Validity of cytogenetic analyses from trophoblast tissue throughout gestation

False negative cytogenetic results following amniocentesis

We report 2 cases where prenatal cytogenetic studies following amniocentesis yielded false negative results. Both mothers requested termination of pregnancy but were reassured by the normal chromosome analysis and therefore continued their pregnancies. When cytogenetic studies were repeated in the neonatal period, they demonstrated chromosomal abnormalities, which were confirmed when the initial specimens from amniocentesis were reviewed. Because of our findings, we suggest that if prenatal chromosome analysis is reported as normal, where there is a high index of suspicion of a chromosome abnormality, the result should be questioned and neonatal chromosome analysis undertaken.

Aneuploid correction and confined placental mosaicism

Uniparental disomy (UPD) can be caused by various genetic mechanisms such as gamete complementation, chromosome duplication in a monosomic zygote or postzygotic aneuploid correction. This latter mechanism has been recently well documented in human reproduction and seems to be strictly related to placental mosaicism. We have therefore studied some aspects of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) which are useful to clarify one of the most common sources of UPD in humans.

Abnormal distribution of chromosomes in postzygotic mitotic cell divisions may result in a mosaic condition with two or more cell lines showing different chromosome constitutions. The effects on fetal phenotype and pregnancy development depend on the chromosomes involved, the distribution of the abnormal cells among tissues and on the precise stage at which chromosome mutation occurs.

As shown in Fig. 1, when the mutational event occurs in the blastocyst, prior to the differentiation of embryonic and chorionic compartments, the mosaicism is found in both the placental and fetal tissues. In contrast, when the chromosome mutation occurs at a later stage, after embryonic and chorionic compartment separation, the abnormal cells may be confined to the placenta or to the embryo, and are not necessarily found in both.

Identification of a case of maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 10 associated with confined placental mosaicism

We report a case of maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 10 discovered after chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Direct preparations revealed mosaic trisomy 10, while cultured CVS cells, as well as amniotic fluid cells, showed only a normal 46,XY complement. DNA analysis using microsatellite markers showed both chromosomes 10 to have been inherited from the mother. The pregnancy was complicated by polyhydramnios. A phenotypically normal male infant of appropriate size was delivered by Caesarean section at 41 weeks' gestation. Since only the direct preparations showed trisomy 10, this case illustrates the importance of CVS direct preparations in the detection of pregnancies at risk of uniparental disomy (UPD). Although the increased frequency of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) diagnosed when direct preparations are performed has been viewed negatively, identification of both CPM and UPD may have biological and clinical significance for a pregnancy. Even though only a single case of maternal disomy 10 is reported here, the apparently normal phenotype provides evidence that there are no major imprinted loci on chromosome 10 that affect in utero growth and development. However, other potential effects such as mental retardation will require long-term follow-up of this as well as additional cases.

Rapid karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a comparative study of the 'pipette method' and the 'in situ' technique for chromosome harvesting

Rapid karyotyping in the second and third trimesters has important implications for the management of pregnancies at risk. From September 1985 to March 1992, 735 amniotic fluid samples sent to our laboratory for rapid karyotyping from 64 different diagnostic centres of the Federal Republic of Germany were included in a comparative study on harvesting for chromosome analysis using the 'pipette method' or the 'in situ' technique. The average time between preparation of the amniotic fluid and verbal notification of the analysed karyotype was 5.41 days. The 'pipette method' needed on average 4.65 days, and the 'in situ' technique 5.97 days. In comparison with other more invasive techniques available for rapid karyotyping such as cordocentesis and placental biopsy, amniocentesis and subsequent chromosome harvesting using the 'pipette method' and/or the 'in situ' technique proved very useful and efficient. The overall incidence of chromosome aberrations was 15.3 per cent. The high rate of structural chromosome aberrations and uncommon aneuploidies found in our investigation (12 per cent) indicates that for rapid karyotyping in the second and third trimesters, conventional cytogenetic techniques cannot be replaced by faster techniques based on fluorescent in situ hybridization on interphase cells in the near future.

Cytogenetic analysis of 2928 CVS samples and 1075 amniocenteses from randomized studies

We report cytogenetic results from a randomized Danish chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis (AC) study including 2928 placental and 1075 amniotic fluid specimens processed in the same laboratory. The results are presented in groups comparing CVS with amniocentesis and transabdominal (TA) CVS with transcervical (TC) CVS as randomized. More abnormalities and more ambiguous diagnostic problems were found in placental tissues than in amniotic cells. There were no diagnostic errors and no incorrect sex predictions. Mosaicism was detected in 1 per cent of all cases of CVS (discordancies included). When confirmation studies were done, 90 per cent were found to be confined to the placenta. Eight cases (0.7 per cent) of mosaicism/pseudomosaicism were seen in amniotic fluid specimens, and two cases of five with confirmation studies were confirmed in the fetus. The rate of mosaicism/pseudomosaicism in CVS and AC specimens differed (p < 0.05). The rate of pseudomosaicism in cultures of villi and amniotic fluid cells was 0.5 and 0.6 per cent, respectively. Single-cell aneuploidy was observed in 1.8 per cent of villi and 1.4 per cent of amniotic fluid cell specimens. Maternal cell contamination (MCC) was seen more often after TC sampling (4.5 per cent) compared with TA sampling (1.5 per cent), but posed no problems in interpretation. Compared with the processing of cultured specimens, the short-term method of preparation of villi in our laboratory doubled the technicians' workload. For practical and economic reasons we have ceased the routine use of short-term preparations.

