Factors associated with risk of central nervous system relapse in patients with non-core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Gilteritinib Monotherapy as a Transplant Bridging Option for a Patient with FLT3-Mutated Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Who Developed a Second Relapse after All-Trans Retinoic Acid + Chemotherapy, Arsenic Trioxide, and High-Dose Cytarabine Therapy

We report a case of FLT3-mutated APL who developed disease relapse despite all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) + chemotherapy, and re-induction chemotherapy with arsenic trioxide (ATO) and high-dose (HD) cytarabine (Ara-C) therapy failed to yield complete remission. Because the leukemic cells were resistant to all the aforementioned therapies, we started the patient on monotherapy with gilteritinib, a selective FLT3-inhibitor, as an alternative re-induction treatment option rather than further intensive chemotherapy. The patient showed complete hematologic remission in response to this therapy. This case serves as supporting evidence for the use of single-agent therapy with gilteritinib as a bridge to transplantation in patients with refractory FLT3-mutated APL.

A phase 2 study of sorafenib combined with conventional therapies in refractory central nervous system leukemia

BACKGROUND

Patients with refractory central nervous system leukemia (CNSL) have a dismal prognosis and lack effective therapy. Case reports have shown that sorafenib is effective against brain metastases, including leukemia.

METHODS

To explore the efficacy of sorafenib combined with conventional therapies for refractory CNSL, a phase 2 study was conducted. The primary end point was the complete remission rate (CRR) within 8 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included the overall response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with refractory CNSL were enrolled; they included 17 with isolated CNSL, 7 with hematological relapse, and 2 with another extramedullary relapse. After 8 weeks of treatment, 21 patients achieved complete remission, 2 achieved partial remission, and 3 achieved no remission for a CRR of 80.8% (95% CI, 62.1%-91.5%) and an ORR of 88.5% (95% CI, 71.0%-96.0%). Twenty patients survived, and 6 died. The 2-year EFS and OS rates were 75.0% (95% CI, 54.5%-88.3%) and 76.9% (95% CI, 54.2%-90.4%), respectively. Six patients experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs, including moderate chronic graft-vs-host disease (n = 3), grade 3 or 4 acute graft-vs-host disease (n = 2), and grade 3 skin rash (n = 1). No treatment-related deaths occurred during the therapy of refractory CNSL.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib combined with conventional therapies is effective and safe for refractory CNSL.

LAY SUMMARY

Sorafenib combined with conventional therapies is effective and safe for refractory central nervous system leukemia.

Which FLT3 Inhibitor for Treatment of AML?

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment options in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved significantly over the last decade with better understanding of disease biology and availability of a multitude of targeted therapies. The use of FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) in FLT3-mutated (FLT3^mut) AML is one such development; however, the clinical decisions that govern their use and dictate the choice of the FLT3i are evolving. Midostaurin and gilteritinib are FDA-approved in specific situations; however, available data from clinical trials also shed light on the utility of sorafenib maintenance post-allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and quizartinib as part of combination therapy in FLT3^mut AML. The knowledge of the patient's concurrent myeloid mutations, type of FLT3 mutation, prior FLT3i use, and eligibility for allo-SCT helps to refine the choice of FLT3i. Data from ongoing studies will further precisely define their use and help in making more informed choices. Despite improvements in FLT3i therapy, the definitive aim is to enable the eligible patient with FLT3^mut AML (esp. ITD) to proceed to allo-SCT with regimens containing FLT3i incorporated prior to SCT and as maintenance after SCT.

Central Nervous System Involvement in Adults with Acute Leukemia: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent treatment advances in both acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia have drastically improved outcomes for these diseases, but central nervous system (CNS) relapses still occur. Treatment of CNS disease can be challenging due to the impermeability of the blood-brain barrier to many systemic therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of CNS leukemia relies on assessment of clinical symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid sampling for conventional cytology and/or flow cytometry, and neuroimaging. While treatment of CNS leukemia with systemic or intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiation can be curative in some patients, these modalities can also lead to serious toxicities. In the modern era, prophylaxis with intrathecal chemotherapy is the most important strategy to prevent CNS relapses in high risk patients. Accurate risk stratification tools and the use of risk-adapted prophylactic therapy are imperative to improving the outcomes of patients with acute leukemias and preventing the development of CNS leukemia.

