The Efficacy of a Lateral Wedge Insole for Painful Medial Knee Osteoarthritis After Prescreening: A Randomized Clinical Trial

EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: 2023 update

INTRODUCTION

Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are increasingly common with a significant impact on individuals and society. Non-pharmacological treatments are considered essential to reduce pain and improve function and quality of life. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee OA were published in 2013. Given the large number of subsequent studies, an update is needed.

METHODS

The Standardised Operating Procedures for EULAR recommendations were followed. A multidisciplinary Task Force with 25 members representing 14 European countries was established. The Task Force agreed on an updated search strategy of 11 research questions. The systematic literature review encompassed dates from 1 January 2012 to 27 May 2022. Retrieved evidence was discussed, updated recommendations were formulated, and research and educational agendas were developed.

RESULTS

The revised recommendations include two overarching principles and eight evidence-based recommendations including (1) an individualised, multicomponent management plan; (2) information, education and self-management; (3) exercise with adequate tailoring of dosage and progression; (4) mode of exercise delivery; (5) maintenance of healthy weight and weight loss; (6) footwear, walking aids and assistive devices; (7) work-related advice and (8) behaviour change techniques to improve lifestyle. The mean level of agreement on the recommendations ranged between 9.2 and 9.8 (0-10 scale, 10=total agreement). The research agenda highlighted areas related to these interventions including adherence, uptake and impact on work.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2023 updated recommendations were formulated based on research evidence and expert opinion to guide the optimal management of hip and knee OA.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2023: Biomechanics

Biomechanics plays a significant yet complex role in osteoarthritis (OA) onset and progression. Identifying alterations in biomechanical factors and their complex interactions is critical for gaining new insights into OA pathophysiology and identification of clearly defined and modifiable mechanical treatment targets. This review synthesized biomechanics studies from March 2022 to April 2023, from which three themes relating to human gait emerged: (1) new insights into the pathogenesis of OA using computational modeling and machine learning, (2) technology-enhanced biomechanical interventions for OA, and (3) out-of-lab biomechanical assessments of OA. We further highlighted future-focused areas which may continue to advance the field of biomechanics in OA, with a particular emphasis on exploiting technology to understand and treat biomechanical mechanisms of OA outside the laboratory. The breadth of studies included in this review highlights the complex role of biomechanics in OA and showcase numerous innovative and outstanding contributions to the field. Exciting cross-disciplinary efforts integrating computational modeling, mobile sensors, and machine learning methods show great promise for streamlining in vivo multi-scale biomechanics workflows and are expected to underpin future breakthroughs in the understanding and treatment of biomechanics in OA.

Clinically-accessible and laboratory-derived predictors of biomechanical response to standalone and supported lateral wedge insoles in people with knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Lateral wedge insoles (both standalone and those incorporating individualized arch support) have been frequently studied for the effects on knee joint loading and pain in people with knee osteoarthritis. It has been shown that many people who use these insoles do not obtain the intended biomechanical effect, and thus may not experience a clinical benefit. The ability to identify biomechanical responders to lateral wedge insoles before research or clinical intervention is an important objective for efficient resource use and optimizing patient outcomes. The purpose of our exploratory, hypothesis-generating study was to provide an initial assessment of variables that are associated with the biomechanical response to lateral wedge insoles in people with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We collected a number of demographic (age, sex, body mass index, foot posture), clinical (knee pain, foot pain, radiographic disease severity), and walking-related (speed, knee alignment, frontal plane subtalar movement, and foot rotation) outcomes from 53 individuals with painful, radiographically-confirmed knee osteoarthritis. The walking-related outcomes were obtained using equipment both from the research laboratory and the clinical setting. We used logistic regression to generate predictive models to determine candidate variables associated with a reduction in the knee adduction moment during walking - a surrogate for tibiofemoral load distribution, and a known biomechanical risk factor for osteoarthritis progression - with the use of standalone and arch-supported lateral wedge insoles. Three different response thresholds (2%, 6%, and 10% reductions in the knee adduction moment) were used.

RESULTS

In general, biomechanical responders were those who walked faster, were female, had less varus alignment, and had less severe radiographic severity. Findings were similar between the standalone and arch-supported lateral wedge insoles, as well as between models using the laboratory-derived or clinically-available measures of walking performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our hypothesis-generating study provides valuable information that will inform future research into the efficient and effective use of lateral wedge insoles in the conservative management of knee osteoarthritis.

