Outcomes of therapy with venetoclax combined with a hypomethylating agent in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia

Reduced dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia following intensive or low-intensity induction: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia have high rates of relapse, especially if they are unable to complete standard consolidation strategies or allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). The phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001 study showed an overall survival benefit with oral azacitidine maintenance. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax is highly active in acute myeloid leukaemia and synergistic with azacitidine. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia.

METHODS

We performed a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a WHO 2016 diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia in complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery following intensive or low-intensity induction and not immediately eligible for HSCT. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status had to be 3 or less. Patients were assigned to maintenance therapy with azacitidine 50 mg/m2 intravenously or subcutaneously for 5 days and venetoclax 400 mg orally for 7 days or 14 days. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival. The study was closed early due to slow accrual. All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04062266).

FINDINGS

Between Sept 26, 2019, and Oct 26, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled, of whom 25 (71%) were assigned to cohort 1 following intensive induction and ten (29%) to cohort 2 following low-intensity induction. Of 35 patients, 18 (51%) were male and 17 (49%) were female. The median age was 55 years (IQR 41-62). The median number of cycles given was 9 (IQR 2-22) and median follow-up time was 23·3 months (IQR 9·0-30·0). The median relapse-free survival was not reached (95% CI 20·2 to not calculable) in the full cohort, not reached (29·1 to not calculable) in cohort 1, and 30·3 months (16·5 to not calculable) in cohort 2. The 2-year relapse-free survival was 65% (95% CI 50-85) in the full cohort, 71% (53-94) in cohort 1, and 52% (27-100) in cohort 2. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=6), lung infection (n=4), leukopenia (n=4), and neutropenia (n=3). No deaths occurred during maintenance therapy.

INTERPRETATION

Low dose azacitidine plus venetoclax is a feasible maintenance strategy in acute myeloid leukaemia following intensive and low-intensity induction.

FUNDING

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, MDS/AML Moon Shot, Genentech.

Biomarkers of Response to Venetoclax Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recent progress in the use of massive sequencing technologies has greatly enhanced our understanding of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pathology. This knowledge has in turn driven the development of targeted therapies, such as venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor approved for use in combination with azacitidine, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of newly diagnosed adult patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, a significant number of AML patients still face the challenge of disease relapse. In this review, we will explore biomarkers that may predict disease progression in patients receiving venetoclax-based therapy, considering both clinical factors and genetic changes. Despite the many advances, we conclude that the identification of molecular profiles for AML patients who will respond optimally to venetoclax therapy remains an unmet clinical need.

The core concepts of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: Current considerations for prognosis and treatment

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML), defined by t(8;21) or inv(16), is a subset of favorable risk AML. Despite its association with a high complete remission rate after induction and relatively good prognosis overall compared with other subtypes of AML, relapse risk after induction chemotherapy remains high. Optimizing treatment planning to promote recurrence free survival and increase the likelihood of survival after relapse is imperative to improving outcomes. Recent areas of research have included evaluation of the role of gemtuzumab in induction and consolidation, the relative benefit of increased cycles of high dose cytarabine in consolidation, the utility of hypomethylating agents and kinase inhibitors, and the most appropriate timing of stem cell transplant. Surveillance with measurable residual disease testing is increasingly being utilized for monitoring disease in remission, and ongoing investigation seeks to determine how to use this tool for early identification of patients who would benefit from proceeding to transplant. In this review, we outline the current therapeutic approach from diagnosis to relapse while highlighting the active areas of investigation in each stage of treatment.

Sporadic and Familial Acute Myeloid Leukemia with CEBPA Mutations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

CCAAT enhancer binding protein A (CEBPA) gene mutation is one of the common genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which can be associated with sporadic and familial AML.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to the recent advances in molecular testing and the prognostic role of CEBPA mutation in AML, the definition for AML with CEBPA mutation (AML-CEBPA) has significantly changed. This review provides the rationale for the updates on classifications, and the impacts on laboratory evaluation and clinical management for sporadic and familial AML-CEBPA patients. In addition, minimal residual disease assessment post therapy to stratify disease risk and stem cell transplant in selected AML-CEBPA patients are discussed. Taken together, the recent progresses have shifted the definition, identification, and management of patients with AML-CEBPA.

Immunophenotype distinctions of CEBPA mutation subtypes in acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with CEBPA double mutation (CEBPAdm ) were associated with distinct immunophenotypes and prognosis. Recently, both International Consensus Classification (ICC) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications incorporated BZIP single mutations (CEBPAsmBZIP ) into the favorable risk group. However, the immunophenotypes of CEBPAsmBZIP mutations have not been characterized, especially when compared with the immunophenotypes of CEBPAdm .

METHODS

Retrospectively, we investigated and compared the immunophenotypes of AML with CEBPA mutations. Randomforest model and XGBoost algorithm were used to set up a scoring system based on the immunophenotypes of those patients.

