1
|
Allen EG, Charen K, Hipp HS, Shubeck L, Amin A, He W, Nolin SL, Glicksman A, Tortora N, McKinnon B, Shelly KE, Sherman SL. Refining the risk for fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI) by FMR1 CGG repeat size. Genet Med 2021; 23:1648-1655. [PMID: 33927378 PMCID: PMC8460441 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01177-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Approximately 20–30% of women with an FMR1 premutation experience fragile X–associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI); however, current risk estimates based on repeat size only identify women with the midrange of repeats to be at the highest risk. Methods To better understand the risk by repeat size, we collected self-reported reproductive histories on 1,668 women and divided them into high-resolution repeat size bins of ~5 CGG repeats to determine a more accurate risk for FXPOI in relation to CGG repeat length. Results As previously reported, women with 70–100 CGG repeats were at the highest risk for FXPOI using various statistical models to compare average age at menopause and risk of FXPOI, with women with 85–89 repeats being at the highest risk. Importantly, women with <65 repeats or >120 repeats did not have a significantly increased risk for FXPOI compared to women with <45 repeats. Conclusion Using a large cross-section study on 1,668 women, we have provided more personalized risk assessment for FXPOI using high-resolution repeat size bins. Understanding the variability in risk has important implications for family planning and overall health among women with a premutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Graves Allen
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Krista Charen
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Heather S Hipp
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lisa Shubeck
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ashima Amin
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Weiya He
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah L Nolin
- Department of Human Genetics, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Anne Glicksman
- Department of Human Genetics, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Nicole Tortora
- Department of Human Genetics, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Bonnie McKinnon
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Katharine E Shelly
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephanie L Sherman
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Preconception expanded carrier screening: a focus group study with relatives of mucopolysaccharidosis type III patients and the general population. J Community Genet 2021; 12:311-323. [PMID: 33754291 PMCID: PMC8241963 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00519-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS) enables prospective parents to assess their risk of having a child with an autosomal recessive disorder. Knowledge on motivations, feelings, and considerations people have towards the offer and use of ECS is limited. To enrich the public and professional discussion on ECS implementation, this study explored the perspectives towards various aspects of ECS in seven focus groups compromising first- and second-degree relatives of MPS III patients (N=9, N=4, N=5, N=5) and members of the general Dutch population (N=6, N=7, N=5). The focus groups were audio recorded and the transcripts were qualitatively analyzed to identify themes. Both relatives of MPS III patients and participants from the general population supported offering ECS, in particular for severe, childhood-onset disorders. Important barriers identified for ECS were a lack of genetic knowledge and a perceived lack of personal relevance and awareness, as well as out-of-pocket costs of testing. The majority of participants would prefer full disclosure of individual test results instead of couple-based test results. Moreover, offering people a choice for the way of reporting was proposed. All participants agreed that more efforts, for example by governmental campaigns, should be made to increase awareness on the availability, potentials, and limitations of ECS. Educating prospective parents about ECS is essential for increasing awareness and informed decision making. This study provides valuable insights that can be used by governments and public health authorities when considering implementation of preconception ECS.
Collapse
|
3
|
Boardman FK. Attitudes toward population screening among people living with fragile X syndrome in the UK: 'I wouldn't wish him away, I'd just wish his fragile X syndrome away'. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:85-97. [PMID: 33184995 PMCID: PMC7894324 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
In an age of expanded genetic screening, fragile X syndrome is increasingly considered a candidate condition, given its prevalence, the absence of curative interventions, and its impact on families. However, relatively little research has explored the views of families and people living with fragile X syndrome toward population screening. This study reports on in-depth interviews with 19 participants: 3 with people diagnosed with a fragile X condition (fragile X syndrome = 2, FXTAS = 1) and 16 people with fragile X syndrome in their family (11 parents, 2 grandparents, 1 spouse, 1 sibling, and 1 aunt) living in the UK. This study reveals the complexity of attitudes within this group and the existence of genuine ambivalence toward different population screening programs. While the overwhelming majority believed that preconception and newborn genetic screening should be made available to the general public, the notion of prenatal screening was far more controversial, with only five participants expressing support for such a program. Expressivist concerns were highlighted equally both by those who supported prenatal screening, as by also those who did not. Participants who supported prenatal screening drew clear distinctions between people with fragile X syndrome and the condition itself, in order to neutralize expressivist concerns and existential threat. However, for others, this division was challenging to maintain. Impairment effects associated with fragile X syndrome, more specifically, its implications for behavior, intellect, and personality, made it harder for some participants to conceptually separate the person from their condition. This study concludes that screening remains a complex issue for families living with genetic conditions and that expressivist concerns affect, and are managed by, families living with different types of disability in contrasting ways. Screening for conditions that affect personality, behavior, and intellect produces unique iterations of expressivism, identity, and stigmatization that families produce specific, and creative, strategies to navigate.