Prevention and Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapse after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents the only curative option. Progress has been made in the last two decades in the pre-transplant induction therapies, supportive care, selection of donors and conditioning regimens that allowed to extend the HSCT to a larger number of patients, including those aged over 65 years and/or lacking an HLA-identical donor. Furthermore, improvements in the prophylaxis of the graft-versus-host disease and of infection have dramatically reduced transplant-related mortality. The relapse of AML remains the major reason for transplant failure affecting almost 40-50% of the patients. From 10 to 15 years ago to date, treatment options for AML relapsing after HSCT were limited to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and donor leukocyte infusions (DLI). Nowadays, novel agents and targeted therapies have enriched the therapeutic landscape. Moreover, very recently, the therapeutic landscape has been enriched by manipulated cellular products (CAR-T, CAR-CIK, CAR-NK). In light of these new perspectives, careful monitoring of minimal-residual disease (MRD) and prompt application of pre-emptive strategies in the post-transplant setting have become imperative. Herein, we review the current state of the art on monitoring, prevention and treatment of relapse of AML after HSCT with particular attention on novel agents and future directions.

Central Nervous System Prophylaxis and Treatment in Acute Leukemias

OPINION STATEMENT

Improvements in systemic therapy in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved patient outcomes and reduced the incidence of CNS relapse. However, management of patients with CNS disease remains challenging, and relapses in the CNS can be difficult to salvage. In addition to treatment with CNS-penetrant systemic therapy (high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine), intrathecal prophylaxis is indicated in all patients with ALL, however is not uniformly administered in patients with AML without high-risk features. There is a limited role for radiation treatment in CNS prophylaxis; however, radiation should be considered for consolidative treatment in patients with CNS disease, or as an option for palliation of symptoms. Re-examining the role of established treatment paradigms and investigating the role of radiation as bridging therapy in the era of cellular therapy, particularly in chemotherapy refractory patients, is warranted.

Neurologic complications of acute myeloid leukemia. Diagnostic approach and therapeutic modalities

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comprises a heterogeneous group of aggressive blood malignancies that arise from clonal expansion of malignant hematopoietic precursor cells in the bone marrow. Neurologic manifestations of these malignancies are manifolds. AML is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults and this review describes the neurologic complications in this age group. Neurologic symptoms and signs may develop in AML either from a direct neoplastic involvement of the central or the peripheral nervous system or as an indirect effect of the disease process. Direct involvement of the nervous system includes invasion of the central or the peripheral nervous system (parenchymal and leptomeningeal dissemination, myeloid sarcoma, neuroleukemiosis). Thrombotic and hemorrhagic events are common manifestations of indirect involvement of the nervous system and they are the outcome of hyperleukocytosis, thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy. Many neurologic complications are iatrogenic and include diverse categories such as lumbar puncture and intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapies, radiotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Most neurologic manifestations require urgent treatment and confer a poor prognosis. This review describes the neurologic complications of acute myeloid malignancies in the era of contemporary treatment. Those manifestations require expert consideration of their origin as they are being identified with increasing frequency as patients survive longer.

Predictors of outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia and KMT2A rearrangements

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with rearrangement of the lysine methyltransferase 2a gene (KMT2Ar) has adverse outcomes. However, reports on the prognostic impact of various translocations causing KMT2Ar are conflicting. Less is known about associated mutations and their prognostic impact. In a retrospective analysis, we identified 172 adult patients with KMT2Ar AML and compared them to 522 age-matched patients with diploid AML. KMT2Ar AML had fewer mutations, most commonly affecting RAS and FLT3 without significant impact on prognosis, except for patients with ≥2 mutations with lower overall survival (OS). KMT2Ar AML had worse outcomes compared with diploid AML when newly diagnosed and at relapse, especially following second salvage (median OS of 2.4 vs 4.8 months, P < 0.0001). Therapy-related KMT2Ar AML (t-AML) had worse outcomes compared with de novo KMT2Ar AML (median OS of 0.7 years vs 1.4 years, P < 0.0001). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) in first remission was associated with improved OS (5-year, 52 vs 14% for no allo-HSCT, P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, translocation subtypes causing KMT2Ar did not predict survival, unlike age and allo-HSCT. In conclusion, KMT2Ar was associated with adverse outcomes regardless of translocation subtype. Therefore, AML risk stratification guidelines should include all KMT2Ar as adverse.

