Chemotherapy in geriatric patients with poor performance status small cell lung cancer: Series from a tertiary care center

Survival outcomes and prognostic nutritional index in very elderly small-cell lung cancer patients: importance of active treatment and nutritional support

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive tumor with a high metastatic potential, particularly affecting current or former heavy smokers. Treatment typically involves chemotherapy, often combined with radiotherapy, and immunotherapy for extensive disease. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended to reduce brain metastases. Elderly SCLC patients face unique challenges due to frailty and comorbidities, leading to increased risks of treatment-related toxicity and malnutrition. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a composite marker of nutritional and immune status, has shown promise in predicting outcomes in various malignancies. However, the optimal treatment approach for very elderly SCLC patients remains unclear, as they are often excluded from clinical trials.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of SCLC patients aged 75 years or older and their correlation with PNI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed data from 71 SCLC patients aged ≥75 years, focusing on age, gender, smoking status, chronic diseases, performance status, clinical stage, treatment modality, and pretreatment PNI. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that 26.8% of very elderly SCLC patients received no active treatment, resulting in a significantly shorter median survival time of 1.3 months. In contrast, patients who underwent aggressive treatment, such as palliative chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, had significantly longer median survival times. Multivariate analysis revealed that receiving chemotherapy plus radiotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit compared to no treatment. Furthermore, low PNI (≤40) was independently associated with decreased OS.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of active treatment and nutritional support in improving survival outcomes for very elderly SCLC patients. The findings suggest that low PNI and lack of oncological treatment are associated with worse survival outcomes. Therefore, integrating nutritional assessment, interventions, and appropriate treatment strategies are crucial in managing lung cancer patients. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and explore potential interventions to optimize nutritional status and improve outcomes for elderly patients with SCLC.

Clinicopathological Features and First-Line Treatment Outcomes of Geriatric Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study

Introduction The geriatric patient population diagnosed with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is underrepresented in clinical studies. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment patterns and treatment outcomes of patients aged 65 years or older with extensive stage SCLC. Material and methods In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, patients aged 65 years or older, diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC, between January 2009 and December 2021 were included. Patients who were under 65 years of age at the time of diagnosis and did not develop progression after curative treatment and patients with a second malignancy were excluded from the study. The clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment patterns and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 132 patients were included in the study. The median age was 70 years (range:65-91), and 118 (89.4%) patients were male. There were 77 (58.3%) patients with eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1. There were 26 (19.7%) patients in the limited stage disease and 106 (80.3%) patients in the extensive stage disease at the time of diagnosis. First-line chemotherapy was given to 86 (65.2%) patients. Of the patients who could not receive treatment, 18 patients (13.6%) due to patient refusal, and 28 patients (21.2%) due to comorbid diseases and poor performance status with organ dysfunctions. The most common treatment regimen used as first-line treatment was cisplatin+etoposide (n=47, 54.7%), and followed by carboplatin+etoposide (n=39, 45.3%). First-line chemotherapy responses were complete response in 4 (4.7%) patients, partial response in 35 (40.7%) patients, stable disease in 13 (15.1%) patients, and progressive disease in 34 (39.5%) patients. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events was neutropenia in 33 (38.4%) patients. Forty nine patients (57.0%) completed the planned first-line treatment. The mPFS was 6.1 months and the mOS was 8.2 months with first-line treatment. We found that ECOG PS status was the most important negative prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. There was no difference between carboplatin+etoposide and cisplatin+etoposide regimens in terms of PFS, OS, adverse events and treatment compliance. Conclusion Thus, it may be an appropriate approach not to give up chemotherapy treatment easily in elderly patients with a diagnosis of extensive stage SCLC. It should be kept in mind that finding factors that might affect the prognosis and tailoring the tretment precisely on case-by-case basis in geriatric cancer patients have an impact on survival.