Prevalence of type 2 inflammatory signatures and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps from two phase 3 clinical trials: SINUS-24 and SINUS-52

Chinese Position Paper on Biologic Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Emerging biologics that selectively target key cytokines present a promising therapeutic alternative for patients suffering from severe, uncontrollable chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Despite the limited availability of registered biologics for CRSwNP treatment in China, the country is experiencing rapid development in this field. It is imperative to standardize the application of biologic agents in CRSwNP management in preparation for their future integration into the CRSwNP care pathway. The Rhinology Group, Chinese Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; the Rhinology Group, Chinese Medical Doctor Association of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; and the Nasal and Ocular Allergy Group, Chinese Society of Allergy have convened an expert panel consisting of principal investigators experienced in clinical trials of biologic treatment for CRSwNP. This expert panel was assembled to discuss the application of biologic agents in patients with CRSwNP in China. Additionally, the latest findings on the pathogenesis of CRSwNP, mechanisms of biologic agents, and efficacy and safety of biologic treatment in patients with CRSwNP were reviewed, with a special emphasis on research evidence from China. The expert panel reached a consensus on several critical issues, including criteria for the prescription, treatment course, and efficacy evaluation from a Chinese perspective. This position paper aims to guide Chinese physicians in the use of biologic agents for patients with CRSwNP. As our experience with biologic treatment continues to grow, this position paper will be further updated.

Efficacy and safety of GR1802 in uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Placebo-controlled phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Anti-IL-4 receptor subunit alpha (IL-4Rα) treatments can effectively treat eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (ECRSwNP). However, their impact on the overall population of patients with uncontrolled CRSwNP remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of GR1802, a novel anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, in patients with uncontrolled CRSwNP.

METHODS

Seventy patients with uncontrolled CRSwNP were randomized (1:1) to receive either GR1802 (300 mg with an initial doubled dose) or placebo every 2 weeks. Primary end points were the changes from baseline in nasal polyp score and nasal congestion score at week 16. Secondary end points mainly included change from baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, and Lund-Mackay score. Efficacy (exploratory) was also analyzed in ECRSwNP and non-ECRSwNP subgroups. Safety was evaluated throughout the study.

RESULTS

In uncontrolled CRSwNP participants, GR1802 significantly improved nasal polyp score and nasal congestion score compared with placebo, with least squares mean differences of -2.1 (95% confidence interval, -2.6, -1.5) and -0.8 (95% confidence interval, -1.1, -0.4), respectively. Participants treated with GR1802 had significantly decreased TNSS, SNOT-22 score, and Lund-Mackay score. The subgroup analysis demonstrated that GR1802 improved the symptoms and quality of life in both ECRSwNP and non-ECRSwNP participants, as evidenced by changes in nasal polyp score, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test score, and Lund-Mackay score. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19.4% of the GR1802 group and 17.6% of the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

GR1802 is well tolerated and effective in treating the overall population with uncontrolled CRSwNP.

Effect of Dupilumab in CRSwNP Sinonasal Outcomes from Real Life Studies: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a debilitating inflammatory condition that significantly impacts quality of life. Despite treatment advances, recurrence is common, prompting the exploration of novel therapies such as monoclonal antibodies targeting the type 2 immune response, notably dupilumab. This research aims to evaluate the real-world evidence (RWE) of dupilumab in treating severe CRSwNP, comparing sinonasal outcomes to those observed in randomized clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant improvements were noted, with the average SNOT-22 score reduction being 37.2 points post-dupilumab treatment. The nasal polyp size (NPS) showed an average decrease of 3.6 points. The analysis highlighted the practical effectiveness of dupilumab, emphasizing its benefit over conventional therapies in reducing NPS and improving nasal symptoms. The findings advocate for the integration of dupilumab into standard treatment protocols for severe CRSwNP, providing a robust alternative that could potentially reduce the high recurrence rates associated with current management strategies. This study underscores the utility of RWE in assessing the effectiveness of new medical treatments, suggesting that dupilumab offers substantial real-world benefits for patients suffering from this challenging condition.

