Prevention of infections including vaccination strategies in multiple myeloma

Multiple Myeloma Unpacked

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow. The current treatment landscape for multiple myeloma involves a combination of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and autologous stem cell transplantation, which have significantly improved survival outcomes in recent years. However, the disease remains challenging, particularly in relapsed and refractory cases. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating new therapeutic options, including chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, antibody drug conjugate and novel agents like Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulatory Drugs. This review summarizes the key diagnostic criteria, prognostic features, response assessment for MM and highlights the current treatment landscape.

Immune responses after one versus two Influenza A/B vaccinations in patients with multiple myeloma

Seasonal Influenza A/B vaccination is routinely administered in patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) given their disease-and therapy-associated immunosuppression and risk of infection. Previous data show poor seroconversion rates after one vaccination with an increase to ~ 60% after boosting while the impact of multiple lines of therapy remains unclear. Accordingly, we performed a retrospective single-center study assessing immune responses after single or prime-boosting vaccination in 71 patients with MM treated at our institution during the 2019/20 season. Overall, 63.3% of patients with MM achieved sufficient responses after one or two Influenza A/B vaccinations. In patients receiving a prime-boost approach, significantly higher serological titers but no significant increase in responder rates were observed after the boost vaccination. Complete or very good partial remission and no immunoparesis were identified as independent predictors of sufficient serological response by multivariate regression analysis and responders were characterized by high CD19+ B-cell and CD4+ T-cell counts. Patients achieving a sufficient response only after the prime-boost approach showed significantly shorter time since high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT). Together, this study suggests that single vaccination against Influenza A/B might be sufficient for patients with MM while a prime-boost approach might be necessary for patients with recent HDC-ASCT.

Consensus Guidelines and Recommendations for The CD38 Monoclonal Antibody-based Quadruplet Therapy and Management in Clinical Practice for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: From the Pan-Pacific Multiple Myeloma Working Group

The therapeutic outcomes of clinical trials for incorporating anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (including isatuximab and daratumumab) into the bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd) triplet therapy backbone as the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) have demonstrated significant improved efficacies. From a safety perspective, the addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies into the triplet therapies did not raise additional safety concerns. Based on the promising results, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines Version 1.2025 had updated the quadruplet therapy incorporating anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies with VRd-based therapies as the primary therapy for both transplantation-eligible and transplantation-ineligible NDMM patients. Thus, a panel of experts in hematology and oncology with extensive experience in the treatment of NDMM was convened in 2024 to develop consensus recommendations based on recent evidence from pivotal clinical trials and real-world practices, providing clear guidance for optimizing treatment strategies in both transplantation-eligible and transplantation-ineligible patients. The main topics identified for discussion and recommendation were: (i) the benefits and indications for quadruplet therapy for NDMM; (ii) the optimization of quadruplet therapy strategies; (iii) the management and monitoring of potential adverse events for quadruplet therapy, and (iv) the impact of quadruplet regimens on tandem stem cell transplantation and maintenance treatment. Recommendations were then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the recommendations developed, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Risk of Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With T-Cell Redirecting Approaches: A Call Out for Clinicians

T-cell redirecting therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cells and bispecific antibodies, are emerging as a novel class of immunotherapeutic agents for treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Their use is associated with an increased risk of infectious adverse events, fostered by cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia and T-cell exhaustion. Multiple ongoing clinical trials and real-world studies are investigating safety of T-cell therapy, highlighting the need for strategies to prevent and monitor the risk of infection. Recommended measures for risk mitigation include intravenous immunoglobulin supplementation, adequate prophylaxis therapy, vaccination and careful assessment for early diagnosis and treatment of infection. Here, we summarize available data on the risk of infections with approved and under development T-cell redirecting therapies for the treatment of MM.

The Perspective of Romanian Patients on Continuous Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

The treatment paradigm of multiple myeloma (MM) has shifted in the past years, as continuous therapy is becoming the standard of care for both newly diagnosed and relapsed patients. Although it is indisputable that continuous therapy has added a great benefit on the progression-free as well as overall survival, it is still unclear what the patients' perspective is on this therapeutic approach.

METHODS

This study included 155 adult MM patients from Fundeni Clinical Institute in Romania, receiving continuous therapy with daratumumab, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, or bi-specific antibodies. The patients had varied economic, social, and educational backgrounds. We developed a questionnaire to interrogate the quantitative and qualitative effect of the therapy on the patients' personal and professional life and to identify the side effects that had the strongest impact on their quality of life.

RESULTS

74.83% of the patients reported that the treatment they received negatively impacted their quality of life. Among them, 40% considered that the most detrimental aspects of the therapy are the financial burden and the negative impact on their professional life. One-third of the patients reported that the therapy negatively impacted their personal life and that it had a deleterious effect on their relationship with their partner and family members. In terms of the side effects experienced, patients considered that tiredness was the main factor causing a decrease in their quality of life, followed by insomnia and bone pain. Despite this, almost none of the patients considered dropping the therapy, and almost half of the patients considered that the frequent visits to the hospital offered them psychological comfort. In addition, more than 70% of the patients declared that they were afraid to stop the therapy if given the choice, with the main concerns being the fear of an early relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Although continuous therapy is associated with a high financial burden and a negative impact on both professional and personal life, the frequent visits to the hospital appear to be reassuring. Moreover, the patients would not opt for treatment discontinuation and felt safer when monitored frequently.

