An in vitro study of the influence of a drug's molecular weight on its overall (Clt), diffusive (Cld) and convective (Clc) clearance through dialysers

Caspofungin sequestration in a polyacrylonitrile-derived filter: Increasing the dose does not mitigate sequestration

OBJECTIVES

Critically ill patients frequently require continuous renal replacement therapy. Echinocandins are recommended as first-line treatment of candidemia. Preliminary results suggested echinocandin sequestration in a polyacrylonitrile filter. The present study aimed to determine whether increasing the dose might balance sequestration.

METHODS

An STX filter (Baxter-Gambro) was used. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for dosage of caspofungin. In vitro drug disposition was evaluated by NeckEpur (Neckepur, Versailles, France) technology using a crystalloid medium instead of diluted/reconstituted blood, focusing on the disposition of the unbound fraction of drugs. Two concentrations were assessed.

RESULTS

At the low dose, the mean measured initial concentration in the central compartment (CC) was 5.1 ± 0.6 mg/L. One hundred percent of the initial amount was eliminated from the CC within the 6-h session. The mean total clearance from the CC was 9.6 ± 2.5 L/h. The mean percentages of elimination resulting from sequestration and diafiltration were 96.0 ± 5.0 and 4.0 ± 5.2%, respectively. At high dose, the mean measured initial concentration in the CC was 13.1 mg/L. One hundred percent of the initial amount was eliminated from the CC within the 6-h session. The mean total clearance from the CC was 9.5 L/h. The mean percentages of elimination resulting from sequestration and filtration were 88.5% and 11.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the dose does not mitigate caspofungin sequestration in the STX filter. The results raise caution about the simultaneous use of caspofungin and polyacrylonitrile-derived filters. Intermittent modes of renal replacement therapy might be considered. For sensitive species, fluconazole might be an alternative.

Disposition of gentamicin and amikacin in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using a heparin-coated filter: An in vitro assessment

Disposition of gentamicin and amikacin during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has not been addressed in in vitro models. The HLS Advanced 7.0^® circuit with the Cardio Help^® monitor, Getinge, was used. The 5-L central compartment (CC) was loaded with gentamicin and amikacin at a targeted concentration of 40 and 80 mg/L in the same bag prior connection to the circuit. Samples were collected in the CC, the inlet and outlet ports from 15 min to 6 h post-connection. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using the NeckEpur^® method. Analysis of results of gentamicin and amikacin showed in the filter-pump block (i) the extremely low value of the extraction coefficients, (ii) similar values of the areas under the curve (AUCs) at the inlet and outlet ports, (iii) using the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test no significant differences of the inlet-outlet concentrations in the filter-pump. In the whole system (i) the amounts recovered in the CC at the end of the 6-h session were not significantly different from the initial values, (ii) the extremely low values of the total clearance of gentamicin and amikacin from the CC in comparison with the measured simulated blood flowrate, (iii) the lack of significant time-concentration interactions in the CC and the inlet and outlet ports. These findings allow concluding no detectable adsorption of gentamicin and amikacin occurred in the HLS Advanced 7.0 circuit.

Elimination of three doses of gentamicin over three consecutive days using a polyacrylonitrile-derived filter: An in vitro assessment

INTRODUCTION

Adsorption of gentamicin in a polyacrylonitrile filter was previously evidenced in a session lasting 6 h using the NeckEpur model. We extended the study over three consecutive days to mimic the 72-h life span of a filter.

METHODS

Prismaflex^® monitor and ST150^® filter were used in the continuous diafiltration (CDF) mode at a 2.5 L/h flowrate. The daily session started with a 6-h session of CDF. Thereafter, the 5-L central compartment was changed using a bag free of gentamicin to assess gentamicin release over the following 18 h. Experiments were repeated on Day 2 and stopped at the end of the 6-h session of CDF on Day 3. The experiment was performed in duplicate.

RESULTS

At a 2.5 L/h diafiltration flowrate, the mean daily clearances of gentamicin were 5.5, 4.0, and 3.3 L/h, respectively. The mean diafiltration and adsorption ratios in the daily elimination of gentamicin were 32/68%, 58/42%, and 88/12%, respectively. During days 1 and 2, the mean amount of gentamicin released from the ST150^® filter were 14 and 34 mg, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics of gentamicin over 3 days is strongly altered by adsorption in the same filter with a progressive decrease of elimination by adsorption, suggesting saturation of the filter. One limitation of our study results from the mode of administration using a bolus dose instead of an infusion over 30 min. Adsorption adds a clearance to those of diafiltration. The time-dependency of gentamicin clearance precludes using a constant dosage regimen over the filter's life span.

