Thromboembolic events after fetal loss in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: comment on the article by Erkan et al

Clinical and therapeutic value of the adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score in primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVES

(1) To assess the clinical utility of the adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) to predict new obstetric events during follow-up in primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (POAPS) patients under standard-of-care treatment (SC) based on the use of low-dose aspirin (LDA) + heparin and (2) to study the risk of a first thrombotic event and to evaluate whether stratification according to this score could help to identify POAPS patients who would benefit from long-term thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, multicentre study. 169 women with POAPS were evaluated for the presence of a new obstetric event and/or a first thrombotic event during follow-up [time period: 2008-2020, median: 7 years (6-12 years)]. The outcomes of 107 pregnancies from these POAPS patients with SC were studied to evaluate relapses. Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Regarding obstetric morbidity, only triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) [OR = 8.462 (95% CI: 2.732-26.210); p < 0.0001] was found to be a strong risk factor independently associated with treatment failure. On the other hand, triple positivity for aPLs [OR=10.44 (95% CI: 2.161-50.469), p = 0.004] and an aGAPSS ≥7 [OR = 1.621 (95% CI: 1.198-2.193), p = 0.002] were independent risk factors associated with a first thrombotic event. LDA was marginally associated with a decrease in the risk of thrombosis only in patients with aGAPSS ≥ 7 (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

aGAPSS appears to be useful in predicting the occurrence of a first thrombotic event in POAPS patients, and these stratification of patients could be helpful in selecting patients who would benefit from thromboprophylaxis with LDA.

The first thrombotic event in purely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome patients and in antiphospholipid antibody carriers: comparison of incidence and characteristics

PURPOSE

The long-term risk of thrombosis after pregnancy in women with purely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is not well defined. The current study's primary outcome was to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of the first thrombotic event in OAPS, identifying the risk factors for thrombosis in OAPS was its secondary one.

METHODS

Patients with purely OAPS were consecutively enrolled between September 1999 and September 2019. Subjects without a history of pregnancy morbidity or thrombosis but with persistent positivity for one or more antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL carriers) made up the control group. The study groups included 94 OAPS patients and 124 aPL carriers who were matched for clinical and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

An event rate of 0.49/100 patient years was registered in OAPS patients during a mean follow-up of 8.7 years ± 5.5 SD. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was not significantly different in OAPS patients vs aPL carriers. Arterial thrombosis and cerebrovascular events were the more frequent types of vascular involvement in the two groups. As far as risk factors for thrombosis were concerned, the presence of lupus anticoagulant significantly prevailed in both thrombotic OAPS patients and thrombotic aPL carriers with respect to purely OAPS patients and aPL carriers who did not develop thrombosis (p = 0.01 and p = 0.00, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Just as for aPL carriers, closer monitoring and possibly, a pharmacological prophylaxis should be reserved for OAPS patients at highest risk of developing the first thrombotic event.

Recommendations of the Spanish Rheumatology Society for Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Part II: Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Special Situations

OBJECTIVE

The difficulty in diagnosis and the spectrum of clinical manifestations that can determine the choice of treatment for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has fostered the development of recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER), based on the best possible evidence. These recommendations can serve as a reference for rheumatologists and other specialists involved in the management of APS.

METHODS

A panel of 4rheumatologists, a gynaecologist and a haematologist with expertise in APS was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call or based on professional merits. The stages of the work were: identification of the key areas for the document elaboration, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, SIGN levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and formal assessment or reasoned judgement techniques (consensus techniques).

RESULTS

Forty-six recommendations were drawn up, addressing 5main areas: diagnosis and evaluation, measurement of primary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for APS or secondary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for obstetric APS and special situations. These recommendations also include the role of novel oral anticoagulants, the problem of recurrences or the key risk factors identified in these subjects. This document reflects the last 25, referring to the areas of: obstetric APS and special situations. The document provides a table of recommendations and treatment algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

Update of SER recommendations on APS is presented. This document corresponds to part II, related to obstetric SAF and special situations. These recommendations are considered tools for decision-making for clinicians, taking into consideration both the decision of the physician experienced in APS and the patient. A part I has also been prepared, which addresses aspects related to diagnosis, evaluation and treatment.