Transformation of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Deletion of Chromosome 7q and Additional Abnormalities in Chromosome 8 in a Patient with Essential Thrombocythemia

This is a case report of a 60-year-old male patient with essential thrombocythemia (ET) that progressed to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in approximately 9 years. His platelet count decreased approximately 8 years after ET treatment with hydroxyurea (HU) and aspirin. The dose of HU was reduced because of suspected myelosuppression due to HU; however, myelosuppression did not improve. Bone marrow examination revealed myelofibrosis; therefore, ruxolitinib was administered. Approximately 1 year later, his leukocyte and blast counts in the peripheral blood increased; thus, ET was judged to have progressed to AML-myelodysplasia-related change. Induction chemotherapy and consolidation therapy were initiated; however, the patient unfortunately failed to achieve complete remission. We then continued to administer salvage chemotherapy; however, his general condition worsened, and he died from cerebral hemorrhage. The karyotype at the onset of ET was 46,XY, which changed to 47,XY,del(7q),+8 at the time of AML diagnosis. In addition, genetic testing revealed FLT-3 ITD mutation. His histopathological analysis showed subarachnoid and intraparenchymal hemorrhages and tumor cell infiltration into the cerebrum, brainstem, and cerebellum. In this case, deletion of the long arm of chromosome 7, additional abnormalities in chromosome 8, and FLT3-ITD mutation were confirmed as risk factors for having developed secondary AML for approximately 9 years and death from cerebral hemorrhage 1 year later.

Prognosis and risk factors for central nervous system relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

We performed a nested case-control study to investigate the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of central nervous system (CNS) relapse after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and compared the outcomes of patients with CNS relapse following haploidentical donor (HID) HSCT versus identical sibling donor (ISD) HSCT. A total of 37 patients (HID-HSCT, 24; ISD-HSCT, 13) developed CNS relapse after transplantation between January 2009 and January 2019, with an incidence of 1.81%. The median time from transplantation to CNS relapse was 239 days. Pre-HSCT CNS involvement (HR 6.940, 95% CI 3.146-15.306, p < .001) was an independent risk factor for CNS relapse after allo-HSCT for AML. The 3-year overall survival (OS) for patients with CNS relapse was 60.3 ± 8.8%, which was significantly lower than that in the controls (81.5 ± 4.5%, p = .003). The incidence of CNS relapse was 1.64% for patients who received HID-HSCT and 2.55% for those who received ISD-HSCT (p = .193). There was no significant difference in OS between the HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT subgroups among the patients with CNS relapse. In conclusion, CNS relapse is a rare but serious complication after allo-HSCT for AML, and the incidence and outcomes of patients with CNS relapse are comparable following HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT.

Myeloid sarcoma, chloroma, or extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia tumor: A tale of misnomers, controversy and the unresolved

The World Health Organization classification and definition of "myeloid sarcoma" is imprecise and misleading. A more accurate term is "extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia tumor (eAML)." The pathogenesis of eAML has been associated with aberrancy of cellular adhesion molecules, chemokine receptors/ligands and RAS-MAPK/ERK signaling. eAML can present with or without synchronous or metachronous intramedullary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) so a bone marrow evaluation is always recommended. Accurate diagnosis of eAML requires tissue biopsy. eAML confined to one or a few sites is frequently treated with local therapy such as radiotherapy. About 75-90% of patients with isolated eAML will develop metachronous intramedullary AML with a median latency period ranging from 4 to 12 months; thus, patients with isolated eAML may also be treated with systemic anti-leukemia therapy. eAML does not appear to have an independent prognostic impact; selection of post-remission therapy including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) is typically guided by intramedullary disease risk. Management of isolated eAML should be individualized based on patient characteristics as well as eAML location and cytogenetic/molecular features. The role of PET/CT in eAML is also currently being elucidated. Improving outcomes of patients with eAML requires further knowledge of its etiology and mechanism(s) as well as therapeutic approaches beyond conventional chemotherapy, ideally in the context of controlled trials.