Recommendations and guidance for herpes zoster vaccination for adults in Taiwan

Herpes zoster (HZ) is a painful, vesicular, cutaneous eruption from reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV), which can lead to potentially debilitating complications. The lifetime risk of HZ is estimated to be 20%-30% in the general population, with an increased risk in the elderly and immunocompromised populations. The most effective strategy to prevent HZ and its complications is by vaccination. Two types of HZ vaccines, zoster vaccine live and recombinant zoster vaccine, have been approved for use. This guidance offers recommendations and suggestions for HZ vaccination in adults, aiming to reduce the disease burden of HZ and its complications. It is intended as a guide to first-line healthcare providers, but does not supersede clinical judgement when assessing risk and providing recommendations to individuals. The Working Group on Adult Immunization Practice was appointed by the Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan (IDST) and recommendations were drafted after a full literature review, using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The recommendations were reviewed and revised by expert review panels during a series of consensus meetings and endorsed by the IDST, Taiwan Association of Family Medicine, the Taiwanese Dermatological Association, the Taiwan Oncology Society, the Taiwan Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, the Transplantation Society of Taiwan, the Taiwan AIDS Society, and the Taiwan College of Rheumatology. This guidance describes the epidemiology of HZ and provides recommendations for HZ vaccination in adults with varying levels of risk, differing history of previous VZV infection and past varicella or zoster vaccinations.

Death Caused by Disseminated Herpes Zoster in a Patient with Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report and Literature Review

We report a fatal case of disseminated herpes zoster in a patient with multiple myeloma, illustrating the severe risks immunocompromised individuals face from viral infections. By combining a detailed case report with an extensive literature review, the paper seeks to shed light on the underlying susceptibility factors for varicella-zoster virus infection in multiple myeloma patients. We further evaluate effective prophylactic protocols for herpes zoster, aiming to equip clinicians with improved therapeutic strategies. The case underscores the critical need for vigilant clinical assessments and tailored patient management to mitigate infection risks and enhance patient outcomes.

Dismal prognosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with multiple myeloma

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at high risk for infections, including opportunistic infections such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with MM developing PJP over a 6-year period between January 2016 and December 2021 at the University Hospital of Würzburg by screening cases of microbiologically documented PJP. A total of 201 positive results for P. jirovecii in respiratory specimens were retrospectively retrieved through our microbiology database. Of these cases, 13 patients with MM fulfilled the definition of probable PJP according to EORTC fungal disease definitions. We observed two peaks in PJP incidence, one after stem cell transplantation during first-line treatment (n = 5) and the other in heavily pretreated patients with six or more prior lines of therapy (n = 6). There was high morbidity with nine (69%) patients admitted to the ICU, seven of whom (78%) required mechanical ventilation, and high mortality (62%, n = 8). Notably, only two of the 13 patients (15%) had received PJP prophylaxis. The main reason for discontinuation of prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was grade IV neutropenia. The observed morbidity and mortality of PJP in MM patients are significant and even higher than reported for patients with other hematologic malignancies. According to most current guidelines, the use of prophylaxis would have been clearly recommended in no more than three (23%) of the 13 patients. This illustrates the need to critically reconsider the indications for PJP prophylaxis, which remain incompletely defined.

Practical management of disease-related manifestations and drug toxicities in patients with multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a very heterogeneous disease with multiple symptoms and clinical manifestations. MM affects mainly elderly patients and is difficult to manage in the presence of comorbidities, polypharmacy, frailty and adverse events of disease-targeted drugs. The rapid changes in MM treatment resulting from constant innovations in this area, together with the introduction of numerous new drugs with distinct mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles, have led to an increased complexity in the therapeutic decision-making and patient management processes. The prolonged exposure to novel agents, sometimes in combination with conventional therapies, makes this management even more challenging. A careful balance between treatment efficacy and its tolerability should be considered for every patient. During treatment, a close monitoring of comorbidities, disease-related manifestations and treatment side effects is recommended, as well as a proactive approach, with reinforcement of information and patient awareness for the early recognition of adverse events, allowing prompt therapeutic adjustments. In this review, we discuss various issues that must be considered in the treatment of MM patients, while giving practical guidance for monitoring, prevention and management of myeloma-related manifestations and treatment-related toxicities.

Monitoring, prophylaxis, and treatment of infections in patients with MM receiving bispecific antibody therapy: consensus recommendations from an expert panel

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are emerging as an important novel class of immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), and are set to be more widely used in clinical practice. However, this new class of therapies is associated with a distinct adverse event (AE) profile that includes cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, as well as AEs leading to increased infection risk such as cytopenias and hypogammaglobulinemia, and infections themselves. As preliminary data with this class of agents shows an increased risk of infections as compared with conventional MM treatment regimens, such as immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), guidance on infection monitoring, prophylaxis and treatment is required. This review provides consensus recommendations from a panel of 13 global experts, following a meeting in August 2022. The meeting objective was to review existing literature and identify relevant information on infections with all BsAbs in patients with MM, as well as to discuss clinical experience of experts in managing these infections. The recommendations outlined here can be used to guide management of infection risk factors, such as hypogammaglobulinemia and neutropenia. In addition, they can be used to guide the monitoring, prophylaxis, and treatment of bacterial, viral and fungal infections, including emerging infections of interest, such as coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), and the use of vaccinations prior to and during BsAb treatment. The recommendations have been graded by the panel based on level of data available. Key recommendations include universal herpes simplex and varicella zoster virus prophylaxis, screening for hepatitis B virus reactivation risk in all patients, monthly intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for immunoparesis and in the absence of life-threatening infectious manifestations, use of colony-stimulating factors in patients with Grade 3 neutropenia, universal pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis and no routine anti-fungal prophylaxis.