1
|
Iezza M, Cortesi S, Ottaviani E, Mancini M, Venturi C, Monaldi C, De Santis S, Testoni N, Soverini S, Rosti G, Cavo M, Castagnetti F. Prognosis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Baseline Factors, Dynamic Risk Assessment and Novel Insights. Cells 2023; 12:1703. [PMID: 37443737 PMCID: PMC10341256 DOI: 10.3390/cells12131703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed the treatment paradigm of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), leading to a dramatic improvement of the outcome of CML patients, who now have a nearly normal life expectancy and, in some selected cases, the possibility of aiming for the more ambitious goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). However, the minority of patients who fail treatment and progress from chronic phase (CP) to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) still have a relatively poor prognosis. The identification of predictive elements enabling a prompt recognition of patients at higher risk of progression still remains among the priorities in the field of CML management. Currently, the baseline risk is assessed using simple clinical and hematologic parameters, other than evaluating the presence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs), especially those at "high-risk". Beyond the onset, a re-evaluation of the risk status is mandatory, monitoring the response to TKI treatment. Moreover, novel critical insights are emerging into the role of genomic factors, present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This review presents the current knowledge regarding prognostic factors in CML and their potential role for an improved risk classification and a subsequent enhancement of therapeutic decisions and disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Iezza
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (C.M.); (S.D.S.); (N.T.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Sofia Cortesi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (C.M.); (S.D.S.); (N.T.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Emanuela Ottaviani
- Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.O.); (M.M.); (C.V.)
| | - Manuela Mancini
- Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.O.); (M.M.); (C.V.)
| | - Claudia Venturi
- Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.O.); (M.M.); (C.V.)
| | - Cecilia Monaldi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (C.M.); (S.D.S.); (N.T.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Sara De Santis
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (C.M.); (S.D.S.); (N.T.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Nicoletta Testoni
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (C.M.); (S.D.S.); (N.T.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (F.C.)
- Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.O.); (M.M.); (C.V.)
| | - Simona Soverini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (C.M.); (S.D.S.); (N.T.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Gianantonio Rosti
- Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Michele Cavo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (C.M.); (S.D.S.); (N.T.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (F.C.)
- Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.O.); (M.M.); (C.V.)
| | - Fausto Castagnetti
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (C.M.); (S.D.S.); (N.T.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (F.C.)
- Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.O.); (M.M.); (C.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Banjar H, Adelson D, Brown F, Chaudhri N. Intelligent Techniques Using Molecular Data Analysis in Leukaemia: An Opportunity for Personalized Medicine Support System. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 2017:3587309. [PMID: 28812013 PMCID: PMC5547708 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3587309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
The use of intelligent techniques in medicine has brought a ray of hope in terms of treating leukaemia patients. Personalized treatment uses patient's genetic profile to select a mode of treatment. This process makes use of molecular technology and machine learning, to determine the most suitable approach to treating a leukaemia patient. Until now, no reviews have been published from a computational perspective concerning the development of personalized medicine intelligent techniques for leukaemia patients using molecular data analysis. This review studies the published empirical research on personalized medicine in leukaemia and synthesizes findings across studies related to intelligence techniques in leukaemia, with specific attention to particular categories of these studies to help identify opportunities for further research into personalized medicine support systems in chronic myeloid leukaemia. A systematic search was carried out to identify studies using intelligence techniques in leukaemia and to categorize these studies based on leukaemia type and also the task, data source, and purpose of the studies. Most studies used molecular data analysis for personalized medicine, but future advancement for leukaemia patients requires molecular models that use advanced machine-learning methods to automate decision-making in treatment management to deliver supportive medical information to the patient in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haneen Banjar
- School of Computer Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Department of Computer Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - David Adelson
- School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Fred Brown
- School of Computer Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Naeem Chaudhri
- Oncology Centre, Section of Hematology, HSCT, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Outcome prediction by the transcript level of BCR-ABL at 3 months in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib-a single institution historical experience. Leuk Res 2014; 38:1191-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2014] [Revised: 07/04/2014] [Accepted: 07/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
5
|
Khorashad JS, Deininger MWN. Selection of therapy: rational decisions based on molecular events. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2012; 25:1009-23, vi. [PMID: 22054732 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2011.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews to what extent molecular data can be used to rationalize therapeutic choices in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Two categories of data are discussed: markers that globally measure risk but do not provide a molecular rationale for therapy selection; and biomarkers with a causal link to a clinical phenotype, such as certain mutations of the BCR-ABL kinase domain. As therapy selection is still mainly based on clinical criteria, molecular biomarkers are discussed in the context of available clinical prognostication tools, focusing on biomarkers that do not reflect disease burden as a surrogate of responsiveness to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamshid S Khorashad
- Deininger Lab, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Room 4270, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5550, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|