Outcomes of bendamustine- or cyclophosphamide-based first-line chemotherapy in older patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma

Immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a National Cancer Database analysis

Debate remains over the role of rituximab, a large molecule with reduced central nervous system (CNS) penetration, in therapy for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Since 2013, the National Cancer Database has distinguished between chemotherapy and immunotherapy for frontline treatment. In this setting, rituximab would be the only standard frontline immunotherapy. We examined factors associated with the receipt of immunotherapy using a multivariate regression model for relative risk, with a random intercept to account for the hospital-specific treatment selection process. Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to limit possible confounders, and overall survival (OS) was compared in the matched cohort. We identified 4691 patients with PCNSL diagnosed between 2013 and 2018. The use of immunotherapy has increased from 45% in 2013 to 76% in 2018. Immunotherapy use was associated with sociodemographic variables and local (hospital level) preference rather than clinical factors. The main factors associated with reduced use of immunotherapy included male sex, Black race or Hispanic ethnicity (compared with White non-Hispanic), HIV+ status, treatment in a lower-volume hospital, and earlier year of diagnosis. We matched 2830 patients for the survival analysis. Receipt of immunotherapy was associated with a significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.83). There was heterogeneity according to age, because the advantage of immunotherapy was more pronounced for patients aged ≤75 years (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80) than for those older than 75 years (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08). Overall, our findings support the current trend toward rituximab use, although a nuanced approach should be adopted when treating older patients.

Risk of a second cancer and infection in patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma exposed to first-line bendamustine plus rituximab: A retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database

Bendamustine has a potent immunosuppressive effect because it causes T-cell lymphopenia, which might lead to a second primary malignancy (SPM) and would increase the risk of infection. Using the Medical Data Vision administrative claims database, we compared the cumulative incidence of SPM, infections within 6 months, and overall survival (OS) among untreated patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas (iBCL) who received rituximab-based chemotherapy between 2009 and 2020. Patients with grade 3b follicular lymphoma or a previous history of malignancy were excluded. Eligible 5234 patients were assigned to three cohorts: rituximab monotherapy (N = 780), RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP (doxorubicin replaced with pirarubicin) (N = 2298), or bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (N = 2156). There were 589 recorded SPMs, of which myelodysplastic syndromes were the most common (1.7%). The cumulative incidence of SPM was significantly higher in patients treated with BR than in those treated with rituximab monotherapy (p < 0.01) or RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP (p < 0.0001): the 5-year cumulative incidence function was 18.1%, 12.5%, and 12.9%, respectively. In the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model, BR showed a significantly higher cumulative incidence of SPM than RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP (subhazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.61). Furthermore, in sensitivity analysis, a nested case-control study using an entire cohort showed consistent results: the SPM odds ratios (95% CI) of first-line bendamustine, bendamustine after first-line, and any-line bendamustine were 1.43 (1.14-1.78), 1.26 (0.96-1.64), and 1.33 (1.09-1.62), respectively. Regarding infections, adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of BR compared to RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP were as follows: cytomegalovirus infection, 13.7 (4.88-38.4); bacterial pneumonia, 0.63 (0.50-0.78); and pneumocystis pneumonia, 0.24 (0.11-0.53). There was no significant difference in OS between RCHOP/RCVP/RTHPCOP and BR in patients with follicular, mantle cell, marginal zone, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas. In conclusion, treatment strategies that consider the risk of SPM and infections after chemotherapy are warranted in patients with iBCL.

Functional status and therapy for older adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in nursing homes: A population-based study

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the prevalence of functional and cognitive impairments, and associations between impairments and treatment among older patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving nursing home (NH) care.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database to identify beneficiaries diagnosed with DLBCL 2011-2015 who received care in a NH within -120 ~ +30 days of diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare receipt of chemoimmunotherapy (including multi-agent, anthracycline-containing regimens), 30-day mortality, and hospitalization between NH and community-dwelling patients, estimating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We also examined overall survival (OS). Among NH patients, we examined receipt of chemoimmunotherapy based on functional and cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

Of the eligible 649 NH patients (median age: 82 years), 45% received chemoimmunotherapy; among the recipients, 47% received multi-agent, anthracycline-containing regimens. Compared with community-dwelling patients, those in a NH were less likely to receive chemoimmunotherapy (OR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.29-0.41), had higher 30-day mortality (OR: 2.00, 95%CI: 1.43-2.78) and hospitalization (OR: 1.51, 95%CI: 1.18-1.93), and poorer OS (hazard ratio: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.11-1.65). NH patients with severe functional (61%) or any cognitive impairment (48%) were less likely to receive chemoimmunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of functional and cognitive impairment and low rates of chemoimmunotherapy were observed among NH residents diagnosed with DLBCL. Further research is needed to better understand the potential role of novel and alternative treatment strategies and patient preferences for treatment to optimize clinical care and outcomes in this high-risk population.