Collapse
|
4
|
Boardman FK, Hale R. "I didn't take it too seriously because I'd just never heard of it": Experiential knowledge and genetic screening for thalassaemia in the UK. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:141-154. [PMID: 30629758 PMCID: PMC7814888 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Members of the public face particular challenges when undergoing reproductive genetic screening. Lack of family history with genetic disease has been identified as a key barrier affecting screening uptake and responses to genetic risk. This study explores this obstacle using beta thalassaemia as a case study. Fifteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted exploring the reproductive views and decisions of people at risk of transmitting thalassaemia. Eleven participants had thalassaemia themselves and/or were members of an affected family. Four participants were identified as thalassaemia carriers through genetic screening programmes with no family history. Notable differences were observed between these two groups. For thalassaemic individuals and families, past experience clarified and facilitated their sense of reproductive responsibility, however carriers struggled to relate to, and incorporate the information into their lives. It was witnessing their child becoming symptomatic-rather than receiving a diagnosis or genetic risk information per se that had the most substantial influence on carriers' subsequent views and decisions. Educational resources used to support genetic screening programmes would benefit from an engagement with the experiential accounts of life with genetic disease in order to more effectively bridge the chasm in knowledge and understanding between affected families and the general public, towards whom expansive genetic screening is aimed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Nijmeijer SCM, Conijn T, Lakeman P, Henneman L, Wijburg FA, Haverman L. Attitudes of the general population towards preconception expanded carrier screening for autosomal recessive disorders including inborn errors of metabolism. Mol Genet Metab 2019; 126:14-22. [PMID: 30563741 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial number of severely debilitating and often ultimately fatal inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) still lack an effective disease-modifying treatment. Informing couples before a pregnancy about an increased risk of having a child with an inherited disorder is now feasible by preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS). While knowledge about carrier status enhances reproductive autonomy, it may also result in ethical dilemmas. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes of the general Dutch population towards preconception ECS and to investigate which factors influence these attitudes. METHODS Data collection was carried out in collaboration with a market research agency. In total, 1188 Dutch individuals of reproductive age (18-45 years) were invited by email to complete an online ECS questionnaire in 2016. Prior to the start of the questionnaire, a written explanation of the concepts of autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance, carrier status and ECS was presented. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by 781 individuals (65.7%), of whom 31% indicated they would take an ECS test themselves. In addition, 55% agreed that ECS should be offered to all prospective parents. The most frequently selected argument in favor of ECS (47.2%) was that participants want to spare a child from a life with a severe hereditary disorder. The reason most often mentioned not to participate in ECS (48%) was that participants reported not having a hereditary disorder in the family. The majority preferred receiving individual test results above a couple-based disclosure method in which participants receive the carrier status results only when they are a carrier couple of the same disorder. Participants with religious beliefs were less likely to participate in ECS, whereas participants who were considering a (future) pregnancy were more likely to participate. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates an overall positive attitude among participants of reproductive age in the general Dutch population towards preconception ECS. A striking misconception is that many of the participants believe that ECS is of interest only for those with a positive family history of one of the hereditary disorders. This finding emphasizes the importance of providing understandable, balanced information and education to the general public regarding the concepts of inheritance when presenting the option of carrier screening. Our results provide valuable insights that can be used in the debate about the responsible implementation of preconception ECS for AR disorders, including IEMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie C M Nijmeijer
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Metabolic Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital and Amsterdam Lysosome Center "Sphinx", Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Thirsa Conijn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Metabolic Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital and Amsterdam Lysosome Center "Sphinx", Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Phillis Lakeman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Frits A Wijburg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Pediatric Metabolic Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital and Amsterdam Lysosome Center "Sphinx", Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Lotte Haverman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Holtkamp KCA, Mathijssen IB, Lakeman P, van Maarle MC, Dondorp WJ, Henneman L, Cornel MC. Factors for successful implementation of population-based expanded carrier screening: learning from existing initiatives. Eur J Public Health 2017; 27:372-377. [PMID: 27485720 PMCID: PMC5421354 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Carrier screening for autosomal recessive disorders aims to facilitate reproductive decision-making by identifying couples with a 1-in-4 risk in every pregnancy of having an affected child. Except for a few countries or regions, carrier screening is not widely offered and is mostly ancestry-based. Technological advances enable carrier screening for multiple diseases simultaneously allowing universal screening regardless of ancestry (population-based expanded carrier screening). It is important to study how this can be successfully implemented. This study therefore aims to identify critical factors involved in successful implementation, from a user perspective, by learning from already implemented initiatives. Methods: Factors associated with successful implementation were identified by: (i) a literature review and (ii) two case studies; studying experiences with carrier screening in two high-risk communities (a Dutch founder population and the Ashkenazi Jewish population), including a survey among community members. Results: Factors identified were familiarity with (specific) genetic diseases and its availability, high perceived benefits of screening (e.g. screening avoids much suffering), acceptance of reproductive options, perceived risk of being a carrier and low perceived social barriers (e.g. stigmatization). In contrast to the Jewish community, the initial demand for screening in the Dutch founder population did not entirely come from the community itself. However, the large social cohesion of the community facilitated the implementation process. Conclusion: To ensure successful implementation of population-based expanded carrier screening, efforts should be made to increase knowledge about genetic diseases, create awareness and address personal benefits of screening in a non-directive way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim C A Holtkamp