RESULTS

In a total of 967 AML patients: 218 were CEBPAdm (198 consisted of mutations in the BZIP region [CEBPAdmBZIP ], 20 were double mutations outside BZIP region [CEBPAdm-woBZIP ]), 117 were CEBPAsm (54 CEBPAsmBZIP and 63 were single mutations outside BZIP region [CEBPAsm-woBZIP ]) and the others were wildtype CEBPA (CEBPAwt ). Patients with CEBPAdmBZIP , CEBPAdm-woBZIP and CEBPAsmBZIP shared the distinct immunophenotype of CD7+ CD34+ MPO+ HLA-DR+ CD19- , in contrast to patients with CEBPAsm-woBZIP and CEBPAwt who showed reduced expression of CD7, HLA-DR, MPO, CD34 and a higher expression of CD19. Based on these immunophenotypes, we developed a scoring system to preemptively identify AML with CEBPAsmBZIP and CEBPAdm and validated it internally and externally.

CONCLUSIONS

AML with CEBPAdmBZIP , CEBPAdm-woBZIP , and CEBPAsmBZIP shared similar immunophenotypic profiles, whereas profoundly differed from the CEBPAsm-woBZIP and CEBPAwt AML.

Hypomethylating agent-based therapies in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia - A joint review by the Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Trainee Committee

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes in older adults. A major goal of treatment is to balance quality of life and functional independence with disease control. With the approval of new, more tolerable regimens, more older adults are able to receive AML-directed therapy. Among these options are hypomethylating agents (HMAs), specifically azacitidine and decitabine. HMAs have become an integral part of AML therapy over the last two decades. These agents are used either as monotherapy or nowadays more commonly in combination with other agents such as the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax. Biological AML characteristics, such as molecular and cytogenetic risk factors, play crucial roles in guiding treatment decisions. In patients with high-risk AML, HMAs are increasingly used rather than intensive chemotherapy, although further trials based on a risk-adapted approach using patient- and disease-related factors are needed. Here, we review trials and evidence for the use of HMA monotherapy and combination therapy in the management of older adults with AML. Furthermore, we discuss the use of HMAs and HMA combination therapies in AML, mechanisms of action, their incorporation into hematopoietic stem cell transplantation strategies, and their use in patients with comorbidities and reduced organ function.

Venetoclax and azacitidine followed by allogeneic transplant results in excellent outcomes and may improve outcomes versus maintenance therapy among newly diagnosed AML patients older than 60

The combination of venetoclax (ven) and azacitidine (aza) has resulted in high response rates in the upfront treatment of AML in patients age > 75 and patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Given the poor historical outcomes in patients age ≥ 60 treated with induction chemotherapy, ven/aza has become our institutional preference for the initial treatment of non-core binding factor (CBF) AML patients age ≥ 60. The benefit of allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) in patients who achieve response to ven/aza is uncertain. We report outcomes of SCT-eligible patients treated at our center. Between 1/2015 and 1/2020, 119 newly diagnosed non-CBF AML patients age ≥ 60 received ven/aza as initial therapy. 21 patients underwent SCT; 31 additional patients were potentially SCT eligible but deferred SCT. Overall survival (OS) was significantly greater among SCT patients (median survival not reached) versus potentially SCT eligible patients not undergoing SCT (median 518 days) (p = 0.01). Our data suggest that ven/aza followed by SCT in newly diagnosed AML patients older than ≥ 60 results in excellent outcomes and likely improves outcomes over maintenance therapy. Ongoing investigation will further refine the optimal timing of and selection of patients for SCT based on prognostic disease features and response assessments.

3+7 Combined Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Is It Time to Say Goodbye?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the recent approval of multiple new drugs for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the relevance of conventional treatment approaches, such as daunorubicin and cytarabine ("3+7") induction chemotherapy, has been challenged. We review the AML risk stratification, the efficacy of the newly approved drugs, and the role of "3+7".

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment of AML is becoming more niched with specific subtypes more appropriately treated with gemtuzumab, midostaurin, and CPX-351. Although lower intensity therapies can yield high response rates, they are less efficient at preventing relapses. The only curative potential for poor-risk AML is still an allogeneic stem cell transplant. The number of AML subtypes where 3+7 alone is an appropriate therapeutic option is shrinking. However, it remains the backbone for combination therapy with newer agents in patients suitable for intensive chemotherapy.

Emerging therapies for inv(16) AML

The core binding factor composed of CBFβ and RUNX subunits plays a critical role in most hematopoietic lineages and is deregulated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The fusion oncogene CBFβ-SMMHC expressed in AML with the chromosome inversion inv(16)(p13q22) acts as a driver oncogene in hematopoietic stem cells and induces AML. This review focuses on novel insights regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in CBFβ-SMMHC-driven leukemogenesis and recent advances in therapeutic approaches to target CBFβ-SMMHC in inv(16) AML.