Sengupta M, Karmakar B. Mode of inheritance of finger dermatoglyphic traits among Vaidyas of West Bengal, India.
Ann Hum Biol 2009;
31:526-40. [PMID:
15739382 DOI:
10.1080/03014460412331287164]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
It is well established that dermatoglyphics are genetically determined. But, to date, few studies have given attention to the inheritance pattern of dermatoglyphics. Furthermore, despite the existence of different advanced statistical packages, none of these previous studies implemented a model-fitting technique to reveal the mode of inheritance. Thus, the genetic nature of dermatoglyphics is still not clear.
AIM
In the present communication, an attempt has been made to provide some information regarding the genetics of finger dermatoglyphics by estimating the magnitude and mode of inheritance of these traits.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The fingerprints of 824 individuals from 200 families including two generations were collected from Barasat in North 24-Parganas, West Bengal. The study includes familial correlations between first-degree relatives and corresponding heritabilities. In the final stage, segregation analyses by the Pedigree Analysis Package (PAP) were conducted on these data to understand the mode of inheritance.
RESULTS
The major findings indicated the following: (a) Familial correlations in all possible relationships (except spouse correlation) were statistically significant and of comparable magnitude. (b) The corresponding heritabilities were in the range between 59% for Pattern Intensity Index (PII) and 77% for Total Finger Ridge Count (TFRC). These estimates were in agreement with previously published data on this subject. (c) By segregation analysis, the 'Sporadic', 'Environmental', 'No major gene effect' as well as 'No polygenic component' models were strongly rejected (p < 0.05) and the hypothesis of a major gene's (MG) influence on all studied traits was accepted, though the proportion of MG variance was low. (d) The Most Parsimonious Mendelian model clearly indicated the contribution of a major gene with dominant (for PII) and additive (for two ridge counts) effects.
CONCLUSION
The present report supports the evidence of the existence of a major gene on these dermatoglyphic traits and the transmission of this effect is consistent with Mendelian expectation.
Collapse