Efficacy of aspirin for the primary prevention of thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: an international and collaborative meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether aspirin has a significant protective effect on risk of first thrombosis among patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL+). Observational and interventional studies identified from the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were selected if they assessed the incidence of first thrombosis in aPL+ patients treated with aspirin versus those without. Pooled effect estimates were obtained using a random-effects model. Of 1211 citation retrieved, 11 primary studies (10 observational and 1 interventional) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 1208 patients and 139 thrombotic events. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the risk of first thrombosis in patients treated with aspirin (n=601) was 0.50 (95%CI: 0.27 to 0.93) compared to those without aspirin (n=607), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I(2)=46%, p=0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a protective effect of aspirin against arterial (OR: 0.48 [95%CI: 0.28-0.82]) but not venous (OR: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.32-1.06]) thrombosis, as well as in retrospective (OR: 0.23 [0.13-0.42]) but not prospective studies (OR: 0.91 [0.52-1.59]). Subgroup analysis according to underlying disease revealed a significant protective effect of aspirin for asymptomatic aPL+ individuals (OR: 0.50 [0.25-0.99]), for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (OR: 0.55 [0.31-0.98]) and obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (OR: 0.25 [0.10-0.62]). This meta-analysis shows that the risk of first thrombotic event is significantly decreased by low dose aspirin among asymptomatic aPL individuals, patients with SLE or obstetrical APS. Importantly, no significant risk reduction was observed when considering only prospective studies or those with the best methodological quality.

Thromboembolism risk following recurrent miscarriage

Normal pregnancy is associated with extensive changes in hemostasis such that the procoagulant effect becomes dominant. The evolutionary advantage of this hypercoagulability may be to counteract the inherent instability associated with hemochorial placentation, which is unique to human beings. However, overall, there is a four- to 10-fold increased thrombotic risk throughout gestation and the postpartum period. Certain inherited or acquired thrombophilic factors may predispose to arterial and/or venous thrombosis and have a possible association with pregnancy complications, including recurrent miscarriage (RM), which affects up to 5% of couples with childbearing desire. A subgroup of women with RM has been demonstrated to be in a prothombotic state before and after pregnancy. The long-term health implications of this hypercoagulability may imply an increased risk of ischemic heart disease. Moreover, the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies rather than thrombophilic genetic defects (i.e., factor V Leiden or prothrombin G202010A mutation) in patients with RM is a determinant of thrombotic events later in life, especially among those patients having also cardiovascular risk factors. This article highlights the thromboembolic risk in nonpregnant RM patients in different thrombophilic settings and the need for thromboprophylaxis among these patients.

Management of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by recurrent venous or arterial thromboses, fetal losses and thrombocytopenia in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, namely lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies or antibodies directed to various proteins, mainly β2 glycoprotein I, or all three. There is consensus in treating patients with APS and first venous thrombosis with oral anticoagulation to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0. A recent systematic review recommended a target INR of >3.0 in those patients with APS and arterial thrombosis. The approach in women with obstetric manifestations of APS is based on the use of aspirin plus heparin. The best treatment for patients with the catastrophic variant of the APS is a combination of anticoagulation, corticosteroids, and plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulins.

The relation between antiphospholipid syndrome-related pregnancy morbidity and non-gravid vascular thrombosis: a review of the literature and management strategies

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is associated with pregnancy morbidity and vascular thrombosis in the presence of circulating antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies. Clinical manifestations of aPL antibodies represent a spectrum (asymptomatic, pregnancy events, vascular events, or both pregnancy and vascular events), and APS should not be considered a single disease with a predictable outcome. Patients with aPL antibodies are at increased risk of vascular thrombotic events during pregnancy, the postpartum period, and even during long-term follow-up after an APS-related pregnancy event. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review the relation between APS-related pregnancy morbidity and vascular thrombosis, and to address the importance of prophylactic therapy during and after APS pregnancies to prevent maternal thrombotic complications. During pregnancy, low-dose aspirin (LDA) should be considered for all patients with aPL antibodies and heparin should be added to LDA in patients fulfilling the Sapporo criteria for definite APS. During delivery, especially with caesarian section, periods without anticoagulation should be kept to an absolute minimum. Some data suggest that LDA might be effective against future non-gravid vascular thrombosis in patients with APS and a history of only pregnancy morbidity.