1
|
Nogues JC, Jain N, Chou CT, Lin FY. Obstructive sleep apnea for the rhinologist. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 32:35-39. [PMID: 37997886 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a ubiquitous disease defined by repetitive partial or complete cessation of airflow during sleep caused by upper airway collapse. Otolaryngologists play a crucial role in the management of OSA, which is rapidly evolving with the advent of new surgical techniques and medical devices. Here we review the medical and surgical treatment options for OSA with a focus on unique considerations for patients with OSA who undergo nasal, sinus, and skull base surgery. RECENT FINDINGS Treatment of OSA includes both nonsurgical and surgical options. Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy remains the first-line medical treatment for OSA, but alternatives such as oral appliance and positional therapy are viable alternatives. Surgical treatments include pharyngeal and tongue base surgery, hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy, and skeletal surgery. Nasal surgery has been shown to improve sleep quality and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) tolerance and usage. Sinus and skull base patients with comorbid OSA have special perioperative considerations for the rhinologist to consider such as the need for overnight observation and timing of CPAP therapy resumption. SUMMARY OSA patients present with special considerations for the rhinologist. Patients with moderate to severe OSA may benefit from overnight observation after ambulatory surgery, especially those with an elevated BMI, cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and those who are not using CPAP regularly at home. Though CPAP may be safely resumed in the perioperative setting of nasal, sinus, and skull base surgery, the exact timing depends on patient, surgeon, and systemic factors such as severity of OSA, CPAP pressures required, extent of surgery, and the postoperative monitoring setting. Lastly, nasal and sinus surgery can improve sleep quality and CPAP tolerance and compliance in patients with OSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Nogues
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abiri A, Patel TR, Nguyen E, Birkenbeuel JL, Tajudeen BA, Choby G, Wang EW, Schlosser RJ, Palmer JN, Adappa ND, Kuan EC. Postoperative protocols following endoscopic skull base surgery: An evidence-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:42-71. [PMID: 35678720 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative management strategies for endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) vary widely because of limited evidence-based guidance. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from January 1990 through February 2022 to examine 18 postoperative considerations for ESBS. Nonhuman studies, articles written in a language other than English, and case reports were excluded. Studies were assessed for levels of evidence, and each topic's aggregate grade of evidence was evaluated. RESULTS A total of 74 studies reporting on 18 postoperative practices were reviewed. Postoperative pain management, prophylactic antibiotics, and lumbar drain use had the highest grades of evidence (B). The literature currently lacks high quality evidence for a majority of the reviewed ESBS precautions. There were no relevant studies to address postoperative urinary catheter use and medical intracranial pressure reduction. CONCLUSION The evidence for postoperative ESBS precautions is heterogeneous, scarce, and generally of low quality. Although this review identified the best evidence available in the literature, it suggests the urgent need for more robust evidence. Therefore, additional high-quality studies are needed in order to devise optimal postoperative ESBS protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Abiri
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Tirth R Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emily Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Jack L Birkenbeuel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|