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge B Mathijssen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Phillis Lakeman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merel C van Maarle
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wybo J Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Institutes CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boardman FK, Young PJ, Warren O, Griffiths FE. The role of experiential knowledge within attitudes towards genetic carrier screening: A comparison of people with and without experience of spinal muscular atrophy. Health Expect 2017; 21:201-211. [PMID: 28703871 PMCID: PMC5750730 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Autosomal recessive conditions, while individually rare, are a significant health burden with limited treatment options. Population carrier screening has been suggested as a means of tackling them. Little is known, however, about the attitudes of the general public towards such carrier screening and still less about the views of people living with candidate genetic diseases. Here, we focus on the role that such experience has on screening attitudes by comparing views towards screening of people with and without prior experience of the monogenetic disorder, Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Methods An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was adopted. In‐depth qualitative interviews were used to develop two surveys. The surveys addressed attitudes towards carrier screening (pre‐conceptual and prenatal) for SMA. Participants 337 participants with SMA experience completed the SMA Screening Survey (UK) and 336 participants with no prior experience of SMA completed the UK GenPop Survey, an amended version of the SMA Screening Survey (UK). Results The majority of both cohorts were in favour of pre‐conception and prenatal carrier screening, however people with experience of type II SMA were least likely to support either. Key differences emerged around perceptions of SMA, with those without SMA experience taking a dimmer view of the condition than those with. Conclusion This study underscores the significance of prior experience with the condition to screening attitudes. It highlights the need for accurate and high‐quality educational resources to support any future carrier screening programmes, that particularly in relation to rare genetic disorders like SMA that will fall outside the remit of everyday experience for the majority of the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity K Boardman
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Philip J Young
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Oliver Warren
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Frances E Griffiths
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Metcalfe SA, Martyn M, Ames A, Anderson V, Archibald AD, Couns GDG, Carter R, Cohen J, Cotter M, GenCouns M, Dang W, Delatycki MB, Donath S, Edwards S, Educ PGD, Couns GDG, Forbes R, Couns GDG, Gavrila M, MedSci M, Halliday J, Hickerton C, Hill M, Couns GDG, Jacobs L, Ultrasound PGD, Petrou V, Couns GDG, Plunkett L, GenCouns M, Sheffield L, Racp F, Thornton A, Couns GDG, Younie S, Econ PGDH, Emery JD. Informed decision making and psychosocial outcomes in pregnant and nonpregnant women offered population fragile X carrier screening. Genet Med 2017; 19:1346-1355. [PMID: 28661491 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposePopulation-based carrier screening for fragile X syndrome (FXS) is still not universally endorsed by professional organizations due to concerns around genetic counseling for complex information and potential for psychosocial harms.MethodsWe determined uptake levels, decision making, and psychosocial impact in a prospective study of pregnant and nonpregnant Australian women offered FXS carrier screening in clinical settings. Women received pretest genetic counseling, and completed questionnaires when deciding and one month later.ResultsOf 1,156 women recruited, 83.1% returned the first questionnaire with 70.6% nonpregnant and 58.8% pregnant women choosing testing (χ2=16.98, P<0.001). Overall, informed choice was high in both nonpregnant (77.4%) and pregnant (72.9%) women (χ2=0.21, P=0.644), and more tested (76.0%) than not-tested (66.7%) women (χ2=6.35, P=0.012) made an informed choice. Measures of depression, stress, and anxiety were similar to population norms for ~85% of women. Decisional conflict and regret were generally low; however, decisional uncertainty and regret were greater in pregnant than nonpregnant women, and not-tested than tested women (uncertainty: χ2=18.51, P<0.001 and χ2=43.11, P<0.001, respectively; regret: χ2=6.61, P<0.037 and χ2=35.54, P<0.001, respectively).ConclusionWe provide evidence to inform guidelines that population FXS carrier screening can be implemented with minimal psychosocial harms following appropriate information and prescreening genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice Ames
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vicki Anderson
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison D Archibald
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Grad Dip Gen Couns
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rob Carter
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan Cohen
- Fragile X Alliance Clinic and Centre for Developmental Disability Health Victoria, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Megan Cotter
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - M GenCouns
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William Dang
- Australian Clinical Labs (formerly Healthscope Pathology), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Donath
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samantha Edwards
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - PGrad Dip Educ
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - Grad Dip Gen Couns
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - Robin Forbes
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Mioara Gavrila
- Australian Clinical Labs (formerly Healthscope Pathology), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - M MedSci
- Australian Clinical Labs (formerly Healthscope Pathology), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Melissa Hill
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Grad Dip Gen Couns
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Lorilli Jacobs
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - PGrad Dip Ultrasound
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia
| | - Vicki Petrou
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Loren Plunkett
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - M GenCouns
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leslie Sheffield
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,MyDNA Life Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - F Racp