The Management of Relapsed or Refractory Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy produced by a bone marrow lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, an indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in which the cure is still an unmet challenge. Combinations with alkylating agents, purine analogs, and monoclonal antibodies, Bruton tyrosine kinase, and proteasome inhibitors are used for the treatment of relapsed and refractory patients. Moreover, new additional agents can be seen on the horizon as potential effective therapies. No consensus on a preferred treatment in the relapsed setting is available yet.

Second primary malignancies in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: epidemiology and risk factors

With the advancements in therapeutics for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), the long-term survival of patients with NHL has markedly increased. Second primary malignancies (SPMs) have become an increasingly relevant long-term concern for NHL survivors. The etiology of SPMs is multifactorial and involves multiple steps. Germline alterations, immune dysregulation, and clonal hematopoiesis contribute to the accumulation of intrinsic adverse factors, and external factors such as lifestyle; exposure to infectious factors; and late effects of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, high-dose therapy, and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation further increase SPM risk. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) are a devastating complication of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. However, as targeted therapies begin to replace cytotoxic chemotherapy, the incidence of t-MNs is likely to decline, particularly for indolent B-cell NHL.

BR (bendamustine plus rituximab) versus R-CHOP for patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP) have been shown to be effective in the treatment of indolent B-cell lymphomas (iBCL). The survival outcomes and adverse events of BR and R-CHOP are still controversial, thus we did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess them. We searched articles in Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science comparing BR to R-CHOP in patients with iBCL. A total of 3141 patients were included. The results of our meta-analysis revealed that BR has the potential of improving PFS (HR = 0.67, p = 0.03). No apparent benefit of BR was noted in patients with iBCL for OS (HR = 1.18, p = 0.04). Compared with R-CHOP, we found that BR regimen had the potential of prolonging PFS, minor toxicity, a better quality of life, and better cost-effectiveness. These results supported BR as a preferred first-line treatment option for patients (especially for elders) with iBCL.

An international analysis evaluating frontline bendamustine with rituximab in extranodal marginal zone lymphoma

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) is a heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma. No consensus exists regarding the standard-of-care in patients with advanced-stage disease. Current recommendations are largely adapted from follicular lymphoma, for which bendamustine with rituximab (BR) is an established approach. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of frontline BR in EMZL using a large international consortium. We included 237 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 21-85). Most patients presented with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1 (n = 228; 96.2%), stage III/IV (n = 179; 75.5%), and intermediate (49.8%) or high (33.3%) Mucosa Associated Lymphoid Tissue International Prognosis Index (MALT-IPI). Patients received a median of 6 (range, 1-8) cycles of BR, and 20.3% (n = 48) received rituximab maintenance. Thirteen percent experienced infectious complications during BR therapy; herpes zoster (4%) was the most common. Overall response rate was 93.2% with 81% complete responses. Estimated 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 80.5% (95% CI, 73.1% to 86%) and 89.6% (95% CI, 83.1% to 93.6%), respectively. MALT-IPI failed to predict outcomes. In the multivariable model, the presence of B symptoms was associated with shorter PFS. Rituximab maintenance was associated with longer PFS (hazard ratio = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.71; P = .016) but did not impact OS. BR is a highly effective upfront regimen in EMZL, providing durable remissions and overcoming known adverse prognosis factors. This regimen is associated with occurrence of herpes zoster; thus, prophylactic treatment may be considered.

Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection with Bendamustine and Rituximab as First-Line Therapy for B-Cell Lymphomas: A Phase I Study

Background

We conducted an investigator-initiated, phase I trial of vincristine sulfate liposomal injection (VSLI) in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for indolent B-cell (BCL) or mantle cell lymphoma.

Methods

Participants received 6 cycles of standard BR with VSLI at patient-specific dose determined by the Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) model targeting 33% probability of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included rates of adverse events (AEs), overall response rate (ORR), and complete response (CR). Vincristine sulfate liposomal injection is FDA approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph−) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Results

Among 10 enrolled patients, VSLI was escalated from 1.80 to 2.24 mg/m², with one DLT (ileus) at 2.04 mg/m². Two patients discontinued VSLI early. The most common AE included lymphopenia (100%), constipation, nausea, infusion reaction (each 60%), neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy (50%). Grade 3/4 AE included lymphopenia (90%), neutropenia (20%), and ileus (10%), with prolonged grade ≥2 lymphopenia observed in most patients. Calculated MTD for VSLI was 2.25 mg/m² (95% Bayesian credible interval: 2.00-2.40). Overall response was 100% with 50% CR. With median follow-up 26 months, 4/10 patients experienced recurrence and 1 died.

