatory protein levels. Here, we leveraged publicly available genome-wide association study data to investigate the intrinsic causal relationship between sarcopenia, obesity, circulating inflammatory protein levels, and osteoarthritis.

METHODS

In this study, we used Mendelian randomization analyses to explore the causal relationship between sarcopenia phenotypes (Appendicular lean mass [ALM], Low hand-grip strength [LHG], and usual walking pace [UWP]) and osteoarthritis (Knee osteoarthritis [KOA], and Hip osteoarthritis [HOA]). Univariable Mendelian randomization (UVMR) analyses were performed using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, MR-Egger, weighted median method, simple mode, and weighted mode, with the IVW method being the primary analytical technique. Subsequently, the independent causal effects of sarcopenia phenotype on osteoarthritis were investigated using multivariate Mendelian randomization (MVMR) analysis. To further explore the mechanisms involved, obesity and circulating inflammatory proteins were introduced as the mediator variables, and a two-step Mendelian randomization analysis was used to explore the mediating effects of obesity and circulating inflammatory proteins between ALM and KOA as well as the mediating proportions.

RESULTS

UVMR analysis showed a causal relationship between ALM, LHG, UWP and KOA [(OR = 1.151, 95% CI: 1.087-1.218, P = 1.19 × 10-6, PFDR = 7.14 × 10-6) (OR = 1.215, 95% CI: 1.004-1.470; P = 0.046, PFDR = 0.055) (OR = 0.503, 95% CI: 0.292-0.867; P = 0.013, PFDR = 0.027)], and a causal relationship between ALM, UWP and HOA [(OR = 1.181, 95% CI: 1.103-1.265, P = 2.05 × 10-6, PFDR = 6.15 × 10-6) (OR = 0.438, 95% CI: 0.226-0.849, P = 0.014, PFDR = 0.022)]. In the MVMR analyses adjusting for confounders (body mass index, insomnia, sedentary behavior, and bone density), causal relationships were observed between ALM, LHG, UWP and KOA [(ALM: OR = 1.323, 95%CI: 1.224- 1.431, P = 2.07 × 10-12), (LHG: OR = 1.161, 95%CI: 1.044- 1.292, P = 0.006), (UWP: OR = 0.511, 95%CI: 0.290- 0.899, P = 0.020)], and between ALM and HOA (ALM: OR = 1.245, 95%CI: 1.149- 1.348, P = 7.65 × 10-8). In a two-step MR analysis, obesity was identified to play a potential mediating role in ALM and KOA (proportion mediated: 5.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that decreased appendicular lean mass, grip strength, and walking speed increase the risk of KOA and decreased appendicular lean mass increases the risk of HOA in patients with sarcopenia in a European population. Obesity plays a mediator role in the occurrence of KOA due to appendicular lean body mass reduction.

Genetic causality and site-specific relationship between sarcopenia and osteoarthritis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Background: Previous studies demonstrated a controversial relationship between sarcopenia (SP) and osteoarthritis (OA) and their genetic causality is unclear. Thus, we conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the possible causal association between sarcopenia-related traits (appendicular lean mass (ALM), grip strength, usual walking pace) and OA. Method: We used pooled genetic data from the UK Biobank for ALM(n = 450,243), left-hand grip strength (n = 461,026), right-hand grip strength (n = 461,089) and usual walking pace (n = 459,915). Moreover, summary statistics for OA were obtained from the latest study conducted by the Genetics of Osteoarthritis Consortium, including all OA (n = 826,690), hand OA (n = 303,7782), hip OA (n = 353,388) and knee OA (n = 396,054). The primary method for estimating causal effects was the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, with the utilizing of false discovery rate adjusted p values (P FDR). Additional MR methods such as MR-Egger regression, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), weighted median were employed as supplementary analyses. Results: We discovered ALM (odds ratio (OR) = 1.103, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.052-1.156, P FDR = 2.87E-04), hand grip strength (left, IVW OR = 0.823, 95% CI = 0.712 to 0.952, P FDR = 0.020; right, OR = 0.826, 95% CI = 0.718 to 0.950, P FDR = 0.020), and usual walking pace (OR = 0.339, 95% CI = 0.204 to 0.564, P FDR = 2.38E-04) were causally associated with OA risk. In the reverse MR analysis, we identified a causal effect of OA on ALM (β = -0.258, 95% CI = -0.369 to 0.146, P FDR = 0.6.07E-06), grip strength (left, β = -0.064, 95% CI = -0.104 to 0.024, P FDR = 0.002; right, β = -0.055, 95% CI = -0.095 to 0.014, P FDR = 0.008), and usual walking pace (β = -0.104, 95% CI = -0.147 to 0.061, P FDR = 1.61E-05). Conclusion: This present study suggests an obvious causality of SP on OA, with condition exhibiting site-specific effects, while evidence was also provided for the causal effect of OA on SP.