OpenCap: Human movement dynamics from smartphone videos

Measures of human movement dynamics can predict outcomes like injury risk or musculoskeletal disease progression. However, these measures are rarely quantified in large-scale research studies or clinical practice due to the prohibitive cost, time, and expertise required. Here we present and validate OpenCap, an open-source platform for computing both the kinematics (i.e., motion) and dynamics (i.e., forces) of human movement using videos captured from two or more smartphones. OpenCap leverages pose estimation algorithms to identify body landmarks from videos; deep learning and biomechanical models to estimate three-dimensional kinematics; and physics-based simulations to estimate muscle activations and musculoskeletal dynamics. OpenCap's web application enables users to collect synchronous videos and visualize movement data that is automatically processed in the cloud, thereby eliminating the need for specialized hardware, software, and expertise. We show that OpenCap accurately predicts dynamic measures, like muscle activations, joint loads, and joint moments, which can be used to screen for disease risk, evaluate intervention efficacy, assess between-group movement differences, and inform rehabilitation decisions. Additionally, we demonstrate OpenCap's practical utility through a 100-subject field study, where a clinician using OpenCap estimated musculoskeletal dynamics 25 times faster than a laboratory-based approach at less than 1% of the cost. By democratizing access to human movement analysis, OpenCap can accelerate the incorporation of biomechanical metrics into large-scale research studies, clinical trials, and clinical practice.

Kinematic effects of lateral wedged insoles in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis

[Purpose] To examine the effect of lateral wedged insoles on the rotation mechanism of the knee joint in patients with knee osteoarthritis. [Participants and Methods] The participants included 11 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. We asked all participants to stand up from a 40-cm-high chair, and we measured the rotation angle of the knee joint during the movement. The standing motion was performed under four conditions: barefoot and with 7-, 10-, and 13-mm lateral wedged insoles. We also measured four healthy participants as controls for comparison. [Results] During the standing motion, we internally rotated the tibia relative to the femur. In healthy participants, we measured 19.6° internal rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. Patients with knee osteoarthritis had internal rotations of approximately 9.8° when barefoot and 7.1°, 6.4°, and 7.1° when wearing lateral wedged insoles of 7, 10, and 13 mm, respectively. [Conclusion] Lateral wedged insoles do not modify the knee joint rotation motion of patients with knee OA to the correct style.

Remotely delivered, individualized, and self-directed gait modification for knee osteoarthritis: A pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Gait modification interventions have reported variable results and relied on in-person biofeedback limiting clinical accessibility. Our objective was to assess a remotely delivered and self-directed gait modification for knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This was an unblinded, 2-arm, delayed control, randomized pilot trial (NCT04683913). Adults aged ≥50 years with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized to an immediate group (Week 0: Baseline, Intervention; Week 6: Follow-up, Week 10: Retention) or delayed group (Week 0: Baseline, Wait Period, Week 6: Secondary Baseline, Intervention, Week 12: Follow-up, Week 16: Retention). Participants practiced modifying their foot progression angle "as much as was comfortable" while receiving support via weekly telerehabilitation appointments and remote monitoring with an instrumented shoe. Primary outcomes included participation, foot progression angle modification magnitude, confidence, difficulty, and satisfaction while secondary outcomes included symptoms and knee biomechanics during gait.

RESULTS

We screened 134 people and randomized 20. There was no loss to follow up and 100% attendance at the telerehabilitation appointments. By follow up, participants reported high confidence (8.6/10), low difficulty (2.0/10), and satisfaction (75%) with the intervention and no significant adverse events. Foot progression angle was modified by 11.4° ± 5.6, which was significantly different (p < 0.001, η²_g = 0.8) when compared between groups. No other between-group differences were significant, while several significant pre-post improvements in pain (d = 0.6, p = 0.006) and knee moments (d = 0.6, p = 0.01) were observed.

INTERPRETATION

A personalized, self-directed gait modification supported with telerehabilitation is feasible, and the preliminary effects on symptoms and biomechanics align with past trials. A larger trial is warranted to evaluate efficacy.

