Current progress in perioperative chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to further explore the impact of the addition of immunotherapy to gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients.

Methods

Literature research was performed, and hazard ratio values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the tau-squared estimator ( τ 2 ) . The total Cochrane Q test (Q) was also assessed. The overall survival rate, objective response rate, and progression-free survival in the selected studies were assessed.

Results

A total of 1,754 participants were included. Heterogeneity among the studies selected was found to be non-significant (p = 0.78; tau2 = 0, I2 = 0%). The model estimation results and the forest plot suggested that the test for the overall effect was significant (Z = -3.51; p< 0.01).

Conclusion

The results of the current meta-analysis further confirm the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus gemcitabine-cisplatin as the new standard first-line treatment for advanced BTC patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023488095.

Impact of the serum creatinine and cystatin C ratio for prediction of sarcopenia and prognosis in biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a poor prognostic factor in cancer patients. In recent years, there have been reports that serum creatinine and cystatin C (Cr/CysC) ratio is associated with sarcopenia. However, the prognostic value of the Cr/CysC ratio in biliary tract cancer is unclear. We evaluated the impact of the Cr/CysC ratio on sarcopenia and prognosis in biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 190 patients with biliary tract cancer who had undergone surgical resection from January 2017 to March 2023. Frozen serum samples collected at the time of surgery were used to measure CysC. We calculated the Cr/CysC ratio and investigated the relationship with sarcopenia and the prognostic significance.

RESULTS

We calculated the cutoff value of the Cr/CysC ratio for low skeletal muscle index (SMI) (< 42 cm2/m2 for males and < 38 cm2/m2 for females). The optimal cutoff value of the Cr/CysC ratio was 0.848. The low Cr/CysC ratio group was significantly associated with higher preoperative CRP and lower albumin, lower SMI, lower handgrip strength, and higher intramuscular adipose tissue content. In multivariate analysis, patients with a low Cr/CysC ratio showed poorer overall survival (hazard ratio 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.07-6.29, p = 0.033), which was significantly worse than in those with a high Cr/CysC ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with biliary tract cancer, the Cr/CysC ratio showed weak correlation with sarcopenic indicators. However, the Cr/CysC ratio could be strong prognostic factor in biliary tract cancer.

SERPINE1: Role in Cholangiocarcinoma Progression and a Therapeutic Target in the Desmoplastic Microenvironment

A heterogenous population of inflammatory elements, other immune and nonimmune cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are evident in solid malignancies where they coexist with the growing tumor mass. In highly desmoplastic malignancies, CAFs are the prominent mesenchymal cell type in the tumor microenvironment (TME), where their presence and abundance signal a poor prognosis. CAFs play a major role in the progression of various cancers by remodeling the supporting stroma into a dense, fibrotic matrix while secreting factors that promote the maintenance of cancer stem-like characteristics, tumor cell survival, aggressive growth and metastasis and reduced sensitivity to chemotherapeutics. Tumors with high stromal fibrotic signatures are more likely to be associated with drug resistance and eventual relapse. Identifying the molecular underpinnings for such multidirectional crosstalk among the various normal and neoplastic cell types in the TME may provide new targets and novel opportunities for therapeutic intervention. This review highlights recent concepts regarding the complexity of CAF biology in cholangiocarcinoma, a highly desmoplastic cancer. The discussion focuses on CAF heterogeneity, functionality in drug resistance, contributions to a progressively fibrotic tumor stroma, the involved signaling pathways and the participating genes.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus raltitrexed or S-1 versus standard third-line therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

After the failure of standard first- and second-line treatments, including oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with targeted drugs, the currently recommended third-line regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include TAS-102, regorafenib, and fruquintinib. However, these regimens have the drawbacks of mediocre efficacy, substantive side effects, and high cost. Therefore, more effective, economical regimens with fewer side effects are needed in clinical practice. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus raltitrexed or S-1 as a third- or later-line treatment in comparison to those of standard third-line therapies for patients with mCRC.