Age- and sex-specific normative values for muscle mass parameters in 18,625 Brazilian adults

Background

The present study aimed to provide age- and sex-specific normative values for muscle mass parameters in Brazilian adults.

Methods

Data pertaining to Brazilian adults (18+ years) who attended a nutritional clinical between January 2018 and July 2022 were analyzed. Muscle mass parameters were assessed using a bioimpedance digital scale (InBody 230, GBC BioMed NZ). Assessments were conducted under standard conditions, with participants refraining from physical exercise for 96 h and from eating or drinking (including water) for 8 h before evaluations.

Results

A total of 18,625 Brazilian adults were analyzed. Normative values for absolute and relative (height, m2) muscle mass and appendicular muscle mass (ASM) were calculated. In addition, specific age-related changes in muscle mass parameters were observed. In women, muscle mass peaked between the ages of 40-49 before gradually declining at an average rate of 5.7% per decade from the sixth decade of life onwards. ASM reached its peak earlier, during the third decade of life, and started to decline later, from 50 to 59 years. In contrast, absolute and ASM peaked at 40-49 years and declined from the sixth decade of life in men. Both sexes displayed a slightly greater decline in ASM than in muscle mass (13 vs. 12%).

Conclusions

The present study provides normative values for absolute and relative muscle mass and ASM in Brazilian adults. Furthermore, important specific age-related changes in muscle mass parameters were observed. These data have public health implications and might serve as a reference tool to guide health professionals.

Causal relationship between sarcopenia and osteoarthritis: a bi-directional two-sample mendelian randomized study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that osteoarthritis (OA) and sarcopenia (SP) are closely related to each other, but the causal relationships between them have not been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the causal associations between OA and SP via a bi-directional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

METHODS

A bi-directional two-sample MR was adopted to research the causal relationship between SP and OA. The instrumental variables for SP and four types of OA: KOA, HOA, total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) were derived from published large genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger and weighted median estimator (WME) methods were used to estimate bi-directional causal effects.

RESULTS

Low grip strength (GS) did not have a causal effect on four types of OA (KOA: OR = 1.205, 95% CI 0.837-1.734, p = 0.316; HOA: OR = 1.090, 95% CI 0.924-1.609, p = 0.307; TKR: OR = 1.190, 95% CI 1.084-1.307, p = 0.058; THR: OR = 1.035, 95% CI 0.792-1.353, p = 0.798), while appendicular lean mass (ALM) had a causal effect on four types of OA (KOA: OR = 1.104, 95% CI 1.041-1.171, p = 0.001; HOA: OR = 1.151, 95% CI 1.071-1.237, p < 0.001; TKR: OR = 1.114, 95% CI 1.007-1.232, p < 0.001; THR: OR = 1.203, 95% CI 1.099-1.316, p < 0.001). In the reverse direction, KOA or HOA did not have a significant causal effect on both GS and ALM (KOA-GS: OR = 1.077, 95% CI 0.886-1.309, p = 0.458; KOA-ALM: Beta = 0.004, p = 0.892; HOA-GS: OR = 1.038, 95% CI 0.981-1.099, p = 0.209; HOA-ALM: Beta = - 0.017, p = 0.196; TKR-GS: OR = 0.999, 95% CI 0.739-1.351, p = 0.997; TKR-ALM: Beta = 0.018, p = 0.501; THR-GS: OR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.978-1.101, p = 0.222; THR-ALM: Beta = - 0.023, p = 0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that SP may have a causal effect on OA through changes in muscle composition rather than muscle strength, while little evidence was provided for the causal effect of OA on SP.

