Expert Perspective: Management of Refractory Inflammatory Myopathy

The concept of difficult-to-treat disease in rheumatology: where next?

New pathogenesis-based therapeutics and evidence-based consensus treatment recommendations, often with predefined treatment goals, have remarkably improved outcomes across many chronic diseases. However, a clinically significant subgroup of patients responds poorly to interventions and show a progressive decline in the disease trajectory, which poses an increasing health-care challenge. Difficult-to-treat approaches exist in several areas of medicine and the need for similar definitions has recently also emerged in rheumatology. The term difficult-to-treat refers not only to patients with pathology-driven, treatment-refractory disease, but also implicates multiple other factors that can contribute to patients being in this state, including having few treatment options, misdiagnosis, and coincident psychosocial factors. Therefore, the difficult-to-treat state requires a comprehensive, holistic, multidisciplinary approach that considers the specific characteristics of each disease and the personalised needs of the patient. In this Personal View, we provide an overview of the different aspects of the concept of difficult-to-treat disease, highlight its advantages, and propose the importance of incorporating this concept more widely in the design of rheumatological treatment strategies.

Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in Adults

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases characterized by muscle involvement and various extramuscular manifestations. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most common extramuscular manifestations of IIM and is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. The clinical phenotypes, treatment responses, and prognosis of IIM-ILD are significantly related to myositis-specific antibody (MSA) profiles, with some racial differences. The features associated with MSA in IIM-ILD could also be relevant to cases of ILD where MSA is present but does not meet the criteria for IIM. The anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody is highly associated with rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD), especially in Asian populations, and with characteristic cutaneous manifestations, such as skin ulcers. Radiologically, ground-glass opacities, consolidations, and nonsegmental linear opacities were more predominant than reticular opacities and honeycombing. While the mortality rate is still around 30%, the prognosis can be improved with early intensive therapy with corticosteroids and multiple immunosuppressants. In contrast, anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies are associated with chronic ILD, although RP-ILD is also common. Patients with anti-ARS antibodies often show lung-predominant presentations, with subtle muscle and skin involvement. Radiologically, reticular opacities, with or without consolidation, are predominant and may progress to honeycombing over time. Combination therapy with corticosteroids and a single immunosuppressant is recommended to prevent relapses, which often lead to a decline in lung function and fatal long-term outcomes. Significant advances in immunology and genetics holds promise for fostering more personalized approaches to managing IIMILD.

Evaluation of ventricular repolarization in dermatomyositis and relationship with inflammation and autoimmunity

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a chronic multi-systemic inflammatory disorder of autoimmune origin, which has been associated with cardiovascular complications, including ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio have been accepted as new markers for the assessment of myocardial repolarization and ventricular arrhythmogenesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate ventricular repolarization by using Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio in patients with DM, and to assess the relation with inflammation and autoimmunity. This study included 281 DM patients (180 females, 101 males; mean age 52.73 ± 15.80 years) and 281 control subjects (180 females, 101 males; mean age 53.38 ± 15.72 years). QTc, Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio were measured from the 12-lead ECG. The plasma level of blood routine test, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was measured. These parameters were compared between groups. No statistically significant difference was found between two groups in terms of basic characteristics. In electrocardiographic parameters analysis, QTc, Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio were significantly increased in DM patients compared to the control group (441.44 ± 26.62 ms vs 422.72 ± 11.7 ms, 104.16 ± 24.34 ms vs 77.23 ± 16.25 ms and 0.27 ± 0.06 ms vs 0.20 ± 0.04 ms, all P value < 0.01). QTc, Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT were positively correlated with NLR, CRP, and ESR (all P values < 0.01), and were increased in anti-Ro/SSA-52kD positive patients compared to those negative (452.33 ± 24.89 ms vs 438.55 ± 26.37 ms, 114.05 ± 22.68 ms vs 101.53 ± 24.13 ms, and 0.29 ± 0.06 ms vs 0.27 ± 0.05 ms, all P value < 0.01). Our study demonstrated that QTc, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QT ratio were increased in DM patients and were associated with inflammatory markers and anti-Ro/SSA-52kD positivity.

Where are we now in biologic drugs for myositis?

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of chronic autoimmune disorders. Up to 40% of IIM patients have long-term sequelae and significant functional disability. Its management can be challenging and new therapies are badly needed. The small number of cases with diverse presentations and different diagnostic criteria significantly affect clinical trial results. Only IVIG has been internationally approved for IIM patients. Most clinical trials of new biologic therapies have failed to meet their primary endpoints in IIM, with only one biologic drug recommended for refractory IIM treatment (rituximab), although not approved. We review several new emerging biologic drugs, including B cell depletion therapies, abatacept, Janus kinase inhibitors, and aldesleukin. Encouragingly, some phase II randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of new biologics in IIM, demonstrating an improvement in clinical and laboratory measures.

Tacrolimus personalized therapy based on CYP3A5 genotype in Chinese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous and life-threatening group of diseases; in particular, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody positive DM (MDA5+ DM) is reportedly strongly associated with high mortality rate. Tacrolimus (TAC) provides an excellent therapeutic option, but the trough concentration (Cmin)-outcome relationship remains unexplored. This study was undertaken to identify optimal Cmin and individualized dose based on CYP3A5 genotype for IIM patients.