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,MyDNA Life Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Thornton
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sandra Younie
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - PGrad Dip Hlth Econ
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- School of Primary Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia.,Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tardif J, Pratte A, Laberge AM. Experience of carrier couples identified through a population-based carrier screening pilot program for four founder autosomal recessive diseases in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean. Prenat Diagn 2017; 38:67-74. [PMID: 28419508 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Tardif
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine and Department of Pediatrics; Université de Montréal; Montreal Quebec Canada
- Medical Genetics; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Annabelle Pratte
- CIUSSS Saguenay Lac-St-Jean, Hôpital de Chicoutimi; Montreal Quebec Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine and Department of Pediatrics; Université de Montréal; Montreal Quebec Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Molster CM, Lister K, Metternick-Jones S, Baynam G, Clarke AJ, Straub V, Dawkins HJS, Laing N. Outcomes of an International Workshop on Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening: Some Considerations for Governments. Front Public Health 2017; 5:25. [PMID: 28286745 PMCID: PMC5323409 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Consideration of expanded carrier screening has become an emerging issue for governments. However, traditional criteria for decision-making regarding screening programs do not incorporate all the issues relevant to expanded carrier screening. Further, there is a lack of consistent guidance in the literature regarding the development of appropriate criteria for government assessment of expanded carrier screening. Given this, a workshop was held to identify key public policy issues related to preconception expanded carrier screening, which governments should consider when deciding whether to publicly fund such programs. Methods In June 2015, a satellite workshop was held at the European Society of Human Genetics Conference. It was structured around two design features: (1) the provision of information from a range of perspectives and (2) small group deliberations on the key issues that governments need to consider and the benefits, risks, and challenges of implementing publicly funded whole-population preconception carrier screening. Results Forty-one international experts attended the workshop. The deliberations centered primarily on the conditions to be tested and the elements of the screening program itself. Participants expected only severe conditions to be screened but were concerned about the lack of a consensus definition of “severe.” Issues raised regarding the screening program included the purpose, benefits, harms, target population, program acceptability, components of a program, and economic evaluation. Participants also made arguments for consideration of the accuracy of screening tests. Conclusion A wide range of issues require careful consideration by governments that want to assess expanded carrier screening. Traditional criteria for government decision-making regarding screening programs are not a “best fit” for expanded carrier screening and new models of decision-making with appropriate criteria are required. There is a need to define what a “severe” condition is, to build evidence regarding the reliability and accuracy of screening tests, to consider the equitable availability and downstream effects on and costs of follow-up interventions for those identified as carriers, and to explore the ways in which the components of a screening program would be impacted by unique features of expanded carrier screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caron M Molster
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health Western Australia , Perth, WA , Australia
| | - Karla Lister
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health Western Australia , Perth, WA , Australia
| | | | - Gareth Baynam
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Genetic Services WA, Perth, WA, Australia; School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia; Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies, Perth, WA, Australia; Spatial Sciences, Department of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Angus John Clarke
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Cardiff , UK
| | - Volker Straub
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | - Hugh J S Dawkins
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Centre for Comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia; Centre for Population Health Research, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Nigel Laing
- Centre for Medical Research, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Neurogenetics Unit, Department of Diagnostic Genomics, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Department of Health Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boardman FK, Young PJ, Griffiths FE. Population screening for spinal muscular atrophy: A mixed methods study of the views of affected families. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 173:421-434. [PMID: 27792846 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Autosomal recessive conditions are a significant health burden with few treatments. Population carrier screening has been suggested as a means to tackle them. Little is known about the views of affected families despite the potential for direct impacts on them. Data are presented on attitudes among families affected by Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) toward two population screening programs, pre-conception, and prenatal. Data were gathered through qualitative interviews (n = 36) and a survey (n = 337). Eighty-two survey participants had SMA and 255 were family members. The majority were in favor of screening (75%). Reasons for supporting pre-conception screening support were a belief that it would reduce SMA-related terminations and raise awareness of SMA in the population. For prenatal screening, reasons for support included a belief in the importance of informed decision-making and the need to reduce suffering. Key reasons for non-support of pre-conception screening included concerns about carrier stigmatization and social engineering. For prenatal screening, concerns focused on the collateral loss of high quality of life lives affected by SMA. This study highlights that those affected by SMA are predominantly in favor of screening, although pre-conception screening is most favored. While family members and adults with SMA had largely consistent views, perceptions varied according to the severity (type) of SMA, with those affected by SMA type II the least likely to support screening. These findings suggest that screening for SMA is a complex issue for affected families, underscoring the need to consider and include their views when planning and implementing screening programs. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity K Boardman
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Philip J Young
