Trisomy 20 mosaicism caused by a maternal meiosis II error is associated with normal intellect but multiple congenital anomalies

Building the brain mosaic: an expanded view

The complexity of the brain is closely tied to its nature as a genetic mosaic, wherein each cell is distinguished by a unique constellation of somatic variants that contribute to functional and phenotypic diversity. Postzygotic variation arising during neurogenesis is recognized as a key contributor to brain mosaicism; however, recent advances have broadened our understanding to include sources of neural genomic diversity that develop throughout the entire lifespan, from embryogenesis through aging. Moving beyond the traditional confines of neurodevelopment, in this review, we delve into the complex mechanisms that enable various origins of brain mosaicism.

Additional Evidence for Neuropsychiatric Manifestations in Mosaic Trisomy 20: A Case Report and Brief Review

Mosaic trisomy 20 is a genetic condition in which three chromosomes 20 are found in some cells. Its clinical phenotype seems to be highly variable, with most features not reported across all individuals and not considered pathognomonic of the condition. Limited and recent evidence indicates that neuropsychiatric manifestations may be more present in the context of trisomy 20 than was once thought. Here, we present a case of a 14-year-old female adolescent of White/Caucasian ethnicity with mosaic trisomy 20, who was admitted twice to an inpatient Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit for persisting self-injury and suicidal ideation. A severe and complex neuropsychiatric presentation emerged at the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral levels, including mild neurodevelopmental issues, isolation, socio-relational difficulties, depressed mood, temper outbursts, irritability, low self-esteem, lack of interest, social anxiety, panic attacks, self-cutting, and low-average-range and heterogeneous intelligence quotient profile. Particularly, the patient was considered at high risk of causing harm, mainly to self, and appeared to be only partially responsive to medication, even when polypharmacy was attempted to improve clinical response. Except for school bullying, no other severe environmental risk factors were present in the patient’s history. The patient received a diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder.

Maternal Uniparental Disomy of Chromosome 20 (UPD(20)mat) as Differential Diagnosis of Silver Russell Syndrome: Identification of Three New Cases

Silver Russell Syndrome (SRS, MIM #180860) is a rare growth retardation disorder in which clinical diagnosis is based on six features: pre- and postnatal growth failure, relative macrocephaly, prominent forehead, body asymmetry, and feeding difficulties (Netchine–Harbison clinical scoring system (NH-CSS)). The molecular mechanisms consist in (epi)genetic deregulations at multiple loci: the loss of methylation (LOM) at the paternal H19/IGF2:IG-DMR (chr11p15.5) (50%) and the maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 (UPD(7)mat) (10%) are the most frequent causes. Thus far, about 40% of SRS remains undiagnosed, pointing to the need to define the rare mechanisms in such a consistent fraction of unsolved patients. Within a cohort of 176 SRS with an NH-CSS ≥ 3, a molecular diagnosis was disclosed in about 45%. Among the remaining patients, we identified in 3 probands (1.7%) with UPD(20)mat (Mulchandani–Bhoj–Conlin syndrome, OMIM #617352), a molecular mechanism deregulating the GNAS locus and described in 21 cases, characterized by severe feeding difficulties associated with failure to thrive, preterm birth, and intrauterine/postnatal growth retardation. Our patients share prominent forehead, feeding difficulties, postnatal growth delay, and advanced maternal age. Their clinical assessment and molecular diagnostic flowchart contribute to better define the characteristics of this rare imprinting disorder and to rank UPD(20)mat as the fourth most common pathogenic molecular defect causative of SRS.

Acute Implant-related Complications in Pediatric Cervical Spine Fusion

BACKGROUND

The use of modern rigid instrumentation in pediatric cervical fusions decreases the risk of implant-related complications, both acute and long term. However, previous studies have indicated that acute implant-related issues still occur in the adult population. Reports of pediatric acute implant complications, occurring within 3 months of surgery, are under-represented in the literature. The purpose of this study is to document the prevalence of acute implant-related complications in a pediatric cervical fusion population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of instrumented cervical fusions from August 2002 to December 2018 was conducted. Acute implant-related complications were defined as malposition, fracture, or disengagement of cervical instrumentation, including screws, rods, and plates, within 90 days of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 166 cases were included (55% male individuals) with an average age at surgery of 12.5 years (SD, ±5.28). Acute implant-related complications occurred in 5 patients (3%). All 5 patients had a syndromic diagnosis: Loeys-Dietz (n=1), osteopetrosis (n=1), neurofibromatosis (n=1), trisomy 20 (n=1), and achondroplasia (n=1). One case involved asymptomatic screw protrusion, 1 case lateral mass screw pull-out, 2 more had screw-rod disengagement, and the last experienced dislodgement of the anterior plate. The median time until the presentation was 25 days (range, 1 to 79 d). All patients (n=5) required surgical revision.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series suggests that the overall incidence of acute cervical implant failure is low. However, failure is more likely to occur in patients with underlying syndromes compared with patients with different etiologies. Intraoperative use of 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging is recommended to evaluate the screw position and potentially avoid later surgery.