Methods

Patients with previous failures of at least two lines of standard therapy with oxaliplatin, 5-FU, irinotecan, or capecitabine combined with targeted drugs were included. The participants received standard third-line therapies (including TAS-102, regorafenib, and fruquintinib) or gemcitabine plus raltitrexed or S-1 until disease progression, death, or intolerable toxicity arose. Imaging follow-up was performed every 3 months during their treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the potential predictors of survival.

Results

From April 2018 to October 2022, 60 patients with mCRC were enrolled in our study. The numbers of patients in the chemotherapy, fruquintinib, regorafenib, and TAS-102 groups were 13, 15, 17, and 15, respectively; the median OS of the four groups was 7.4, 6.1, 8.3, and 6.7 months (P=0.384), respectively; the median PFS was 4.1, 3.4, 4.4, and 2.3 months (P=0.656), respectively; the overall response rate was 7.69%, 6.67%, 0.00%, and 13.33%, respectively; and the disease control rate was 61.54%, 60.00%, 70.59%, and 60.00%, respectively. Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed that primary lesion located in the rectum was adverse independent prognostic factors for OS. A typical case is presented in this article.

Conclusions

The gemcitabine plus raltitrexed or S-1 regimen is a potential regimen with tolerable adverse reactions and low cost for patients with mCRC.

Establishment and characterization of the gemcitabine-resistant human gallbladder cancer cell line NOZ GemR

Background

Patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) generally receive gemcitabine as the standard treatment; however, its efficacy is often limited owing to the development of resistance.

Methods

To identify the mechanisms underlying gemcitabine resistance in GBC, a gemcitabine-resistant GBC cell line (NOZ GemR) was established by exposing the parental NOZ cell line to increasing concentrations of gemcitabine. Morphological changes, growth rates, and migratory and invasive capabilities were evaluated. Protein expression was detected using western blotting.

Results

The results demonstrated that the IC50 of NOZ and NOZ GemR was 0.011 and 4.464 μM, respectively, and that the resistance index ratio was 405.8. In comparison, NOZ GemR cells grew slower and had significantly lower migration and invasion abilities than NOZ cells. There were altered levels of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation markers in NOZ GemR cells, as well as increased levels of the Akt/mTOR pathway protein.

Conclusion

The NOZ GemR cell line could be used as an effective in vitro model to improve our understanding of gemcitabine resistance in GBC.

Current Standards, Multidisciplinary Approaches, and Future Directions in the Management of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Biliary tract cancers are molecularly and anatomically diverse cancers which include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic (perihilar and distal) cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer. While recognized as distinct entities, the rarer incidence of these cancers combined with diagnostic challenges in classifying anatomic origin has resulted in clinical trials and guideline recommended strategies being generalized patients with all types of biliary tract cancer. In this review, we delve into the unique aspects, subtype-specific clinical trial outcomes, and multidisciplinary management of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. When resectable, definitive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (sometimes with selective radiation/chemoradiation) is current standard of care. Due to high recurrence rates, there is growing interest in the use of upfront/neoadjuvant therapy to improve surgical outcomes and to downstage patients who may not initially be resectable. Select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are being successfully treated with novel approaches such as liver transplant. In the advanced disease setting, combination gemcitabine and cisplatin remains the standard base for systemic therapy and was recently improved upon with the addition of immune checkpoint blockade to the chemotherapy doublet in the recently reported TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials. Second-line all-comer treatments for these patients remain limited in both options and efficacy, so clinical trial participation should be strongly considered. With increased use of molecular testing, detection of actionable mutations and opportunities to receive indicated targeted therapies are on the rise and are the most significant driver of improved survival for patients with advanced stage disease. Though these targeted therapies are currently reserved for the second or later line, future trials are looking at moving these to earlier treatment settings and use in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In addition to cross-disciplinary management with surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, patient-centered care should also include collaboration with advanced endoscopists, palliative care specialists, and nutritionists to improve global patient outcomes.