Walking with Different Insoles Changes Lower-Limb Biomechanics Globally in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

Using insoles to modify walking biomechanics is of keen interest for the treatment of medial-compartment knee osteoarthritis. So far, insole interventions have focused on reducing the peak of the knee adduction moment (pKAM) and have led to inconsistent clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in other gait variables related to knee osteoarthritis when patients walk with different insoles to provide insights into the necessity to enlarge the biomechanical analyses to other variables. Walking trials were recorded for 10 patients in four insole conditions. Changes among conditions were computed for six gait variables, including the pKAM. The associations between the changes in pKAM and the changes in the other variables were also assessed individually. Walking with different insoles had noticeable effects on the six gait variables, with high heterogeneity among patients. For all variables, at least 36.67% of the changes were of medium-to-large effect size. The associations with the changes in pKAM varied among variables and patients. In conclusion, this study showed that varying the insole could globally influence ambulatory biomechanics and that limiting measurement to the pKAM could lead to an important loss of information. Beyond the consideration of additional gait variables, this study also encourages personalized interventions to address inter-patient variability.

Effects of three-dimensional image based insole for healthy volunteers: a pilot clinical trial

Insoles are used to treat various foot diseases, including plantar foot, diabetic foot ulcers, and refractory plantar fasciitis. In this study, we investigated the effects of 3-dimensional image-based (3-D) insole in healthy volunteers with no foot diseases. Additionally, the comfort of the 3-D insole was compared with that of a custom-molded insole. A single-center, randomized, open clinical trial was conducted to address the effectiveness of insole use in a healthy population with no foot or knee disease. Two types of arch support insoles were evaluated for their effectiveness: a 3-D insole and a custom-molded insole. Fifty Korean volunteers participated in the study and were randomly allocated into the "3-D insole" (n = 40) or "custom-molding insole" (n = 10) groups. All subjects wore 3-D insoles or custom-molded insoles for 2 weeks. The sense of wearing shoes (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and score) and fatigue of the foot were used to assess the insole effects at the end of the 2-week study period. The 3-D insole groups showed significantly improved sense of wearing shoes (VAS, p = 0.0001; score, p = 0.0002) and foot fatigue (p = 0.0005) throughout the study period. Although the number of subjects was different, the custom-molding insole group showed no significant changes in the sense of wearing shoes (VAS, 0.1188; score, p = 0.1483). Foot fatigue in the 3-D insole group improved significantly (p = 0.0005), which shows that a 3-D insole might have favorable effects on foot health in a healthy population.

Trial Registration

Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0008100.

Walking with shorter stride length could improve knee kinetics of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis

Walking with a shorter stride length (SL) was recently proposed for gait retraining in medial knee osteoarthritis; however it was never assessed in this patient population. This study tested the hypothesis that shortening SL while maintaining walking speed reduces knee adduction (KAM) and flexion (KFM) moments in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Walking trials with normal SL and SL reduced by 0.10 m and 0.15 m were recorded for 15 patients (10 men, 55.5 ± 8.7 years old, 24.6 ± 3.0 kg/m²). SL was modified using an augmented reality system displaying target footprints on the floor. Repeated one-way ANOVAs and post-hoc paired t-tests were performed to compare gait measures between normal and reduced SL. The individual effects of SL reduction were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Group analysis indicated significant decreases in KAM impulse with both SL reductions (p < 0.05). No systematic change was observed in the first peaks KAM and KFM when walking with reduced SL (p > 0.05). Individually, 33 % of the patients decreased the peak KAM, whereas 20 % decreased the KAM impulse. Among these patients with a decrease in peak KAM or in KAM impulse, 0 % and 33 % had a simultaneous increase in peak KFM, respectively. In conclusion, this study showed that SL shortening can decrease kinetic measures associated with the progression of medial knee osteoarthritis in some patients, demonstrating the importance of considering SL modifications on an individual basis. While further research is necessary, notably regarding dose-response relationships and long-term effects, these findings are particularly encouraging because SL reductions could be easily integrated into rehabilitation protocols.