Dupilumab improves sense of smell and clinical outcomes in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps with anosmia

OBJECTIVE

Loss of sense of smell is a cardinal symptom of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and significantly impacts health-related quality-of-life. Dupilumab significantly improved smell outcomes (loss of smell [LoS] score; University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT]) versus placebo in the phase 3 SINUS-24/-52 studies (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02898454/NCT02912468) in patients with severe CRSwNP. This post hoc analysis investigated the effect of dupilumab on olfaction using UPSIT smell impairment categories.

METHODS

Patients with baseline smell impairment (UPSIT ≤34/≤33 [women/men; score range 0-40] AND LoS score ≥1 [0-3] AND smell/taste item of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test >0 [SNOT-22; 0-5]) treated with dupilumab 300 mg or placebo once every 2 weeks on background intranasal corticosteroids were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 724 patients, 665 (91.9%) had smell impairment at baseline; most had anosmia (UPSIT 0-18) (dupilumab/placebo: 80.9%/79.8%). At week 24, the proportion of dupilumab-treated patients with anosmia decreased to 28.5%, while 14.9% achieved normosmia; most placebo-group patients (79.2%) remained anosmic and only 1.2% achieved normosmia (odds ratio = 17.3; 95% confidence interval = 5.1-59.0; p <.0001); results were similar at week 52. Improvements in Nasal Polyp Score, nasal congestion, and SNOT-22 total score were moderately correlated with improvements in UPSIT at weeks 24 and 52 (r = -.38 to -.50).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with severe CRSwNP had anosmia at baseline. Dupilumab treatment significantly improved smell versus placebo, with 14.9% achieving normosmia by week 24. There was a trend for better clinical outcomes in patients with greater smell improvement.

Comparison between clinical and cytological findings in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated with Dupilumab

PURPOSE

Biologics represent a new therapeutic strategy for severe and recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Usually, their actual therapeutic effectiveness is assessed by reduction in nasal polyps and/or improvement in nasal symptoms and quality of life. However, these measures do not consider nasal immunophlogosis, which can be evaluated through nasal cytology. The purpose of this study was to assess not only the clinical impact but also the cellular changes in the nasal inflammatory infiltrate observed through nasal cytology of CRSwNP patients treated with Dupilumab for 24 months.

METHODS

Fifty-five CRSwNP patients treated with Dupilumab were collected. Patients were evaluated before starting treatment and at one, three, six, nine months, one year, one and a half years, and two years after the first drug administration. During follow-up visits patients underwent endoscopic evaluation, nasal symptoms and quality of life assessment, complete blood count and nasal cytology.

RESULTS

During follow-up, significant improvement was found in Nasal Polyps Score (NPS), nasal patency, olfaction, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Regarding nasal cytology, a reduction in eosinophils and mast cells in the cellular infiltrate was observed over the two-year follow-up period compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab has demonstrated broad efficacy in the management of CRSwNP from both clinical and cytological findings. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and evaluate the biologics' impact on nasal mucosal inflammatory cells by nasal cytology with the aim of better identifying each patient's endotype and predicting the response to biologics.

Efficacy of dupilumab for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab exerts clinical effects, including improved sinus opacification, olfactory function, and quality of life, in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs). Meanwhile, only a few studies have reported its effects on nasal airway resistance and olfactory function, particularly in the Japanese population. Predictors of response remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the comprehensive efficacy and therapeutic response to dupilumab in patients with severe CRSwNP with comorbid asthma.

METHODS

In 16 adult patients with severe CRSwNP with comorbid asthma, the efficacy of 48-week dupilumab treatment, including olfactory function measured by a T&T olfactometer, nasal airway resistance measured by rhinomanometry, nasal polyp score, Lund-Mackay computed tomography score, and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), was assessed. Regarding asthma, the annualized rate of exacerbations, 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7), and spirometry were assessed. Treatment responsiveness was analyzed.