Elimination of fluconazole during continuous renal replacement therapy. An in vitro assessment

Introduction:

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) efficiently eliminates fluconazole. However, the routes of elimination were not clarified. Adsorption of fluconazole by filters is a pending question. We studied the elimination of fluconazole in a model mimicking a session of CRRT in humans using the NeckEpur® model. Two filters were studied.

Methods:

The AV1000®-polysulfone filter with the Multifiltrate Pro. Fresenius and the ST150®-polyacrylonitrile filter with the Prismaflex. Baxter-Gambro were studied. Continuous filtration used a flowrate of 2.5 L/h in post-dilution only. Session were made in duplicate. Routes of elimination were assessed using the NeckEpur® model.

Results:

The mean measured initial fluconazole concentration (mean ± SD) for the four sessions in the central compartment (CC) was 14.9 ± 0.2 mg/L. The amount eliminated from the CC at the end of 6 h-session at a 2.5 L/h filtration flowrate for the AV1000®-polysulfone and the ST150®-polyacrylonitrile filters were 90%–93% and 96%–94%, respectively; the clearances from the central compartment (CC) were 2.5–2.6 and 2.4–2.3 L/h, respectively. The means of the instantaneous sieving coefficient were 0.94%–0.91% and 0.99%–0.91%, respectively. The percentages of the amount eliminated from the CC by filtration/adsorption were 100/0%–95/5% and 100/0%–100/0%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Neither the ST150®-polyacrylonitrile nor the AV1000®-polysulfone filters result in any significant adsorption of fluconazole.

Diafiltration flowrate is a determinant of the extent of adsorption of amikacin in renal replacement therapy using the ST150®-AN69 filter: An in vitro study

Introduction:

In continuous renal replacement therapy, conduction and convection are controlled allowing prescribing dosage regimen improving survival. In contrast, adsorption is an uncontrolled property altering drug disposition. Whether adsorption depends on flowrates is unknown. We hypothesized an in vitro model may provide information in conditions mimicking continuous renal replacement therapy in humans.

Methods:

ST150®-AN69 filter and Prismaflex dialyzer, Baxter-Gambro were used. Simulated blood flowrate was set at 200 mL/min. The flowrates in the filtration (continuous filtration), dialysis (continuous dialysis), and diafiltration (continuous diafiltration) were 1500, 2500, and 4000 mL/h, respectively. Routes of elimination were assessed using NeckEpur® analysis.

Results:

The percentages of the total amount eliminated by continuous filtration, continuous dialysis, and continuous diafiltration were 82%, 86%, and 94%, respectively. Elimination by effluents and adsorption accounted for 42% ± 7% and 58% ± 5%, 57% ± 7% and 43% ± 6%, and 84% ± 6% and 16% ± 6% of amikacin elimination, respectively. There was a linear regression between flowrates and amikacin clearance: Y = 0.6 X ± 1.7 (R2 = 0.9782). Conversely, there was a linear inverse correlation between the magnitude of amikacin adsorption and flowrate: Y = –16.9 X ± 84.1 (R2 = 0.9976).

Conclusion:

Low flowrates resulted in predominant elimination by adsorption, accounting for 58% of the elimination of amikacin from the central compartment in the continuous filtration mode at 1500 mL/h of flowrate. Thereafter, the greater the flowrate, the lower the adsorption of amikacin in a linear manner. Flowrate is a major determinant of adsorption of amikacin. There was an about 17% decrease in the rate of adsorption per increase in the flowrate of 1 L/min.

Simple Formula for Predicting Drug Removal Rates During Hemodialysis

The present study sought to derive a simple formula for predicting the drug removal rates during hemodialysis. We examined the relationship between drug removal rates during hemodialysis and the molecular weights or pharmacokinetic parameters of injectable drugs (N = 90) obtained from pharmaceutical interview forms in Japan. Stepwise multiple regression analysis with the removal rate by hemodialysis as the objective variable adjusted for molecular weight or pharmacokinetic parameters as explanatory variables, showed that the logarithm of molecular weight (B = -18.87), the protein binding rate (B = -0.40), and the fraction of the unchanged drug excreted into the urine/volume of distribution (B = 0.05) were significantly and independently associated with drug removal rate by hemodialysis (α = 90.78, adjusted R²  = 0.64, P = 2.2e^-16 ). Our data demonstrated that molecular weight, protein binding rate, and volume of distribution were important factors affecting drug removal during hemodialysis, and that our simple regression equation could be used to predict the drug removal rate during hemodialysis.

Extracorporeal treatment for theophylline poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning workgroup was created to provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in poisoning. Here, the workgroup presents its systematic review and recommendations for theophylline.