A Study on the Effects of Lateral-Wedge Insoles on Plantar-Pressure Pattern for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Using the Wearable Sensing Insole

Patients with knee osteoarthritis have a unique plantar-pressure pattern during walking, and lateral-wedge insoles are one of the treatment options. Participants were randomly assigned to either the lateral-wedge insole group or the ordinary insole group. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and plantar-pressure test scores were evaluated at the baseline and at 20 weeks. Plantar pressure data were collected using a pressure insole with 89 sensing locations. In the ordinary insole group, the function and total WOMAC scores decreased significantly (function score, 24.8 (baseline) to 16.5 (week 20); total score, 34.9 (baseline) to 24.6 (week 20)). During walking, the transverse width of the center of pressure as a percentage of foot width (%Trans) significantly increased in the ordinary insole group (baseline, 6.3%; week 20, 14.8%). In addition, the values of partial foot pressure as a percentage of body weight (%PFP) on the forefoot (baseline, 30.3%; week 20, 39.2%) and heel (baseline, 28.1%; week 20, 16.9%) also increased significantly in the ordinary insole group. Significant group-by-time interaction effects were observed for partial foot pressure per body weight in the forefoot (p = 0.031) and heel (p = 0.024). In the ordinary insole group, the plantar pressure on the heel significantly decreased (p = 0.011) and that on the forefoot significantly increased (p = 0.023). In contrast, plantar pressure remained stable in all regions in the lateral-wedge insole group. Thus, lateral-wedge insoles may protect against plantar pressure deterioration in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Association of medial arch support of foot orthoses with knee valgus angle at initial contact during cutting maneuvers in female athletes: a controlled laboratory study

BACKGROUND

The effect of medial arch support foot orthoses on kinematics and kinetics of the knee joint has remained unknown.

METHODS

Sixteen female collegiate-level athletes volunteered to participate. Participants were asked to perform a 30° sidestep cut using orthoses of 3 different medial arch heights, comprising of the following: (1) "low," a full flat foot orthosis without arch support, (2) "mid," a commercially available foot orthosis with general height arch support, and (3) "high," a foot orthosis with double the commercially available height for arch support to observe the effect on the knee when overcorrected. Kinematics and kinetics of the knee joint were collected by a markerless motion capture system with 2 force plates and compared between orthosis types using linear regression analysis, assuming a correlation between the measurements of the same cases in the error term.

RESULTS

The knee valgus angle at initial contact was 2.3 ± 5.2 degrees for "low" medial arch support height, 2.1 ± 5.8 degrees for "mid," and 0.4 ± 6.6 degrees for "high". Increased arch support height significantly decreased the knee valgus angle at initial contact (p = 0.002). Other kinematic and kinetic measurements did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The valgus angle of the knee at initial contact was decreased by the height of the medial arch support provided by foot orthosis during cutting manoeuvres. Increasing the arch support height may decrease knee valgus angle at initial contact. Medial arch support of foot orthosis may be effective in risk reduction of ACL injury. Clinical trial registration numbers and date of registration: UMIN000046071, 15/11/2021.

Personalization improves the biomechanical efficacy of foot progression angle modifications in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis

Modifying the foot progression angle during walking can reduce the knee adduction moment, a surrogate measure of medial knee loading. However, not all individuals reduce their knee adduction moment with the same modification. This study evaluates whether a personalized approach to prescribing foot progression angle modifications increases the proportion of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis who reduce their knee adduction moment, compared to a non-personalized approach. Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis (N=107) walked with biofeedback instructing them to toe-in and toe-out by 5° and 10° relative to their self-selected angle. We selected individuals' personalized foot progression angle as the modification that maximally reduced their larger knee adduction moment peak. Additionally, we used lasso regression to identify which secondary kinematic changes made a 10° toe-in gait modification more effective at reducing the first knee adduction moment peak. Seventy percent of individuals reduced their larger knee adduction moment peak by at least 5% with a personalized foot progression angle modification, which was more than (p≤0.002) the 23-57% of individuals who reduced it with a uniformly assigned 5° or 10° toe-in or toe-out modification. When toeing-in, greater reductions in the first knee adduction moment peak were related to an increased frontal-plane tibia angle (knee more medial than ankle), a more valgus knee abduction angle, reduced contralateral pelvic drop, and a more medialized center of pressure in the foot reference frame. In summary, personalization increases the proportion of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis who may benefit from a foot progression angle modification.