RESULTS

With 48-week dupilumab treatment, olfactory function, nasal airway resistance, nasal polyp score, Lund-Mackay computed tomography score, and SNOT-22 scores improved significantly. Regarding comorbid asthma, the annualized rate of exacerbations decreased, and ACQ-7 scores and lung function improved significantly. According to the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020/European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases criteria, 15 patients (94%) were moderate-to-excellent responders at 48 weeks of treatment. Patients with higher SNOT-22 scores, ACQ-7 scores, the rate of asthma exacerbations in the previous year, and blood eosinophil counts benefited more from the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab improved upper and lower airway outcomes especially in patients with severe CRSwNP with comorbid, poorly controlled asthma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000038669.

Efficacy of Biologics in NSAID-ERD: United Airways From the Nose to the Bronchi

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD), the clinical triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and respiratory reactions to cyclooxygenase 1 inhibitors, is often challenging to manage, with many patients failing first-line therapies for CRSwNP and asthma. There are now 6 biologic medications approved for asthma and/or severe CRSwNP: omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab. With the availability of respiratory biologic treatment for both asthma and CRSwNP, clinicians now have a multitude of additional management options for patients with NSAID-ERD. Herein, we review the currently available clinical trial and real-world evidence for biologic efficacy and safety in patients with NSAID-ERD, discuss the mechanisms of biologic therapy specific to NSAID-ERD, and review evidence regarding the use of biologic therapy versus endoscopic sinus surgery for CRSwNP in patients with NSAID-ERD. We propose a management approach for choosing biologic therapy or endoscopic sinus surgery paired with aspirin therapy after desensitization for patients with NSAID-ERD.

Dupilumab improves outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps irrespective of gender: results from the SINUS-52 trial

Objectives

This post hoc analysis assessed disease characteristics and response to dupilumab treatment in male and female patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) (SINUS-52 study; NCT02898454).

Methods

Patients received dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks on background intranasal corticosteroids. Efficacy was assessed through Week 52 using nasal polyp score (NPS), nasal congestion/obstruction score, loss of smell score and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test score. Disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22).

Results

The analysis included 192 male and 111 female patients. Female patients had higher mean SNOT-22 total score (56.6 vs. 49.1, P < 0.01) and more coexisting asthma (78.4% vs. 46.4%, P < 0.0001) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD) (38.7% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.0001) than male patients, but other baseline characteristics were similar. Dupilumab significantly improved CRSwNP outcomes vs. placebo at Week 52, regardless of gender: least squares mean differences (95% confidence interval) for NPS were -2.33 (-2.80, -1.86) in male and -2.54 (-3.18, -1.90) in female patients (both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and for SNOT-22 were -19.2 (-24.1, -14.2) in male and -24.4 (-31.5, -17.3) in female patients (both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo). There were no significant efficacy-by-gender interactions.

Conclusion

Female patients had greater asthma, NSAID-ERD and HRQoL burden at baseline than male patients. Dupilumab treatment significantly improved objective and subjective outcomes compared with placebo, irrespective of gender.

Antibody-based therapeutics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent inflammatory condition with heterogenous underlying endotypes, the most common being type 2 mediated inflammation. Several biologics have been developed to target specific pro-inflammatory cytokines and their receptors with proven efficacy in both quantitative and qualitative outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled disease. However, there is an ongoing debate on the role of biologics relative to conventional therapies for CRSwNP and their efficacy in patient subgroups with non-polyp type 2 disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the evidence on the efficacy and safety of biologics in CRSwNP, recommendations for their use, and discusses the broader economic factors influencing their application in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging real-life data demonstrating the variable efficacy of the available biologics for patients with CRSwNP, coupled with the high cost compared to conventional therapies such as surgery, renders biologics to be considered as an add-on therapy in the majority of cases. However, ongoing research into increasing biologic dose intervals and novel therapies targeting alternative pathways may offer a more cost-effective and sustainable option in future.