METHODS

A total of 134 IIM patients with 467 Cmin were enrolled. We examined the relationship between TAC Cmin and relapses. The receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to confirm the optimal Cmin. Analyses of factors influencing Cmin were conducted. The dose requirement based on CYP3A5 genotype was confirmed.

RESULTS

TAC Cmin is strongly associated with relapses. The optimal cutoff values were 5.30, 5.85, 4.85 and 5.35 ng/ml for acute, subacute, chronic and all-phase IIM patients (P = 0.001, 0.013, 0.002 and <0.001, respectively), as well as 5.35, 5.85, 5.55 and 5.85 ng/ml for acute, subacute, chronic and all-phase MDA5+ DM patients (P = 0.007, 0.001, 0.036 and <0.001, respectively). CYP3A5 genotype was one of the significant factors influencing TAC Cmin. CYP3A5 expressers required 0.059 mg/kg/day to attain the target Cmin, while nonexpressers required 0.046 mg/kg/day (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

TAC treatment may elicit favorable outcome in patients with IIM and MDA5+ DM when Cmin exceeded 5.35 and 5.85 ng/ml, which is crucial to a lower relapse rate. The individualized dose based on the CYP3A5 genotype provides a reference for TAC personalized therapy in IIM.

Effectiveness of generic tofacitinib in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM)-a retrospective analysis from Indian Myositis Registry (MyoIN)

OBJECTIVES

Determine domain-based-outcomes and steroid-sparing efficacy of generic tofacitinib in IIM.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study wherein clinical phenotype, autoantibody profile, prior immunosuppressives, and outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months were retrieved for IIM patients prescribed tofacitinib. Overall clinical response was assessed as complete or partial remission as per physician judgment. Changes in cutaneous and calcinosis domain were recorded as per physician global assessment (PGA), lung domain as per medical research council (MRC) dyspnea scale, and muscle strength by Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8).

RESULTS

Forty-two patients of IIM with mean age 38.7 ± 16 years; (76.2% (N = 32) women), median duration of illness 48 (19;88) months were included. Commonest indication for initiating tofacitinib was either for refractory or as steroid sparing for cutaneous domain (N = 25/42, 59.5%) followed by calcinosis (N = 16/42, 38%). Overall complete and/or partial remission was achieved in 23/37 (64.8%), 30/35 (85.7%), and 29/30 (96.6%) patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At 12-month follow-up, there was a reduction in prednisolone dose, with absolute decrease from a daily dose of 17.5 mg (IQR 5;50) to 2.5 mg (IQR 0;5) (p < 0.001). Individual domain assessments revealed improvement in cutaneous domain [16/25 (64%)] and calcinosis [6/15 (40%)]. Adverse effects included herpes zoster (N = 2/42, 4.8%) and dyslipidemia (N = 4/42, 9.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with generic tofacitinib significantly reduces the daily dose of corticosteroids and is effective in cutaneous domain including calcinosis in IIM.

KEY POINTS

• This multicenter retrospective study is the first real-world data from India, elucidating steroid sparing efficacy of generic tofacitinib in patients with inflammatory myositis. • Domain-based outcome assessment suggests good clinical improvement especially in cutaneous domain, even those with refractory disease. • Modest benefits were evident in calcinosis, but its effect on the muscle and pulmonary domain appears limited.

Past, Present, and Future in Dermatomyositis Therapeutics

Purpose of review

This review highlights current and emerging pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM). Current clinical evidence, in addition to recently published and ongoing clinical trials for various drugs in development, are summarized in this review.

Recent findings

There has been significant progress in the research and development of potential treatments in DM. The FDA recently approved Octagam® 10% Immune Globulin Intravenous (IVIg) for the treatment of DM. Several drug targets are being explored as viable therapeutic options in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials; at the forefront of these are JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib and baricitinib) and T-cell co-stimulation blockers (i.e. abatacept). In addition, clinical trials are currently under way for therapeutics targeting novel molecular pathways, including immunoproteasome inhibitors, anti-B cell therapy, anti-interferon drugs, complement inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors.

Summary

With the large number of clinical trials, multiple novel therapeutics in development, and improved classification and outcome measures, the treatment landscape for DM will continue to rapidly evolve in the coming years as more options become available.

Characterisation of Disease Patterns of Dermatomyositis with Different Initial Manifestations

Purpose

To determine the characteristics and prognoses of dermatomyositis (DM) by comparing the difference in initial symptoms.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the patients diagnosed with DM from 1 January 2019 to 1 January 2021. Based on the firstly presented symptoms, patients were divided into five groups, namely rash group, muscle weakness group, arthritis group, respiratory symptom group and atypical symptom group. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded. All patients were followed up until 31 May 2021.

Results

In total 136 DM patients, rash (40%) was the most common initial symptom, followed by respiratory symptoms (22%), arthritis (20%), muscle weakness (10%) and atypical symptoms (8%). Rash group and atypical group had a higher positive rate of anti-TIF1γ antibodies than arthritis group and respiratory symptom group (P < 0.05). Respiratory symptom and arthritis groups had a higher positive rate of anti-Ro52 antibodies than rash and muscle weakness groups (P < 0.05). Respiratory group had a higher incidence of ILD than rash and atypical groups. The FVC and DLCO in respiratory group were significantly lower than rash group, arthritis group and atypical group (P < 0.05). The survival rate of rash group was significantly higher than muscle weakness group and arthritis group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

DM patients with different initial manifestations had different myositis antibodies and prognoses.