Multicenter evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of venetoclax-based combinations in patients with accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms

Outcomes of intensive and nonintensive blast-reduction strategies in accelerated and blast-phase MPN

ABSTRACT

Transformation of BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) to an accelerated or blast phase is associated with poor outcomes. The efficacy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-type intensive and nonintensive hypomethylating agent-based regimens is not well studied. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of patients with MPN-AP/BP (N = 138) treated with intensive (N = 81) and nonintensive (N = 57) blast-reduction strategies. We used clinically relatable response criteria developed at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. The overall best response, comprising complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and reversion to chronic phase MPN (cMPN), in the intensive and nonintensive groups was 77% (62 of 81) and 39% (21 of 54), respectively. Similar overall best response rates were observed in patients receiving induction with daunorubicin combined with cytarabine arabinoside (daunorubicin + ara-C) (74% [23 of 31]) or FLAG-IDA/NOVE-HiDAC (78% [39 of 50], P = .78). However, patients receiving daunorubicin + ara-C more often required second inductions (29% [9 of 31] vs 4% [2 of 50], P = .002). Most responses in the entire cohort were reversions to cMPN (55 of 83 [66%]). CR and CRi comprised 30% (25 of 83) and 4% (3 of 83) of responses, respectively. Mutations in TP53 (overall response [OR] 8.2 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01, 37.1], P = .004) and RAS pathway (OR 5.1 [95%CI 1.2, 23.7], P = .03) were associated with inferior treatment response for intensively treated patients, and poorer performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) was associated with inferior treatment response in both intensively (OR 10.4 [95% CI 2.0, 78.5], P = .009) and nonintensively treated groups (OR 12 [95% CI 2.04, 230.3], P = .02). In patients with paired samples before and after therapy (N = 26), there was a significant residual mutation burden remaining irrespective of response to blast-reduction therapy.

Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm

Leukemic transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), also referred to as "blast-phase MPN", is the most feared disease complication, with incidence estimates of 1-4% for essential thrombocythemia, 3-7% for polycythemia vera, and 9-13% for primary myelofibrosis. Diagnosis of MPN-BP requires the presence of ≥20% circulating or bone marrow blasts; a lower level of excess blasts (10-19%) constitutes "accelerated phase" disease (MPN-AP). Neither "intensive" nor "less intensive" chemotherapy, by itself, secures long-term survival in MPN-BP. Large-scale retrospective series have consistently shown a dismal prognosis in MPN-BP, with 1- and 3-year survival estimates of <20% and <5%, respectively. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) offers the possibility of a >30% 3-year survival rate and should be pursued, ideally, while the patient is still in chronic phase disease. The value of pre-transplant bridging chemotherapy is uncertain in MPN-AP while it is advised in MPN-BP; in this regard, we currently favor combination chemotherapy with venetoclax (Ven) and hypomethylating agent (HMA); response is more likely in the absence of complex/monosomal karyotype and presence of TET2 mutation. Furthermore, in the presence of an IDH mutation, the use of IDH inhibitors, either alone or in combination with Ven-HMA, can be considered. Pre-transplant clearance of excess blasts is desired but not mandated; in this regard, additional salvage chemotherapy is more likely to compromise transplant eligibility rather than improve post-transplant survival. Controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal pre- and post-transplant measures that target transplant-associated morbidity and post-transplant relapse.

Treating accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: progress and challenges

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of clonal hematologic malignancies that include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF). MPNs are characterized by activating mutations in the JAK/STAT pathway and an increased risk of transformation to an aggressive form of acute leukemia, termed MPN-blast phase (MPN-BP). MPN-BP is characterized by the presence of ⩾20% blasts in the blood or bone marrow and is almost always preceded by an accelerated phase (MPN-AP) defined as ⩾10-19% blasts in the blood or bone marrow. These advanced forms of disease are associated with poor prognosis with a median overall survival (mOS) of 3-5 months in MPN-BP and 13 months in MPN-AP. MPN-AP/BP has a unique molecular landscape characterized by increased intratumoral complexity. Standard therapies used in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have not demonstrated improvement in OS. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and infrequently utilized in clinical practice. Therefore, an urgent unmet need persists for effective therapies in this advanced phase patient population. Here, we review the current management and future directions of therapy in MPN-AP/BP.

The Cup Runneth Over: Treatment Strategies for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Since 2017, the number of agents for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has rapidly expanded. Given the increased therapeutic options, better identification of high-risk subsets of AML and more refined approaches to patient fitness assessment, the decisions surrounding selection of intensive chemotherapy versus lower-intensity treatment have grown increasingly more nuanced. In this review, we present available data for both standard and investigational approaches in the initial treatment of AML using an intensive chemotherapy backbone or a lower-intensity approach. We summarize management strategies in newly diagnosed secondary AML, considerations around allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and the role of maintenance therapy. Finally, we highlight important areas of future investigation and novel agents that may hold promise in combination with standard therapies.

Targeted Therapy for MPNs: Going Beyond JAK Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

JAK inhibition is an effective means of controlling symptom burden and improving splenomegaly in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, a majority of patients treated with JAK inhibition will have disease progression with long-term use. In In this review, we focus on the investigation of novel targeted agents beyond JAK inhibitors both in the chronic phase of disease and in the accelerated/blast phase of disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Relevant targeted therapies in MPNs include BET inhibitors, BCL inhibitors, LSD1 inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, IDH inhibitors, telomerase inhibitors, and MDM2 inhibitor. Agents within these classes have been investigated either as monotherapy or in combination with a JAK inhibitor. We summarize the prospective data for these agents along with detailing the ongoing phase III trials incorporating these agents. While JAK inhibition has been a mainstay of therapy in MPNs, a majority of patients will have disease of progression. JAK inhibitors also have limited anti-clonal effect and do not impact the rate of progression to the blast phase of disease. The novel therapies detailed in this review not only show promise in ameliorating the symptom burden of MPNs but may be able to alter the natural history of disease.

Hitting the brakes on accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: current and emerging concepts

The BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have a variable risk of progressing to accelerated- or blast-phase MPN (MPN-AP/MPN-BP), defined by the presence of 10% to 19% and more than or equal to 20% myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow, respectively. The molecular processes underlying the progression to MPN-AP/MPN-BP are becoming increasingly understood with the acquisition of additional mutations in epigenetic modifiers (eg, ASXL1, EZH2, TET2), TP53, the Ras pathway, or splicing factors (eg, SRSF2, U2AF1), having been described as important steps in this evolutionary process. At least partially driven by the enrichment of these high-risk molecular features, the prognosis of patients with MPN-BP remains inferior to other patients with acute myeloid leukemia, with a median overall survival of 3 to 6 months. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative therapeutic modality, but only a minority of patients are eligible. In the absence of curative intent, therapeutic strategies or palliative treatment with hypomethylating agents as monotherapy or in combination with ruxolitinib or venetoclax can be considered. Several novel agents are in various stages of clinical development but are not available for routine use at this point, highlighting the need for ongoing research and the prioritization of clinical trial enrollment when feasible.