Conclusion

Vincristine sulfate liposomal injection at 2.25 mg/m² can be safely combined with BR for indolent B-cell lymphoma, but given observed toxicities and recurrences, we did not pursue an expanded cohort.

Clinical Trials Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02257242.

Global Risk Indicator and Therapy for Older Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Population-Based Study

PURPOSE

To examine the impact of global risk, a measure comprising age, comorbidities, function, and cognitive statuses, on treatment selection and outcomes among older home care recipients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

From SEER-Medicare, we selected home care recipients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 2011-2015, who had pretreatment Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) evaluations. We created a global risk indicator categorizing patients as low-, moderate-, or high-risk on the basis of OASIS assessments. We examined the association of global risk with receipt of therapy and among chemotherapy recipients, with mortality, emergency department visits, hospitalization, and intensive care unit admission within 30 days from first treatment in logistic models, reporting adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. We compared overall survival across risk groups estimating adjusted hazard ratios.

RESULTS

Of the 1,232 patients (median age, 80 years), 65% received chemotherapy. High-risk patients (v moderate-risk) were less likely to receive any chemotherapy (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.64) and curative regimens (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.86) if treated, although even in the moderate-risk group, only 61% received curative regimens. High-risk patients were more likely to experience acute mortality (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.52), emergency department visits (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.83), hospitalization (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.17), or intensive care unit admission (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.22) and had inferior overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.78).

CONCLUSION

Global risk on the basis of OASIS is easily available, suggesting a potential way to improve patient selection for curative treatment and institution of preventive measures.

Clinical Efficacy of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab (BR) for B-cell Relevant Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Role of β2-MG in Predicting the Efficacy of BR Regimen: A Real-World Retrospective Study in China

Background. Domestic bendamustine has been approved for appearing on the market in China in the past two years. The report on bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in the treatment of Chinese B-cell-associated indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL) has not yet been published. This study probed into clinical efficacy of the BR regimen for B-cell-associated iNHL in China as well as the value of β2-microglobulin (β2-MG) as a prognostic factor. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 73 B-cell-associated iNHL patients who received BR treatment in The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University from January 2020 to January 2021, including clinical characteristics, therapies, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis-related factors. Thirty-three patients (45.2%) did not receive any other treatment before the BR regimen, and other patients received CHOP, R-CHOP, and other regimens in the past. The cutoff date for follow-up was May 2021. Clinical characteristics of patients were analyzed. The clinical efficacy of the BR regimen was evaluated. Differences of β2-MG expression before and after treatment were analyzed between the CR+PR group and the SD+PD group. Main outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A multivariate Cox regression model was taken to analyze prognostic factors relative to survival rate of patients, and adverse events (AEs) during treatment. Results. The objective response rate (ORR) of B-cell-associated iNHL patients who received BR regimen as first-/multiline treatment was 79.5%, with complete response (CR) of 37.0%, partial response (PR) of 42.5%, median PFS of 12.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.9-13.2), and median OS of 15.5 months (95% CI: 14.8-16.1). Before treatment, there was no statistical significance in the β2-MG level between the CR+PR group and the SD+PD group ( $p>0.05$ ). After treatment, the β2-MG level in the CR group was noticeably lower than that in the SD+PD group ( $p<0.05$ ). The β2-MG level in the CR+PR group decreased conspicuously after treatment ( $p<0.05$ ). The β2-MG level in the SD+PD group after treatment was not notably different from that before treatment ( $p>0.05$ ). According to the median expression level of β2-MG before treatment, patients were divided into two groups. The average PFS of the low expression group was $12.69\pm 0.77$ months, which was longer than the high expression group ( $10.13\pm 0.74$ months), but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant ( $p>0.05$ ). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that B-cell-associated iNHL subtype was the independent prognostic marker most likely to affect PFS of patients ( $p=0.051$ ). Incidence of any grade of AEs in all patients was 32.9% (24/73). Conclusion. B-cell-associated iNHL patients who received BR regimen had favorable clinical efficacy and were tolerable to AEs. Though the β2-MG level in this study could not be used to predict clinical outcome, a lower level before treatment seemed to be implicated in better survival outcomes of patients. Our research also unraveled that B-cell-associated iNHL subtype may be a key factor to patient’s prognosis. Overall, this study offers some important insights into clinical application of the BR regimen for Chinese B-cell-associated iNHL patients.