Changes in the Kinematics of Midfoot and Rearfoot Joints with the Use of Lateral Wedge Insoles

The lateral wedge insole (LWI) is a typical orthopedic treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis pain, chronic ankle instability, and peroneal tendon disorders. It is still unknown what the effects are in the most important joints of the foot when using LWIs as a treatment for knee and ankle pathologies. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of LWIs on the position of the midfoot and rearfoot joints by measuring the changes using a tracking device. Methods: The study was carried out with a total of 69 subjects. Movement measurements for the midfoot were made on the navicular bone, and for the rearfoot on the calcaneus bone. The Polhemus system was used, with two motion sensors fixed to each bone. Subjects were compared by having them use LWIs versus being barefoot. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the varus movement when wearing a 4 mm LWI (1.23 ± 2.08°, p < 0.001) versus the barefoot condition (0.35 ± 0.95°), and in the plantarflexion movement when wearing a 4 mm LWI (3.02 ± 4.58°, p < 0.001) versus the barefoot condition (0.68 ± 1.34°), in the midfoot. There were also statistically significant differences in the valgus movement when wearing a 7 mm LWI (1.74 ± 2.61°, p < 0.001) versus the barefoot condition (0.40 ± 0.90°), and in the plantar flexion movement when wearing a 4 mm LWI (2.88 ± 4.31°, p < 0.001) versus the barefoot condition (0.35 ± 0.90°), in the rearfoot. Conclusions: In the navicular bone, a varus, an abduction, and plantar flexion movements were generated. In the calcaneus, a valgus, an adduction, and plantar flexion movements were generated with the use of LWIs.

Changes in foot progression angle during gait reduce the knee adduction moment and do not increase hip moments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis

People with knee osteoarthritis who adopt a modified foot progression angle (FPA) during gait often benefit from a reduction in the knee adduction moment. It is unknown, however, whether changes in the FPA increase hip moments, a surrogate measure of hip loading, which will increase the mechanical demand on the joint. This study examined how altering the FPA affects hip moments. Individuals with knee osteoarthritis walked on an instrumented treadmill with their baseline gait, 10° toe-in gait, and 10° toe-out gait. A musculoskeletal modeling package was used to compute joint moments from the experimental data. Fifty participants were selected from a larger study who reduced their peak knee adduction moment with a modified FPA. In this group, participants reduced the first peak of the knee adduction moment by 7.6% with 10° toe-in gait and reduced the second peak by 11.0% with 10° toe-out gait. Modifying the FPA reduced the early-stance hip abduction moment, at the time of peak hip contact force, by 4.3% ± 1.3% for 10° toe-in gait (p = 0.005, d = 0.49) and by 4.6% ± 1.1% for 10° toe-out gait (p < 0.001, d = 0.59) without increasing the flexion and internal rotation moments (p > 0.15). Additionally, 74% of individuals reduced their total hip moment at time of peak hip contact force with a modified FPA. In summary, when adopting a FPA modification that reduced the knee adduction moment, participants, on average, did not increase surrogate measures of hip loading.

Muscle coordination retraining inspired by musculoskeletal simulations reduces knee contact force

Humans typically coordinate their muscles to meet movement objectives like minimizing energy expenditure. In the presence of pathology, new objectives gain importance, like reducing loading in an osteoarthritic joint, but people often do not change their muscle coordination patterns to meet these new objectives. Here we use musculoskeletal simulations to identify simple changes in coordination that can be taught using electromyographic biofeedback, achieving the therapeutic goal of reducing joint loading. Our simulations predicted that changing the relative activation of two redundant ankle plantarflexor muscles—the gastrocnemius and soleus—could reduce knee contact force during walking, but it was unclear whether humans could re-coordinate redundant muscles during a complex task like walking. Our experiments showed that after a single session of walking with biofeedback of summary measures of plantarflexor muscle activation, healthy individuals reduced the ratio of gastrocnemius-to-soleus muscle activation by 25 ± 15% (p = 0.004, paired t test, n = 10). Participants who walked with this “gastrocnemius avoidance” gait pattern reduced late-stance knee contact force by 12 ± 12% (p = 0.029, paired t test, n = 8). Simulation-informed coordination retraining could be a promising treatment for knee osteoarthritis and a powerful tool for optimizing coordination for a variety of rehabilitation and performance applications.