Further Characterization of Hb Bronovo [α103(G10)His→Leu; HBA2: c.311A>T] and First Report of the Homozygous State

Hb Bronovo [α103(G10)His→Leu, HBA2: c.311A>T] is an α-globin variant that interferes with and decreases binding efficiency to α hemoglobin (Hb) stabilizing protein (AHSP), a chaperone molecule. The histidine residue at position 103 is integral to the AHSP hydrogen bond formation where disruption results in an increased quantity of cytotoxic free α-globin chains, thereby creating a similar pathophysiology as β-thalassemia (β-thal). We report a family with Hb Bronovo, including a homozygous proband, which resulted from maternal uniparental disomy (UPD). Although not detected by routine studies in previous reports, the variant protein is visible by intact mass spectrometry (MS).

Mosaic trisomy 20 and mitigation in capital crimes sentencing: A review and case report

Trisomy 20 is a genetic abnormality in which individuals have an extra copy of chromosome 20. Complete trisomy 20 is rare and believed to be incompatible with life. A mosaic form of trisomy 20, in which only some cells or tissues contain the extra chromosome, is a relatively commonly encountered chromosomal abnormality found during prenatal testing, and c. 90% result in a normal phenotype. However, despite the absence of a consistent phenotype, certain findings have been reported across multiple cases of mosaic trisomy 20. These include an array of morphological findings, developmental delays, and learning disabilities. Beyond physical manifestations, a wide range of developmental and learning delays have also been reported. In this work, we provide an overview of the trisomy 20 literature and a case report of a young adult male with mosaic trisomy 20 who committed homicide. His developmental and life history, eventual diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 20, similarities and differences in his condition compared with prior research findings, and potentially new phenotypic findings associated with trisomy 20 that he manifested (childhood visual hallucinations, self-injury, polydactyly) are presented. Additionally, the potential role of this genetic diagnosis in his neuropsychiatric history and its successful application as a mitigating factor at his capital sentencing trial are described. We did not identify other similar cases during our search of major scientific and legal databases. As a backdrop, the use of genetics in criminal trials is on the rise, and courts are increasingly likely to accept behavioral genetics evidence; therefore, it is crucial that the legal system is well acquainted with the opportunities and limitations of these approaches.

Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 20: a novel imprinting disorder of growth failure

PURPOSE

Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 20 (UPD(20)mat) has been reported in only four patients, three of whom also had mosaicism for complete or partial trisomy of chromosome 20. We sought to evaluate the clinical significance of isolated UPD(20)mat in eight individuals.

METHODS

We evaluated phenotypic and genomic findings of a series of eight new patients with UPD(20)mat.

RESULTS

All eight individuals with UPD(20)mat had intrauterine growth restriction, short stature, and prominent feeding difficulties with failure to thrive. As a common feature, they often required gastric tube feeds. Genomic data in most patients are indicative of UPD as a result of trisomy rescue after meiosis II nondisjunction.

CONCLUSION

We describe the first natural history of the disorder and the results of therapeutic interventions, including the frequent requirement of direct gastric feedings only during the first few years of life, and propose that growth hormone supplementation is probably safe and effective for this condition. We suggest that UPD(20)mat can be regarded as a new imprinting disorder and its identification requires specialized molecular testing, which should be performed in patients with early-onset idiopathic isolated growth failure.Genet Med 18 4, 309-315.