CD5 expression in marginal zone lymphoma predicts differential response to rituximab or bendamustine/rituximab

We examined outcomes of 244 patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) diagnosed in 2010-2020, of which 25 (10%) expressed CD5. CD5 expression was present in 22% of splenic, 8% of nodal, and 5% of extranodal MZL, and showed frequent blood/bone marrow involvement, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and TP53 deletions. CD5 expression was not associated with progression-free or overall survival, but it conferred a significantly higher risk of histologic transformation (22% versus 4% at 5 years, p = 0.002). Among patients receiving first-line rituximab monotherapy, CD5 expression was associated with lower response rate (30% versus 77%, p = 0.006), PFS (25% versus 45% at 3 years, p = 0.003) and OS (44% versus 77%, p = 0.010), whereas CD5 status did not significantly affect outcomes of patients receiving bendamustine with rituximab (P for interaction = 0.012 for progression-free survival). CD5-positive MZL may have a propensity to leukemic dissemination, histologic transformation, and may derive benefit from first-line bendamustine/rituximab rather than rituximab alone.

Late-onset complications with bendamustine versus CHOP or CVP based chemoimmunotherapy in indolent Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Bendamustine is a preferred first-line chemoimmunotherapy regimen for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL). Emerging evidence suggests an increased incidence of late-onset complications with bendamustine-based regimens compared with CHOP/CVP; however, this evidence is limited. We retrospectively compared late-onset complications from January 2005 to May 2020 in adults with previously untreated iNHL who received rituximab or obinutuzumab with CHOP, CVP, or bendamustine. Forty-six patients received CHOP/CVP; 119 received bendamustine. No difference in incidence of late-onset infections was observed. Bendamustine led to a higher rate of prolonged and unresolved lymphocytopenia and a greater incidence of late-onset neutropenia. Many patients receiving bendamustine did not have lymphocyte recovery even three years following administration. Ongoing infection prophylaxis with bendamustine-based regimens may offset translation of these laboratory findings to late-onset infectious risk.

Real-world evidence on survival, adverse events, and health care burden in Medicare patients with mantle cell lymphoma

Most data on overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are from controlled trials; therefore, in this population-based study, we retrospectively assessed treatment patterns, OS, and AEs in MCL patients initiating systemic treatment during 2013-2015 using the United States Medicare claims database. Among 1390 eligible patients (median age = 74 years), chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine/rituximab (BR) was the preferred choice in first-line (35.3%), followed by ibrutinib (33.5%), rituximab (9.1%), and rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine (R-CHOP) (6.8%). Twenty-four-month OS was 73% for BR; 47%, ibrutinib; 72%, rituximab; and 71%, R-CHOP. For the four most commonly used regimens, neutropenia, anemia, hypertension, and infection were the most frequent AEs. Patients with ≥3 AEs had nearly four times higher monthly costs than those with 0-2 AEs in the first observed therapy line. Findings demonstrate a substantial increase in the economic burden as the number of AEs increased among the Medicare MCL patients.

Rare lymphomas in routine practice - Treatment and outcome in marginal zone lymphoma in the prospective German Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms

Owing to its heterogeneity and rarity, management of disseminated marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma (MZL) remains largely understudied. We present prospective data on choice of systemic treatment and survival of patients with MZL treated in German routine practice. Of 175 patients with MZL who had been documented in the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (NCT00889798) collecting data on systemic treatment, 58 were classified as extranodal MZL of mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and 117 as non‐MALT MZL. We analyzed the most commonly used first‐line and second‐line chemo(immuno)therapies between 2009 and 2016 and examined objective response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for survival. Compared to patients with MALT MZL, those with non‐MALT MZL more often presented with bone marrow involvement (43% vs. 14%), Ann Arbor stage III/IV (72% vs. 57%) and were slightly less often in good general condition (ECOG = 0; 41% vs. 47%). In German routine practice, rituximab‐bendamustine for a median of 6 cycles was the most frequently used first‐line (76%) and second‐line treatment (36%), with no major differences between MZL subtypes. The ORR for patients encompassing any positive response was 81%. For patients with MALT and non‐MALT MZL, respectively, 5‐years PFS was 69% (95% CI 52%–81%) and 66% (95% CI 56%–75%), 5‐years OS 79% (95% CI 65%–89%) and 75% (95% CI 66%–83%). Cox proportional hazards models showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for higher age in all patient groups. Our prospective real world data give valuable insights into the management and outcome of non‐selected patients with MZL requiring systemic treatment and can help optimize therapy recommendations.