Effects of Attrition Shoes on Kinematics and Kinetics of Lower Limb Joints During Walking

Shoe attrition is inevitable as wearing time increases, which may produce diverse influences on kinematics and kinetics of lower limb joints. Excessive attrition may change support alignment and lead to deleterious impacts on the joints. The study identifies the biomechanical influences of aging shoes on lower limb joints. The shoes in the experiment were manually worn in the lateral heel. Nineteen healthy participants, including thirteen males and six females, were recruited to conduct walking experiments wearing attrition shoes (AS) and new shoes (NS) with a random order. A Vicon motion analysis system was used to collect kinematic data and ground reaction force. Kinematic and kinetic parameters of the hip, knee, and ankle joints were calculated using the Anybody Musculoskeletal Model and compared between the two conditions, AS and NS. The results showed that wearing an attrition shoe decreased the plantarflexion angle and plantarflexion moment of the ankle joint, while significantly increasing the magnitude of the first peak of the knee adduction moment and hip abduction moment and hip internal rotation moment (p < .05). The results of the study implied that wearing attrition shoes is not recommended for those people with knee problems due to increase in medial loading.

Axial alignment is a critical regulator of knee osteoarthritis

Although osteoarthritis (OA), a leading cause of disability, has been associated with joint malalignment, scientific translational evidence for this link is lacking. In a clinical case study, we provide evidence of osteochondral recovery upon unloading symptomatic isolated medial tibiofemoral knee OA associated with varus malalignment. By mapping response correlations at high resolution, we identify spatially complex degenerative changes in cartilage after overloading in a clinically relevant ovine model. We further report that unloading diminishes OA cartilage degeneration and alterations of critical parameters of the subchondral bone plate in a similar topographic fashion. Last, therapeutic unloading shifted the articular cartilage and subchondral bone phenotype to normal and restored several physiological correlations disturbed in neutral and varus OA, suggesting a protective effect on the integrity of the entire osteochondral unit. Collectively, these findings identify modifiable trajectories with considerable translational potential to reduce the burden of human OA.

Effects of tailored lateral wedge insoles on medial knee osteoarthritis based on biomechanical analysis: 12-week randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Lateral wedge insoles adjusted by biomechanical analysis may improve the condition of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a biomechanics laboratory.

SUBJECTS

A total of 38 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were allocated to either an experimental group (lateral wedge insoles) or a control group (neutral insoles).

INTERVENTIONS

Experimental group (n = 20) received an adjusted lateral wedge insole of 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 degrees, after previous biomechanical analysis. Control group (n = 18) received a neutral insole (0 degrees). All patients used the insoles for 12 weeks.

MAIN MEASURES

Visual analogue scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire, biomechanical parameters: first and second peak of the external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse, and physical performance tests: 30-second sit-to-stand test, the 40-m fast-paced walk test, and the 12-step stair-climb test.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks, between-group differences did not differ significantly for pain intensity (-12.5 mm, (95% CI -29.4-4.4)), biomechanical parameters (p = 0.05), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and physical performance tests, except on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale other symptoms (p = 0.002; 13.8 points, (95% CI 5.6-22.0)).

CONCLUSION

Tailored wedge insoles were no more effective at improving biomechanical or clinically meaningful outcomes than neutral insoles, except on symptoms. More participants from the experimental group reported they felt some improvement. However, these effects were minimal and without clinical significance.

Effect of knee braces and insoles on clinical outcomes of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Knee osteoarthritis is a disabling disease, causing pain and reduced function.Orthoses are used to manage this problem, including knee braces and lateral wedge insoles. However, there is still controversy on which type of intervention is more effective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed toevaluate the effect of knee braces and lateral wedge insoles and compare their clinical outcomes onindividuals with medial knee osteoarthritis. We conducted the search strategy based on the population, intervention, comparison, andoutcome (PICO) method. We searched with PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for the related studies. The articles quality assessment was done based on the modified Downs and Black checklist. Totally, we chose 32 controlled trials, including 1.849 participants, for the final evaluation. Almosttwo-thirds of the studies had a moderate quality. The overall outcome suggested that both interventionshad improved pain and function. The difference between both interventions on pain reduction was not significant (standardized mean difference = 0.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.34 to 0.1) based on meta-analysis. Both knee brace and lateral wedge insole can improve pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis. Using either separately or both of them together are effective.

