Ultrasound parameters to identify and diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. A review of the literature

Variations of the Median Nerve and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a Systematic Review of the Literature

Objectives:The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the different variations of the median nerve (MN) and the diagnostic methods used to identify carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), a common neuropathy resulting from the entrapment of the MN within the carpal tunnel. Understanding the different variations of the MN is crucial in order to prevent injuries during surgical treatment of the syndrome. Materials and methods:Data were extracted from studies published in PubMed. A detailed search in PubMed was performed for studies that reviewed the variations of the MN and CTS. Results:There are two main classifications of the MN, known as the Lanz and Amadio categories. Lanz's classification is the one being mostly used in the surgical literature, with group 3 (Bifid MN) being the main cause of the CTS. Additionally, there are branches and anastomosis of the MN that do not fit into either category, with the third common digital branch being the most injured nerve during carpal tunnel release surgery. Diagnostic techniques for CTS include physical examination combined with NCS tests, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, or elastography. While NCS has been previously the most commonly used diagnostic method, the recent literature suggests that ultrasound and elastography are the most accurate techniques. Conclusions:In order to minimize injuries during carpal tunnel release surgery, it is crucial to have knowledge on the different variations of the MN that cause CTS. Additionally, this review emphasizes the significance of the current diagnostic methods, which not only make CTS more affordable but also facilitate easier recognition of the condition.

Electrodiagnostic Testing and Nerve Ultrasound of the Carpal Tunnel in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

In diabetic patients, controversies still exist about the validity of electrodiagnostic and nerve ultrasound diagnosis for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We analyzed 69 patients with type 2 diabetes. Nerve conduction studies and peripheral nerve ultrasound of the median nerve over the carpal tunnel were performed. CTS symptoms were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Polyneuropathy was assessed using the Neuropathy Symptom Score and the Neuropathy Disability Score. Although 19 patients reported predominantly mild CTS symptoms, 37 patients met the electrophysiological diagnosis criteria for CTS, and six patients were classified as severe or extremely severe. The sonographic cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve at the wrist was larger than 12 mm² in 45 patients (65.2%), and the wrist-to-forearm-ratio was larger than 1.4 in 61 patients (88.4%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that neither the distal motor latency, the median nerve CSA, nor the wrist-to-forearm-ratio could distinguish between patients with and without CTS symptoms. Diagnosis of CTS in diabetic patients should primarily be based upon typical clinical symptoms and signs. Results of electrodiagnostic testing and nerve ultrasound have to be interpreted with caution and additional factors have to be considered especially polyneuropathy, but also body mass index and hyperglycemia.

Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Numerous sonographic modalities and parameters have been used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), with varying accuracy. Our umbrella review aimed to summarize the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding the use of ultrasound imaging to diagnose CTS.

METHODS

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses meeting the inclusion criteria were searched in PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2022. Critical appraisal, data extraction, and synthesis were performed in accordance with the criteria for conducting an umbrella review.

RESULTS

Sixteen reviews were included. Three reviews were classified as high quality, one as moderate, four as low, and eight as critically low. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet demonstrated the best reliability and diagnostic accuracy among multiple parameters. A cutoff CSA value of 9-10.5 mm² gave the highest diagnostic performance in the general population. The degree of CSA enlargement was correlated with CTS severity. Sonoelastography and Doppler ultrasound might provide additional insights into CTS evaluation as median nerve stiffness and vascularity at the wrist were increased in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonography is a reliable tool to diagnose CTS, with inlet CSA being the most robust parameter. Sonoelastography and Doppler ultrasound can serve as auxiliary tools to confirm CTS diagnoses. Further studies are needed to expand the use of sonography for diagnosing CTS, especially in the presence of concomitant neuromuscular disease(s).