Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis With and Without Fever at Baseline: Results From an Open-Label, Active-Treatment Extension Study

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the first Chinese experience

BACKGROUND

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a severe form of juvenile arthritis that is characterized by chronic joint inflammation and systemic symptoms such as fever, rash, and organ involvement. Anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab is an effective treatment. However, some patients still experience persisting or recurrent symptoms and the real-world effectiveness of canakinumab in Chinese patients with sJIA has never been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in Chinese patients with sJIA using real-world data.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on children with active sJIA. Clinical features, laboratory data, corticosteroid dosage, and adverse events (AEs) were collected at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after initiating canakinumab treatment.

RESULTS

Seven female and four male patients were included in the study. All patients had previously been treated with tocilizumab and were administered canakinumab for 12.4 ± 3.4 months. Notably, significant improvements were observed in both clinical signs and symptoms as well as laboratory indicators. Four children under corticosteroid treatment were able to successfully discontinue their corticosteroid therapy: one at week 4, two at week 12, and one at week 24. Notably, there was a significant reduction in the number of tender and swollen joints (P = 0.0059) as well as the systemic juvenile arthritis disease activity score (P < 0.0001). The most common AE was infection, but no patients experienced serious AEs. No cases of macrophage activation syndrome or death were reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Canakinumab was found to be potentially efficacious and safe in Chinese patients with sJIA. No new AEs were observed with canakinumab treatment.

Immune Mechanisms in Epileptogenesis: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Epilepsy Syndromes

Seizures and epilepsy can result from various aetiologies, yet the underlying cause of several epileptic syndromes remains unclear. In that regard, autoimmune-mediated pathophysiological mechanisms have been gaining attention in the past years and were included as one of the six aetiologies of seizures in the most recent classification of the International League Against Epilepsy. The increasing number of anti-neuronal antibodies identified in patients with encephalitic disorders has contributed to the establishment of an immune-mediated pathophysiology in many cases of unclear aetiology of epileptic syndromes. Yet only a small number of patients with autoimmune encephalitis develop epilepsy in the proper sense where the brain transforms into a state where it will acquire the enduring propensity to produce seizures if it is not hindered by interventions. Hence, the term autoimmune epilepsy is often wrongfully used in the context of autoimmune encephalitis since most of the seizures are acute encephalitis-associated and will abate as soon as the encephalitis is in remission. Given the overlapping clinical presentation of immune-mediated seizures originating from different aetiologies, a clear distinction among the aetiological entities is crucial when it comes to discussing pathophysiological mechanisms, therapeutic options, and long-term prognosis of patients. Moreover, a rapid and accurate identification of patients with immune-mediated epilepsy syndromes is required to ensure an early targeted treatment and, thereby, improve clinical outcome. In this article, we review our current understanding of pathogenesis and critically discuss current and potential novel treatment options for seizures and epilepsy syndromes of underlying or suspected immune-mediated origin. We further outline the challenges in proper terminology.

Biomarkers in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Macrophage Activation Syndrome and Their Importance in COVID Era

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and its complication, macrophage activation syndrome (sJIA-MAS), are rare but sometimes very serious or even critical diseases of childhood that can occasionally be characterized by nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms at onset-such as non-remitting high fever, headache, rash, or arthralgia-and are biologically accompanied by an increase in acute-phase reactants. For a correct positive diagnosis, it is necessary to rule out bacterial or viral infections, neoplasia, and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Delays in diagnosis will result in late initiation of targeted therapy. A set of biomarkers is useful to distinguish sJIA or sJIA-MAS from similar clinical entities, especially when arthritis is absent. Biomarkers should be accessible to many patients, with convenient production and acquisition prices for pediatric medical laboratories, as well as being easy to determine, having high sensitivity and specificity, and correlating with pathophysiological disease pathways. The aim of this review was to identify the newest and most powerful biomarkers and their synergistic interaction for easy and accurate recognition of sJIA and sJIA-MAS, so as to immediately guide clinicians in correct diagnosis and in predicting disease outcomes, the response to treatment, and the risk of relapses. Biomarkers constitute an exciting field of research, especially due to the heterogeneous nature of cytokine storm syndromes (CSSs) in the COVID era. They must be selected with utmost care-a fact supported by the increasingly improved genetic and pathophysiological comprehension of sJIA, but also of CSS-so that new classification systems may soon be developed to define homogeneous groups of patients, although each with a distinct disease.