Aneuploid human embryonic stem cells: origins and potential for modeling chromosomal disorders

Chromosomal aneuploidies are widely recognized genetic disorders in humans that often lead to spontaneous abortion. Aneuploid fetuses that survive to term commonly exhibit impaired developmental growth and mental retardation in addition to multiple congenital malformations. Preimplantation genetic screening is used to detect chromosomal aneuploidies in early embryos. Human embryonic stem cell (ESC) cell lines generated from aneuploid embryos created a unique repository of cell lines. The spectrum of aneuploidies in these ESC lines reflects the range of common embryonic chromosomal aberrations and significantly differs from the spectrum of aneuploid human ESC lines generated by cell adaptation in culture. The aneuploid human ESC lines represent an excellent model to study human chromosomal abnormalities especially in the early stages of development.

Non-mosaic trisomy 20 of paternal origin in chorionic villus and amniotic fluid also detected in fetal blood and other tissues

Trisomy 20 mosaicism is a common abnormality found in prenatal diagnosis. Its clinical significance remains unclear since approximately 90-93% of cases result in normal phenotype. Only 5 cases of non-mosaic trisomy 20 in amniotic fluid culture surviving beyond the first trimester have been reported. Moreover, trisomic cells are generally not detectable in blood and have only been reported in three cases. We present a case of non-mosaic trisomy 20 found in chorionic villi sample and amniotic fluid culture in a fetus with minor abnormalities not detected by ultrasound examination. Pathological examination of the fetus only revealed right pulmonary isomerism and camptodactily, and no major malformations were disclosed. Trisomic lineage was also detected in fetal blood, kidney, skin and brain tissue cultures. Molecular analysis revealed that the extra chromosome 20 was originated in paternal meiosis. To our knowledge, we report the first prenatal case of non-mosaic trisomy 20 of paternal origin that has been confirmed in several fetal tissues, including blood, in a fetus with minor malformations not detected prenatally.

Expanding the phenotype of mosaic trisomy 20

Mosaic trisomy 20 is one of the more common cytogenetic abnormalities found on amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Studies have shown that outcome is normal in 90-93% of prenatally diagnosed cases. There are however, reports in the literature of children with mosaic trisomy 20 described as having an assortment of dysmorphic features and varying levels of developmental delay. Unfortunately, the literature has not defined a specific phenotype for this entity. Here we report on three patients with mosaic trisomy 20, two of whom were identified prenatally. Over a number of years of follow-up it has become apparent that there are some striking similarities among the three. Comparison between our patients and the literature cases indicates a more consistent phenotype than has previously been suggested. Recurring features include; spinal abnormalities (including spinal stenosis, vertebral fusion, and kyphosis), hypotonia, lifelong constipation, sloped shoulders, and significant learning disabilities despite normal intelligence. These findings may be overlooked on routine history and physical exam or assumed to be standard pediatric problems. It is not our intention to suggest that there is a distinctive face for this entity but to suggest that a subtle phenotype does exist. We have attempted to identify a set of findings for which any child diagnosed with mosaic trisomy 20 should be assessed or followed even in the presence of an apparently normal physical exam at birth.

Cryptic mosaicism for monosomy 20 identified in renal tract cells

We report a post-natal case of mosaic aneuploidy for chromosome 20 in a 4 months old male baby with an abnormal phenotype including dysmorphic features (asymmetric facial growth), ventricular septal defect, hypotonia and bilateral vesicoureteric reflux. Conventional cytogenetics on peripheral blood showed 1 cell of 200 with 47,XY,+20. Further investigations using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on a urine sample, with a centromere probe for chromosome 20, revealed 39 of 50 cells giving one signal indicative of monosomy 20. FISH analysis of a buccal smear was consistent with disomy 20 as was conventional cytogenetics on skin fibroblasts. This is the fourth reported case of mosaic monosomy 20, the second case where monosomy 20 is present with a trisomy 20 cell and the first case with each aneuploidy found in two separate tissues. The identification of mosaicism is a difficult task since the abnormal cells can be present only in certain tissues and may disappear with selection as the fetus develops, thus leading to single-cell abnormalities that may get dismissed (pseudomosaicism). The use of FISH in this case was crucial in identifying the cryptic mosaic monosomy 20 cell line. The likely mechanism of origin is post-zygotic nondisjunction giving rise to monosomy, disomy and trisomy cell(s) in the same or different tissues. Although no other trisomy 20 cells were found, the abnormal phenotype plus the finding of a monosomy 20 cell line make this mechanism the most plausible explanation. Had we dismissed the single-cell abnormality, the cryptic mosaicism of monosomy 20 would not have been identified. A detailed analysis of all tissues accessible in conjunction with careful consideration of all clinical information available is the best course of action in suspected mosaicism.