The correlation between osteoarthritis stage and the effect of the lateral wedge insole for 3 months on medial meniscus extrusion in the knee joint

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) leads to symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) due to increased mechanical stress. MME increases with weight-bearing, and the difference in MME between non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing status (ΔMME) is a factor that causes greater MME. The lateral wedge insole (LWI) is an ideal approach for decreasing the amount of ΔMME associated with the reduction of medial loading stress in the early stage of knee OA. However, the effect of the LWI for 3 months on the ΔMME and its response to OA stage have not been elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of the LWI for 3 months on MME and the ΔMME in each stage of OA.

METHODS

Participants were divided into three groups: no intervention with the LWI (control group; n = 9) and intervention with the LWI in early OA (early OA group: Kellgren-Lawrence (K/L) stage = 2, n = 17) and late OA (late OA group: K/L stage > 2, n = 13). MME was evaluated using ultrasound, and the ΔMME was obtained as the difference in MME from non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing conditions. These measurements were performed at two time points: the initial office visit as a baseline and post-3 months.

RESULTS

The weight-bearing MME and ΔMME values post-3 months were significantly decreased compared with those at baseline in the early OA group but not in the control or late OA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the LWI for 3 months decreased weight-bearing MME and ΔMME values, and its effectiveness was more pronounced in the early stage of knee OA.

Change in pain and its relation to change in activity in osteoarthritis

Objective

Trials testing promising interventions in knee osteoarthritis (OA) often fail to show pain reductions. This may be due to change in activity whereby a person's pain decreases, leading them to increase their activity levels, in turn increasing pain back to baseline levels. Using data from a trial of a beneficial treatment for knee pain, we explored whether activity changes might mask a treatment's effect on pain, by looking at whether activity levels increased with effective treatment and whether change in activity level related to change in pain.

Design

During the InRespond trial (ISRCTN55059760) participants wore an accelerometer for 7 days before and during treatments. We assessed change in pain on treatment using scores for overall knee pain and pain in a nominated pain-aggravating activity both in the last week and evaluated change in different types of activity using accelerometer data. Principal components analysis tested whether change in activity and pain outcomes were correlated and created composites combining them. We then tested whether activity, pain or the composites showed a treatment effect, and examined their responsiveness.

Results

In the 61 participants (mean age 64.5 years, 38% women, mean overall knee pain score 5.08 (0-10)), activity levels mostly decreased during the trial. Principal component analyses suggested that pain and activity did not correlate highly, loading on different components. Treatment that showed significant effects on pain did not show similar effects on either activity (e.g. the active treatment had a slightly greater reduction in total steps taken than the control treatment (difference 1942.6 steps/week, p = 0.42) nor on composites combining activity and pain. Pain outcomes were the most responsive; static loading (standing) outcomes were the most responsive activity outcome.

Conclusion

We found no evidence to support the hypothesis that activity levels increase during effective OA treatment and might account for the negligible pain effects of OA treatments.

Influence of foot posture on immediate biomechanical responses during walking to variable-stiffness supported lateral wedge insole designs

BACKGROUND

Novel designs of lateral wedge insoles with arch support can alter walking biomechanics as a conservative treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. However, variations in foot posture may influence individual responses to insole intervention and these effects are not yet known.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does foot posture influence biomechanical responses to novel designs of lateral wedge insoles with arch support?

METHODS

This exploratory biomechanical investigation categorized forty healthy volunteers (age 23-34) into pronated (n = 16), neutral (n = 15), and supinated (n = 9) foot posture groups based on the Foot Posture Index. Three-dimensional gait analysis was conducted during walking with six orthotic insole conditions: flat control, lateral wedge, uniform-stiffness arch support, variable-stiffness arch support, and lateral wedge + each arch support. Frontal plane knee and ankle/subtalar joint kinetic and kinematic outcomes were compared among insole conditions and foot posture groups using a repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The lateral wedge alone and lateral wedge + variable-stiffness arch support were the only insole conditions effective at reducing the knee adduction moment. However, the lateral wedge + variable-stiffness arch support had a smaller increase in peak ankle/subtalar eversion moment than the lateral wedge alone. Supinated feet had smaller ankle/subtalar eversion excursion and moment impulse than neutral and pronated feet, across all insole conditions.