The Conundrum of Lung Disease and Drug Hypersensitivity-like Reactions in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

An unusual form of lung disease has begun to affect some children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), coincident with increasing utilization of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6 antagonists. Many children with systemic JIA-associated lung disease (SJIA-LD) have a history of clinical and laboratory features resembling drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), a presentation now convincingly associated with HLA-DRB1*15. Treatment of DRESS typically requires drug discontinuation, a daunting prospect for clinicians and families who rely upon these agents. Here we review SJIA-LD and its associated DRESS-like phenotype. We suggest an alternative explanation, the cytokine plasticity hypothesis, proposing that IL-1 and IL-6 blockers modulate the milieu in which T cells develop, leading to a pathologic immune response triggered through exposure to common microbes, or to other exogenous or endogenous antigens, rather than to the drugs themselves. This hypothesis differs from DRESS in mechanism but also in clinical implications, predicting that control of pathogenic T cells could permit continued use of IL-1 and IL-6 antagonists in some individuals. The spectrum posed by these two hypotheses provides a conceptual framework that will guide investigation into the pathogenesis of SJIA-LD and may open up new therapeutic avenues for patients with systemic JIA.

B Cells on the Stage of Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Leading or Supporting Actors in Disease Pathogenesis?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a term that collectively refers to a group of chronic childhood arthritides, which together constitute the most common rheumatic condition in children. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria define seven categories of JIA: oligoarticular, polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) negative (RF-), polyarticular RF positive (RF+), systemic, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis. The ILAR classification includes persistent and extended oligoarthritis as subcategories of oligoarticular JIA, but not as distinct categories. JIA is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process affecting the synovia that begins before the age of 16 and persists at least 6 weeks. If not treated, JIA can cause significant disability and loss of quality of life. Treatment of JIA is adjusted according to the severity of the disease as combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), synthetic and/ or biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although the disease etiology is unknown, disturbances in innate and adaptive immune responses have been implicated in JIA development. B cells may have important roles in JIA pathogenesis through autoantibody production, antigen presentation, cytokine release and/ or T cell activation. The study of B cells has not been extensively explored in JIA, but evidence from the literature suggests that B cells might have indeed a relevant role in JIA pathophysiology. The detection of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in JIA patients supports a breakdown in B cell tolerance. Furthermore, alterations in B cell subpopulations have been documented in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from JIA patients. In fact, altered B cell homeostasis, B cell differentiation and B cell hyperactivity have been described in JIA. Of note, B cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in children with JIA, which further supports B cell intervention in disease development.

Adult-Onset Still’s Disease: A Case Report and Review of Current Therapeutic Options

Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is a rare autoinflammatory disease that typically presents with a triad of fever, evanescent rash, and arthritis. There is often a delay in diagnosis of AOSD due to its nonspecific clinical presentation, which may mimic other infectious, rheumatological disorders, and malignancies. Corticosteroids have been the cornerstone for the management of AOSD for the past many years. However, with the expanding understanding of its pathogenesis, novel therapeutic options targeting various cytokines are being increasingly recognized. Herein, we present a case of AOSD that was successfully treated with tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor. For the purpose of this article, we also conducted a literature search to review the current therapeutic options available for the treatment of AOSD.

A dysregulated interleukin-18-interferon-γ-CXCL9 axis impacts treatment response to canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The monoclonal IL-1β antibody canakinumab is approved for the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA). Its efficacy has been proven in several trials, but not all patients show a complete and sustained response to therapy. We aimed to analyse the association of baseline serum biomarkers with treatment outcome in patients with SJIA treated with canakinumab.