Improved quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps associated with expanded types of endoscopic sinus surgery: A 2-year retrospective study

KEY POINTS

Expanded types of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) significantly improve quality of life and reduce revision surgeries rates, supporting their early application for moderate-to-severe cases. Minimal clinically important difference may play as a crucial role in defining surgical treatment response (i.e., responder and super-responder conditions). Expanded FESS benefits patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps but more data are required to have a clearer understanding of its uses due to varied approaches and reported outcomes in the literature.

Biologic Therapies across Nasal Polyp Subtypes

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a common inflammatory condition, with subtypes like aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, and central compartment atopic disease sharing a common type 2 inflammatory pathway. Respiratory biologic therapies have been developed that target type 2 inflammation. In this article, we discuss the use of respiratory biologic therapies for nasal polyposis in general, as well as within the various subtypes of nasal polyps. Further, we discuss future roles of novel biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in nasal polyposis.

The interleukin-4/interleukin-13 pathway in type 2 inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is predominantly a type 2 inflammatory disease associated with type 2 (T2) cell responses and epithelial barrier, mucociliary, and olfactory dysfunction. The inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, and IL-5 are key mediators driving and perpetuating type 2 inflammation. The inflammatory responses driven by these cytokines include the recruitment and activation of eosinophils, basophils, mast cells, goblet cells, M2 macrophages, and B cells. The activation of these immune cells results in a range of pathologic effects including immunoglobulin E production, an increase in the number of smooth muscle cells within the nasal mucosa and a reduction in their contractility, increased deposition of fibrinogen, mucus hyperproduction, and local edema. The cytokine-driven structural changes include nasal polyp formation and nasal epithelial tissue remodeling, which perpetuate barrier dysfunction. Type 2 inflammation may also alter the availability or function of olfactory sensory neurons contributing to loss of sense of smell. Targeting these key cytokine pathways has emerged as an effective approach for the treatment of type 2 inflammatory airway diseases, and a number of biologic agents are now available or in development for CRSwNP. In this review, we provide an overview of the inflammatory pathways involved in CRSwNP and describe how targeting key drivers of type 2 inflammation is an effective therapeutic option for patients.

Dupilumab Reduces Asthma Disease Burden and Recurrent SCS Use in Patients with CRSwNP and Coexisting Asthma

Purpose

Dupilumab significantly reduced the requirement for systemic corticosteroids (SCS) in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients with CRSwNP and coexisting asthma typically have a higher disease burden and have more difficulty in managing disease. Here, we report an analysis of asthma outcomes and SCS use in patients with CRSwNP and coexisting asthma.

Patients and Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled SINUS-24 and SINUS-52 studies (NCT02912468/NCT02898454) in patients with severe CRSwNP and coexisting asthma (patient self-reported) from the pooled intention-to-treat population randomized to dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or placebo. On-treatment SCS use was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), percent predicted FEV1, and the 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) were assessed at baseline and Week 24 (pooled SINUS-24/52) in patients with/without history of asthma exacerbation or prior SCS use.

Results

Of 337 patients with coexisting asthma, 88 (26%) required on-treatment SCS use. The requirement for on-treatment SCS use for any reason was significantly lower with dupilumab (20/167 patients; 12%) vs placebo (68/170; 40%); hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.248 (0.150-0.409); p < 0.0001. The most frequent reasons for SCS use were nasal polyps (dupilumab 3% and placebo 27%) and asthma (2% and 9%, respectively). FEV1, percent predicted FEV1, and ACQ-6 were all significantly improved at Week 24 with dupilumab vs placebo irrespective of history of asthma exacerbation or prior SCS use (all p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Dupilumab significantly reduced the requirement for SCS and improved asthma outcomes irrespective of history of asthma exacerbation or prior SCS use vs placebo in patients with CRSwNP and coexisting asthma, demonstrating concomitant reduction of SCS use and asthma disease burden in these patients.