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Frances E Griffiths
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Henneman L, Borry P, Chokoshvili D, Cornel MC, van El CG, Forzano F, Hall A, Howard HC, Janssens S, Kayserili H, Lakeman P, Lucassen A, Metcalfe SA, Vidmar L, de Wert G, Dondorp WJ, Peterlin B. Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:e1-e12. [PMID: 26980105 PMCID: PMC4867464 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This document of the European Society of Human Genetics contains recommendations regarding responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening. Carrier screening is defined here as the detection of carrier status of recessive diseases in couples or persons who do not have an a priori increased risk of being a carrier based on their or their partners' personal or family history. Expanded carrier screening offers carrier screening for multiple autosomal and X-linked recessive disorders, facilitated by new genetic testing technologies, and allows testing of individuals regardless of ancestry or geographic origin. Carrier screening aims to identify couples who have an increased risk of having an affected child in order to facilitate informed reproductive decision making. In previous decades, carrier screening was typically performed for one or few relatively common recessive disorders associated with significant morbidity, reduced life-expectancy and often because of a considerable higher carrier frequency in a specific population for certain diseases. New genetic testing technologies enable the expansion of screening to multiple conditions, genes or sequence variants. Expanded carrier screening panels that have been introduced to date have been advertised and offered to health care professionals and the public on a commercial basis. This document discusses the challenges that expanded carrier screening might pose in the context of the lessons learnt from decades of population-based carrier screening and in the context of existing screening criteria. It aims to contribute to the public and professional discussion and to arrive at better clinical and laboratory practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Davit Chokoshvili
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Centre for Medical Genetics Ghent, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carla G van El
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Heidi C Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sandra Janssens
- Centre for Medical Genetics Ghent, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hülya Kayserili
- Department of Medical Genetics, Koç University School of Medicine (KUSoM), Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Phillis Lakeman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke Lucassen
- Department of Clinical Ethics and Law (CELS), University of Southampton and Wessex Clinical Genetic Service, Southampton, UK
| | - Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Lovro Vidmar
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wybo J Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beard CA, Amor DJ, Di Pietro L, Archibald AD. "I'm Healthy, It's Not Going To Be Me": Exploring experiences of carriers identified through a population reproductive genetic carrier screening panel in Australia. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170:2052-9. [PMID: 27150953 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Advancing genetic testing technologies mean that population-based carrier screening for multiple inherited conditions is now available. As the number of genetic conditions being screened increases, there is a need for research into how people experience these screening programs. This research aimed to explore how women experience simultaneous carrier screening for three inherited conditions: cystic fibrosis (CF), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and fragile X syndrome (FXS). A qualitative approach was adopted using in-depth semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of ten female participants: five SMA carriers, three CF carriers, and two FXS premutation carriers. Eight participants were pregnant when offered screening by their general practitioner or obstetrician and the decision to have screening was described as straightforward. Participants reported experiencing emotional responses such as anxiety and stress while waiting for either their partner's carrier screen result (CF or SMA carriers) or the pregnancy's CVS result (FXS carrier) and sought additional information about the relevant condition during this time. Most participants were in favor of population carrier screening for these conditions, preferably prior to conception. Genetic counselors played an essential role in supporting couples after they received a carrier result given the variable consent processes undertaken when screening was offered. Further research should focus on the development of reliable online information tailored to people receiving carrier results and strategies for raising awareness of the availability of population carrier screening within the community. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A Beard
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louisa Di Pietro
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Genetic Support Network of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison D Archibald
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Family Communication and Cascade Testing for Fragile X Syndrome. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:1075-84. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9940-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
15
|
Archibald AD, Hickerton CL, Wake SA, Jaques AM, Cohen J, Metcalfe SA. "It gives them more options": preferences for preconception genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome in primary healthcare. J Community Genet 2016; 7:159-71. [PMID: 26842720 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0262-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to explore stakeholder views about offering population-based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. A qualitative study using interviews and focus groups with stakeholders was undertaken to allow for an in-depth exploration of views and perceptions about practicalities of, and strategies for, offering carrier screening for fragile X syndrome to the general population in healthcare settings. A total of 188 stakeholders took part including healthcare providers (n = 81), relatives of people with fragile X syndrome (n = 29), and members of the general community (n = 78). The importance of raising community awareness about screening and providing appropriate support for carriers was emphasized. There was a preference for preconception carrier screening and for providing people with the opportunity to make an informed decision about screening. Primary care was highlighted as a setting which would ensure screening is accessible; however, challenges of offering screening in primary care were identified including time to discuss screening, knowledge about the test and possible outcomes, and the health professionals' approach to offering screening. With the increasing availability of genetic carrier tests, it is essential that research now focuses on evaluating approaches for the delivery of carrier screening programs. Primary healthcare is perceived as an appropriate setting through which to access the target population, and raising awareness is essential to making genetic screening more accessible to the general community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison D Archibald