METHODS

Serum samples from 54 patients with active SJIA without recent macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) treated with canakinumab in an open-label response characterization study were subjected to a multiplexed bead array assay. Interesting targets from these analyses were validated by ELISA. Clinical treatment outcomes included modified paediatric ACR (pACR) 30 and 90 responses, clinically inactive disease (CID) within 15 days of treatment and sustained complete response, defined as pACR100 or CID within 15 days of treatment plus no future flare or MAS.

RESULTS

In canakinumab-naïve patients most biomarkers were elevated when compared with healthy controls at baseline and some rapidly decreased by day 15 [IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), IL-6, IL-18 and S100A12]. Responders had higher IL-18 and IFN-γ levels and lower chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9) levels at baseline, emphasized by the IL-18: CXCL9 and IFN-γ: CXCL9 ratios. These ratios had significant accuracy in predicting treatment responses.

CONCLUSION

Differential regulation of the IL-18-IFN-γ-CXCL9 axis is observed in patients with SJIA. Higher IL-18: CXCL9 and IFN-γ: CXCL9 ratios at baseline are associated with a better clinical response to canakinumab treatment in SJIA. Future studies are needed to validate these findings and determine their generalizability to patients with recent MAS.

Precision medicine in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-has the time arrived?

The introduction of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapies for treating children and adolescents with chronic arthritis (ie, juvenile idiopathic arthritis [JIA]) has revolutionised care and outcomes. The biologic revolution continues to expand, with ever-changing immunological targets coming to market after basic research and clinical trials. The first class of biologics that was beneficial for children with JIA was tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. If used early and aggressively, TNF inhibitors are capable of inducing disease remission for most of the seven subtypes of JIA, with the exception of systemic JIA (which more frequently responds to interleukin [IL]-1 or IL-6 inhibition). Nevertheless, there are still subsets of patients with JIA with disease that is difficult to treat or who develop extra-articular features that require a different therapeutic approach. Although finding an effective biological therapy for individual children with JIA can be trial and error, ongoing research and clinical trials are providing insight into a more personalised approach to care. In addition, redefining the JIA classification, in part based on shared similarities with various adult arthritides, could allow for extrapolation of knowledge from studies in adults with chronic arthritis.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treatment Updates

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a group of heterogeneous chronic inflammatory arthropathies occurring in childhood without a known cause. This article discusses the key clinical features of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and treatment updates for oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and systemic arthritis. Paradigm changes in management include the earlier use of biologic agents and the introduction of biosimilars and targeted synthetic disease modifying agents like tofacitinib. This review summarizes recent developments while considering potential areas for improvement and study.

Safety updates in novel therapeutics for pediatric rheumatic disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biologics and novel targeted therapeutics have transformed the management of pediatric rheumatic diseases over the past two decades; however, questions about short-term and long-term safety remain. Safety data gathered from recent clinical trials, long-term extensions of prior trials, registries, and other real-world evidence are summarized here for biologics and novel therapeutics commonly prescribed for pediatric rheumatic diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

With nearly 20 years of therapeutic experience, tumor necrosis inhibitors (TNFi) are generally well tolerated, although infections, malignancy, and development of new autoimmunity remain a concern. Risk of infections may be higher in IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors, and lower in abatacept, compared with TNFi. Safety data for B-cell-targeted therapeutics and janus kinase inhibitors are emerging, but remain limited, especially in children.

SUMMARY

Biologic and novel targeted therapeutics offer a promising future for children with pediatric rheumatic disease. However, long-term safety data in children remain limited for several agents. With any therapeutic option, both short-term and long-term safety concerns must be weighed against individual clinical needs when choosing the optimal treatment for each child.

CANAKINUMAB IN SYSTEMIC JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS: REAL-LIFE DATA FROM A RETROSPECTIVE ITALIAN COHORT

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in real-life the effectiveness and safety of canakinumab in Italian patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA).