Osteoarthritis and sarcopenia-related traits: the cross-sectional study from NHANES 2011-2014 and Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) and sarcopenia are common musculoskeletal disorders in the aged population, and a growing body of evidence indicated that they mutually influence one another. Nevertheless, there was still substantial controversy and uncertainty about the causal relationship between sarcopenia and OA. We explored the complex association between sarcopenia-related traits and OA using cross-sectional analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR).

METHODS

The cross-sectional study used the data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2014. Weighted multivariable-adjusted logistic regression and subgroup analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between sarcopenia, grip, appendicular lean mass (ALM) and the risk of OA. Then, we further performed MR analysis to examine the causal effect of sarcopenia-related traits (grip strength, ALM) on OA. Instrumental variables for grip strength and ALM were from the UK Biobank, and the summary-level data for OA was derived from the Genetics of Osteoarthritis (GO) Consortium GWAS (n = 826,690).

RESULTS

In this cross-sectional analysis, we observed that sarcopenia, grip were significantly linked with the risk of OA (OR 1.607, 95% CI 1.233-2.094, P < 0.001), (OR 0.972, 95% CI 0.964-0.979, P < 0.001). According to subgroup analyses stratified by gender, body mass index (BMI), and age, the significant positive relationship between sarcopenia and OA remained in males, females, the age (46-59 years) group, and the BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m²) group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, MR analysis and sensitivity analyses showed causal associations between right grip, left grip and KOA (OR 0.668; 95% CI 0.509 to 0.877; P = 0.004), (OR 0.786; 95% CI 0.608 to 0.915; P = 0.042). Consistent directional effects for all analyses were observed in both the MR-Egger and weighted median methods. Subsequently, sensitivity analyses revealed no heterogeneity, directional pleiotropy or outliers for the causal effect of grip strength on KOA (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our research provided evidence that sarcopenia is correlated with an increased risk of OA, and there was a protective impact of genetically predicted grip strength on OA. These findings needed to be verified in further prospective cohort studies with a large sample size.

Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Muscle Mass Are Associated With Incident Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Recent literature suggests that sarcopenia, often represented by low lower limbs muscle mass and strength, can be considered a potential risk factor for knee osteoarthritis (OA), but the available literature is still limited. We therefore aimed to investigate whether sarcopenia is associated with a higher risk of radiographic (ROA) and symptomatic knee OA (SxOA) in a large cohort of North American people in the context of the OA initiative. Sarcopenia at baseline was diagnosed in case of low skeletal muscle mass (i.e., lower skeletal mass index) and poor performance in the chair stands test. The outcomes of interest for this study included ROA (radiographical osteoarthritis) if a knee developed a Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade ≥2 at follow-up, and SxOA (symptomatic osteoarthritis) defined as new onset of a combination of painful knee OA. Altogether, 2,492 older participants (mean age: 68.4 years, 61.4% females) were included. At baseline, sarcopenia was present in 6.1% of the population. No significant difference in ROA prevalence was observed between those with and without sarcopenia (p=0.76), whilst people with sarcopenia reported a significant higher prevalence of SxOA (p<0.0001). Using a logistic regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders at baseline and the diagnosis of sarcopenia during follow-up, sarcopenia was associated with a higher incidence of knee SxOA (odds ratio, OR=2.29; 95%CI [confidence interval]: 1.42-3.71; p=0.001), but not knee ROA (OR=1.48; 95%CI: 0.53-4.10; p=0.45). In conclusion, sarcopenia could be associated with a higher risk of negative knee OA outcomes, in particular symptomatic forms.