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Samantha A Wake
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alice M Jaques
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jonathan Cohen
- Fragile X Alliance Inc., Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Developmental Disability Health Victoria, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome (FXS), a trinucleotide repeat disorder, is the most common heritable form of cognitive impairment. Since the discovery of the FMR1 gene in 1991, great strides have been made in the field of molecular diagnosis for FXS. Cytogenetic analysis, which was the method of diagnosis in the early 1990, was replaced by Southern blot and PCR analysis albeit with some limitations. In the past few years many PCR-based methodologies, able to amplify large full mutation expanded alleles, with or without methylation, have been proposed. Reviewed here are the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of the most recent developments in the field of FXS diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora Tassone
- a Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine , University of California, Davis, School of Medicine , Davis , CA 95616 , USA.,b MIND Institute , University of California Davis Medical Center , Sacramento , CA 95817 , USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
"Is It Worth Knowing?" Focus Group Participants' Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier Screening. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:135-45. [PMID: 26093606 PMCID: PMC4726717 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9851-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
As genome sequencing technology advances, research is needed to guide decision-making about what results can or should be offered to patients in different clinical settings. We conducted three focus groups with individuals who had prior preconception genetic testing experience to explore perceived advantages and disadvantages of genome sequencing for preconception carrier screening, compared to usual care. Using a discussion guide, a trained qualitative moderator facilitated the audio-recorded focus groups. Sixteen individuals participated. Thematic analysis of transcripts started with a grounded approach and subsequently focused on participants’ perceptions of the value of genetic information. Analysis uncovered two orientations toward genomic preconception carrier screening: “certain” individuals desiring all possible screening information; and “hesitant” individuals who were more cautious about its value. Participants revealed valuable information about barriers to screening: fear/anxiety about results; concerns about the method of returning results; concerns about screening necessity; and concerns about partner participation. All participants recommended offering choice to patients to enhance the value of screening and reduce barriers. Overall, two groups of likely users of genome sequencing for preconception carrier screening demonstrated different perceptions of the advantages or disadvantages of screening, suggesting tailored approaches to education, consent, and counseling may be warranted with each group.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ross LF. Ethical and policy issues in newborn screening of children for neurologic and developmental disorders. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015; 62:787-98. [PMID: 26022175 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2015.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing for neurologic and developmental disorders spans the spectrum from universal newborn screening for conditions like phenylketonuria to diagnostic testing for suspected genetic conditions, to predictive genetic testing for childhood-onset conditions. Given that virtually all children in the United States undergo genetic screening in the newborn period, this article focuses on 3 actual case studies of neurologic and developmental disorders that have been included or proposed for inclusion in newborn screening programs: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (a neuromuscular disorder), Krabbe disease (a neurodegenerative disorder), and fragile X syndrome (a neurodevelopmental disorder).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lainie Friedman Ross
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ames AG, Metcalfe SA, Archibald AD, Duncan RE, Emery J. Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23:8-21. [PMID: 24848746 PMCID: PMC4266751 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.89] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2013] [Revised: 03/11/2014] [Accepted: 04/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic screening and health-care guidelines recommend that programmes should facilitate informed choice. It is therefore important that accurate measures of informed choice are available to evaluate such programmes. This review synthesises and appraises measures used to evaluate informed choice in population-based genetic screening programmes for reproductive risk. Databases were searched for studies offering genetic screening for the purpose of establishing reproductive risk to an adult population sample, in which aspects of informed choice were measured. Studies were included if, at a minimum, measures of uptake of screening and knowledge were used. Searches identified 1462 citations and 76 studies were reviewed in full text; 34 studies met the inclusion criteria. Over 20 different measures of informed choice were used. Many measures lacked adequate validity and reliability data. This systematic review will inform future evaluation of informed choice in population genetic screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Grace Ames
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sylvia Ann Metcalfe
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Dalton Archibald
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rony Emily Duncan
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Health Services Delivery for Adolescents, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- General Practice and Primary Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Martyn M, Anderson V, Archibald A, Carter R, Cohen J, Delatycki M, Donath S, Emery J, Halliday J, Hill M, Sheffield L, Slater H, Tassone F, Younie S, Metcalfe S. Offering fragile X syndrome carrier screening: a prospective mixed-methods observational study comparing carrier screening of pregnant and non-pregnant women in the general population. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e003660. [PMID: 24022395 PMCID: PMC3773647 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the leading cause of inherited intellectual and developmental disability. Policy development relating to carrier screening programmes for FXS requires input from large studies examining not only test uptake but also psychosocial aspects. This study will compare carrier screening in pregnant and non-pregnant populations, examining informed decision-making, psychosocial issues and health economics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Pregnant and non-pregnant women are being recruited from general practices and obstetric services. Women receive study information either in person or through clinic mail outs. Women are provided pretest counselling by a genetic counsellor and make a decision about testing in their own time. Data are being collected from two questionnaires: one completed at the time of making the decision about testing and the second 1 month later. Additional data are gathered through qualitative interviews conducted at several time points with a subset of participating women, including all women with a positive test result, and with staff from recruiting clinics. A minimum sample size of 500 women/group has been calculated to give us 88% power to detect a 10% difference in test uptake and 87% power to detect a 10% difference in informed choice between the pregnant and non-pregnant groups. Questionnaire data will be analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models. Interview data will be thematically analysed. Willingness-to-pay and cost effectiveness analyses will also be performed. Recruitment started in July 2009 and data collection will be completed by December 2013. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been granted by the Universities of Melbourne and Western Australia and by recruiting clinics, where required. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and through a website http://www.fragilexscreening.net.au. The results of this study will make a significant contribution to discussions about the wider introduction of population carrier screening for FXS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Martyn
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Archibald AD, Hickerton CL, Jaques AM, Wake S, Cohen J, Metcalfe SA. "It's about having the choice": stakeholder perceptions of population-based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2012; 161A:48-58. [PMID: 23239566 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2012] [Accepted: 08/31/2012] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
This project explored, the views of key stakeholders regarding population-based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome (FXS). Interviews and focus groups were conducted with healthcare providers, relatives of individuals with FXS and members of the general population. Data were transcribed verbatim and coded into themes. 188 individuals took part in this study. Perceived benefits of carrier screening included: learning the risk of having a child with FXS; learning the risk of fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency; and the opportunity for carriers to access reproductive options. Concerns included: the emotional impact of screening and receiving a carrier result; the predictive testing nature of the carrier test with respect to fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome; potential confusion created by receiving an intermediate result; and implications of genetic screening for society. Overall, population-based genetic carrier screening was perceived to be acceptable provided it is optional and offered at an appropriate stage of life. With the support of the participants to promote individual choice by offering a population-based carrier screening program for FXS, it is essential to carefully consider how screening might be offered in order to ensure broad accessibility and facilitation of decision-making.
Collapse
|
22
|
Can a decision aid enable informed decisions in neonatal nursery recruitment for a fragile X newborn screening study? Genet Med 2012; 15:299-306. [PMID: 23100013 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether a brochure based on principles of informed decision making improved attention to study materials or altered decisions made by parents invited to participate in a fragile X syndrome newborn screening study. METHODS A total of 1,323 families were invited to participate in a newborn screening study to identify infants with fragile X syndrome as well as premutation carrier infants. Of these families, 716 received the original project brochure and 607 were given a new decision aid brochure. RESULTS Families were more likely to look at the new decision aid and mothers were more likely to read it completely, but the proportion of mothers who read the entire decision aid was only 14%. Families were more likely to rate the decision aid as very helpful. Consistent with informed decision making theory and research, participants receiving the decision aid brochure were less likely to agree to participate. CONCLUSION The decision aid increased attention to and perceived helpfulness of educational information about the study, but most families did not read it completely. The study suggests that even well-designed study materials are not fully reviewed in the context of in-hospital postpartum study recruitment and may need to be accompanied by a research recruiter to obtain informed consent.
Collapse
|
23
|
Ames AG, Jaques A, Ukoumunne OC, Archibald AD, Duncan RE, Emery J, Metcalfe SA. Development of a fragile X syndrome (FXS) knowledge scale: towards a modified multidimensional measure of informed choice for FXS population carrier screening. Health Expect 2012; 18:69-80. [PMID: 23067225 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic carrier screening is increasingly possible for many conditions, but it is important to ensure decisions are informed. The multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC) is a quantitative instrument developed to evaluate informed choice in prenatal screening for Down syndrome, measuring knowledge, attitudes and uptake. To apply the MMIC in other screening settings, the knowledge scale must be modified. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a modified MMIC knowledge scale for use with women undergoing carrier screening for fragile X syndrome (FXS). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Responses to MMIC items were collected through questionnaires as part of a FXS carrier screening pilot study in a preconception setting in Melbourne, Australia. DESIGN Ten knowledge scale items were developed using a modified Delphi technique. Cronbach's alpha and factor analysis were used to validate the new FXS knowledge scale. We summarized the knowledge, attitudes and informed choice status based on the modified MMIC. RESULTS Two hundred and eighty-five women were recruited, 241 eligible questionnaires were complete for analysis. The FXS knowledge scale items measured one salient construct and were internally consistent (alpha = 0.70). 71% (172/241) of participants were classified as having good knowledge, 70% (169/241) had positive attitudes and 27% (65/241) made an informed choice to accept or decline screening. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We present the development of a knowledge scale as part of a MMIC to evaluate informed choice in population carrier screening for FXS. This can be used as a template by other researchers to develop knowledge scales for other conditions for use in the MMIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice G Ames
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia; Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Metcalfe SA, Archibald AD, Couns G. Fragile X population carrier screening. Genet Med 2012; 14:350; author reply 351. [PMID: 22391783 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