METHODS

After a systematic review of the literature, a subgroup reviewed articles, extracted data, summarized findings, and proposed structured voting statements following a pre-determined format. A two-round modified Delphi method was chosen to reach a consensus on voting statements and the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to quantify disagreement. Anonymous votes were compiled, returned, and discussed. A second vote determined the final recommendations.

RESULTS

141 articles were included: 6 in vitro studies, 4 animal studies, 101 case reports/case series, 7 descriptive cohorts, 4 observational studies, and 19 pharmacokinetic studies, yielding a low-to-very-low quality of evidence for all recommendations. Data on 143 patients were reviewed, including 10 deaths. The workgroup concluded that theophylline is dialyzable (level of evidence = A) and made the following recommendations: ECTR is recommended in severe theophylline poisoning (1C). Specific recommendations for ECTR include a theophylline concentration [theophylline] > 100 mg/L (555 μmol/L) in acute exposure (1C), the presence of seizures (1D), life-threatening dysrhythmias (1D) or shock (1D), a rising [theophylline] despite optimal therapy (1D), and clinical deterioration despite optimal care (1D). In chronic poisoning, ECTR is suggested if [theophylline] > 60 mg/L (333 μmol/L) (2D) or if the [theophylline] > 50 mg/L (278 μmol/L) and the patient is either less than 6 months of age or older than 60 years of age (2D). ECTR is also suggested if gastrointestinal decontamination cannot be administered (2D). ECTR should be continued until clinical improvement is apparent or the [theophylline] is < 15 mg/L (83 μmol/L) (1D). Following the cessation of ECTR, patients should be closely monitored. Intermittent hemodialysis is the preferred method of ECTR (1C). If intermittent hemodialysis is unavailable, hemoperfusion (1C) or continuous renal replacement therapies may be considered (3D). Exchange transfusion is an adequate alternative to hemodialysis in neonates (2D). Multi-dose activated charcoal should be continued during ECTR (1D).

CONCLUSION

Theophylline poisoning is amenable to ECTRs. The workgroup recommended extracorporeal removal in the case of severe theophylline poisoning.

Determination of vancomycin and gentamicin clearance in an in vitro, closed loop dialysis system

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing an in-vitro, closed loop hemodialysis system as a method to assess drug clearance. Secondarily, this study tested the influence of variables (blood flow rate, dialysate flow rate, and type of filter) in the hemodialysis procedure on the clearance of vancomycin and gentamicin.

Methods

An in-vitro, closed loop hemodialysis system was constructed. The vancomycin (30 mg/L) and gentamicin (25 mg/L) were added to a simulated blood system (SBS). Four conditions (C1-C4) were tested by defining the filter (Polyflux 170H or F180) and the blood and dialysate flow rates (BFR and DFR). All hemodialysis sessions were 3 hours in length and each condition was completed in duplicate. Dialysate effluent was collected in a 50 gallon polyethylene drum. Samples were collected (in duplicate) from the SBS and the dialysate effluent at baseline and at the end of the hemodialysis session. Samples were analyzed for vancomycin and gentamicin with an ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method.

Results

A total of eight 3-hour hemodialysis sessions were conducted. For all tested conditions (C1-C4), vancomycin was undetectable in the SBS at the end of dialysis. However, total vancomycin recovery in the dialysis effluent was 85±18%, suggesting that up to 15% may have adsorbed to the dialysis filter or tubing. Gentamicin clearance from SBS was >98% in all tested conditions. Average gentamicin recovery in the dialysate effluent was 99±15%.

Conclusion

Both vancomycin and gentamicin were readily removed by high-flux hemodialysis under all conditions studied. No significant differences in drug clearance were observed between conditions used in this in vitro study. The clinical implications of changing these hemodialysis parameters are unknown.

Improving hollow fiber dialyzer efficiency with a recirculating dialysate system. I: Theory and applicability

The mathematical theory that underlies a novel non-regenerated recirculating dialysate system (RDS) for improving diffusive clearance in hemodialyzers is presented. The theory states the conditions that hemodialyzers must meet to be suitable in RDS optimization. We have verified the applicability of the RDS for several Cuprophan and polysulfone (PS) commercial dialyzers, showing that PS (synthetic) membranes achieve the highest increments of diffusive clearance. A numerical simulation analysis over more general conditions defined by the dimensionless groups of the system demonstrated that the highest diffusive clearance improvements are achieved in dialyzers operating with a low value of the diffusive mass-transfer area/blood flow rate ratio. This study has provided the base for the assessment of the performance of the RDS as compared to several high-efficiency systems, presented in Part II of this work [M. Prado, L. M. Roa, A. Palma, and J. A. Milan, Ann. Biomed. Eng. (2004) submitted].