SIGNIFICANCE

Supinated feet have less mobile ankle/subtalar joints than neutral and pronated feet and, as a result, may be less likely to respond to biomechanical intervention from orthotic insoles. Supported lateral wedge insoles incorporating an arch support design that is variable-stiffness may be better than uniform-stiffness since reductions in the knee adduction moment can be achieved while minimizing increases in the ankle/subtalar eversion moment.

How foot progression angle affects knee adduction moment and angular impulse in people with and without medial knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effects of foot progression angle (FPA) modification on the first and second peaks of external knee adduction moment (EKAM) and knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI) in individuals with and without medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) during level walking.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to February 2020 by two independent reviewers. Included studies compared FPA modification (toe-in or toe-out gait) interventions to lower EKAM and/or KAAI with natural walking. Studies were required to report the first or second peaks of EKAM or KAAI.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included and more than 85% of included patients were graded with Kellgren-Lawrence II-IV knee OA. Toe-in gait reduced the first EKAM peak (standard mean difference (SMD): -0.75; 95%CI: -1.05~-0.45) and KAAI (SMD: -0.46; 95%CI: -0.86~-0.07), while toe-out gait reduced the second EKAM peak (SMD: -1.04; 95%CI: -1.34~-0.75) in healthy individuals. For patients with knee OA, toe-out gait reduced the second EKAM peak (SMD: -0.53; 95%CI: -0.75~-0.31) and KAAI (SMD: -0.26; 95%CI: -0.49~-0.03) while toe-in gait did not affect both EKAM peaks and KAAI.

CONCLUSION

Discrepancy in biomechanical effects of FPA modification was demonstrated between individuals with and without medial knee OA. Compared with natural walking, both toe-in and toe-out gait may be more effective in lowering EKAM and KAAI in healthy individuals. Toe-out gait may reduce EKAM and KAAI in patients with mild to severe knee OA. There is insufficient data from patients with early-stage knee OA, indicating future research is required.

Changes in ambulatory knee adduction moment with lateral wedge insoles differ with respect to the natural foot progression angle

Lateral wedge insoles (LWI) have been proposed to reduce the knee adduction moment (KAM) during walking; a biomechanical modification notably sought in case of medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the inter-individual inconsistency in KAM changes with LWI limits their therapeutic use. Although the foot progression angle (FPA) has been frequently discussed in KAM modifications literature, there is a lack of data regarding a possible relationship between this gait measure and changes in KAM with LWI. This study aimed to test if KAM changes with LWI differ with respect to the natural FPA and to compare KAM-related variables between individuals walking with smaller and larger natural FPA. Twenty-two healthy participants (14 males, 24 ± 3 years, 22.7 ± 2.7 kg/m²) underwent gait analysis with and without LWI. They were divided into two groups based on their natural FPA, and changes in KAM 1st peak, KAM impulse, and KAM-related variables were compared between groups. KAM 1st peak and impulse decreased with LWI in the smaller natural FPA group (p ≤ 0.006), while only KAM impulse decreased in the larger natural FPA group (p < 0.001). The difference in KAM 1st peak changes was explained by a less reduced lever arm in participants walking with larger natural FPA. In conclusion, this study brought new insight into the variability in KAM response to LWI. If the findings are confirmed in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis, the FPA could become a simple measure to help identify the patients more likely to reduce their KAM with LWI.

Effect of lateral-wedge insole on the center of foot pressure and lower extremity muscle activity at gait initiation in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis

[Purpose] In clinical settings, patients with knee osteoarthritis often complain of pain at gait initiation. In the present study, we aimed to determine the differences in the center of foot pressure and lower extremity muscle activity at gait initiation in healthy volunteers compared to patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. [Participants and Methods] The study comprised of 10 females without medial knee osteoarthritis (healthy group) and 10 females with medial knee osteoarthritis (medial knee osteoarthritis group). We measured the center of foot pressure trajectory and muscle activity onset times of the tibialis anterior and internal gastrocnemius at gait initiation. Moreover, we examined the effects of insole use in the medial knee osteoarthritis group. [Results] The posterior center of foot pressure displacement was significantly smaller in the medial knee osteoarthritis group (barefoot and insole) than in the healthy group. The anterior center of foot pressure displacement significantly improved with insole use. The muscle activity onset time of the tibialis anterior was significantly delayed in the medial knee osteoarthritis group (barefoot) than in the healthy group. [Conclusion] Postural control decreased at gait initiation in the medial knee osteoarthritis group.