25
|
Metcalfe SA. Carrier screening in preconception consultation in primary care. J Community Genet 2011; 3:193-203. [PMID: 22183783 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-011-0071-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2011] [Accepted: 11/08/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Discussing carrier screening during preconception consultation in primary care has a number of advantages in terms of promoting autonomy and enabling the greatest range of reproductive choices. For those with a family history of an inherited condition, this ought to be a routine discussion; however, this can be expanded to include the wider population, especially for those conditions for which carrier frequencies are considered relatively common. There is published literature from around the world regarding experiences with carrier screening in primary care for cystic fibrosis, haemoglobinopathies, fragile X syndrome, Tay-Sachs disease and spinal muscular atrophy, although many of these have tended to focus on consultations during rather than before pregnancy. Overall, these studies reveal that population carrier screening is well received by the participants with apparent minimal psychosocial harms; however, challenges exist in terms of approaches to ensure couples receive adequate information to make personally relevant decisions and for ongoing health professional engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital and Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Archibald AD, McClaren BJ. Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making. J Community Genet 2011; 3:47-54. [PMID: 22109909 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-011-0067-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2011] [Accepted: 10/05/2011] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alison D Archibald
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lieberman S, Zuckerman S, Levy-Lahad E, Altarescu G. Conflicts regarding genetic counseling for fragile X syndrome screening: a survey of clinical geneticists and genetic counselors in Israel. Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155A:2154-60. [PMID: 21834046 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2010] [Accepted: 05/01/2011] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Although fragile X screening has been offered in Israel since 1994, issues related to potential neurological and gynecological symptoms in carriers make counseling for fragile X different from recessive disorders. We evaluated the attitudes of clinical geneticists and genetic counselors regarding genetic counseling given to the women undergoing screening. We performed a self-administered questionnaire including 13 study questions mailed to all clinical geneticists and genetic counselors in Israel. The questions were related to counseling for women pre- and post-screening regarding themselves and the affected fetuses (including the risk for premature ovarian insufficiency; FXPOI and fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome; FXTAS). Out of a total of 80 clinical geneticists and genetic counselors, 34 responded with no additional responses on e-mail re-call. There was no clear consensus for 11/13 (85%) presented questions. The most striking differences in opinion were observed for issues regarding FXTAS risk in pre-screening counseling sessions (P < 0.05). This study demonstrates that, there is no consensus on critical variables implying risk for fetus and mother and that counseling practices are dissimilar even in this small cohort of experts. We demonstrated a conflict between the detailed amount of information, which should be given prior to the test in order to allow informed decisions and the overload of information, which may cause confusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sari Lieberman
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hill MK, Archibald AD, Cohen J, Metcalfe SA. A systematic review of population screening for fragile X syndrome. Genet Med 2010; 12:396-410. [PMID: 20548240 DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e3181e38fb6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a systematic review of literature regarding population-based screening for fragile X syndrome in newborns and women of reproductive age, either before or during pregnancy. METHODS Seven electronic databases were searched for English language studies published between January 1991 and November 2009. Data extraction was performed for all included studies. Results were synthesized using a narrative approach. RESULTS One article that examined offering newborn screening for fragile X syndrome and 10 that examined the offer of fragile X syndrome screening to women of reproductive age were identified. Two of these articles also addressed psychosocial aspects of population screening for fragile X syndrome such as attitudes to screening and experiences of screening, and a further nine addressed these issues alone. Studies exploring psychosocial issues demonstrated challenges for counseling arising from a lack of awareness or personal experience with fragile X syndrome in the general population. CONCLUSIONS Targeted counseling and educational strategies will be essential to support women from the general population. It is crucial that future studies offering screening for fragile X syndrome explore a range of psychosocial aspects in addition to looking at uptake of testing and mutation frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa K Hill
- Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tluczek A, Zaleski C, Stachiw-Hietpas D, Modaff P, Adamski CR, Nelson MR, Reiser CA, Ghate S, Josephson KD. A tailored approach to family-centered genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis newborn screening: the Wisconsin model. J Genet Couns 2010; 20:115-28. [PMID: 20936425 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9332-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2010] [Accepted: 09/15/2010] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This article describes the development of a tailored family-centered approach to genetic counseling following abnormal newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF). A genetic counseling consortium reviewed research literature, selected theoretical frameworks, and incorporated counseling psychology micro skills. This innovative intervention integrated theories and empirically validated techniques. Pilot testing and parent feedback confirmed satisfaction with and feasibility of the approach designed to (a) minimize parents' distress, (b) facilitate parents' understanding, (c) increase parents' capacities to use genetic information, and (d) enhance parents' experiences with genetic counseling. Counselors engage in a highly interactive process of evaluating parents' needs and tailoring assessments and interventions that include a therapeutic environment, the family's emotional needs, parents' informational needs, and a follow-up plan. This promising new model is the first to establish a theory-driven, evidence-based standard for genetic counseling in the context of NBS for CF. Additional research will evaluate the model's efficacy in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Tluczek
- University of Wisconsin, School of Nursing, 600 Highland Ave. K6/346, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|