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre study of children with sJIA was performed. Clinical features, laboratory parameters and adverse events were collected at baseline, after 6 and 12 months from starting canakinumab. The effectiveness primary outcome was clinical inactive disease (CID) off glucocorticoids (GCs) treatment at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 80 children were analyzed from 15 Italian centers. Of the 12 patients who started canakinumab in CID while receiving anakinra, all maintained CID. Of the 68 with active disease at baseline, 57.4% achieved CID off GCs at 6 months and 63.8% at 12 months. In univariate analysis, the variables significantly related with non-response were number of active joints (NAJ) ≥5, history of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and disease duration. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association with non-response of NAJ ≥5 (OR 6.37 (95%CI 1.69-24.02), p= 0.006) and history of MAS (OR 3.53 (95%CI 1.06-11.70), p= 0.039). No serious adverse events were recorded in this series. There were two cases of MAS during canakinumab, leading to a rate of 2.9 episodes per 100 patient year.

CONCLUSION

We confirm, in real-life, the efficacy of canakinumab in sJIA in a multicentric cohort. History of MAS and higher NAJ were associated with lower probability of achieving clinical inactive disease.

Signals and Mechanisms Regulating Monocyte and Macrophage Activation in the Pathogenesis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Monocytes (Mos) and macrophages (Mφs) are key players in the innate immune system and are critical in coordinating the initiation, expansion, and regression of many autoimmune diseases. In addition, they display immunoregulatory effects that impact inflammation and are essential in tissue repair and regeneration. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an umbrella term describing inflammatory joint diseases in children. Accumulated evidence suggests a link between Mo and Mφ activation and JIA pathogenesis. Accordingly, topics regarding the signals and mechanisms regulating Mo and Mφ activation leading to pathologies in patients with JIA are of great interest. In this review, we critically summarize recent advances in the understanding of how Mo and Mφ activation is involved in JIA pathogenesis and focus on the signaling pathways and mechanisms participating in the related cell activation processes.

Perspectives on anti-IL-1 inhibitors as potential therapeutic interventions for severe COVID-19

The overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, resulting in what has been described as a cytokine storm or cytokine release syndrome (CRS), may be the key factor in the pathology of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is also a crucial cause of death from COVID-19. With the purpose of finding effective and low-toxicity drugs to mitigate CRS, IL-1 blockade agents, which are one of the safest ways to stop this overwhelming innate immune response, are already available in several preliminary reports or are under observational trials and may offer an important treatment option in hyperinflammatory COVID-19. In this review, we described the key information in both case reports and clinical studies on the potential beneficial features of IL-1 inhibitors in COVID-19 patients.

Interleukin-1 Blockade in Polygenic Autoinflammatory Disorders: Where Are We now?

Polygenic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), such as systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), adult-onset Still's disease, Kawasaki disease, idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP), Behçet’s Syndrome, Crystal-induced arthropatihes such as gout or Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease are characterized by the overexpression of inflammasome-associated genes, leading to a dysregulation of the innate immune response. The IL-1 cytokine family (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-18, IL-36Ra, IL-36α, IL-37, IL-36β, IL-36g, IL-38, IL-33) was defined to be principally responsible for the inflammatory nature of polygenic AIDs. Several clinical trials were initiated, and IL-1 blockade has been proven to cause a rapid reduction of clinical symptoms and normalization of laboratory parameters in the majority of cases. Randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials, together with registry-based clinical trials and open-label, retrospective and prospective observational studies, supported the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors in the treatment of polygenic AIDs. Most of the current data are focused on the therapeutic use of anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, canakinumab, an anti-IL-1β monoclonal antibody, and rilonacept, a soluble decoy receptor. However, other promising agents, such as gevokizumab, IL-1β blocking monoclonal antibody, tadekinig alfa, a human recombinant IL-18-binding protein, and tranilast, an analog of a tryptophan metabolite, are currently being tested. Anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept caused impressive improvements in both systemic and musculoskeletal symptoms. Furthermore, the anti-IL-1 therapy allowed corticosteroid tapering and, in some cases, even withdrawal. This article reviews the current IL-1 inhibitors and the results of all clinical trials in which they have been tested for the management of broad spectrum of polygenic AIDs.