Unusual segregation for 11q;22q parental translocation in a triplet pregnancy: prenatal diagnosis in chorionic villi and amniotic fluid

The prenatal diagnosis of an 11q;22q translocation in a triplet pregnancy detected at the time of chorionic villus sampling (CVS) because of advanced maternal age is reported. Karyotypes obtained from two apparently different CV samples showed the balanced form of translocation, while the one obtained from a third empty sac showed the unbalanced form: 46,XX,-22,+der(22)t(11;22). Second-trimester amniocentesis confirmed the balanced translocation in one of the two viable fetuses and a normal karyotype in the other. The detected karyotypes derived from two different types of meiotic segregation, alternate and adjacent 1. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an unbalanced karyotype not due to a 3:1 meiotic segregation of this specific translocation.

Mosaicism and accuracy of prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses after chorionic villus sampling and placental biopsies

Discrepant chromosome findings in placenta and fetus (false negative and false positive) after chorionic villus sampling (CVS) are mainly due to confined mosaicism. Non-mosaic normal or abnormal chromosome counts after direct preparation and culture nearly always correctly reflect the fetal chromosome constitution. False-negative results have almost exclusively been restricted to cytotrophoblast cells not representing a fetal chromosome abnormality. Diagnosis of placental mosaicism definitely requires an adequate follow-up by amniocentesis, fetal blood sampling, or sonography before a pregnancy is terminated. When direct preparations and cultured cells are used for cytogenetic diagnoses and placental mosaicism is not taken as proof for a chromosomal abnormality in the fetus, CVS is an accurate diagnostic tool.

'False-negative' and 'false-positive' prenatal cytogenetic results due to 'true' mosaicism

A 37-year-old gravida was referred for CVS because of advanced maternal age. A trisomy 21 was present in all cells after short-term incubation (direct processing (DP)) and long-term culture. According to our policy, a retap was offered for confirmation of the result during the legally required 3-day waiting period between communication of the result and termination of pregnancy. Unexpectedly all cells after DP showed a normal male chromosome complement. Further investigations revealed mosaicism in trophoblast tissue and a normal karyotype in amniotic fluid cells and fetal blood (50 mitoses each). The parents elected to continue the pregnancy after extensive ultrasound examinations did not show suspicious findings. After the birth of a healthy child, cell cultures from ten different placental sites confirmed mosaicism. Four out of 100 mitoses from a lymphocyte culture showed an additional chromosome 21. The child had no dysmorphic features and the development was normal at the age of 10 weeks. This case demonstrates the restricted validity of prenatal cytogenetic analysis in the presence of true fetal mosaicism. It also stresses the benefit of our policy to offer a retap in cases with abnormal cytogenetic results prior to termination of pregnancy which is considered unnecessary by many cytogeneticists.

Direct analysis of uncultured cytotrophoblastic cells from second- and third-trimester placentas: an accurate and rapid method for detection of fetal chromosome abnormalities

Transabdominal chorionic villus sampling can be readily used for detection of fetal chromosome abnormalities in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Although culture of chorionic villi offers little advantage over cultured amniotic fluid cells with respect to time required to obtain results, cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villi by direct analysis of uncultured cytotrophoblastic cells offers clear advantages because of the very short time required to obtain results. To determine whether direct analysis of uncultured cytotrophoblastic cells from second- and third-trimester placentas can routinely provide rapid and accurate assessment of fetal status, we evaluated chorionic villus specimens obtained from 57 placentas; 49 placentas were sampled in the second trimester whereas eight were sampled in the third trimester. Direct preparations yielded karyotypes in 56 (98.2%) preparations; all results of direct analyses were available within 72 hours and, when requested, within 12 hours. All results were confirmed by chromosome analysis of cultured mesenchymal core cells or cultured fetal tissue. We conclude that direct analysis of cytotrophoblastic cells from second- and third-trimester placentas is a very rapid and accurate method for determining fetal chromosome status that is comparable with, if not superior to, percutaneous umbilical blood sampling.

Discordant findings in chorionic villus direct preparation and long term culture--mosaicism in the fetus

Prenatal cytogenetic study of chorionic villi showed a discrepancy between a normal female karyotype 46,XX in the direct preparation after short-term incubation, and a 45,X karyotype in the long-term culture. The subsequent amniocentesis revealed a normal karyotype in three cultures and a 45,X/46,XX mosaicism in one culture. Cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villi after termination of the pregnancy showed a normal karyotype in the direct preparation and a 45,X/46,XX mosaicism in the long-term culture. Fetal lymphocytes showed normal karyotypes, whereas fibroblast cultures revealed a 45,X/46,XX mosaicism.

Benefits of placental biopsies for rapid karyotyping in the second and third trimesters (late chorionic villus sampling) in high-risk pregnancies

In a total of 301 placental biopsies in the second and third trimesters, 225 were performed because of suspicious ultrasonographic findings. In this group there was a high rate of aneuploidies (20%). As opposed to the alternative methods for rapid karyotyping, placental biopsies can easily be performed even in pregnancies with abnormal amounts of amniotic fluid. Oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios were key ultrasonographic findings in 38% of cases and were found to be associated with 22% of abnormal chromosomal findings. Suggestive ultrasonographic findings seem to justify the exclusive use of direct preparation.

'Late CVS' international registry compilation of data from 24 centres

Data on 2058 late CVS cases, i.e., placental biopsies after 12 completed weeks of pregnancy, were collected from 24 centres. Two major groups of indications with or without ultrasound findings suspicious of fetal chromosomal abnormalities can be differentiated. In the first group, the rates of cytogenetic anomalies (21 per cent) and fetal losses (10 per cent) are high. The respective figures for the low-risk group are 6 per cent for chromosome anomalies and 2 per cent for total fetal losses. To evaluate this rapidly spreading new method further, more data are required and will be collected by the CVS registry based in Philadelphia, U.S.A.