MTX-HOPE is a low-dose salvage chemotherapy for aged patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma

As the aging society advances, the number of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients is increasing. Aged relapsed or refractory (r/r) NHL patients have limited treatment options. Therefore, a safe and effective regimen is urgently needed for these patients. Thus, we originally developed the MTX-HOPE (methotrexate, hydrocortisone, vincristine, sobuzoxane, and etoposide) regimen for r/r NHL and validated the safety and efficacy of this regimen in a clinical setting. We analyzed the data of 42 r/r NHL patients who received MTX-HOPE in this single-center retrospective cohort study. The median age of the patients was 81 years. The overall response rate was 45.3%. The median overall survival (OS) was 7 months, the one-year OS was 43.7%, and the two-year OS was 40.8%. Grade ≥3 neutropenia and renal dysfunction were observed in 47.6% and 11.9% of patients, respectively, and treatment-related death were not observed. Appropriate supportive care enabled these patients to continue the MTX-HOPE regimen. The proportion of patients who needed hospitalization during MTX-HOPE therapy was only 21.4%. Multivariable analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that both OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly influenced by high Ki-67 expression in pathology, with response to the MTX-HOPE regimen after three to five cycles as a time-dependent covariate. Our results suggest that MTX-HOPE therapy can be an option for non-aggressive r/r NHL patients. To validate MTX-HOPE therapy, further prospective investigation is needed.

Early Palliative Care Services and End-of-Life Care in Medicare Beneficiaries with Hematologic Malignancies: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) often receive aggressive care at the end of life (EOL). Early palliative care (PC) has been shown to improve EOL care outcomes, but its benefits are less established in HM than in solid tumors. Objectives: We sought to describe the use of billed PC services among Medicare beneficiaries with HM. We hypothesized that receipt of early PC services (rendered >30 days before death) may be associated with less aggressive EOL care. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis Setting/Subjects: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare registry, we studied patients with leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasm who died between 2001 and 2015. Measurements: We described trends in the use of PC services and evaluated the association between early PC services and metrics of EOL care aggressiveness. Results: Among 139,191 decedents, the proportion receiving PC services increased from 0.4% in 2001 to 13.3% in 2015. Median time from first encounter to death was 10 days and 84.3% of encounters occurred during hospitalizations. In patients who survived >30 days from diagnosis (N = 120,741), the use of early PC services was more frequent in acute leukemia, women, and black patients, among other characteristics. Early PC services were associated with increased hospice use and decreased health care utilization at the EOL. Conclusion: Among patients with HM, there was an upward trend in PC services, and early PC services were associated with less aggressive EOL care. Our results support the need for prospective trials of early PC in HM.

Outcomes of lenalidomide- or bortezomib-based regimens in older patients with plasma cell myeloma

The "triplet" regimen of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) showed survival advantage over lenalidomide-dexamethasone (RD) in clinical trials, but older patients with myeloma often receive doublet regimens (RD or bortezomib-dexamethasone, VD), or VD plus cyclophosphamide (VCD). We compared these first-line regimens using real-world data from Medicare beneficiaries receiving therapy between 2007 and 2015. In each comparative analysis, we balanced confounding characteristics using a propensity score. Outcomes included overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS, reporting hazard ratios [HR] with 95% confidence intervals [CI]), adverse events, and costs. We identified 6076 patients with median age 76 and median OS of 2.6 years. In the comparison of RVD vs RD/VD doublets, RVD showed significantly better OS (HR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95) and EFS (HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.61-0.76). So, RVD was associated with more frequent hospitalizations, anemia, and neuropathy, but no increase in thromboembolism or secondary cancers. Costs were higher with RVD. In the comparison of RD vs VD, RD demonstrated better EFS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.81) and marginally better OS (HR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99). And, RD resulted in significantly more thromboembolic events, less neuropathy, and no significant difference in hospitalizations, transfusions, or secondary cancers. In the comparison of VCD vs VD, we observed no significant difference in any outcome. Superior survival favors RVD over doublet regimens, but even in 2015 RVD was applied for only about 25% of Medicare beneficiaries with myeloma. For patients not eligible for RVD due to toxicity, VCD offers no survival benefit over VD. Lenalidomide-dexamethasone may be the preferred line doublet considering its advantage over VD.