Differential Pattern of Interhemispheric Connections Between Homotopic Layer V Regions in the Forelimb Representation in Rat Barrel Field Cortex

Activation of the glutamatergic cingulate cortical-cortical connection facilitates pain in adult mice

The brain consists of the left and right cerebral hemispheres and both are connected by callosal projections. Less is known about the basic mechanism of this cortical-cortical connection and its functional importance. Here we investigate the cortical-cortical connection between the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) by using the classic electrophysiological and optogenetic approach. We find that there is a direct synaptic projection from one side ACC to the contralateral ACC. Glutamate is the major excitatory transmitter for bilateral ACC connection, including projections to pyramidal cells in superficial (II/III) and deep (V/VI) layers of the ACC. Both AMPA and kainate receptors contribute to synaptic transmission. Repetitive stimulation of the projection also evoked postsynaptic Ca2+ influx in contralateral ACC pyramidal neurons. Behaviorally, light activation of the ACC-ACC connection facilitated behavioral withdrawal responses to mechanical stimuli and noxious heat. In an animal model of neuropathic pain, light inhibitory of ACC-ACC connection reduces both primary and secondary hyperalgesia. Our findings provide strong direct evidence for the excitatory or facilitatory contribution of ACC-ACC connection to pain perception, and this mechanism may provide therapeutic targets for future treatment of chronic pain and related emotional disorders.

The Role of Interhemispheric Interactions in Cortical Plasticity

Despite the fact that there is a growing awareness to the callosal connections between hemispheres the two hemispheres of the brain are commonly treated as independent structures when peripheral or cortical manipulations are applied to one of them. The contralateral hemisphere is often used as a within-animal control of plastic changes induced onto the other side of the brain. This ensures uniform conditions for producing experimental and control data, but it may overlook possible interhemispheric interactions. In this paper we provide, for the first time, direct proof that cortical, experience-dependent plasticity is not a unilateral, independent process. We mapped metabolic brain activity in rats with 2-[¹⁴C] deoxyglucose (2DG) following experience-dependent plasticity induction after a month of unilateral (left), partial whiskers deprivation (only row B was left). This resulted in ∼45% widening of the cortical sensory representation of the spared whiskers in the right, contralateral barrel field (BF). We show that the width of 2DG visualized representation is less than 20% when only contralateral stimulation of the spared row of whiskers is applied in immobilized animals. This means that cortical map remodeling, which is induced by experience-dependent plasticity mechanisms, depends partially on the contralateral hemisphere. The response, which is observed by 2DG brain mapping in the partially deprived BF after standard synchronous bilateral whiskers stimulation, is therefore the outcome of at least two separately activated plasticity mechanisms. A focus on the integrated nature of cortical plasticity, which is the outcome of the emergent interactions between deprived and non-deprived areas in both hemispheres may have important implications for learning and rehabilitation. There is also a clear implication that there is nothing like “control hemisphere” since any plastic changes in one hemisphere have to have influence on functioning of the opposite one.

Repetitive microstimulation in rat primary somatosensory cortex (SI) strengthens the connection between homotopic sites in the opposite SI and leads to expression of previously ineffective input from the ipsilateral forelimb

The primary somatosensory cortex (SI) receives input from the contralateral forelimb and projects to homotopic sites in the opposite SI. Since homotopic sites in SI are linked by a callosal pathway, we proposed that repetitive intracortical microstimulation (ICMSr) of neurons in layer V of SI forelimb cortex would increase spike firing in the opposite SI cortex thereby strengthening the callosal pathway sufficiently to allow normally ineffective stimuli from the ipsilateral forelimb to excite cells in the ipsilateral SI. The forelimb representation in SI in one hemisphere was mapped using mechanical and electrical stimulation of the contralateral forelimb, a homotopic site was similarly identified in the opposite SI, the presence of ipsilateral peripheral input was tested in both homotopic sites, and ICMS was used to establish an interhemispheric connection between the two homotopic recording sites. The major findings are: (1) each homotopic forelimb site in SI initially received short latency input only from the contralateral forelimb; (2) homotopic sites in layer V in each SI were interconnected by a callosal pathway; (3) ICMSr delivered to layer V of the homotopic SI in one hemisphere generally increased evoked response spike firing in layer V in the opposite homotopic site; (4) increased spike firing was often followed by the expression of a longer latency normally ineffective input from the ipsilateral forelimb; (5) these longer latency ipsilateral responses are consistent with a delay time sufficient to account for travel across the callosal pathway; (6) increased spike firing and the resulting ipsilateral peripheral input were also corroborated using in-vivo intracellular recording; and (7) inactivation of the stimulating site in SI by lidocaine injection or local surface cooling abolished the ipsilateral response, suggesting that the ipsilateral response was very likely relayed across the callosal pathway. These results suggest that repetitive microstimulation can do more than expand receptive fields in the territory adjacent to the stimulating electrode but in addition can also alter receptive fields in homotopic sites in the opposite SI to bring about the expression of previously ineffective input from the ipsilateral forelimb.

Telemetry-controlled simultaneous stimulation-and-recording device (SRD) to study interhemispheric cortical circuits in rat primary somatosensory (SI) cortex

Background

A growing need exists for neuroscience platforms that can perform simultaneous chronic recording and stimulation of neural tissue in animal models in a telemetry-controlled fashion with signal processing for analysis of the chronic recording data and external triggering capability. We describe the system design, testing, evaluation, and implementation of a wireless simultaneous stimulation-and-recording device (SRD) for modulating cortical circuits in physiologically identified sites in primary somatosensory (SI) cortex in awake-behaving and freely-moving rats. The SRD was developed using low-cost electronic components and open-source software. The function of the SRD was assessed by bench and in-vivo testing.

Results

The SRD recorded spontaneous spiking and bursting neuronal activity, evoked responses to programmed intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) delivered internally by the SRD, and evoked responses to external peripheral forelimb stimulation.

Conclusions

The SRD is capable of wireless stimulation and recording on a predetermined schedule or can be wirelessly synchronized with external input as would be required in behavioral testing prior to, during, and following ICMS.